Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania

Felix Joseph Mkonyi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania

Felix Joseph Mkonyi

Published in International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 3, Issue 5)

Received: 21 September 2018 Accepted: 30 October 2018 Published: 28 November 2018

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) governance is increasingly seen as a critical determinant for PA management effectiveness. This paper aims to explore the actors involved in PA governance and management and their roles, and the factors influencing the PA management success as perceived by local communities in Manyara region, Tanzania. This study further explores the community perceptions of PAs governance using good governance principles including legitimacy and voice, accountability, performance, and fairness and rights. A mixed methods approach was used in this research which comprised structured household interviews, key informant interviews and document review. Respondents ranked local community involvement (12.6%) and environmental education and awareness (13.8%) as the top most important or relevant factors for PA management success in the region. Overall perceptions of respondents indicate that legitimacy and voice (83%), fairness and rights (75%) and performance (68%) were the good principles of PA governance while transparency was the weak governance criteria which may undermine effective community participation in PAs management in the region. This study suggests the need for full involvement and coordination of many stakeholders including the local communities, integration of multilateral governance principles and improving environmental education and awareness for effective governance and management of PAs in the region.

Published in	International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 3, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11
Page(s)	75-88
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Good Governance, Governance Principles, Actors, Management, Manyara Region, Protected Areas (PAs), Tanzania

References

[1]	Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Ryland, A. B., Konstant, W. R., Flick, P et al. C. (2002). Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 16: 909–923.
[2]	Myers, N. (1993). Questions of mass extinction. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2: 2–17.
[3]	Myers, N & Knoll A. H. (2001). The biotic crisis and the future of evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98: 5389–5392.
[4]	Smith, R. J. & Walpole, M. J. (2005). Should conservationists pay more attention to corruption? Oryx, 39 (03): 251–256.
[5]	Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Dudley N., & Lassen B., S. T. (2013). Governance of protected areas: from understanding to action. Best practice protected area guidelines series No. 20. IUCN, Gland.
[6]	Lockwood, M. (2007). Values and benefits. Managing protected areas: a global guide. London: Earthscan.
[7]	Wilson, R., (2002). Private partners and the public good, Belfast. Available at: https://www.belfastfestival.com/schools/SchoolofLaw/Research/InstituteofGoverna nce/Publications/.
[8]	Graham, J, Amos, B & Plumptre, T., (2003). Governance principles for protected areas in the 21st. century. Fifth World Parks Congress, South Africa in September 2003.
[9]	Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2010). Governance principles for natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 23: 986-1001.
[10]	Abrams, P.; Borrini-Feyerabend, G.; Gardner, J & Heylings, P. (2003). Evaluating governance: A handbook to accompany a participatory process for a protected area. draft for field testing, Parks Canada and TILCEPA; Retrieved from http://www.iucn.org/about/union/commissions/ceesp/topics/governance/shared.cfm. Accessed on May 21, 2018.
[11]	Moreno, P. (2005). An organizational approach for the biodiversity management by local communities in developing countries. Judge institute of management studies, Cambridge.
[12]	Kisingo, A. W. (2013). Governance of protected areas in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Victoria, Canada.
[13]	Kisingo, A., Rollins, R., Murray, G., Dearden, P., & Clarke, M. (2016). Evaluating ‘good governance’: the development of a quantitative tool in the Greater Serengeti Ecosystem. Journal of Environmental Management, 181: 749–755.
[14]	Rands, M. R. W., Adams, W. M., Bennun, L., Butchart, S. H. M., Clements, A., Coomes, D., Entwistle, A et al. (2010). Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science, 329 (5997): 1298–303.
[15]	Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2004). Indicators and evaluation of sustainable natural resource management and governance in Biosphere Reserves. Second Thematic Workshop: Projecting Global Change Impacts in Mountain Biosphere Reserves. Gran Sasso National Park. 29 November–2 December 2004.
[16]	URT (United Republic of Tanzania). (2009a). The wildlife conservation act., Pub. L. No. 5. Tanzania.
[17]	URT (United Republic of Tanzania). (2009b). Wildlife Conservation Act (Non-consumptive use regulations).
[18]	Rwiza, A. (2002). Community-based forest management. a case study of Duru-Haitemba forest in Babati district, Tanzania. (Unpublished report).
[19]	Kajembe, G. C. & Mgoo, J. S. (1999). Evaluation report on community-based forest management approach in Babati District: a case of Duru-Haitemba village forest reserve. Orgut Consulting AB (Unpublished).
[20]	Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
[21]	Bergin, P. J. (1995). Conservation and development: the Institutionalization of community conservation in Tanzania National Parks. School of Development Studies. Norwich, UK, University of East Anglia: 198.
[22]	Andrade, G. S. M. & Rhodes, J. R. (2012). Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecology and Society, 17 (4):14.
[23]	Thomas, L. & Middleton, J. (2003). Guidelines for management planning of protected areas. United Kingdom: Cardiff University. IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge x+ 79pp.
[24]	Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2006). Barriers and success factors for implementing mechanisms for sustainable use of biodiversity. The Sustainable harvest of non-timber forest products in China. Strategies to balance economic benefits and biodiversity conservation. Symposium proceedings, Sino-German Symposium.
[25]	Dorji, R. (2009). Interactions between protected areas and local communities. a case study from Jigme Dorji National Park, Bhutan, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
[26]	Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2005). Voices for biodiversity management in the 21st century. Environment; 47 (10): 24-36.
[27]	Stoll-Kleemann, S., Bender, S., Berghöfer, A., Bertzky, M., Fritz-Vietta, N., Schliep, R. & Thierfelder B. (2006). Linking governance and management perspectives with conservation success in protected areas and Biosphere Reserves. GoBi Discussion Paper Series No. 1, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin.
[28]	MNRT (Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism). (1998b). The Wildlife Policy of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam: Government Printer.
[29]	Abensperg-Traun, M., Roe, D. & O’Criodain, C., eds. (2011). CITES and CBNRM. Proceedings of an international symposium on “The relevance of CBNRM to the conservation and sustainable use of CITES-listed species in exporting countries”, Vienna, Austria, 18-20 May 2011. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and London, UK: IIED. 172pp.
[30]	Badola, R., Barthwal, S. & Hussain, S. A. (2012). Attitudes of local communities towards conservation of mangrove forests: A case study from the east coast of India. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 96: 188-196.
[31]	Alden Wily, L. (1997). Villagers as forest managers and government ‘learning to let go’. the case of Duru-Haitemba and Mgori forests in Tanzania. London: Institute of International Development. (Forest participation series; no. 9.)
[32]	Murphree, M. W. (2009). The strategic pillars of communal natural resource management: benefit, empowerment and conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18:2551–2562.
[33]	Ribot, J. (2002). Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources: Institutionalizing Popular Participation. World Resources Institute: Washington, DC.
[34]	Bhattacharya, P., Pradhan, L., & Yadav, G. (2010). Joint forest management in India: experiences of two decades. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54 (8): 469-480.
[35]	Kajembe, G. C, Monela, G. C & Mvena, Z. S. K. (2003). Making community-based forest management work: a case study from Duru-Haitemba village forest reserve, Babati, Tanzania. In Policies and governance structures in woodlands of southern Africa, edited by G Kowero, BM Campbell and UR Sumaila. Jakarta: Center for International Forestry Research:16–27.
[36]	Malimbwi, R. E. (2003). Inventory reports of Ayasanda, Bubu, Duru, Endagwe, Endanachan, Gidas, Hoshan and Riroda Village Forest Reserves in Babati, Manyara, Tanzania. Manyara, Tanzania: Land Management Programme, Babati District Council.
[37]	NEP (National Environmental Policy). (1997). The United Republic Of Tanzania.
[38]	Alden Wily, L. (2003). Community forest management in Africa progress and challenges in the 21st century in FAO 2003.
[39]	Lukama, B. (2000). Participatory forest management: a strategy for sustainable forest management in Africa. a case study of the Chinyunyu Community Forestry Project, Zambia. In FAO 2000a.
[40]	Nguyen, T. Q. (2005). ‘What benefits and for whom? Effects of devolution of forest management in Dak Lak, Vietnam.’ In V. Beckmann and K. Hagedorn (eds). Shaker Verlag: Aachen, Germany.
[41]	Acharya, K. P. (2003). Conserving biodiversity and improving livelihoods: the case of community forestry in Nepal. Proceedings of International Conference on Rural Livelihood, Forests and Biodiversity, Centre for International Forestry Research, 19-23 May 2003, Bonn.
[42]	Sreekesh, S., Vashist U. S. & Kurian M. (1998). Property rights and sustainable forest management: case study from Haryana State, North West India. The World Bank/WBI’s CBNRM Initiative.
[43]	Gollin, K. L. & Kho J. (2002). Rethinking community, participation, and power in Philippine CBNRM. Manila: Ford Foundation.
[44]	Barret, C. B; Brandon, K; Gibson, C & Gjertsen, H. (2001). Conserving tropical biodiversity amid weak institutions. Bioscience, 51: 497-502.
[45]	Bray, D. B. & Merino-Perez, L. (2002). The rise of community forestry in Mexico: history, concepts, and lessons learned from twenty-five years of community timber production.
[46]	Lai, C. K. & Lanying Z. (2002). A decade of discovery: An external review of Ford Foundation work with the Forestry Departments of Yunnan and Sichuan Provinces, Southwest China. Beijing: Ford Foundation.
[47]	Mazur, R. E. & Stakhanov O. V. (2008). Prospects for enhancing livelihoods, communities, and biodiversity in Africa through community-based forest management: a critical analysis. Local Environment, 13 (5): 405–421.
[48]	Turyahabwe N; Geldenhuys C. J; Watts S. & Obua J. (2007). Local organizations and decentralized forest management in Uganda: roles, challenges and policy implications. International Forest Review, 9 (2): 581-596.
[49]	Danida, (2004). Danida’s annual Development Co-operation Report, 2004/ Danida’s årsberetning 2004.
[50]	Awimbo, J., Barrow E. G. C & Karaba, M. (2004). Community-based natural resource management in the IGAD region. 249pp.
[51]	Hulme, D. & Murphree, M.. (2001). African wildlife and livelihoods: the promise and performance of community conservation. Oxford: James Currey Ltd.
[52]	Armitage, D. (2005). Adaptive Capacity and Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Environmental Management, 35:703-715.
[53]	Murphree, M. W. (1993). Communities as resource management institutions. International Institute for Environment and Development, Gatekeeper Series No. 36.
[54]	Western, D. (1994). Ecosystem conservation and rural development: the case of Amboseli. Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation. D. Western, R. M. Wright and S. Strum. Washington, DC: Covelo, CA, Island Press: 15-52.
[55]	Conyers, D. (2002). Whose elephants are they? Decentralization of control over wildlife management through the Campfire programme in Binga district, Zimbabwe. Working Paper No. 4. World Resources Institute.
[56]	Nelson, F. (2006). Patronage or participation? Understanding the failure and success of community-based natural resource management reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa. School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan.
[57]	Mujakachi, L. (2000). Institutional issues and the governance of CBNRM: some lessons from the SADC Natural Resources Management Programme. Presentation at the 2nd Regional Meeting ‘CBNRM in Southern Africa’ held at the School of Government, University of the Western Cape, South Africa, 16-17 October 2000.
[58]	Campell, T. (2006). Devolved natural resource management as a means of empowering the poor: rhetoric or reality? TrÓcaire Development Review, Dublin. Pp. 117–133.
[59]	Sosovele, H. (2007). Establishing wildlife management areas (WMAs): Impacts of CBNRM on biodiversity and communities in Tanzania. Proceedings on the workshop between the Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group (ABCG) and Frame held at WWF, Washington, DC.
[60]	Jones, B. T. B. (2004). Synthesis of the current status of CBNRM policy and legislation in Botswana, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Harare: WWF Southern African Regional Programme Office.
[61]	Neumann, R. (1998). Imposing wilderness: struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa. Berkeley, California, University of California Press.
[62]	Norton-Griffiths, M. (1995). Economic incentives to develop the rangelands of Serengeti: implications for Wildlife Conservation. Serengeti II: Dynamics, Management, and Conservation of an Ecosystem. A. R. E. a. A. P. Sinclair. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. II: 588-604.
[63]	Langton, M., Rhea, M. Z., & Palmer L., (2005). Community-oriented protected areas for indigenous peoples and local communities. Journal of Political Ecology, 12 (1): 23–49.
[64]	Blomley, R., Nelson F., Martin A & Ngobo M. (2007). Community conserved areas. a review of status and needs in selected countries of central and eastern Africa. A Draft report.
[65]	Kajembe, G. C & Mbwambo, J. S. (2000). The role of local institutions in biodiversity conservation: a case study of Udzungwa Mountains Tanzania. In: Shemwetta, D. T. K and Ngaga, Y. M (Edds). Proceedings of the workshop on ‘Operationalization of forest policy: Opportunities and Challenges’ Sokoine University of Agriculture Tanzania 36–56 p.
[66]	Shemdoe, R. S. (2003). The role of local institutions in the management of biodiversity: a case study of Lake Manyara National Park, Tanzania. Research report. UNESCO-MAB Young Scientist Programme.
[67]	Gadgil, M., Berkes F. & Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio, 22 (2-3): 151-156.
[68]	Kajembe, G. C., Kimasa, S. F., Monela, G. C & Zahabu, E. (2000). The role of local institutions in the management of forest resources in Tanzania: a case study of Kahama District. Tanzania Journal of Forest and Nature Conservation, 73:9–16.
[69]	Pimbert, M. P & Pretty J. N. (1997). Parks, people and professionals: putting ‘participation’ into protected area management. In: Ghimire BK, Pimbert MP, editors. Social Change and Conservation. London, UK: Earthscan.
[70]	Songorwa, A. N., Bührs, K. & Hughey, K. (2000). Community-based wildlife management in Africa: a critical assessment of the literature. Natural Resources Journal, 40 (2): 603-643.
[71]	MNRT (Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism). (2002b). The Wildlife Conservation (Wildlife Management Areas) Regulation. Dar es Salaam: Government Printer.
[72]	Poudel, C. B. (2007). Governance vs accountability: a case of protected area management with people's participation in Nepal. IUFRO Division VI Symposium Integrative Science for Integrative Management (14-17 August 2007).
[73]	Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27:629-649.
[74]	Baker, M & Kusel J. (2003). Community forestry in the United States: learning from the past, crafting the future. Washington, DC: Island Press. 247 pp.
[75]	Oates, J. F. (1999). Myth and reality in the rainforest: how conservation strategies are failing in West Africa. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[76]	Stoll-Kleemann, S; Thierfelder B; Bertzky M & Bergh offer A. (2004). Governance and biodiversity linking conservation success with management perspectives. The case of Biosphere Reserves. Rural Poverty Reduction through Research for Development’ Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Agricultural Economics and Social sciences (IWSL), GoBi Research Group, Germany.
[77]	Gordon, G & Lawson, M. (2012): Why advocate on governance and corruption? Tearfund. Teddington, UK.
[78]	Sandker, M., Campbell, B. M., Nzooh, Z., Sunderland, T., Amougou, V., Defo, L. & Sayer, J., (2009). Exploring the effectiveness of integrated conservation and development interventions in a Central African forest landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18 (11): 2875-2892.
[79]	Smith, R. J., Muir, R. D. J., Walpole, M. J., Balmford, A. & Williams Leader- N. (2003). Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature, 426: 67–70.
[80]	Azfar, O., Lee, Y. & Swamy, A. (2001). The causes and consequences of corruption. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 573: 42–56.
[81]	Emerton, L. & Mfunda I. (1999). Making wildlife economically viable for communities living around the Western Serengeti, Tanzania. Evaluating Eden Series Discussion Paper No. 1. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
[82]	Kideghesho, J. R., Røskaft, E. & Kaltenborn, B. P. (2007). Factors influencing conservation attitudes of local people in Western Serengeti, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16:2213-2230.
[83]	Khumalo, K. E. & Yung, L. A. (2015). Women, Human-Wildlife Conflict, and CBNRM: Hidden Impacts and Vulnerabilities in Kwandu Conservancy, Namibia. Conservation and Society, 13: 232.
[84]	Mfunda, I. M., Holmern, T. & Røskaft, E. (2012). Benefits and access to natural resources influence conservation perceptions and relationship between local people and other stakeholders: The case of Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 4: 535 -547.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Felix Joseph Mkonyi. (2018). Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 3(5), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Felix Joseph Mkonyi. Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 3(5), 75-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Felix Joseph Mkonyi. Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2018;3(5):75-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11,
  author = {Felix Joseph Mkonyi},
  title = {Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania},
  journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management},
  volume = {3},
  number = {5},
  pages = {75-88},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20180305.11},
  abstract = {Protected areas (PAs) governance is increasingly seen as a critical determinant for PA management effectiveness. This paper aims to explore the actors involved in PA governance and management and their roles, and the factors influencing the PA management success as perceived by local communities in Manyara region, Tanzania. This study further explores the community perceptions of PAs governance using good governance principles including legitimacy and voice, accountability, performance, and fairness and rights. A mixed methods approach was used in this research which comprised structured household interviews, key informant interviews and document review. Respondents ranked local community involvement (12.6%) and environmental education and awareness (13.8%) as the top most important or relevant factors for PA management success in the region. Overall perceptions of respondents indicate that legitimacy and voice (83%), fairness and rights (75%) and performance (68%) were the good principles of PA governance while transparency was the weak governance criteria which may undermine effective community participation in PAs management in the region. This study suggests the need for full involvement and coordination of many stakeholders including the local communities, integration of multilateral governance principles and improving environmental education and awareness for effective governance and management of PAs in the region.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania
AU  - Felix Joseph Mkonyi
Y1  - 2018/11/28
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11
T2  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JF  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JO  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
SP  - 75
EP  - 88
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3061
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11
AB  - Protected areas (PAs) governance is increasingly seen as a critical determinant for PA management effectiveness. This paper aims to explore the actors involved in PA governance and management and their roles, and the factors influencing the PA management success as perceived by local communities in Manyara region, Tanzania. This study further explores the community perceptions of PAs governance using good governance principles including legitimacy and voice, accountability, performance, and fairness and rights. A mixed methods approach was used in this research which comprised structured household interviews, key informant interviews and document review. Respondents ranked local community involvement (12.6%) and environmental education and awareness (13.8%) as the top most important or relevant factors for PA management success in the region. Overall perceptions of respondents indicate that legitimacy and voice (83%), fairness and rights (75%) and performance (68%) were the good principles of PA governance while transparency was the weak governance criteria which may undermine effective community participation in PAs management in the region. This study suggests the need for full involvement and coordination of many stakeholders including the local communities, integration of multilateral governance principles and improving environmental education and awareness for effective governance and management of PAs in the region.
VL  - 3
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Felix Joseph Mkonyi

Department of Biological Sciences, Dar es Salaam University College of Education, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Felix Joseph Mkonyi. (2018). Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 3(5), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Felix Joseph Mkonyi. Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 3(5), 75-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Felix Joseph Mkonyi. Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2018;3(5):75-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11,
  author = {Felix Joseph Mkonyi},
  title = {Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania},
  journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management},
  volume = {3},
  number = {5},
  pages = {75-88},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20180305.11},
  abstract = {Protected areas (PAs) governance is increasingly seen as a critical determinant for PA management effectiveness. This paper aims to explore the actors involved in PA governance and management and their roles, and the factors influencing the PA management success as perceived by local communities in Manyara region, Tanzania. This study further explores the community perceptions of PAs governance using good governance principles including legitimacy and voice, accountability, performance, and fairness and rights. A mixed methods approach was used in this research which comprised structured household interviews, key informant interviews and document review. Respondents ranked local community involvement (12.6%) and environmental education and awareness (13.8%) as the top most important or relevant factors for PA management success in the region. Overall perceptions of respondents indicate that legitimacy and voice (83%), fairness and rights (75%) and performance (68%) were the good principles of PA governance while transparency was the weak governance criteria which may undermine effective community participation in PAs management in the region. This study suggests the need for full involvement and coordination of many stakeholders including the local communities, integration of multilateral governance principles and improving environmental education and awareness for effective governance and management of PAs in the region.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Community Evaluation of Protected Areas Governance and Management Effectiveness: A Case Study of Manyara Region, Tanzania
AU  - Felix Joseph Mkonyi
Y1  - 2018/11/28
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11
T2  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JF  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JO  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
SP  - 75
EP  - 88
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3061
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180305.11
AB  - Protected areas (PAs) governance is increasingly seen as a critical determinant for PA management effectiveness. This paper aims to explore the actors involved in PA governance and management and their roles, and the factors influencing the PA management success as perceived by local communities in Manyara region, Tanzania. This study further explores the community perceptions of PAs governance using good governance principles including legitimacy and voice, accountability, performance, and fairness and rights. A mixed methods approach was used in this research which comprised structured household interviews, key informant interviews and document review. Respondents ranked local community involvement (12.6%) and environmental education and awareness (13.8%) as the top most important or relevant factors for PA management success in the region. Overall perceptions of respondents indicate that legitimacy and voice (83%), fairness and rights (75%) and performance (68%) were the good principles of PA governance while transparency was the weak governance criteria which may undermine effective community participation in PAs management in the region. This study suggests the need for full involvement and coordination of many stakeholders including the local communities, integration of multilateral governance principles and improving environmental education and awareness for effective governance and management of PAs in the region.
VL  - 3
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download