Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy

Fasil Merawi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.history.20210902.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy

Fasil Merawi

Published in History Research (Volume 9, Issue 2)

Received: 26 June 2021 Accepted: 21 July 2021 Published: 28 July 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The paper tries to critically expose Hans-Johann Glock’s What is Analytic Philosophy? In this work, Glock identifies the limitations within the geographical, linguistic, historical, methodological, metaphysical and normative oriented conceptions of analytic philosophy. By developing a comparison of analytic and continental philosophy, he shows that no strict criteria could be employed in order to make such a distinction. In return he emphasizes the idea of a family resemblance amongst different proponents and strands of thought within the analytic tradition. This family resemblance is used to explore whether or not there is an underlying thread that is manifested in the different orientations that are identified under analytic philosophy. By analyzing Glock’s conception of analytic philosophy, it will be argued that, the book successfully shows the limitations of conventional definitions of analytic philosophy, exposes the current attempt to equate scientism and logical positivism with analytic philosophy in general, and also demonstrates the relevance of the analytic tradition in today’s world where the need for analysis is more than ever required. It does not limit the significance of analytic philosophy to the analysis of language and shown how there is also an interest in metaphysical and epistemological considerations. Still, Glock also needs to further articulate his thesis of family resemblance, and show whether it constitutes an orientation, philosophical current or perspective within the analytic tradition.

Published in	History Research (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.history.20210902.11
Page(s)	97-103
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Analytic Philosophy, Analysis, Family Resemblance

References

[1]	Beaney, Michael. 2007. The Analytic Turn, Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. New York: Routledge.
[2]	Biletzki, Anat and Matar, Anat. 2002. The Story of Analytic Philosophy, Plot and Heroes, New York: Routledge.
[3]	Bonino, G., & Tripodi, P. 2019. Academic success in America: analytic philosophy and the decline of Wittgenstein. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 1–34. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2019.1618789.
[4]	Glock, Hans-Johann, 2008. What is Analytic Philosophy? New York: Cambridge University Press.
[5]	González de Prado Salas, J., Suárez, M., & Zamora-Bonilla, J. 2018. Special issue: Inferentialism in philosophy of science and in epistemology—introduction. Synthese. doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-02009-4.
[6]	Juhl, Cory and Loomis, Eric. 2010. Analyticity. New York: Routledge.
[7]	Martinich, A. P. and Sosa, David. 2001. A Companion to Analytic Philosophy. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
[8]	Schwartz, Stephen P. 2012. A Brief History of Analytic Philosophy, From Russell to Rawls. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.
[9]	Soames, Scott. 2003. Philosophical Analysis in the twentieth Century, Volume 1, The Dawn of Analysis. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
[10]	Vrahimis, A. 2020. Pragmatism and the History of the Analytic-Continental Divide. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/09672559.2020.1812974.
[11]	Weitz, Morris. 1996. Twentieth century philosophy: the analytic tradition. New York: The free press.
[12]	Wilshire, Bruce. 2002. Fashionable Nihilism, A Critique of Analytic Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fasil Merawi. (2021). Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy. History Research, 9(2), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20210902.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fasil Merawi. Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy. Hist. Res. 2021, 9(2), 97-103. doi: 10.11648/j.history.20210902.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fasil Merawi. Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy. Hist Res. 2021;9(2):97-103. doi: 10.11648/j.history.20210902.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.history.20210902.11,
  author = {Fasil Merawi},
  title = {Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy},
  journal = {History Research},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {97-103},
  doi = {10.11648/j.history.20210902.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20210902.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.history.20210902.11},
  abstract = {The paper tries to critically expose Hans-Johann Glock’s What is Analytic Philosophy? In this work, Glock identifies the limitations within the geographical, linguistic, historical, methodological, metaphysical and normative oriented conceptions of analytic philosophy. By developing a comparison of analytic and continental philosophy, he shows that no strict criteria could be employed in order to make such a distinction. In return he emphasizes the idea of a family resemblance amongst different proponents and strands of thought within the analytic tradition. This family resemblance is used to explore whether or not there is an underlying thread that is manifested in the different orientations that are identified under analytic philosophy. By analyzing Glock’s conception of analytic philosophy, it will be argued that, the book successfully shows the limitations of conventional definitions of analytic philosophy, exposes the current attempt to equate scientism and logical positivism with analytic philosophy in general, and also demonstrates the relevance of the analytic tradition in today’s world where the need for analysis is more than ever required. It does not limit the significance of analytic philosophy to the analysis of language and shown how there is also an interest in metaphysical and epistemological considerations. Still, Glock also needs to further articulate his thesis of family resemblance, and show whether it constitutes an orientation, philosophical current or perspective within the analytic tradition.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy
AU  - Fasil Merawi
Y1  - 2021/07/28
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20210902.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.history.20210902.11
T2  - History Research
JF  - History Research
JO  - History Research
SP  - 97
EP  - 103
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-6719
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20210902.11
AB  - The paper tries to critically expose Hans-Johann Glock’s What is Analytic Philosophy? In this work, Glock identifies the limitations within the geographical, linguistic, historical, methodological, metaphysical and normative oriented conceptions of analytic philosophy. By developing a comparison of analytic and continental philosophy, he shows that no strict criteria could be employed in order to make such a distinction. In return he emphasizes the idea of a family resemblance amongst different proponents and strands of thought within the analytic tradition. This family resemblance is used to explore whether or not there is an underlying thread that is manifested in the different orientations that are identified under analytic philosophy. By analyzing Glock’s conception of analytic philosophy, it will be argued that, the book successfully shows the limitations of conventional definitions of analytic philosophy, exposes the current attempt to equate scientism and logical positivism with analytic philosophy in general, and also demonstrates the relevance of the analytic tradition in today’s world where the need for analysis is more than ever required. It does not limit the significance of analytic philosophy to the analysis of language and shown how there is also an interest in metaphysical and epistemological considerations. Still, Glock also needs to further articulate his thesis of family resemblance, and show whether it constitutes an orientation, philosophical current or perspective within the analytic tradition.
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Fasil Merawi

Department of Philosophy, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fasil Merawi. (2021). Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy. History Research, 9(2), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20210902.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fasil Merawi. Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy. Hist. Res. 2021, 9(2), 97-103. doi: 10.11648/j.history.20210902.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fasil Merawi. Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy. Hist Res. 2021;9(2):97-103. doi: 10.11648/j.history.20210902.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.history.20210902.11,
  author = {Fasil Merawi},
  title = {Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy},
  journal = {History Research},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {97-103},
  doi = {10.11648/j.history.20210902.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20210902.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.history.20210902.11},
  abstract = {The paper tries to critically expose Hans-Johann Glock’s What is Analytic Philosophy? In this work, Glock identifies the limitations within the geographical, linguistic, historical, methodological, metaphysical and normative oriented conceptions of analytic philosophy. By developing a comparison of analytic and continental philosophy, he shows that no strict criteria could be employed in order to make such a distinction. In return he emphasizes the idea of a family resemblance amongst different proponents and strands of thought within the analytic tradition. This family resemblance is used to explore whether or not there is an underlying thread that is manifested in the different orientations that are identified under analytic philosophy. By analyzing Glock’s conception of analytic philosophy, it will be argued that, the book successfully shows the limitations of conventional definitions of analytic philosophy, exposes the current attempt to equate scientism and logical positivism with analytic philosophy in general, and also demonstrates the relevance of the analytic tradition in today’s world where the need for analysis is more than ever required. It does not limit the significance of analytic philosophy to the analysis of language and shown how there is also an interest in metaphysical and epistemological considerations. Still, Glock also needs to further articulate his thesis of family resemblance, and show whether it constitutes an orientation, philosophical current or perspective within the analytic tradition.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Reflections on Glock’s Conception of Analytic Philosophy
AU  - Fasil Merawi
Y1  - 2021/07/28
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20210902.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.history.20210902.11
T2  - History Research
JF  - History Research
JO  - History Research
SP  - 97
EP  - 103
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-6719
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20210902.11
AB  - The paper tries to critically expose Hans-Johann Glock’s What is Analytic Philosophy? In this work, Glock identifies the limitations within the geographical, linguistic, historical, methodological, metaphysical and normative oriented conceptions of analytic philosophy. By developing a comparison of analytic and continental philosophy, he shows that no strict criteria could be employed in order to make such a distinction. In return he emphasizes the idea of a family resemblance amongst different proponents and strands of thought within the analytic tradition. This family resemblance is used to explore whether or not there is an underlying thread that is manifested in the different orientations that are identified under analytic philosophy. By analyzing Glock’s conception of analytic philosophy, it will be argued that, the book successfully shows the limitations of conventional definitions of analytic philosophy, exposes the current attempt to equate scientism and logical positivism with analytic philosophy in general, and also demonstrates the relevance of the analytic tradition in today’s world where the need for analysis is more than ever required. It does not limit the significance of analytic philosophy to the analysis of language and shown how there is also an interest in metaphysical and epistemological considerations. Still, Glock also needs to further articulate his thesis of family resemblance, and show whether it constitutes an orientation, philosophical current or perspective within the analytic tradition.
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download