| Peer-Reviewed

Experimental Study on Soil Electrical Conductivity Inversion by Ground Spectral Measurement and SAR Data

Received: 16 July 2021     Accepted: 13 August 2021     Published: 23 August 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In this paper, the ground-measured spectral reflectance was combined with C-band microwave radar quadrupolarized backscattering data, and the characteristic bands were selected using partial least squares and correlation coefficient methods, and a model was developed to evaluate the degree of soil salinization. Using the spectral reflectance and its logarithmic, first-order and second-order derivatives of the four spectral data, correlation analysis was performed and found that the first and second order derivatives of the spectra were better correlated compared to the first two. The correlations of soil EC values in the four bands of 1584-1588 nm, 1802-1806 nm, 2201-2205 nm, and 2344-2348 nm transformed by second-order derivatives were 0.27, 0.34, 0.33, and 0.35, respectively, and there existed two bands of 1802-1806 nm and 2344-2348 nm that both had better soil EC correlation. The bands selected by the partial least squares method are more backward than those selected by the correlation coefficient method, and there are extremely sensitive bands, and the fit of the second-order derivative transformation model is better compared with that of the correlation coefficient method. By combining the second-order derivatives of reflectance, surface roughness and radar backscatter coefficients, the neural network model with the second-order derivatives of reflectance and radar backscatter characteristics was the best prediction model, and its R2 for soil EC was 0.8666.

Published in Science Discovery (Volume 9, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.sd.20210904.22
Page(s) 200-205
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Soil Conductivity, Multi-source Remote Sensing, Collaborative Inversion, Partial Least Squares Method, The Neural Network

References
[1] 李相君.河套灌区土壤盐分多源遥感数据协同反演[D].内蒙古农业大学,2017.
[2] 王学.盐渍化灌区土壤介电特性与多源遥感水分反演研究[D].内蒙古农业大学,2017.
[3] 张飞.干旱区绿洲盐渍化地光谱、空间特征与成分研究[D].新疆大学,2007.
[4] J FARIFTEH, A FARSHAD, R J GEORGER.Assessing salt-affected soils using remote sensing,solute modelling, and geophysics[J].Geoderma., 2006, 130: 191-206.
[5] J FARIFTEH, F VANDER MEER, C ATZBERGER,et al. Quantitative analysis of salt-affected soil reflectance spectra:A comparison of two adaptive methods (PLSR and ANN)[J].Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 110: 59-78.
[6] JIMENEZ L O, MEDINA J L R, DIAZ E R,et al.Integration of spatial and spectral information by means of non-supervised Extraction and classification for homogeneous objects applied to multispectral and hyperspectral Data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005,43(4): 844-851.
[7] BRUNNER P, LI H T, KINZELBACH W, et al.Generating soil electrical conductivity maps at regional level by integrating measurements on the ground and remote sensing data[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2007, 28(15):3341-3361.
[8] 王静,刘湘南,黄方,等.基于ANN技术和高光谱遥感的盐渍土盐分预测[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(12):161-166.
[9] VALERIANO M M, EPIPHANIO J C N, FORMAGGIO A R, et al. Bi-directional reflectance factor of 14 soil classes from Brazil[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1895,16(1): 113-128.
[10] SCHAAP M G, LEIJ F J.Using neural networks to predict soil water retention and soil hydraulic conductivity[J]. Soil &Tillage Research, 1898, 47(1/2): 37-42.
[11] WALTHALL C, DULANVEY W, ANDERSON M, et al.A comparison of empirical and neural network approaches for estimating cornand soybean leaf area index from Landsat ETM+ imagery[J].Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 92(4): 465-474.
[12] TADJUDIN S, LANDGREBE D A.Covariance estimation with limited training samples[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1899, 37 (4): 2113-2118.
[13] BEHRENS T, FORSTTER H, SCHOLTEN T, et al.Digital soil mapping using artificial neural networks[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2005, 168(1): 55-62.
[14] 刘全明,成秋明,王学,等.河套灌区土壤盐渍化微波雷达反演[J]. 农业工程学报,2016,32(16):109-114.
[15] 孙艺珊.吉林省西部盐渍土电导率的遥感反演及三十年时序变化研究[D].中国科学院大学(中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所),2020.
[16] 尼格拉•塔什甫拉提.渭干河—库车河三角绿洲土壤盐渍化遥感与近感协同监测方法研究[D].新疆大学,2014.
[17] 牛涛.基于地表定量参数的土壤电导率反演模型研究[D].新疆大学,2013.
[18] 郭姝姝.基于遥感及CLUE-S模型的内蒙古河套灌区土壤盐渍化时空演变与调控研究[D].中国水利水电科学研究院,2018.
[19] 彭杰,王家强,向红英,等.土壤含盐量与电导率的高光谱反演精度对比研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2014,34(02):510-514.
[20] 刘广明,吴亚坤,杨劲松,等.基于电磁感应技术的区域三维土壤盐分空间变异研究[J/OL].农业机械学报,2013,44(7):78-82.
[21] 冯雪力,刘全明.基于多源遥感协同反演的区域性土壤盐渍化监测[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(07):127-133.
[22] 李彪,王耀强.寒旱灌区含盐土壤水分雷达反演技术研究[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(02):347-350.
[23] 黎明扬,刘廷玺,罗艳云,等.半干旱草原型流域表层土壤饱和导水率传递函数及遥感反演研究[J].土壤学报,2019,56(01):90-100.
[24] 王学,刘全明,马腾.西北寒旱灌区裸露地表粗糙度SAR反演建模方法研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(06):74-80.
[25] 贾永倩,王振锡,瞿余红,等.基于全极化Radarsat-2数据的苹果园平均树高估算模型[J].森林工程,2017,33(02):45-49+55.
[26] 黎明扬.半干旱草原型流域土壤入渗参数模拟及遥感反演研究[D].内蒙古农业大学,2019.
[27] 王鑫梅,牟洪香,杨可伟,等.不同氮素水平下107杨光谱及光合响应特征研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(03):70-74.
[28] 李焱,王让会,管延龙,等.基于高光谱反射特性的土壤全氮含量预测分析[J].遥感技术与应用,2017,32(01):173-179.
[29] 熊逸邈.城镇化发展与利率调整对房地产需求的影响研究[D].湘潭大学,2018.
[30] 王迪.辽宁中部城市建成区空间形态对生活性碳排放影响研究[D].沈阳建筑大学,2018.
[31] 彭清维,刘芸,于建成,等.基于可见/近红外光谱技术的湄潭翠芽等级判别[J].茶叶科学,2017,37(05):458-464.
[32] 刘全明,陈亚新,王耀强,等.基于BP神经网络技术的土壤水(盐)环境监测[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,{4}(04):105-109.
[33] 梁东.博斯腾湖湖滨绿洲土壤盐渍化预警研究[D].新疆师范大学,2015.
[34] 李荣荣,熊黑钢,段鹏程,等.干旱区平原水库下游盐渍化土壤光谱时空分布特征分析[J].土壤通报,2016,47(03):532-536.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yin Chengshen, Liu Quanming, Wang Chunjuan, Wang Fuqiang. (2021). Experimental Study on Soil Electrical Conductivity Inversion by Ground Spectral Measurement and SAR Data. Science Discovery, 9(4), 200-205. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20210904.22

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yin Chengshen; Liu Quanming; Wang Chunjuan; Wang Fuqiang. Experimental Study on Soil Electrical Conductivity Inversion by Ground Spectral Measurement and SAR Data. Sci. Discov. 2021, 9(4), 200-205. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20210904.22

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yin Chengshen, Liu Quanming, Wang Chunjuan, Wang Fuqiang. Experimental Study on Soil Electrical Conductivity Inversion by Ground Spectral Measurement and SAR Data. Sci Discov. 2021;9(4):200-205. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20210904.22

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sd.20210904.22,
      author = {Yin Chengshen and Liu Quanming and Wang Chunjuan and Wang Fuqiang},
      title = {Experimental Study on Soil Electrical Conductivity Inversion by Ground Spectral Measurement and SAR Data},
      journal = {Science Discovery},
      volume = {9},
      number = {4},
      pages = {200-205},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20210904.22},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20210904.22},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20210904.22},
      abstract = {In this paper, the ground-measured spectral reflectance was combined with C-band microwave radar quadrupolarized backscattering data, and the characteristic bands were selected using partial least squares and correlation coefficient methods, and a model was developed to evaluate the degree of soil salinization. Using the spectral reflectance and its logarithmic, first-order and second-order derivatives of the four spectral data, correlation analysis was performed and found that the first and second order derivatives of the spectra were better correlated compared to the first two. The correlations of soil EC values in the four bands of 1584-1588 nm, 1802-1806 nm, 2201-2205 nm, and 2344-2348 nm transformed by second-order derivatives were 0.27, 0.34, 0.33, and 0.35, respectively, and there existed two bands of 1802-1806 nm and 2344-2348 nm that both had better soil EC correlation. The bands selected by the partial least squares method are more backward than those selected by the correlation coefficient method, and there are extremely sensitive bands, and the fit of the second-order derivative transformation model is better compared with that of the correlation coefficient method. By combining the second-order derivatives of reflectance, surface roughness and radar backscatter coefficients, the neural network model with the second-order derivatives of reflectance and radar backscatter characteristics was the best prediction model, and its R2 for soil EC was 0.8666.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Experimental Study on Soil Electrical Conductivity Inversion by Ground Spectral Measurement and SAR Data
    AU  - Yin Chengshen
    AU  - Liu Quanming
    AU  - Wang Chunjuan
    AU  - Wang Fuqiang
    Y1  - 2021/08/23
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20210904.22
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sd.20210904.22
    T2  - Science Discovery
    JF  - Science Discovery
    JO  - Science Discovery
    SP  - 200
    EP  - 205
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0650
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20210904.22
    AB  - In this paper, the ground-measured spectral reflectance was combined with C-band microwave radar quadrupolarized backscattering data, and the characteristic bands were selected using partial least squares and correlation coefficient methods, and a model was developed to evaluate the degree of soil salinization. Using the spectral reflectance and its logarithmic, first-order and second-order derivatives of the four spectral data, correlation analysis was performed and found that the first and second order derivatives of the spectra were better correlated compared to the first two. The correlations of soil EC values in the four bands of 1584-1588 nm, 1802-1806 nm, 2201-2205 nm, and 2344-2348 nm transformed by second-order derivatives were 0.27, 0.34, 0.33, and 0.35, respectively, and there existed two bands of 1802-1806 nm and 2344-2348 nm that both had better soil EC correlation. The bands selected by the partial least squares method are more backward than those selected by the correlation coefficient method, and there are extremely sensitive bands, and the fit of the second-order derivative transformation model is better compared with that of the correlation coefficient method. By combining the second-order derivatives of reflectance, surface roughness and radar backscatter coefficients, the neural network model with the second-order derivatives of reflectance and radar backscatter characteristics was the best prediction model, and its R2 for soil EC was 0.8666.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China

  • College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China

  • College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China

  • College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China

  • Sections