| Peer-Reviewed

Chromosome Study of Ethiopian Bat Species (Order Chiroptera)

Received: 15 July 2021    Accepted: 2 August 2021    Published: 26 August 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In this study, chromosome numbers and karyotypes of 11 bat species were analyzed. The animals were captured alive by using nets and handpicking and then chromosome preparations were made from bone marrow cells with colchicines method. Bats were collected from nine localities in Ethiopia, namely: Arbaminch, Batu/Ziway, Waliso, Fiche, Bishoftu/Debre-Zeit, Sof-Umar, Koka, Merehabete and Adaba. The species name and the chromosome number (2n) with their corresponding autosomal fundamental number (FN) obtained are: Hipposideros caffer (2n = 32, FN = 60/62) and Triaenops persicus (2n = 36, FN = 60) are belong to family Hipposideridae; Chaerephon pumilus (2n = 48 and FN = 54/56) with metacentric, acrocentric and acrocentric chromosomes, Chaerephon leucogaster (2n = 48, FN = 54), and Mops condylura (2n = 48, FN = 54) are members of the family Molossidae; Pipistrellus pipistrellus (2n = 36, FN = 52) with metacentric and acrocentric chromosomes, Neoromicia nanus (2n = 36, FN = 48), Miniopterus africanus (2n = 46, FN = 54) and Scotophilus dingani (S. viridis) 2n = 36, FN = 54) with metacentric and acrocentric chromosomes are members of the family Vespertilionidae; Micropteropus pusillus (2n = 35/36, FN = 68) with all the chromosomes being biarmed belongs to family Pteropidae; Nycteris thebaica (2n = 42, FN = 78/80) with 40 biarmed and two acrocentric chromosomes is member of family Nycteridae. Totally, 15 different types of chromosome number, fundamental number and morphology were identified. C. leucogaster has not been recorded in the Ethiopian bats list before. All of these species are karyologically described for the first time from Ethiopia. Some of the karyotypic findings in the present study are in agreement with previous reports from other countries, except for the lack of report on one species (C. leucogaster). In our study, the encountered problems include: lack of karyotypic literatures on Ethiopian bats and taxonomic identification. It is recommended that more karyotypic study of bat species in the country should be done using additional techniques and due attentions should be given to the conservations of this threatened groups of animals because they are declining in diversity as well as in density.

Published in American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 9, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.bio.20210904.14
Page(s) 123-130
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Bat, Chiroptera, Chromosome Number, Fundamental Number, Karyotype

References
[1] Ando K, Tagawa T, Uchida TA (1977) Considerations of karyotypic evolution within Vespertilionidae. Experientia, 33877–979.
[2] Bickham JWI, Hafner JC (1978) A chromosomal banding study of three species of vespertilionid bats from Yugoslavia. Genetica, 48 (1): 1–3.
[3] Eick GN, Jacobs DS Yang F, Volleth M (2007) Karyotypic differences in two sibling species of Scotophilusfrom South Africa (Vespertilionidae, Chiroptera, Mammalia). Cytogenet Genome Res 118: 72–77.
[4] Fedyk S, Ruprecht AL (1976) Karyotypes of Pipistrellus Pipistrellus (Schreber 1774) and P. nathusii (Keyserling and Blasius 1839) (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), Caryologia, 29 (3): 283–289.
[5] Fredga K (1977) Chromosomal changes in vertebrate evolution. In: Harrison RJ (ed) Zoological Science. The Royal Society, London, pp 377–397.
[6] Haiduk MW, Baker RJ, Robbins LW, Schlitter DA (1981) Chromosomal evolution in African megachiroptera: G- and C-band assessment of the magnitude of change in similar standard karyotypes. Cytogenet Cell Genet; 29: 221–232.
[7] Hayman RW, Hill JE (1971) Order Chiroptera. In: Meester J, Setzer HW (eds) The mammals of Africa: an identification manual. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, District of Columbia, pp 1–73.
[8] Hill JE, Smith JD (1983) Bats: a Natural History. Natural History Museum, London University of Texas Press. 243.
[9] Hillis DM, Moritz C, Marble BK (1996) Molecular Systematics. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts, U.S.A. pp 121–168.
[10] Jepsen GL (1970) Bat origins and evolution. In: Wimsatt WA (ed) Biology of bats, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 1–64.
[11] Karatafi A, Gharakheloo MM, Kankilic T (2008) Karyotypes of Two Iranian Bat Species, Myotis blythii and Miniopterus schreibersii (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae, Miniopteridae). Turk J Zool 32: 305–308.
[12] Kingdon J (1974) East African Mammals: Insectvores and bats. An Atlas of Evolution in Africa, Vol. 2 (A). Academic Press, London and New York.
[13] Koopman KF (1970) Zoogeography of bats. In: Slaughter BH, Walton DW (eds) About bats: a chiropteran biology symposium. Southern Methodist University Press. Dallas, Texas, pp 29–50.
[14] Kruskop SV, Lavrenchenko LA (2000) A new species of long-eared bat (Plecotus; Vespertilionidae, Mammalia) from Ethiopia. Mammalia 38: 5–17.
[15] Largen MJ, Kock D, Yalden DW (1974) Catalogue of the Mammals of Ethiopia. J. Ital. Zool. 16: 221–298.
[16] Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AV (1964) Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201–220.
[17] Mitchell-Jones T (2003) Focus on bats discovering their lifestyle and habitats. Engl. Nature 2: 3–19.
[18] Nowak RM (1994) Walker’s Bats of the World. The Johns Hopkins University Press, London.
[19] Nowak RM (1999) Walker’s Mammals of the World, 6th edn. Vol. 1. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and Maryland.
[20] Peterson RL, Nagorsen DW (1975) Chromosomes of. fifteen species of bats (Chiroptera) from Kenya and Rhodesia. Life Science Occasional Papers – Royal Ontario Museum 27: 1–14.
[21] Porter CA, Primus AW, Hoffmann FG, Baker RJ (2010). Karyology of five species of bats (Vespertilionidae, Hipposideridae, and Nycteridae) from Gabon with comments on the taxonomy of Glauconycteris. Occasional Papers of the Museum, Texas Tech University 295: 1–7.
[22] Simmons NB (2005) Order Chiroptera. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds) Mammal species of the world: A taxonomic and geographic reference. The Johns Hopkins University Press – Baltimore. pp 312–529.
[23] Sotero-Caio C, Baker RJ Volleth M (2017) Chromosomal Evolution in Chiroptera. Genes, 8 (272): 1–25; http//doi:10.3390/genes8100272
[24] Sreepada KS, Koubínova D, Konecny A, Koubek P, Rab P, Rabova MV, Zima J (2008) Karyotypes of three species of molossid bats (Molossidae, Chiroptera) from India and western Africa Folia Zool. 57 (4): 347–357.
[25] Williams-Whitmer LM, Brittingham-Brant M (2001) Wildlife damage control 4: Bats (http://www.cas.psu.edu).
[26] Wilson ED, Cole RF, Nichols DJ, Rudran R, Foster SM (1996) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London.
[27] Yalden DW, Morris PA (1975) The Lives of Bats. David and Charles Limited, London.
[28] Happold M, Cotterill FPD (2013) Family rhinolophidae- horseshoe bats. In: Kingdon J, Happold D, Hoffmann m BT, Happold M, Kalina, J (eds) Mammals of Africa, vol. 1. Bloomsbury publishing, London, New Delhi, New York and Sydney, pp 300–356.
[29] Petr B, Peter V (2009) Taxonomic revision of the genus Triaenops (chiroptera: hipposideridae) with description of a new species from southern arabia and definitions of a new genus and tribe. Folia Zoologica; Praha 58: 1–45.
[30] Harada M, Minezawa M, Takada S, Yenbutra S, Nunpakdee P, Ohtani S (1982) Karyological analysis of 12 species of Bats from Thailand. Caryologia 35 (2): 269–278.
[31] Denys C, Kadjo B, Missoup AD, Monadjem A, Aniskine V (2013) New records of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) and karyotypes from Guinean Mount Nimba (West Africa), Italian Journal of Zoology, 80: 2, 279–290.
[32] Rautenbach I. L, Bronner GN, Schlitter DA (1993) Karyotypic data and attendant systematic implications for the bats of southern Africa. Koedoe 36 (2): 87-104.
[33] Lee TE, Bickham JW, Schlitter DA (1989) Karyotypes of two nycterid bats from Somalia. Mammalia 53: 120–121.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Bekele Serbessa Tolera, Mulugeta Tafere Woldegebriel, Kifle Dagne Woldegebriel. (2021). Chromosome Study of Ethiopian Bat Species (Order Chiroptera). American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 9(4), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20210904.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Bekele Serbessa Tolera; Mulugeta Tafere Woldegebriel; Kifle Dagne Woldegebriel. Chromosome Study of Ethiopian Bat Species (Order Chiroptera). Am. J. BioSci. Bioeng. 2021, 9(4), 123-130. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20210904.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Bekele Serbessa Tolera, Mulugeta Tafere Woldegebriel, Kifle Dagne Woldegebriel. Chromosome Study of Ethiopian Bat Species (Order Chiroptera). Am J BioSci Bioeng. 2021;9(4):123-130. doi: 10.11648/j.bio.20210904.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.bio.20210904.14,
      author = {Bekele Serbessa Tolera and Mulugeta Tafere Woldegebriel and Kifle Dagne Woldegebriel},
      title = {Chromosome Study of Ethiopian Bat Species (Order Chiroptera)},
      journal = {American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering},
      volume = {9},
      number = {4},
      pages = {123-130},
      doi = {10.11648/j.bio.20210904.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20210904.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.bio.20210904.14},
      abstract = {In this study, chromosome numbers and karyotypes of 11 bat species were analyzed. The animals were captured alive by using nets and handpicking and then chromosome preparations were made from bone marrow cells with colchicines method. Bats were collected from nine localities in Ethiopia, namely: Arbaminch, Batu/Ziway, Waliso, Fiche, Bishoftu/Debre-Zeit, Sof-Umar, Koka, Merehabete and Adaba. The species name and the chromosome number (2n) with their corresponding autosomal fundamental number (FN) obtained are: Hipposideros caffer (2n = 32, FN = 60/62) and Triaenops persicus (2n = 36, FN = 60) are belong to family Hipposideridae; Chaerephon pumilus (2n = 48 and FN = 54/56) with metacentric, acrocentric and acrocentric chromosomes, Chaerephon leucogaster (2n = 48, FN = 54), and Mops condylura (2n = 48, FN = 54) are members of the family Molossidae; Pipistrellus pipistrellus (2n = 36, FN = 52) with metacentric and acrocentric chromosomes, Neoromicia nanus (2n = 36, FN = 48), Miniopterus africanus (2n = 46, FN = 54) and Scotophilus dingani (S. viridis) 2n = 36, FN = 54) with metacentric and acrocentric chromosomes are members of the family Vespertilionidae; Micropteropus pusillus (2n = 35/36, FN = 68) with all the chromosomes being biarmed belongs to family Pteropidae; Nycteris thebaica (2n = 42, FN = 78/80) with 40 biarmed and two acrocentric chromosomes is member of family Nycteridae. Totally, 15 different types of chromosome number, fundamental number and morphology were identified. C. leucogaster has not been recorded in the Ethiopian bats list before. All of these species are karyologically described for the first time from Ethiopia. Some of the karyotypic findings in the present study are in agreement with previous reports from other countries, except for the lack of report on one species (C. leucogaster). In our study, the encountered problems include: lack of karyotypic literatures on Ethiopian bats and taxonomic identification. It is recommended that more karyotypic study of bat species in the country should be done using additional techniques and due attentions should be given to the conservations of this threatened groups of animals because they are declining in diversity as well as in density.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Chromosome Study of Ethiopian Bat Species (Order Chiroptera)
    AU  - Bekele Serbessa Tolera
    AU  - Mulugeta Tafere Woldegebriel
    AU  - Kifle Dagne Woldegebriel
    Y1  - 2021/08/26
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20210904.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.bio.20210904.14
    T2  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
    JF  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
    JO  - American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
    SP  - 123
    EP  - 130
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5893
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bio.20210904.14
    AB  - In this study, chromosome numbers and karyotypes of 11 bat species were analyzed. The animals were captured alive by using nets and handpicking and then chromosome preparations were made from bone marrow cells with colchicines method. Bats were collected from nine localities in Ethiopia, namely: Arbaminch, Batu/Ziway, Waliso, Fiche, Bishoftu/Debre-Zeit, Sof-Umar, Koka, Merehabete and Adaba. The species name and the chromosome number (2n) with their corresponding autosomal fundamental number (FN) obtained are: Hipposideros caffer (2n = 32, FN = 60/62) and Triaenops persicus (2n = 36, FN = 60) are belong to family Hipposideridae; Chaerephon pumilus (2n = 48 and FN = 54/56) with metacentric, acrocentric and acrocentric chromosomes, Chaerephon leucogaster (2n = 48, FN = 54), and Mops condylura (2n = 48, FN = 54) are members of the family Molossidae; Pipistrellus pipistrellus (2n = 36, FN = 52) with metacentric and acrocentric chromosomes, Neoromicia nanus (2n = 36, FN = 48), Miniopterus africanus (2n = 46, FN = 54) and Scotophilus dingani (S. viridis) 2n = 36, FN = 54) with metacentric and acrocentric chromosomes are members of the family Vespertilionidae; Micropteropus pusillus (2n = 35/36, FN = 68) with all the chromosomes being biarmed belongs to family Pteropidae; Nycteris thebaica (2n = 42, FN = 78/80) with 40 biarmed and two acrocentric chromosomes is member of family Nycteridae. Totally, 15 different types of chromosome number, fundamental number and morphology were identified. C. leucogaster has not been recorded in the Ethiopian bats list before. All of these species are karyologically described for the first time from Ethiopia. Some of the karyotypic findings in the present study are in agreement with previous reports from other countries, except for the lack of report on one species (C. leucogaster). In our study, the encountered problems include: lack of karyotypic literatures on Ethiopian bats and taxonomic identification. It is recommended that more karyotypic study of bat species in the country should be done using additional techniques and due attentions should be given to the conservations of this threatened groups of animals because they are declining in diversity as well as in density.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Biology, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute Bahir Dar Biodiversity Center, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

  • Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Sections