k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung were both very fond of Buddhism, and were very fond of the relationship between Buddhism, Confucianism and Buddhism. In fact, there are similarities and differences in the recognization of the relationship between Buddhism, Confucianism and Buddhism. k'ang Yu-wei ranked Confucianism, Buddhism and Buddhism, while T'an Ssu-t'ung ranked Buddhism, Confucianism and Buddhism. This order not only shows the same arrangement of Buddhism, but also shows the different arrangement of Christianity and Confucianism. In fact, their different ranking of Buddhism and Confucianism itself is a value judgment, indicating that k'ang Yu-wei supported Confucianism and T'an Ssu-t'ung advocated Buddhism. Although k'ang Yu-wei loudly advocated the establishment of Confucianism as the state religion in reality, he affirmed that Confucianism was applicable to the present and Buddhism to the future in the multiplication of Confucianism and Buddhism. T'an Ssu-t'ung, like k'ang Yu-wei, believed that Buddhism is and will be prevailed in datong society. On the one hand, both men affirmed the compatibility of Buddhism and Confucianism, and described benevolence as the common purpose of both. On the other hand, the definition of benevolence by k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung follows the unbearable human heart of Confucianism and the compassionate heart of Buddhism, and finally deduces two different forms and patterns: k'ang Yu-wei constructs the Buddhism of fraternity, and T'an Ssu-t'ung constructs the Buddhism of equality.
Published in | International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 8, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijp.20200802.15 |
Page(s) | 54-60 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
k'ang Yu-wei, T'an Ssu-t'ung, Buddhism and Confucianism, Rank Arrangement
[1] | The study of benevolence, complete works of T'an Ssu-t'ung, China Book Company, 1998, p. 289. p291. p293-294. p317. p333. |
[2] | "Wan Mu Cao Tang∙Spring and autumn fan-lu", the complete works of k'ang Yu-wei (vol. 2), Ren Min university of China press, 2007, p167. p171. p173. p. 188. p206. |
[3] | "Wan Mu Cao Tang∙Confucius restructuring", the complete works of k'ang Yu-wei (vol. 2), Ren Min university of China press, 2007, p. 152. |
[4] | "Datong shu", Zhong Zhou Ancient Books press, 1998, p. 349. p361. |
[5] | Kang nanhai's lecture on the history of ancient and modern learning", k'ang Yu-wei's complete works (second volume), Ren Min university of China press, 2007, p. 110. |
[6] | The biography of Mr. Kang of nanhai, complete works of Liang Ch’i-chao (volume 1), Beijing press, 1999, p. 488. |
[7] | "Shang Ouyang zhonghu shi", T'an Ssu-t'ung complete works (addendum) China Book company 1998 edition, page 464. |
[8] | The emperor's book, yan fu ji (volume 1), Zhong Hua Book company, 1986, pp. 73-74. |
[9] | "Benevolence studies > preface", T'an Ssu-t'ung complete works (revised edition), Chinese Book company, 1998, p. 374. |
APA Style
Yixia Wei. (2020). k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung's Arrangement of Buddhism and Confucianism and Their Enlightenment. International Journal of Philosophy, 8(2), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20200802.15
ACS Style
Yixia Wei. k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung's Arrangement of Buddhism and Confucianism and Their Enlightenment. Int. J. Philos. 2020, 8(2), 54-60. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20200802.15
AMA Style
Yixia Wei. k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung's Arrangement of Buddhism and Confucianism and Their Enlightenment. Int J Philos. 2020;8(2):54-60. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20200802.15
@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20200802.15, author = {Yixia Wei}, title = {k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung's Arrangement of Buddhism and Confucianism and Their Enlightenment}, journal = {International Journal of Philosophy}, volume = {8}, number = {2}, pages = {54-60}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20200802.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20200802.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20200802.15}, abstract = {k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung were both very fond of Buddhism, and were very fond of the relationship between Buddhism, Confucianism and Buddhism. In fact, there are similarities and differences in the recognization of the relationship between Buddhism, Confucianism and Buddhism. k'ang Yu-wei ranked Confucianism, Buddhism and Buddhism, while T'an Ssu-t'ung ranked Buddhism, Confucianism and Buddhism. This order not only shows the same arrangement of Buddhism, but also shows the different arrangement of Christianity and Confucianism. In fact, their different ranking of Buddhism and Confucianism itself is a value judgment, indicating that k'ang Yu-wei supported Confucianism and T'an Ssu-t'ung advocated Buddhism. Although k'ang Yu-wei loudly advocated the establishment of Confucianism as the state religion in reality, he affirmed that Confucianism was applicable to the present and Buddhism to the future in the multiplication of Confucianism and Buddhism. T'an Ssu-t'ung, like k'ang Yu-wei, believed that Buddhism is and will be prevailed in datong society. On the one hand, both men affirmed the compatibility of Buddhism and Confucianism, and described benevolence as the common purpose of both. On the other hand, the definition of benevolence by k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung follows the unbearable human heart of Confucianism and the compassionate heart of Buddhism, and finally deduces two different forms and patterns: k'ang Yu-wei constructs the Buddhism of fraternity, and T'an Ssu-t'ung constructs the Buddhism of equality.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung's Arrangement of Buddhism and Confucianism and Their Enlightenment AU - Yixia Wei Y1 - 2020/06/17 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20200802.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijp.20200802.15 T2 - International Journal of Philosophy JF - International Journal of Philosophy JO - International Journal of Philosophy SP - 54 EP - 60 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7455 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20200802.15 AB - k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung were both very fond of Buddhism, and were very fond of the relationship between Buddhism, Confucianism and Buddhism. In fact, there are similarities and differences in the recognization of the relationship between Buddhism, Confucianism and Buddhism. k'ang Yu-wei ranked Confucianism, Buddhism and Buddhism, while T'an Ssu-t'ung ranked Buddhism, Confucianism and Buddhism. This order not only shows the same arrangement of Buddhism, but also shows the different arrangement of Christianity and Confucianism. In fact, their different ranking of Buddhism and Confucianism itself is a value judgment, indicating that k'ang Yu-wei supported Confucianism and T'an Ssu-t'ung advocated Buddhism. Although k'ang Yu-wei loudly advocated the establishment of Confucianism as the state religion in reality, he affirmed that Confucianism was applicable to the present and Buddhism to the future in the multiplication of Confucianism and Buddhism. T'an Ssu-t'ung, like k'ang Yu-wei, believed that Buddhism is and will be prevailed in datong society. On the one hand, both men affirmed the compatibility of Buddhism and Confucianism, and described benevolence as the common purpose of both. On the other hand, the definition of benevolence by k'ang Yu-wei and T'an Ssu-t'ung follows the unbearable human heart of Confucianism and the compassionate heart of Buddhism, and finally deduces two different forms and patterns: k'ang Yu-wei constructs the Buddhism of fraternity, and T'an Ssu-t'ung constructs the Buddhism of equality. VL - 8 IS - 2 ER -