This paper explores the importance of supply chain asymme tries by investigating the difference between firms in terms of key parameters. For the examination of inter-firm competition through product development, the context of simultaneous entry and sequential entry are treated separately. This allows a deeper understanding of the implications of information asymmetry and commit ment which have been regarded as important determinants in the context of game-theoretic studies. The study of innovation based competition has often considered aspects related to patent races and incremental product-process innovation to achieve distinctive advantage. However, recently innovation-based competition has become an aspect of buyer-supplier relationships. There are many instances in manufacturing where one finds situations of lock-ins created by innovative suppliers.
Published in | International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 4, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.17 |
Page(s) | 315-322 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Supply Chain, Outsourcing, Competition, Investment Strategy, Stochastic Games
[1] | Clark, K. B. and Fujimoto, T. (1991), Product Development Performance, Boston, Ma.: Harvard Business School Press. |
[2] | Cox, Andrew; Ireland, P. Lonsdale, C. Sanderson, J.; Watson,G. (2002), Supply Chains, Markets and Power: Mapping Buyer and Supplier Power Regimes, London: Routledge. |
[3] | Dasgupta, P., Stiglitz, J. (1981), “Resource Depletion under Technological Uncer¬taintv”, Econometrica 49, 85-104. |
[4] | Dockner, E., Jorgensen, S., Van Long, N., Sorger, G (2000), Differential Games in Economics and Management Science, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. |
[5] | The Economist (2007), “Revving Up”, A Special Report on Innovation, Oct.27, 6-10. |
[6] | Fine, C, H, (1999), Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage, New York: Perseus. |
[7] | Gottinger, H. W. (2006), Innovation, Technology and Hypercompetition, London: Routledge. |
[8] | Gottinger, H. W. (2015), “Supply Chain Coopetition”, International Journal of Business and Economics Research 4(2), 67-71. |
[9] | Gottinger, H. W. (2016), Networks, Competition, Innovation and Industrial Growth, NovaScience: New York. |
[10] | Harris, C., and Vickers, J.(1995),”Innovation and Natural Resources: A Dynamic Game with Uncertainty”, The Rand Journal of Economics 26(3), 418-430. |
[11] | Porter, Michael E. (1979), “How Competitive Forces shape Strategy”, Chapter 1 in On Competition, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 21-38. |
[12] | Schelling, T. (1980), Strategy and Conflict, Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard Univ. Press. |
[13] | Sutton, J. (2001), Technology and Market Structure, MIT Press: Cambridge, Ma. |
[14] | Tang, C. S., Teo, C.-P. and K. K. Wei, eds. (2008), Supply Chain Analysis, Springer: New York. |
APA Style
Hans W. Gottinger. (2015). Vertical Competition and Outsourcing in a Supply Chain. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 4(6), 315-322. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.17
ACS Style
Hans W. Gottinger. Vertical Competition and Outsourcing in a Supply Chain. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2015, 4(6), 315-322. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.17
AMA Style
Hans W. Gottinger. Vertical Competition and Outsourcing in a Supply Chain. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2015;4(6):315-322. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.17
@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.17, author = {Hans W. Gottinger}, title = {Vertical Competition and Outsourcing in a Supply Chain}, journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research}, volume = {4}, number = {6}, pages = {315-322}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20150406.17}, abstract = {This paper explores the importance of supply chain asymme tries by investigating the difference between firms in terms of key parameters. For the examination of inter-firm competition through product development, the context of simultaneous entry and sequential entry are treated separately. This allows a deeper understanding of the implications of information asymmetry and commit ment which have been regarded as important determinants in the context of game-theoretic studies. The study of innovation based competition has often considered aspects related to patent races and incremental product-process innovation to achieve distinctive advantage. However, recently innovation-based competition has become an aspect of buyer-supplier relationships. There are many instances in manufacturing where one finds situations of lock-ins created by innovative suppliers.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Vertical Competition and Outsourcing in a Supply Chain AU - Hans W. Gottinger Y1 - 2015/12/30 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.17 T2 - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JF - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JO - International Journal of Business and Economics Research SP - 315 EP - 322 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-756X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20150406.17 AB - This paper explores the importance of supply chain asymme tries by investigating the difference between firms in terms of key parameters. For the examination of inter-firm competition through product development, the context of simultaneous entry and sequential entry are treated separately. This allows a deeper understanding of the implications of information asymmetry and commit ment which have been regarded as important determinants in the context of game-theoretic studies. The study of innovation based competition has often considered aspects related to patent races and incremental product-process innovation to achieve distinctive advantage. However, recently innovation-based competition has become an aspect of buyer-supplier relationships. There are many instances in manufacturing where one finds situations of lock-ins created by innovative suppliers. VL - 4 IS - 6 ER -