Organizations are facing many challenges due to multiplicity of factors such as globalization and the resulting intensification of competition within organizations. This calls for a reexamination of organizational leadership and its response to the increasing competitive world. It also implies that organizations need to introduce robust organizational communication between leaders and subordinates in an institutionally supported and coherent package combined with high reliance on technology-based systems. The objective of this study was therefore to determine the influence of organizational leadership on organizational learning among private universities in Kenya. The study reviewed the theories of organizational learning focusing mainly on the human capital theory, contingency theory, and institution theory as well the empirical literature relevant to the study. The study adopted descriptive research design using both quantitative and qualitative approaches because it ensures complete description of the situation, making sure that there is minimum bias in the collection of data. The target population for the study was obtained from 18 private charted Universities authorized to offer higher education in Kenya, through purposive sampling. The sample population was made up of a total of 180 respondents, comprising 10 participants in the rank of senior managers from each of the 18 chartered Kenyan Private Universities. Data was collected through interview schedules and drop and pick questionnaires and analysed with the aid of descriptive and inferential statistics. A response of 87% was obtained. Pearson Product Moment Correlation analysis was carried out to ascertain the extent of the relationship between the variables. The study revealed that in private chartered universities in Kenya, organizational leadership is a valid antecedent since the variable had significant positive relationship with organization learning.
Published in | Journal of Business and Economic Development (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.14 |
Page(s) | 30-36 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Organizational Leadership, Organizational Communication, Organizational Learning, Private Universities, Stratified Sampling
[1] | Argote, L. (2012). Organizational learning and knowledge management. In S. Kozlowski (Ed.). |
[2] | Oxford handbook of organizational psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[3] | Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (10th ed.). London: Kogan Page Limited. |
[4] | Armstrong, M. (2009). A handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (11th ed.). London: Kogan Page. |
[5] | Baek-Kyoo, J., & Ji Hyun, S. (2010). Psychological empowerment and organizational commitment: the moderating effect of organizational learning culture. Human Resource Development International, 13 (4): 425-441. |
[6] | Balakrishnan, C., & Masthan, D. (2013). Impact of Internal Communication on Employee Engagement: A Study at Delhi International Airport. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3 (8), 1-13. |
[7] | Barney, J. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Executive, 26 (1), 41-56. |
[8] | Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed methods. |
[9] | Approaches. (4th ed.). Boston: Paperback, Boylston Street. |
[10] | Cross, R., & Israeli, S. (2000). Strategic Learning in a Knowledge Economy: Individual, Collective and Organizational Process. Feeding Organizational Memory. In L. Rober, J. Cross, & S. B. Israelit (Eds.), Strategic Learning in a Knowledge Economy: Individual, Collective and Organizational Process. Feeding Organizational Memory, 69-90. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. |
[11] | Crossan, M., & Apaydin M., (2010). A muti-dimenstional framework of organizational innovation: A sytematic review of the literation. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (6), 1154-1191. |
[12] | Crossan, M. M., Lane H. W. & White R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, (24) 3, 522-537. |
[13] | Daft, R. L., (2001). Organization Theory and Design (7th ed.). Ohio: South-Western College Publishing. |
[14] | Dolphin, R., (2015). Internal Communications: Today's Strategic Imperative. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11 (3), 171-190. |
[15] | Dominick, J. (2012). The Dynamics of Mass Communication (12th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. |
[16] | Drafke, M. (2013). The Human Side of Organizations (14th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall. |
[17] | Driver, M. (2010). Learning as lack: Individual learning in organizations as an empowering encounter with failed imaginary constructions of the self. Management Learning Journal, (41), 561–574. |
[18] | Drory, A. & Vigoda-Gadot E., (2010). Organizational Politics and Human Resource Management: A typology and the Israeli experience. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 194–202. |
[19] | Dust, S. B., Resick C. J., & Mawritz M. B., (2014). Transformational Leadership, psychological empowerment and the moderating role of mechanistic-organic contexts. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, (35) 2, 413-433. |
[20] | Easterby-Smith, M. & Prieto, I. (2008). Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: an integrative role for learning? In: British Journal of Management. (19) 3, 235-249. |
[21] | EWERC. (2013). Human Resource Management Policies and Practices. ESRC Future of Work Programme, 1-33. |
[22] | Fard, H. D., Rostamy, A. A. A., & Taghiloo, H. (2009). How types of organization cultures contribute in shaping learning organizations. Singapore Management Review, 31 (1), 49-61. |
[23] | Farndale, E., & Vidovic, M. (2015). Human Resource Management Policies and Practices in the United States. New York: CRANET. |
[24] | Ganjinia, H. S., Mohammad, S. B., and Ghasabsaraei, M. Y. (2014). Knowledge management role in motivating employees through supervisory control and perceived organizational support and its impact on knowledge sharing in red crescent society of guilanprovice. Sohar University, Oman and American University of Kuwait, Kuwait City, India, Business and Economics Management, Kuwait Chapter of the Arabian, Journal of Business and Management Review, 3, 325-333. |
[25] | García-Morales, V. J., Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., & Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. 2011. Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of Business Research (0). |
[26] | George E. Smith, Kathleen J. Barnes, Caudia Harris, (2014). A learning approach to the ethical organization. The Learning Organization, (21) 2, 113-125. |
[27] | Ghinea, V. M., & Bratianu, C. (2012). Organizational culture modeling. Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 7 (2), 257–276. |
[28] | Gilson, L., Lim, H. S., Luciano, M. M. & Choi, J. N. (2013), “Unpacking the cross-level effects of tenure diversity, explicit knowledge, and knowledge sharing on individual creativity”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, (86) 2, 203-222. |
[29] | Gollwitzer, P. (2015). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. Higgins, & R. Sorrentino, Handbook of motivation and cognition. New York: Guilford Press. |
[30] | Government of Kenya, (2010). Constitution of Kenya, (2010). Nairobi: Government Printers Kenya. |
[31] | Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, 109-122. |
[32] | Grinsven, M. V., & Visser, M. (2011). Empowerment, knowledge conversion and dimensions of organizational learning. Learning Organization, 18 (5), 392-405. |
[33] | Guest, P. M., & Conway, T. L. (2012). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (2), 268-279. |
[34] | Guest, D. E. (2011). Human Resource Management & Performance: still searching for some answers: Human Resourse Management Journal, (21), 3-13. |
[35] | Hargie, O., & Tourish, D. (Eds.). (2014). Auditing organizational communication. London: Routledge. |
[36] | Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D. and Winter S. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organisations. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. |
[37] | Helfat, C. E. and Peteraf, M. A. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, (7), 91-102. |
[38] | Herbst, D. (2012). Communication in Organizations. Riga: Zvaigzne ABC. |
[39] | Ho, L.-A., & Kuo, T.-H. 2009. Alternative organizational learning therapy: an empirical case study using behaviour and U Theory. Australian Educational Researcher, 36 (3), 105-124. |
[40] | Hoe, S. L., & McShane, S. 2010. Structural and informal knowledge acquisition and dissemination in organizational Learning: An exploratory analysis. The Learning Organization, 17 (4), 364-386. |
[41] | Hodgkinson, M. (2000). Managerial perceptions of barriers to becoming a ‘learning organisation. The Learning Organisation, 7 (3), 156-166. |
[42] | Holmqvist, M. (2009). Complicating the organization: a new prescription for the learning organization? Management Learning, (40) 3, 275-287. |
[43] | Huang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2009). The mediating effect of knowledge management on social interaction and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 30 (3), 285-301. |
[44] | Huang, P., & Yao, C. (2017) Effect of Learning Organization on Organizational Communication and Organizational Creativity in High-Tech Industry. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13 (12), 7723-7730. |
[45] | Hung, R. Y., Fang, C. S., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Knowledge as a facilitator for enhancing innovation performance through total quality management. Total Quality Management, 21 (4), 425-438. |
[46] | Huang, X., Kristal M. M., & Schroeder R. G. (2008). Linking learning and effective process implementation to mass customization capability. Journal of Operations Management, (26) 714-729 Kipkebut, D. J. (2010). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction in higher educational institutions: The Kenyan case. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Mass: Middlesex University. |
[47] | Kim, S., & Wright, P. M. (2011). Putting strategic human resource management in context: A contextualized model of high commitment work systems and its implications in China. Management and Organization Review, 7 (1), 153–174. |
[48] | Kompo, D. K., & Tromp, D. L. (2006). Proposal and Thesis Writing: An Introduction. Nairobi: Paulines Publications Africa. |
[49] | Kothari, C. R. (2008). “Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques" (2nd Revised Ed.), New Delhi: New Age International Publishers, New Delhi. |
[50] | Kukenberger, M. R., Mathieu J. E., Ruddy T., (2012). A cross-level test of empowerment and process influences on members’ informal learning and team commitment. Journal of Management, 41 (3), 987-1016. |
APA Style
Beth Wangari Njuguna, Esther Waiganjo, Willy Muturi. (2021). Influence of Organizational Leadership on Organizational Learning in Private Chartered Universities in Kenya. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 6(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.14
ACS Style
Beth Wangari Njuguna; Esther Waiganjo; Willy Muturi. Influence of Organizational Leadership on Organizational Learning in Private Chartered Universities in Kenya. J. Bus. Econ. Dev. 2021, 6(1), 30-36. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.14
AMA Style
Beth Wangari Njuguna, Esther Waiganjo, Willy Muturi. Influence of Organizational Leadership on Organizational Learning in Private Chartered Universities in Kenya. J Bus Econ Dev. 2021;6(1):30-36. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.14
@article{10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.14, author = {Beth Wangari Njuguna and Esther Waiganjo and Willy Muturi}, title = {Influence of Organizational Leadership on Organizational Learning in Private Chartered Universities in Kenya}, journal = {Journal of Business and Economic Development}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {30-36}, doi = {10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jbed.20210601.14}, abstract = {Organizations are facing many challenges due to multiplicity of factors such as globalization and the resulting intensification of competition within organizations. This calls for a reexamination of organizational leadership and its response to the increasing competitive world. It also implies that organizations need to introduce robust organizational communication between leaders and subordinates in an institutionally supported and coherent package combined with high reliance on technology-based systems. The objective of this study was therefore to determine the influence of organizational leadership on organizational learning among private universities in Kenya. The study reviewed the theories of organizational learning focusing mainly on the human capital theory, contingency theory, and institution theory as well the empirical literature relevant to the study. The study adopted descriptive research design using both quantitative and qualitative approaches because it ensures complete description of the situation, making sure that there is minimum bias in the collection of data. The target population for the study was obtained from 18 private charted Universities authorized to offer higher education in Kenya, through purposive sampling. The sample population was made up of a total of 180 respondents, comprising 10 participants in the rank of senior managers from each of the 18 chartered Kenyan Private Universities. Data was collected through interview schedules and drop and pick questionnaires and analysed with the aid of descriptive and inferential statistics. A response of 87% was obtained. Pearson Product Moment Correlation analysis was carried out to ascertain the extent of the relationship between the variables. The study revealed that in private chartered universities in Kenya, organizational leadership is a valid antecedent since the variable had significant positive relationship with organization learning.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Influence of Organizational Leadership on Organizational Learning in Private Chartered Universities in Kenya AU - Beth Wangari Njuguna AU - Esther Waiganjo AU - Willy Muturi Y1 - 2021/03/04 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.14 DO - 10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.14 T2 - Journal of Business and Economic Development JF - Journal of Business and Economic Development JO - Journal of Business and Economic Development SP - 30 EP - 36 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-3874 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.14 AB - Organizations are facing many challenges due to multiplicity of factors such as globalization and the resulting intensification of competition within organizations. This calls for a reexamination of organizational leadership and its response to the increasing competitive world. It also implies that organizations need to introduce robust organizational communication between leaders and subordinates in an institutionally supported and coherent package combined with high reliance on technology-based systems. The objective of this study was therefore to determine the influence of organizational leadership on organizational learning among private universities in Kenya. The study reviewed the theories of organizational learning focusing mainly on the human capital theory, contingency theory, and institution theory as well the empirical literature relevant to the study. The study adopted descriptive research design using both quantitative and qualitative approaches because it ensures complete description of the situation, making sure that there is minimum bias in the collection of data. The target population for the study was obtained from 18 private charted Universities authorized to offer higher education in Kenya, through purposive sampling. The sample population was made up of a total of 180 respondents, comprising 10 participants in the rank of senior managers from each of the 18 chartered Kenyan Private Universities. Data was collected through interview schedules and drop and pick questionnaires and analysed with the aid of descriptive and inferential statistics. A response of 87% was obtained. Pearson Product Moment Correlation analysis was carried out to ascertain the extent of the relationship between the variables. The study revealed that in private chartered universities in Kenya, organizational leadership is a valid antecedent since the variable had significant positive relationship with organization learning. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -