Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Domestic Urban Ecological Space Research: Progress and Review in the Past Five Years

Received: 13 November 2023    Accepted: 9 December 2023    Published: 14 December 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Cities are important carriers of modernization and the most densely populated places with the highest concentration of pollution emissions. With the reduction and fragmentation of urban ecological land, the quality of urban ecosystems has declined, the ecological service function has been reduced, and the sustainable development of cities is facing a severe test. Therefore, urban ecological space planning and construction is a topic that needs to be emphasized and solved in China's territorial space planning. Urban ecological space has various service values such as ecology, landscape, culture and health. From the perspective of environmental value, it can regulate the urban heat island effect, enhance the aesthetic enjoyment of urban landscape, and solve all kinds of atmospheric and water pollution problems. From the point of view of people's well-being, it can reduce the incidence of diseases, improve mental health, and reduce social medical expenses, while spreading ecological culture and promoting social harmony. Therefore, urban ecological space serves as an effective approach to address these challenges by integrating nature into urban areas. This literature review explores the concept of urban ecological space, its importance, challenges, and key findings of related research. The review emphasizes the potential of urban ecological spaces to enhance urban sustainability, biodiversity conservation, human health, and community well-being. It also discusses the challenges associated with the creation and maintenance of urban ecological spaces, including governance, land planning reviews, and social equity considerations. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of urban ecological space and inform future research and planning efforts to create sustainable and liveable cities.

Published in Science Discovery (Volume 11, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.sd.20231106.19
Page(s) 261-266
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Urban, Ecological Space, Conference

References
[1] 邓小文, 孙贻超, 韩士杰. 城市生态用地分类及其规划的一般原则 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2005 (10): 2003-2006.
[2] 陈爽, 刘云霞, 彭立华. 城市生态空间演变规律及调控机制——以南京市为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2008 (05): 2270-2278.
[3] 陈婧, 史培军. 土地利用功能分类探讨 [J]. 北京师范大学学报 (自然科学版), 2005 (05): 536-540.
[4] 岳健, 张雪梅. 关于我国土地利用分类问题的讨论 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2003 (01): 78-88.
[5] 史津. 城市生态空间 [J]. 天津城市建设学院学报, 2002 (01): 9-13.
[6] 马琪, 王梓柔, 赵永宏. 西安市“三生空间”时空格局演化与功能测度 [J]. 山地学报, 2021, 39 (05): 722-733.
[7] 叶海涵. 昆明市三生空间变化特征及冲突分析研究 [D]. 云南大学, 2020.
[8] 崔家兴, 罗静, 孔雪松等. 武汉城市圈三生空间格局演化特征分析 [C] //中国自然资源学会土地资源研究专业委员会, 中国地理学会农业地理与乡村发展专业委员会. 2018'中国土地资源科学创新与发展暨倪绍祥先生学术思想研讨会论文集. 2018'中国土地资源科学创新与发展暨倪绍祥先生学术思想研讨会论文集, 2018: 400-409.
[9] 林伊琳, 赵俊三, 张萌, 陈国平. 滇中城市群国土空间格局识别与时空演化特征分析 [J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50 (08): 176-191.
[10] 禹文东, 车通, 罗云建, 周超. 基于生态网络的扬州城市绿地格局及其演变特征 [J]. 扬州大学学报 (农业与生命科学版), 2020, 41 (05): 125-130.
[11] 杨洁. 北京市生态空间的时空演变分析及影响因素研究 [D]. 北京林业大学, 2020.
[12] 张考, 黄春华, 王志远, 伍瑾意, 曾志强, 穆佳佳, 杨文挹. 基于DTTD-MCR-PLUS模型的三生空间格局优化——以长沙市为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42 (24): 9957-9970.
[13] 赵寿露, 李石华, 许新惠, 李应鑫, 杨文仙, 邱利丹. 耦合MOP-FLUS模型的滇中城市群“三生”空间格局优化 [J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29 (04): 322-328.
[14] 陆羽. 多模型集成的生态空间冲突区优化决策 [D]. 南京大学, 2021.
[15] 杨志广, 蒋志云, 郭程轩等. 基于形态空间格局分析和最小累积阻力模型的广州市生态网络构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29 (10): 3367-3376.
[16] 李亚萌. 基于生态位理论的城市新区生态网络构建 [D]. 华南理工大学, 2020.
[17] 袁领兄. 基于生态空间敏感性评价的太原市城市绿地景观格局及植物多样性优化研究 [D]. 北京林业大学, 2020.
[18] 阳文锐, 李婧, 闻丞, 黄越, 顾燚芸, 朱洁, 唐燕. 基于物种分布的北京平原生态网络构建 [J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42 (20): 8213-8222.
[19] 魏乐, 周亮, 孙东琪等. 黄河流域城市群扩张的时空格局演化及情景模拟——以呼包鄂榆城市群为例 [J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41 (06): 1610-1622.
[20] 赵旭, 汤峰, 张蓬涛等. 基于CLUE-S模型的县域生产-生活-生态空间冲突动态模拟及特征分析 [J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (16): 5897-5908.
[21] 陈永林, 谢炳庚, 钟典等. 基于微粒群-马尔科夫复合模型的生态空间预测模拟——以长株潭城市群为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38 (01): 55-64.
[22] 张亮, 岳文泽. 城市生态空间多元综合识别研究——以杭州市为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (17): 6460-6468.
[23] 陈新闯, 李锋, 李小倩等. 珠三角城市群生态空间分区方法与管控对策 [J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41 (13): 5233-5241.
[24] 陈新闯, 李小倩, 吕一河, 刘红晓, 郭建英. 区域尺度生态修复空间辨识研究进展 [J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (23): 8717-8724.
[25] 李超, 牛文浩, 黄怀玉等. 城市化背景下粤港澳大湾区生态风险时空演变及生态分区识别研究 [J/OL]. 环境工程技术学报: 1-16 [2023-05-21].
[26] 杨宜男, 李敬, 王立等. 长三角地区城市化对典型生态系统服务供需的影响 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37 (06): 1555-1571.
[27] 许超, 孟楠, 张岩, 谢世林, 韩宝龙, 苏芝敏, 林真光, 逯非, 欧阳志云. 城市生态保护红线划定与管理——以澳门特别行政区为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41 (22): 9103-9117.
[28] 梁梦雅, 罗紫璇, 吴梓恒等. 碳中和背景下城市生态空间碳汇评估与生态服务管理的优先领域——以广东省佛山市为例 [J]. 环境生态学, 2022, 4 (12): 24-30.
[29] 沈琰琰. 多功能视角下都市区生态空间识别与管制研究 [D]. 浙江大学, 2019.
[30] 贺宏斌, 孙然好, 段兴武. 城市景观影响人居环境健康的研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41 (02): 361-370.
[31] 杨琛, 朱捷, 吕梁. 重庆市中心城区绿地空间公平性分析 [J]. 中国城市林业, 2022, 20 (05): 61-68.
[32] 徐宇曦, 陈一欣, 苏杰等. 环境正义视角下公园绿地空间配置公平性评价——以南京市主城区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33 (06): 1589-1598.
[33] 王甫园, 王开泳. 城市化地区生态空间可持续利用的科学内涵 [J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37 (10): 1899-1914.
[34] 王甫园, 王开泳, 陈田, 李萍. 城市生态空间研究进展与展望 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36 (02): 207-218.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Gao, X., Lu, W., Li, L. (2023). Domestic Urban Ecological Space Research: Progress and Review in the Past Five Years. Science Discovery, 11(6), 261-266. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20231106.19

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Gao, X.; Lu, W.; Li, L. Domestic Urban Ecological Space Research: Progress and Review in the Past Five Years. Sci. Discov. 2023, 11(6), 261-266. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20231106.19

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Gao X, Lu W, Li L. Domestic Urban Ecological Space Research: Progress and Review in the Past Five Years. Sci Discov. 2023;11(6):261-266. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20231106.19

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sd.20231106.19,
      author = {Xuran Gao and Wen Lu and Lin Li},
      title = {Domestic Urban Ecological Space Research: Progress and Review in the Past Five Years},
      journal = {Science Discovery},
      volume = {11},
      number = {6},
      pages = {261-266},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20231106.19},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20231106.19},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20231106.19},
      abstract = {Cities are important carriers of modernization and the most densely populated places with the highest concentration of pollution emissions. With the reduction and fragmentation of urban ecological land, the quality of urban ecosystems has declined, the ecological service function has been reduced, and the sustainable development of cities is facing a severe test. Therefore, urban ecological space planning and construction is a topic that needs to be emphasized and solved in China's territorial space planning. Urban ecological space has various service values such as ecology, landscape, culture and health. From the perspective of environmental value, it can regulate the urban heat island effect, enhance the aesthetic enjoyment of urban landscape, and solve all kinds of atmospheric and water pollution problems. From the point of view of people's well-being, it can reduce the incidence of diseases, improve mental health, and reduce social medical expenses, while spreading ecological culture and promoting social harmony. Therefore, urban ecological space serves as an effective approach to address these challenges by integrating nature into urban areas. This literature review explores the concept of urban ecological space, its importance, challenges, and key findings of related research. The review emphasizes the potential of urban ecological spaces to enhance urban sustainability, biodiversity conservation, human health, and community well-being. It also discusses the challenges associated with the creation and maintenance of urban ecological spaces, including governance, land planning reviews, and social equity considerations. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of urban ecological space and inform future research and planning efforts to create sustainable and liveable cities.
    },
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Domestic Urban Ecological Space Research: Progress and Review in the Past Five Years
    AU  - Xuran Gao
    AU  - Wen Lu
    AU  - Lin Li
    Y1  - 2023/12/14
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20231106.19
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sd.20231106.19
    T2  - Science Discovery
    JF  - Science Discovery
    JO  - Science Discovery
    SP  - 261
    EP  - 266
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0650
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20231106.19
    AB  - Cities are important carriers of modernization and the most densely populated places with the highest concentration of pollution emissions. With the reduction and fragmentation of urban ecological land, the quality of urban ecosystems has declined, the ecological service function has been reduced, and the sustainable development of cities is facing a severe test. Therefore, urban ecological space planning and construction is a topic that needs to be emphasized and solved in China's territorial space planning. Urban ecological space has various service values such as ecology, landscape, culture and health. From the perspective of environmental value, it can regulate the urban heat island effect, enhance the aesthetic enjoyment of urban landscape, and solve all kinds of atmospheric and water pollution problems. From the point of view of people's well-being, it can reduce the incidence of diseases, improve mental health, and reduce social medical expenses, while spreading ecological culture and promoting social harmony. Therefore, urban ecological space serves as an effective approach to address these challenges by integrating nature into urban areas. This literature review explores the concept of urban ecological space, its importance, challenges, and key findings of related research. The review emphasizes the potential of urban ecological spaces to enhance urban sustainability, biodiversity conservation, human health, and community well-being. It also discusses the challenges associated with the creation and maintenance of urban ecological spaces, including governance, land planning reviews, and social equity considerations. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of urban ecological space and inform future research and planning efforts to create sustainable and liveable cities.
    
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China

  • Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China

  • Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China

  • Sections