Biofuels have been identified as suitable in combating climate change as a result of green gas emissions from fossil fuels. Bioethanol is a biofuel from lignocellulosic biomass is considered a viable renewable energy alternative to fossil fuels. However, the recalcitrance of biomass feedstocks due to the presence of lignin, creates a barrier to glucose fermentation. This study compares enzymatic and dilute acid hydrolyses of cellulose substrates obtained from pretreated maize stalk. The cellulose substrates were hydrolysed into glucose using dilute H2SO4, dilute HCl and Cellulase enzyme. The glucose obtained was fermented using an active yeast strain (Saccaromyces cerevisae) and then distilled in accordance with ASTM D1078 to obtain bio-ethanol. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) was used in quantitative analyses of the bio-ethanol produced while qualitative tests were done based on ASTM D7795-12 for physical tests (density, boiling point, miscibility, non-volatile residues, colour, flammability and distillation range) and chemical tests (Acidity, Alkalinity, Fusel oil, Readily carbonizable substances and readily oxidizable substances). Enzymatic hydrolysis gave a higher glucose yield, while there was no significant difference between hydrolysis using dilute acids. There was significant difference in extraction efficiencies between acid and enzymatic hydrolysis methods. The bio-ethanol produced has similar purity levels with qualitative properties to that of an industrial grade ethanol.
| Published in | Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jeece.20210601.14 |
| Page(s) | 24-30 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cellulose Substrate, Corn Stalk, Hydrolysis, Extraction Efficiencies
| [1] | Morales M, Quintero J, Conejeros R, Aroca G. Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: environmental impacts and energy balance. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015; 42: 1349–61. |
| [2] | Soam S, Kapoor M, Kumar R, Borjesson P, Gupta RP, Tuli DK. Global warming potential and energy analysis of second generation ethanol production from rice straw in India. Appl Energy 2016; 184: 353–64. |
| [3] | Agostinho F, Bertaglia ABB, Almeida C, Giannetti BF. Influence of cellulase enzyme production on the energetic-environmental performance of lignocellulosic ethanol. Ecol Model 2015; 3 15: 46–56. |
| [4] | Williams CL, Westover TL, Emerson RM, Tumuluru JS, Li C. 2015. Sources of biomass feedstock variability and the potential impact on biofuels production. Bioenergy Res 9 (1): 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s12155-015-9694-y. |
| [5] | Pavlečić M, Rezić T, Ivančić Šantek M, Horvat P, Šantek B. 2017. Bioethanol production from raw sugar beet cossettes in horizontal rotating tubular bioreactor. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2017; 40 (11): 1679–88. 10.1007/s00449-017-1823-x. |
| [6] | Arijana Bušić, Nenad Marđetko, Semjon Kundas, Galina Morzak, Halina Belskaya, Mirela Ivančić Šantek, Draženka Komes, Srđan Novak, and Božidar Šantek, 2018. Bioethanol Production from Renewable Raw Materials and Its Separation and Purification: A Review. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2018 Sep; 56 (3): 289–311. doi: 10.17113/ftb.56.03.18.5546. |
| [7] | Xia, L. M. &. S. X. L., 2004. High-yield cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei ZU-02 on corn cob residues. Bioresource Technology, Volume 91, p. 259–262. |
| [8] | Shahbandeh, M., 2020. Corn production worldwide 2018/2019, by country. [Online] Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/254292/global-corn-production-by-country/ [Accessed 23 May 2020]. |
| [9] | Vincent A, Buhari Y, Buhari S (2018) Farmers differ on expected maize output. Daily trust newspapers report, Published on Feb 18, 2018. Media Trust Limited. https://www.dailytrust.com.ng/farmers-differ-on-expected-maize-output.html. Accessed 21 Mar 2019. |
| [10] | Sokhansanj S, Turhollow A, Cushman J, Cundiff J (2002) Engineering aspects of collecting maize stalk for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 23: 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00063-6. |
| [11] | ScienceDaily, 2006. Corn Waste Potentially More Than Ethanol -- ScienceDaily. [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/07/060719091421. htm [Accessed 22 May 2020]. |
| [12] | Chen, M., Zhao, J. & Xia, L., 2008. Enzymatic hydrolysis of maize straw polysaccharides for the production of reducing sugars. Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume 71, p. 411–415. |
| [13] | Kolajo T. E. and Onilude M. A. 2019. Physical and Chemical assays of maize stalk fractions for ethanol production. Energy, Ecology and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-019-00110-z. |
| [14] | Ximenes E (2011) Dividing corn stover makes ethanol conversion more efficient. Purdue University News Service. Accessed 11/12/2013. |
| [15] | Chen, H., 2015. Integrated industrial lignocellulose biorefinery chains. 1st ed. s.l.: Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier Ltd.. |
| [16] | Nanjing Forestry Institute, 1961. Plant Hydrolysis Technology,, Beijing, 1st edition: Agricultural Press. |
| [17] | Yoon, S.-Y., Han, S.-H. & Shin, S.-J., 2014. The effect of hemicelluloses and lignin on acid hydrolysis of cellulose. Energy, Volume 2014, pp. 1-6. |
| [18] | Huang, Y.-B. and Fu, Y., 2013. Hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose by solid acid catalysts. Green Chem., Volume 15, pp. 1095-1011. |
| [19] | Cho, D. et al., 2010. Enhanced ethanol production from deacetylated yellow poplar acid hydrolysate by Pichia stipitis. Bioresour Technol, Volume 101, p. 4947. |
| [20] | Torget, R. W., Kim, J. S. & Lee, Y. Y., 2000. Fundamental Aspects of Dilute Acid Hydrolysis/Fractionation Kinetics of Hardwood Carbohydrates. 1. Cellulose Hydrolysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Volume 39, pp. 2817-2825. |
| [21] | Iranmahboob, J., Nadim, F. & and Monemi, S., 2002. Optimizing acid-hydrolysis: a critical step for production of ethanol from mixed wood chips. Biomass Bioenergy, Volume 22, p. 401–404. |
| [22] | Hamelinck, C., Hooijdonk, G. & van Faaij, A., 2005. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term. Biomass Bioenergy, Volume 28, p. 384–410. |
| [23] | Chang, J. K.-W. et al., 2018. Two-Step Thermochemical Cellulose Hydrolysis With Partial Neutralization for Glucose Production. Front. Chem., 6 (117), pp. 1-11. |
| [24] | Mood, S. et al., 2013. Lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol, a comprehensive review with a focus on pretreatment. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., Volume 27, pp. 77-99. |
| [25] | Balat, M., 2011. Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical chemical pathway: a review. Energ. Convers. Manage, Volume 52, p. 858–875. |
| [26] | Conde-Mejíaa, C., Jiménez-Gutiérreza, A. & El-Halwagi, M., 2012. A comparison of pretreatment methods for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic materials. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Volume 90, pp. 189-202. |
| [27] | Mikulski, D., Kłosowski, G., Menka, A. & Koim-Puchowska, B., 2019. Microwave-assisted pretreatment of maize distillery stillage with the use of dilute sulfuric acid in the production of cellulosic ethanol. Bioresource Technology, Volume 278, p. 318–328. |
| [28] | Golkowska, K. & Greger, M., 2013. Anaerobic digestion of maize and cellulose under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions A comparative study. biomass and bioenergy, Volume 56, pp. 545-554. |
| [29] | Aboagye, D. et al., 2017. Glucose recovery from different corn stover fractions using dilute acid and alkaline pretreatment techniques. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 41 (26), pp. 1-11. |
| [30] | Sipponena, i. H., Laaksoa, S. & Baumberger, S., 2014. Impact of ball milling on maize (Zea mays L.) stem structural components and on enzymatic hydrolysis of carbohydrates. Industrial Crops and Products, Volume 61, pp. 130-136. |
| [31] | Kim, S. M. et al., 2016. Improvement of sugar yields from corn stover using sequential hot water pretreatment and disk milling. Bioresource Technology, Volume 216, p. 706–713. |
| [32] | Aguilar, D. L. et al., 2018. Operational Strategies for Enzymatic Hydrolysis in a Biorefinery. In: S. Kumar & R. K. Sani, eds. Biorefining of Biomass to Biofuels, Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies. AG: Springer International Publishing, pp. 223-248. |
| [33] | Kolajo, T. E and Onilude, M. A. 2016. Design and Construction of a Low Temperature Chemical Reactor for Biomass Pre-Treatment. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 IJERTV5IS010221 Vol. 5 Issue 01, January-2016. |
| [34] | Kolajo T. E. 2020. Predictive modeling and optimization of alkaline sulphite and sodium hydroxide pretreatments of maize stalk fractions in the production of bio-ethanol. Proceedings of the 2020 International Virtual Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology, July 12-15, Slovenia. Pp 42-53. |
| [35] | Mertens, D. R. (1992). Critical conditions in determining detergent fibre. Proceedings of NFTA Forage Analysis Workshop. Denver, CO. p C1-C8. |
| [36] | Joint Expert Committee on Food Additive (JECFA). (1996). Combined Compendium of Food Additive Specifications. Analytical methods, test and procedures and laboratory solutions used and referenced in the food additive specifications. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. |
| [37] | Yang, B., A. Boussaid, S. D. Mansfield, D. J. Gregg and J. N. Saddler. (2002). Fast and efficient alkaline peroxide treatment to enhance the enzymatic digestibility of steam-exploded softwood substrates. Biotechnology Bioengineering 77 (6), 678–684. |
| [38] | Xiang Li Mi Li Yunqiao Pu Mark Thies Yi Zheng 2018. Inhibitory effects of lignin on enzymatic hydrolysis: The role of lignin chemistry and molecular weight. Renewable Energy. Volume 123, August 2018, Pages 664-674. |
| [39] | Rafaela I. S. Ladeira Ázar, Sidnei Emilio Bordignon-Junior, Craig Laufer, Jordan Specht, Drew Ferrier and Daehwan Kim. 2020. Effect of Lignin Content on Cellulolytic Saccharification of Liquid Hot Water Pretreated Sugarcane Bagasse. Molecules. 25, 623. |
| [40] | Chum, H. L., Johnson D. K. and Black S. K. (1998). Organosolv pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of poplar. I. Enzyme hydrolysis of cellulosic residues. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 31, 643–649. |
| [41] | Vlasenko, E. Y., H. Ding, J. M. Labavitch and S. P. Shoemaker. (1997). Enzymatic hydrolysis of pre-treated rice straw. Bioresource Technology. 59 (2 & 3), 109–119. |
| [42] | Teymouri, F., L. Laureano-Perez, H. Alizadeh, and B. E. Dale. (2005). “Optimization of the Ammonia Fibre Explosion (AFEX) Treatment Parameters for Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Maize Stalk.” Bioresource Technology 96 (18): 2014–18. |
| [43] | Hamzeh, H., K. Keikhosro, Z. Hamid and J. T. Mohammad. (2010). Simultaneous Pretreatment of Lignocellulose and Hydrolysis of Starch Mixtures to Sugars. "Lignocellulose and Starch". Bio-Resources 5 (4), 2457–2468. |
| [44] | Ademiluyi, F. T. and H. D. Mepba. (2013). Yield and Properties of Ethanol Biofuel produced from Different Whole Cassava Flours. International Scholarly Research Notices. ISRN Biotechnology Article ID 916481. |
APA Style
Kolajo Tolulope Eunice. (2021). Enzymatic and Dilute Acid Hydrolyses of Maize Stalk Substrate in Bio-ethanol Production. Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, 6(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20210601.14
ACS Style
Kolajo Tolulope Eunice. Enzymatic and Dilute Acid Hydrolyses of Maize Stalk Substrate in Bio-ethanol Production. J. Energy Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 6(1), 24-30. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20210601.14
AMA Style
Kolajo Tolulope Eunice. Enzymatic and Dilute Acid Hydrolyses of Maize Stalk Substrate in Bio-ethanol Production. J Energy Environ Chem Eng. 2021;6(1):24-30. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20210601.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jeece.20210601.14,
author = {Kolajo Tolulope Eunice},
title = {Enzymatic and Dilute Acid Hydrolyses of Maize Stalk Substrate in Bio-ethanol Production},
journal = {Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {24-30},
doi = {10.11648/j.jeece.20210601.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20210601.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jeece.20210601.14},
abstract = {Biofuels have been identified as suitable in combating climate change as a result of green gas emissions from fossil fuels. Bioethanol is a biofuel from lignocellulosic biomass is considered a viable renewable energy alternative to fossil fuels. However, the recalcitrance of biomass feedstocks due to the presence of lignin, creates a barrier to glucose fermentation. This study compares enzymatic and dilute acid hydrolyses of cellulose substrates obtained from pretreated maize stalk. The cellulose substrates were hydrolysed into glucose using dilute H2SO4, dilute HCl and Cellulase enzyme. The glucose obtained was fermented using an active yeast strain (Saccaromyces cerevisae) and then distilled in accordance with ASTM D1078 to obtain bio-ethanol. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) was used in quantitative analyses of the bio-ethanol produced while qualitative tests were done based on ASTM D7795-12 for physical tests (density, boiling point, miscibility, non-volatile residues, colour, flammability and distillation range) and chemical tests (Acidity, Alkalinity, Fusel oil, Readily carbonizable substances and readily oxidizable substances). Enzymatic hydrolysis gave a higher glucose yield, while there was no significant difference between hydrolysis using dilute acids. There was significant difference in extraction efficiencies between acid and enzymatic hydrolysis methods. The bio-ethanol produced has similar purity levels with qualitative properties to that of an industrial grade ethanol.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Enzymatic and Dilute Acid Hydrolyses of Maize Stalk Substrate in Bio-ethanol Production AU - Kolajo Tolulope Eunice Y1 - 2021/02/23 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20210601.14 DO - 10.11648/j.jeece.20210601.14 T2 - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering JF - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering JO - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering SP - 24 EP - 30 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-434X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20210601.14 AB - Biofuels have been identified as suitable in combating climate change as a result of green gas emissions from fossil fuels. Bioethanol is a biofuel from lignocellulosic biomass is considered a viable renewable energy alternative to fossil fuels. However, the recalcitrance of biomass feedstocks due to the presence of lignin, creates a barrier to glucose fermentation. This study compares enzymatic and dilute acid hydrolyses of cellulose substrates obtained from pretreated maize stalk. The cellulose substrates were hydrolysed into glucose using dilute H2SO4, dilute HCl and Cellulase enzyme. The glucose obtained was fermented using an active yeast strain (Saccaromyces cerevisae) and then distilled in accordance with ASTM D1078 to obtain bio-ethanol. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) was used in quantitative analyses of the bio-ethanol produced while qualitative tests were done based on ASTM D7795-12 for physical tests (density, boiling point, miscibility, non-volatile residues, colour, flammability and distillation range) and chemical tests (Acidity, Alkalinity, Fusel oil, Readily carbonizable substances and readily oxidizable substances). Enzymatic hydrolysis gave a higher glucose yield, while there was no significant difference between hydrolysis using dilute acids. There was significant difference in extraction efficiencies between acid and enzymatic hydrolysis methods. The bio-ethanol produced has similar purity levels with qualitative properties to that of an industrial grade ethanol. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: