Objective: To evaluate the application of prospective nursing intervention in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopes. Methods: We invested 84 patients to join our study who undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopes. The participant’s age was higher than 60 years. The time of receiving gastrointestinal endoscopes is from March 2017 to September 2019. The control group participants receive traditional nursing model. In another group, the intervention group patients receive prospective nursing intervention, we provide suitable preventive nursing measures to the participants. Additionally, we use interview and questionnaires to collect the data from participants, the data include patient characteristics information, incidence of complications and inspection time of gastrointestinal endoscopes. Result: The data of Drop in blood pressure, Intestinal bloating and Abdominal pain is Statistical significance. The relative complications cases of intervention group were less than that of control group in overall [1 (2.4%) vs 4 (9.5%), 1 (2.4%) vs 3 (7.1%), 2 (4.8%) vs 5 (11.9%)]. In inspection time of gastrointestinal endoscopes, intervention group participants have better performance than that of control group, the intervention group has shorter Gastroscopy time and Colonoscopy time (15.62±1.56 vs 17.41±1.42, 24.89±2.77 vs 27.01±2.63). The data between the intervention group and control group is statistical significance. Conclusion: the prospective nursing intervention has strong influence to improve patient complications situation and reducing inspection time of gastrointestinal endoscopes.
| Published in | International Journal of Gastroenterology (Volume 4, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.16 |
| Page(s) | 24-26 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Prospective Nursing Intervention, Gastrointestinal Endoscopes, Nursing
| [1] | Kovaleva J, Peters FTM, van der Mei HC, Degener JE. Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016; 26: 231–54. |
| [2] | Cattoir L, Vanzieleghem T, Florin L, Helleputte T, De Vos M, Verhasselt B, et al. Surveillance of endoscopes: comparison of different sampling techniques. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 38: 1062-1069. |
| [3] | Visrodia K, Hanada Y, Pennington KM, Tosh PK, Topazian MD, Petersen BT. Duodenoscope reprocessing surveillance with adenosine triphosphate testing and terminal cultures: a clinical pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 86: 180-186. |
| [4] | Wu L, Cao Y, Liao C, Huang J, Gao F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of Simethicone for gastrointestinal endoscopic visibility. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 46: 227-235. |
| [5] | Rosa BJ, Barbosa M, Magalhaes J, Rebelo A, Moreira MJ, Cotter J. Oral purgative and simethicone before small bowel capsule endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 5: 67-73. |
| [6] | Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF, Early DS, Muthusamy VR, Khashab MA, et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81: 781-794. |
| [7] | Neale JR, James S, Callaghan J, Patel P. Premedication with N-acetylcysteine and simethicone improves mucosal visualization during gastroscopy: a randomized, controlled, endoscopist-blinded study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 25: 778-83. |
| [8] | Nelson DB. Infection control during gastrointestinal endoscopy. JLab Clin Med. 2015; 141: 159–67. |
| [9] | Estrada A, Tsao NW, Howren A, et al. Utility of electronic medical records in community rheumatology practice for assessing quality of care indicators for gout: a feasibility study. J Clin Rheumatol 2018; 24 (2): 75–79. |
| [10] | Lucini FR, Fogliatto FS, da Silveira GJC, et al. Text mining approach to predict hos-pital admissions using early medical records from the emergency department. Int J Med Inf 2017; 100: 1–8. |
| [11] | Ali MM. A conceptual framework for quality of care. Materia Socio Medica. 2012; 24 (4): 251–261. |
| [12] | Leslie WH, et al. Quality and nursing: Moving from a concept to a core com-petency. Urologic Nursing. 2018; 28 (6): 417–426. |
| [13] | Spach DH, Silverstein FE, Stamm WE. Trans- mission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ann Int &led 2018; 118: 117-128. |
| [14] | Iakovidis DK, Koulaouzidis A. Software for enhanced video capsule endoscopy: challenges for essential progress. Nat. Rev. Gastro. Hepat. 2015; 12 (3), 172–186. |
| [15] | Liedlgruber M, Uhl A. Computer-aided decision support systems for endoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract: a review. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2016; 4 (4): 73–88. |
| [16] | ickery K, Bisset L, Selby W, West R, Catterson D, Cossart YE. Bloodborne virus transmission during endoscopy–viral prevalence or decon-tamination breakdown? In: Jilbert AR, Grgacic EVL, Vickery K, BurrellC, Cossart YE, editors. Proceedings 11th International Symposium on Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease. Melbourne: The Australian Centre for Hepatitis Virology. 2015: 344-6. |
| [17] | Moayyedi P, Lynch D, Axon A. Pseudomonas and endoscopy. Endos-copy. 2018; 26: 554-558. |
| [18] | Spach DH, Silverstein FE, Stamm WE. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 118: 117-28. |
| [19] | Weber DJ, Rutala WA, DiMarino AJ Jr. The prevention of infection fol-lowing gastrointestinal endoscopy: the importance of prophylaxis andreprocessing. In: DiMarino AJ Jr, Benjamin SB, editors. Gastrointestinaldiseases: an endoscopic approach. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc. 2016: 87-106. |
APA Style
Chunmei Lin, Chan Chen. (2020). Evaluating the Application of Prospective Nursing Intervention in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopes. International Journal of Gastroenterology, 4(1), 24-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.16
ACS Style
Chunmei Lin; Chan Chen. Evaluating the Application of Prospective Nursing Intervention in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopes. Int. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 4(1), 24-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.16
AMA Style
Chunmei Lin, Chan Chen. Evaluating the Application of Prospective Nursing Intervention in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopes. Int J Gastroenterol. 2020;4(1):24-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.16
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.16,
author = {Chunmei Lin and Chan Chen},
title = {Evaluating the Application of Prospective Nursing Intervention in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopes},
journal = {International Journal of Gastroenterology},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
pages = {24-26},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.16},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.16},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijg.20200401.16},
abstract = {Objective: To evaluate the application of prospective nursing intervention in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopes. Methods: We invested 84 patients to join our study who undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopes. The participant’s age was higher than 60 years. The time of receiving gastrointestinal endoscopes is from March 2017 to September 2019. The control group participants receive traditional nursing model. In another group, the intervention group patients receive prospective nursing intervention, we provide suitable preventive nursing measures to the participants. Additionally, we use interview and questionnaires to collect the data from participants, the data include patient characteristics information, incidence of complications and inspection time of gastrointestinal endoscopes. Result: The data of Drop in blood pressure, Intestinal bloating and Abdominal pain is Statistical significance. The relative complications cases of intervention group were less than that of control group in overall [1 (2.4%) vs 4 (9.5%), 1 (2.4%) vs 3 (7.1%), 2 (4.8%) vs 5 (11.9%)]. In inspection time of gastrointestinal endoscopes, intervention group participants have better performance than that of control group, the intervention group has shorter Gastroscopy time and Colonoscopy time (15.62±1.56 vs 17.41±1.42, 24.89±2.77 vs 27.01±2.63). The data between the intervention group and control group is statistical significance. Conclusion: the prospective nursing intervention has strong influence to improve patient complications situation and reducing inspection time of gastrointestinal endoscopes.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluating the Application of Prospective Nursing Intervention in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopes AU - Chunmei Lin AU - Chan Chen Y1 - 2020/05/29 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.16 T2 - International Journal of Gastroenterology JF - International Journal of Gastroenterology JO - International Journal of Gastroenterology SP - 24 EP - 26 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-169X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijg.20200401.16 AB - Objective: To evaluate the application of prospective nursing intervention in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopes. Methods: We invested 84 patients to join our study who undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopes. The participant’s age was higher than 60 years. The time of receiving gastrointestinal endoscopes is from March 2017 to September 2019. The control group participants receive traditional nursing model. In another group, the intervention group patients receive prospective nursing intervention, we provide suitable preventive nursing measures to the participants. Additionally, we use interview and questionnaires to collect the data from participants, the data include patient characteristics information, incidence of complications and inspection time of gastrointestinal endoscopes. Result: The data of Drop in blood pressure, Intestinal bloating and Abdominal pain is Statistical significance. The relative complications cases of intervention group were less than that of control group in overall [1 (2.4%) vs 4 (9.5%), 1 (2.4%) vs 3 (7.1%), 2 (4.8%) vs 5 (11.9%)]. In inspection time of gastrointestinal endoscopes, intervention group participants have better performance than that of control group, the intervention group has shorter Gastroscopy time and Colonoscopy time (15.62±1.56 vs 17.41±1.42, 24.89±2.77 vs 27.01±2.63). The data between the intervention group and control group is statistical significance. Conclusion: the prospective nursing intervention has strong influence to improve patient complications situation and reducing inspection time of gastrointestinal endoscopes. VL - 4 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: