This paper intend to demonstrate, as in Foucault, from the 1970s onwards, the archaeological question of how knowledge emerged and transformed, strongly marked by discursiveness, gave rise to the theme of why knowledge? Foucault began to worry about historical investigations about the question of power as an instrument of analysis capable of explaining the production of knowledge and which the philosopher explained in a more elaborate way in his works of Discipline and Punish (1975) and of the History of Sexuality I (1976), naming this method of genealogy of power, appropriating a Nietzschean terminology. Thus, in his 1971 essay titled, "Nietzsche, Genealogy and History” (NGH), the French philosopher, when approaching Nietzsche's On Genealogy of Morals (GM), was not only meant to understand his philosophical method, limiting himself to the function of a mere historian of philosophy, but Foucault was chiefly intending to make use of certain “torsion”, which is ordinary in his interpretive strategy, to prepare in a subtle way the bases of what would become the its own method of analysis in subsequent years. Intend in this paper is to demonstrate, therefore, to what extent, the Nietzschean genealogy constitutes the basis of the genealogy of power in Foucault.
Published in | International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijp.20180602.11 |
Page(s) | 19-22 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
History, Genealogy, Foucault, Nietzsche
[1] | Nietzsche, F. Zur Genealogie der moral. In: Kritische Studienausgabe. B. 5 – Herausgegeben von G. Colli und M. Montinari. Berlin/NY: dtv/de Gruyter. 1988, 224. |
[2] | Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, genealogy and history”. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977, 139. |
[3] | Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, genealogy and history”. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977, 140. |
[4] | Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, genealogy and history”. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977, 142. |
[5] | Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, genealogy and history”. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977, 154. |
[6] | Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, genealogy and history”. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977, 155. |
[7] | Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, genealogy and history”. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977, 157. |
[8] | Saar, Martin. “Understanding genealogy: history, power, and the self”. In: Journal of the Philosophy of History 2, 2008. 295–314. |
[9] | Foucault, Michel. A verdade e as formas Jurídicas. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Nau. 2003, 338. |
[10] | Foucault, Michel. The Birth of the Clinic. An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London: Routledge. 2003, Preface, XV, XVI). |
[11] | Lyotard, Jean-Francois. The Postmodern Condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993, Introduction. |
[12] | Habermas, J. Der Philosophiche Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1985, 117. |
[13] | Robinson, Dave. Nietzsche and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Icon Books, 1999, 35. |
[14] | Gros, Frédéric. “Foucault et la leçon kantienne des Lumières“. In: Dossier Foucault et les lumières. Lumières, Numéro 8, 2006, 159-168. |
[15] | LEMKE, Thomas. Eine Kritik der politischen Vernunft. Foucaults Analyse der modernen Gouvernamentalität, 2. Auflage, Hamburg: Argument Verlag, 2014. |
APA Style
José Nicolao Julião. (2018). An Introduction to Foucault's Nietzschean Genealogy. International Journal of Philosophy, 6(2), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180602.11
ACS Style
José Nicolao Julião. An Introduction to Foucault's Nietzschean Genealogy. Int. J. Philos. 2018, 6(2), 19-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20180602.11
AMA Style
José Nicolao Julião. An Introduction to Foucault's Nietzschean Genealogy. Int J Philos. 2018;6(2):19-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20180602.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20180602.11, author = {José Nicolao Julião}, title = {An Introduction to Foucault's Nietzschean Genealogy}, journal = {International Journal of Philosophy}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, pages = {19-22}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20180602.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180602.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20180602.11}, abstract = {This paper intend to demonstrate, as in Foucault, from the 1970s onwards, the archaeological question of how knowledge emerged and transformed, strongly marked by discursiveness, gave rise to the theme of why knowledge? Foucault began to worry about historical investigations about the question of power as an instrument of analysis capable of explaining the production of knowledge and which the philosopher explained in a more elaborate way in his works of Discipline and Punish (1975) and of the History of Sexuality I (1976), naming this method of genealogy of power, appropriating a Nietzschean terminology. Thus, in his 1971 essay titled, "Nietzsche, Genealogy and History” (NGH), the French philosopher, when approaching Nietzsche's On Genealogy of Morals (GM), was not only meant to understand his philosophical method, limiting himself to the function of a mere historian of philosophy, but Foucault was chiefly intending to make use of certain “torsion”, which is ordinary in his interpretive strategy, to prepare in a subtle way the bases of what would become the its own method of analysis in subsequent years. Intend in this paper is to demonstrate, therefore, to what extent, the Nietzschean genealogy constitutes the basis of the genealogy of power in Foucault.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - An Introduction to Foucault's Nietzschean Genealogy AU - José Nicolao Julião Y1 - 2018/06/11 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180602.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijp.20180602.11 T2 - International Journal of Philosophy JF - International Journal of Philosophy JO - International Journal of Philosophy SP - 19 EP - 22 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7455 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180602.11 AB - This paper intend to demonstrate, as in Foucault, from the 1970s onwards, the archaeological question of how knowledge emerged and transformed, strongly marked by discursiveness, gave rise to the theme of why knowledge? Foucault began to worry about historical investigations about the question of power as an instrument of analysis capable of explaining the production of knowledge and which the philosopher explained in a more elaborate way in his works of Discipline and Punish (1975) and of the History of Sexuality I (1976), naming this method of genealogy of power, appropriating a Nietzschean terminology. Thus, in his 1971 essay titled, "Nietzsche, Genealogy and History” (NGH), the French philosopher, when approaching Nietzsche's On Genealogy of Morals (GM), was not only meant to understand his philosophical method, limiting himself to the function of a mere historian of philosophy, but Foucault was chiefly intending to make use of certain “torsion”, which is ordinary in his interpretive strategy, to prepare in a subtle way the bases of what would become the its own method of analysis in subsequent years. Intend in this paper is to demonstrate, therefore, to what extent, the Nietzschean genealogy constitutes the basis of the genealogy of power in Foucault. VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -