This study examines the impact of macroeconomic variables on foreign direct investment in Nigeria over the period of 1981 to 2014. The data for the research was taken from Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). Based on empirical analysis and econometrics technique, co integration method was adopted to measure the long run relationship between macroeconomic variables (economic growth, exchange rate, inflation-consumer price index, and oil price) and foreign direct investment and the direction of causality between the variables using VECM Granger causality framework plus variance decomposition and impulse response for robust analysis. The result from Johansen’s estimation revealed FDI and macroeconomic variables have at least one common stochastic trend driving the relationship between them. The results from VECM are as follows; that there is long-run unidirectional causality between FDI and real GDP, whereas, in the short run causality do not run from any direction. There is bidirectional causality between FDI and exchange rate. However; there is no causal relationship between in the short run. There is also a noticeable unidirectional causality running from inflation rate captured by consumer price index to FDI in the short run. Bidirectional causality between FDI and Oil price was reported in the long run. These results could be a guide to policy makers in analysing the FDI inflow into the Nigerian economy as thus policies should aim at improving stock improving the level of infrastructure on the continent, opening up and liberalizing trade, strengthening institutions and reducing macroeconomic instability will be beneficial for FDI flows to the continent. Finally, policies aimed at attracting FDI are necessary because higher FDI flows can cause more banking and financial development. Also, government should strengthen the political institutions and adopt democratic principles that will ensure stability within the polity. The current crisis in the Niger-Delta region has been a major obstacle to crude oil production. The restoration of peace in the region will, in turn, too more foreign investment to Nigeria. Finally, the government should invest more in infrastructure (like power, energy, transportation, telecommunication, etc,) so as to enhance the competitiveness of the environment of investment and ultimately increase FDI inflows. All of these should be complemented with the on-going war on corruption.
Published in | Journal of Business and Economic Development (Volume 2, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jbed.20170203.18 |
Page(s) | 187-197 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
FDI, Cointegration, Impulse Response, Variance Decomposition, Macroeconomic Variables
[1] | Aremu, J. A (1997). Foreign Private Investment: Issues, Determinants and Performance. Paper Presented at a Workshop on Foreign Investment Policy and Practice, Nigeria Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, Lagos. |
[2] | UNCTAD (2015) World Debt Tables: Extend Finance for Developing Countries. Vol.2 (Analysis and summary Tables) Washington, D. C. |
[3] | Agbonifo, O. C. (2005). Design and Implementation of Collaborative and Distance Learning System, M. Tech (Doctoral dissertation, Thesis Submitted to the Department of Computer Science, federal University of Technology, Akure). |
[4] | Mankiw, N. G. (2008). What would Keynes have done?. New York Times, 28. |
[5] | Chingarande, A., Karambakuwa, T. Et al (2011). The Impact of Interest Rates on. Foreign Direct Investment: A Case Study of the Zimbabwean Economy. (February 2009-June 2011), International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 7(2) 2226-8235. |
[6] | Bajo-Rubio, 0. & Sosvilla-Rivero, S. (1994). An Econometric Analysis of Foreign Direct Investment in Spain, 1964-89. Southern Economic Journal, 61, 104-120. |
[7] | Hara, M., & Razafimahefa, I. F. (2005). The determinants of foreign direct investments into Japan. Kobe University economic review, 51, 21. |
[8] | Harvey, J. T (1990) The determinants of foreign direct investment, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 12(2), 260-272. |
[9] | Soludo C. (1998) Export- Oreinted industrialization and foreign directinvestment in African in Aryeetay E. et al, Asia and Africa in the global economy. Tokyo: UNU press. |
[10] | Akinlo, S. A. (2004) Foreign Direct Investment and growth in Nigeria: An empirical investigation. Journal of Policy modelling, 26: 627-39. |
[11] | Lv, L., Wen, S., Xiong, Q., 2010. Determinants and performance index of foreign direct investment in China's agriculture. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 2 (1), 36–48. |
[12] | Tsoukalas, D., 2003. Macroeconomic factors and stock prices in the emerging Cypriot equity market. Manag. Financ. 29 (4), 87–92. |
[13] | Bekhet, H. A., Al-Smadi, R. W. (2012). Exploring the Relationship Among FDI Determinates: Evidence from Jordan. Conference on Asian Forum on Business Education (AFBE), UNITEN, Selangor, Malaysia, July, 9. |
[14] | Bekhet, H. A., Mugableh, M. I.(2013). Examining the equilibrium relationships between foreign direct investment inflows and employment in manufacturing and services sectors: evidence from Malaysia. J. Soc. Dev. Sci. 4 (1), 32–38. |
[15] | Hsiao, F., Hsiao, M. (2006). FDI, exports, and GDP in east and Southeast Asia panel data versus time-series causality analyses. J. Asian Econ. 17, 1082–1106. |
[16] | Iamsiraroj, S (2015). The Foreign Direct Investment-Economic Growth Nexus, International Review of Economics and Finance, 42,116-133. |
[17] | Pradhan, R., Saha, D., Gupta, V. (2011). Determinants of FDI in SAARC countries: an investigation using panel VAR model. Inf. Manag. Bus. Rev. 3 (2), 117–126. |
[18] | Othman, R., Salleh, N., Sarmidi, T. (2012). Analysis causal relationship between development, economic growth and foreign direct investment: an ARDL Approach. J. Appl. Sci. 12 (12), 1245–1254. |
[19] | Sun, H., 2011. Co-integration study of relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth. Int. Bus. Res. 4 (4), 226–230. |
[20] | Malik, S & Malik Q (2013) Empirical Analysis of macroeconomics indicators as. Determinants of foreign Direct of Investment in Pakistan. Journal of Business and management, 7, (2), 77-82. |
[21] | Froot, K. A. and Stein, J. C. (1991). Exchange Rates and Foreign Direct Investment and Imperfect Capital Market Approach, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1191–217. |
[22] | Razmi, M. J., & Behname, M. (2012). FDI determinants and oil effects on foreign direct investment: evidence from Islamic countries. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 2(4), 261. |
[23] | Ekpo, A. H (1997). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria: Evidence from Time Series Data, CBN Economic and Financial Review, 35 (1) 59-78. |
[24] | Obadan, M. I. (1982), ‘‘Direct Investment in Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis,’’ African Studies Review, 25(1). |
[25] | Anyanwu, J. C. (1998). An Econometric Investigation of the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria. Annual Conference, Nigeria Economic society. |
[26] | Olatunji, D (2001), ‘‘At Home Abroad When Titles Get In The way’’ The Nation Newspapers, Tuesday, September, 25. |
[27] | Okafor, O (2012), 'Do Domestic Macroeconomic Variables Matter for ForeignDirect Investment Inflow in Nigeria?' Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3, (9).55 - 67. |
[28] | Osinubi, T. S., & Amaghionyeodiwe, L. A. (2009). Foreign direct investment and exchange rate volatility in Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 6(2), 83-116. |
[29] | Gregory, A. W., & Hansen, B. E. (1996). Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of econometrics, 70(1), 99-126. |
[30] | Brooks, C. (2002). Introductory econometrics for finance. 2ed ed. Cambridge university press. |
[31] | Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2008). Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries: new evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2331-2341. |
[32] | Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press. |
[33] | Frey, B. (1984). International Political Economics. Basil Blackwell, 76–81. |
[34] | Moore, M. O. (1993). Determinants of German manufacturing direct investment: 1980–1988. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 129, 120–137. |
[35] | Edwards, S. (1990): Capital Flows, Foreign Direct Investment, and Debt-Equity Swaps in Developing Countries, NBER Working Paper, 3497. |
[36] | Asiedu, E., (2002) on determinants of foreign direct investment in developing countries. Is African different? Development Economics. 30(1), 107-119. |
[37] | Aliber, R. Z. (1970). A theory of foreign direct investment. In Kindleberger, C. P. (Ed.), The international corporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
[38] | Schneider, F. and B. Frey (1985), Economic and Political Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment, World Development, 13, 161–75. |
[39] | Trevino, L. J., & Mixon, F. G., Jr. (2004). Strategic factors affecting foreign direct investment decisions by multi-national enterprises in Latin America. Journal of World Business, 39. |
[40] | Onyeiwu, S., & Shrestha, H. (2004). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Africa. Journal of Developing Societies, 20, 89–106. |
[41] | Faras, R. Y., Ghali, K. H. (2009). Foreign direct investment and economic growth: the case of the GCC countries. Int. Res. J. Financ. Econ. 29, 135–145. |
APA Style
Paul Ndubuisi. (2017). An Analysis of the Impact of Macroeconomic Variables and Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria: A VECM Granger Causality Framework. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 2(3), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20170203.18
ACS Style
Paul Ndubuisi. An Analysis of the Impact of Macroeconomic Variables and Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria: A VECM Granger Causality Framework. J. Bus. Econ. Dev. 2017, 2(3), 187-197. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20170203.18
@article{10.11648/j.jbed.20170203.18, author = {Paul Ndubuisi}, title = {An Analysis of the Impact of Macroeconomic Variables and Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria: A VECM Granger Causality Framework}, journal = {Journal of Business and Economic Development}, volume = {2}, number = {3}, pages = {187-197}, doi = {10.11648/j.jbed.20170203.18}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20170203.18}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jbed.20170203.18}, abstract = {This study examines the impact of macroeconomic variables on foreign direct investment in Nigeria over the period of 1981 to 2014. The data for the research was taken from Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). Based on empirical analysis and econometrics technique, co integration method was adopted to measure the long run relationship between macroeconomic variables (economic growth, exchange rate, inflation-consumer price index, and oil price) and foreign direct investment and the direction of causality between the variables using VECM Granger causality framework plus variance decomposition and impulse response for robust analysis. The result from Johansen’s estimation revealed FDI and macroeconomic variables have at least one common stochastic trend driving the relationship between them. The results from VECM are as follows; that there is long-run unidirectional causality between FDI and real GDP, whereas, in the short run causality do not run from any direction. There is bidirectional causality between FDI and exchange rate. However; there is no causal relationship between in the short run. There is also a noticeable unidirectional causality running from inflation rate captured by consumer price index to FDI in the short run. Bidirectional causality between FDI and Oil price was reported in the long run. These results could be a guide to policy makers in analysing the FDI inflow into the Nigerian economy as thus policies should aim at improving stock improving the level of infrastructure on the continent, opening up and liberalizing trade, strengthening institutions and reducing macroeconomic instability will be beneficial for FDI flows to the continent. Finally, policies aimed at attracting FDI are necessary because higher FDI flows can cause more banking and financial development. Also, government should strengthen the political institutions and adopt democratic principles that will ensure stability within the polity. The current crisis in the Niger-Delta region has been a major obstacle to crude oil production. The restoration of peace in the region will, in turn, too more foreign investment to Nigeria. Finally, the government should invest more in infrastructure (like power, energy, transportation, telecommunication, etc,) so as to enhance the competitiveness of the environment of investment and ultimately increase FDI inflows. All of these should be complemented with the on-going war on corruption.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - An Analysis of the Impact of Macroeconomic Variables and Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria: A VECM Granger Causality Framework AU - Paul Ndubuisi Y1 - 2017/05/26 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20170203.18 DO - 10.11648/j.jbed.20170203.18 T2 - Journal of Business and Economic Development JF - Journal of Business and Economic Development JO - Journal of Business and Economic Development SP - 187 EP - 197 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-3874 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20170203.18 AB - This study examines the impact of macroeconomic variables on foreign direct investment in Nigeria over the period of 1981 to 2014. The data for the research was taken from Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). Based on empirical analysis and econometrics technique, co integration method was adopted to measure the long run relationship between macroeconomic variables (economic growth, exchange rate, inflation-consumer price index, and oil price) and foreign direct investment and the direction of causality between the variables using VECM Granger causality framework plus variance decomposition and impulse response for robust analysis. The result from Johansen’s estimation revealed FDI and macroeconomic variables have at least one common stochastic trend driving the relationship between them. The results from VECM are as follows; that there is long-run unidirectional causality between FDI and real GDP, whereas, in the short run causality do not run from any direction. There is bidirectional causality between FDI and exchange rate. However; there is no causal relationship between in the short run. There is also a noticeable unidirectional causality running from inflation rate captured by consumer price index to FDI in the short run. Bidirectional causality between FDI and Oil price was reported in the long run. These results could be a guide to policy makers in analysing the FDI inflow into the Nigerian economy as thus policies should aim at improving stock improving the level of infrastructure on the continent, opening up and liberalizing trade, strengthening institutions and reducing macroeconomic instability will be beneficial for FDI flows to the continent. Finally, policies aimed at attracting FDI are necessary because higher FDI flows can cause more banking and financial development. Also, government should strengthen the political institutions and adopt democratic principles that will ensure stability within the polity. The current crisis in the Niger-Delta region has been a major obstacle to crude oil production. The restoration of peace in the region will, in turn, too more foreign investment to Nigeria. Finally, the government should invest more in infrastructure (like power, energy, transportation, telecommunication, etc,) so as to enhance the competitiveness of the environment of investment and ultimately increase FDI inflows. All of these should be complemented with the on-going war on corruption. VL - 2 IS - 3 ER -