Cropping systems of maize-legume crops which mostly practiced under conventional practice has resulted in soil degradation and loss of crop yield in Ethiopia. This practice may be inversed by Conservation Agriculture. Optical sensor techniques particularly normalized difference vegetative index is immediate, non-devastative and quantitative assessment method; which opposes conventional plant tissue sampling analysis which is devastating and needs more time. CA practice may enhance soil water and crop yield. CA can improve soil health and crop productivity. It was suggested that CA should be studied by considering both crop and soil parameters in Ethiopia. By considering this field experiment was done at Melkassa agricultural research center during the rainy season of 2018 and 2019 to study the impacts of conventional practice and conservational practice under different cropping systems. Split plot treatment design with 3 replication was used. Two tillage levels were assigned to the main plots and four maize-legume systems were assigned to the sub plots. Results implied that conservation agriculture plot was early in maize emergence and late in maize tasseling, silking and physiological maturity than conventional practice. Maize bean intercropping under conservational was better in maize yield, biomass and harvest index than maize bean intercropping under conventional practice. High normalized difference vegetative index value was recorded under conventional practice for the earlier periods and low value was recorded under conservational practice during earlier periods of maize growing periods. However, Normal difference vegetative index was become higher for conservational practice during grain filling maize grain filling stage. Better soil moisture content at various soil depth was obtained from maize rotation system under conservational practice than cropping system under conventional practice.
| Published in | American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajbes.20241004.12 |
| Page(s) | 105-113 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Soil Moisture, Conservation Practice, Tillage, Maize-legume Cropping System
| [1] | A. Ghanbari, M. Dahmardeh, B. A. Siahsar, M. Ramroudi. 2010. Effect of maize (Zea mays L.)-cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping on light distribution, soil temperature and soil moisture in arid environment. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. 8(1), 102-108 ref. 54. |
| [2] | A. R Dexter. Soil physical quality: Part II. Friability, tillage, tilth and hard-setting. Geoderma, 120(3–4), Pages 215-225. |
| [3] | Adiku, S. G., Ozier-Lafontaine, H. and Bajazet, T. (2001) ‘Patterns of root growth and water uptake of a maize-cowpea mixture grown under greenhouse conditions’, Plant Soil 235: 85-94. |
| [4] | Amare Belay, 1992. Effect of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping on yield and yield components of the component crops. M. Sc. Thesis, Alemaya University of Agriculture, Alemaya, Ethiopia. 305p. |
| [5] | Anne Karuma, Peter Mtakwa, Nyambilila Amuri, Charles K. Gachene, Patrick Gicheru. 2014. Tillage Effects on Selected Soil Physical Properties in a Maize-Bean Intercropping System in Mwala District, Kenya. Wiley online Library |
| [6] | Baladé, A. B., Scopel, E., Affholder, F., Corbeels, M., Silva, F. A. M. D., Xavier, J. H. V. and Wery, J. (2011) ‘Agronomic performance of no-tillage relay intercropping with maize under mallholder conditions in central Brazil’, Field Crops Research 124: 240-251. |
| [7] | Baudron, F., Andersson, J. A., Corbeels, M., & Giller, K. E. (2012). Failing to Yield? Ploughs, Conservation Agriculture and the Problem of Agricultural Intensification: An Example from the Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. The Journal of Development Studies, 48(3), 393–412. |
| [8] | Biazin, B.; Stroosnijder, L. To tie or not to tie ridges for water conservation in rift valley drylands of Ethiopia. Soil Tillage Res. 2012, 124, 83–94. |
| [9] |
Food and Agriculture Organization. Country Fact Sheet on Food and Agriculture Policy Trend. Available online:
http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4181e.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2015). |
| [10] | Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons. New York. |
| [11] | Govaerts, B., Fuentes, M., Mezzalama, M., Nicol, J. M., Deckers, J., Etchevers, J. D., Figueroa-Sandoval, B., and Sayre, K. D. 2007a. Infiltration, soil moisture, root rot and nematode populations after 12 years of different tillage, residue and crop rotation managements. Soil Till. Res. 94: 209-219. |
| [12] | Govaerts, B., K. D. Sayre, and J. Deckers. 2005. Stable high yields with zero tillage and permanent bed planting. Field Crops Res. 94: 33–42. |
| [13] | Govaerts, B., Mezzalama, M., Sayre, K. D., Crossa, J., Nicol, J. M., Deckers, J., 2006a. Long-term consequences of tillage, residue management, and crop rotation on maize/wheat root rot and nematode populations. Appl. Soil Ecol. 32, 305– 315. |
| [14] | Govaerts, B., Mezzalama, M., Unno, Y., Sayre, K. D., Luna-Guido, M., Vanherck, K., Dendooven, L., Deckers, J., 2007b. Influence of tillage, residue management, and crop rotation on soil microbial biomass, and catabolic diversity. Appl. Soil Ecol. 37, 18–30. |
| [15] | Haystead, A., Malajczuk, N. and Grove, T. S. (1988) ‘Underground transfer of nitrogen between pasture plants infected with vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus’, New Phytol 108: 417-432. |
| [16] | Hinsinger, P. (2001) ‘Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review’, In: international Symposium on Phosphorus Cycling in the Soil Plant Continuum, Beijing, China, 17-23 September 2000, pp. 173-195. |
| [17] | Maskey, S. L., Bhattarai, S., Peoples, M. B. and Herridge, D. F. (2001) ‘On-farm measurements of nitrogen fixation by winter and summer legumes in the Hill and Terai regions of Nepal’, Field Crops Research 70: 209-211. |
| [18] | Munz, S., Feike, T., Chen, Q., Claupein, W. and Graeff-Hönninger, S. (2014) ‘Understanding interactions between cropping pattern, maize cultivar and the local environment in strip-intercropping systems’, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 195-196: 152-164. |
| [19] | Nigussie TesfaMichael, 1994. Performance of maize/bean cropping systems under low and medium rain fed situations. M. Sc. Thesis, AUA, Alemaya, Ethiopia. 241p. |
| [20] | Peoples, M. B., Boddey R. M. and Ladha J. K. (1995) ‘Biological nitrogen fixation: an efficient source of nitrogen for sustainable agricultural production?’, Plant Soil 174: 3-28. |
| [21] | Quinones, 1997. Manual on Wheat Agronomy, SG2000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
| [22] | Santalla, M., Rodiňo, A. P., Casquero, P. A. and de Ron, A. M. (2001) ‘Interactions of bush bean intercropped with field and sweet maize’, European Journal of Agriculture 15: 185-196. |
| [23] | Searle, P. G. E., Comudom, Y., Shedden, D. C. and Nance, R. A. (1981) ‘Effect of maize + legume intercropping systems and fertilizer nitrogen on crop yields and residual nitrogen’, Field Crops Res 4: 133-145. |
| [24] | Sileshi, G. W., Akinnifesi, F. K., Ajayi, O. C. and Muys, B. (2011) ‘Integration of legume trees in maize-based cropping systems improves rain use efficiency and yield stability under rain-fed agriculture’, Agricultural Water Management 98: 1364-1372. |
| [25] | Singh, N. B., Singh, P. P. and Nair, K. P. P. (1986) ‘Effect of legume intercropping on enrichment of soil nitrogen, bacterial activity and productivity of associated maize crops’, Experimental Agriculture 22: 339-344. |
| [26] | Thierfelder, C., and P. C. Wall. 2009. Effects of conservation agriculture techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Soil Tillage Res. 105: 217–227. |
| [27] | Verhulst, N., Govaerts, B., Nelissenc, V., Sayre, K. D., Crossaa, J., Raes, D., Deckers, J., 2011. Using NDVI and soil quality analysis to assess influence of agronomic management on withinplot spatial variability and factors limiting production. Field Crops Research 120, 58–67. |
| [28] | William R. Raun, John B. Solie, Gordon V. Johnson, Marvin L. Stone, Erna V. Lukina, Wade E. Thomason, James S. Schepers. 2001. In-Season Prediction of Potential Grain Yield in Winter Wheat Using Canopy Reflectance. |
| [29] | Wojcieska, U. and Kocoň, A. (1997) ‘Reaction of faba bean plants to soil and foliar N application and K nutrition’, Plant Soil 19: 23-28. |
| [30] | Worku, B., S. Chinawong, R. Suwanketnikom, T. Mala, and S. Juntakoo. 2006. Conservation tillage and crop rotation: Win-win option for sustainable maize production in the dryland. Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Kamphaengsaen Acad. J. 4: 48–60. |
APA Style
Tesfa, Y., Abdulahi, J. (2024). Conservation Agriculture Effects on Crop and Moisture in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 10(4), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20241004.12
ACS Style
Tesfa, Y.; Abdulahi, J. Conservation Agriculture Effects on Crop and Moisture in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2024, 10(4), 105-113. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20241004.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajbes.20241004.12,
author = {Yaya Tesfa and Jemal Abdulahi},
title = {Conservation Agriculture Effects on Crop and Moisture in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia
},
journal = {American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {105-113},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajbes.20241004.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20241004.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbes.20241004.12},
abstract = {Cropping systems of maize-legume crops which mostly practiced under conventional practice has resulted in soil degradation and loss of crop yield in Ethiopia. This practice may be inversed by Conservation Agriculture. Optical sensor techniques particularly normalized difference vegetative index is immediate, non-devastative and quantitative assessment method; which opposes conventional plant tissue sampling analysis which is devastating and needs more time. CA practice may enhance soil water and crop yield. CA can improve soil health and crop productivity. It was suggested that CA should be studied by considering both crop and soil parameters in Ethiopia. By considering this field experiment was done at Melkassa agricultural research center during the rainy season of 2018 and 2019 to study the impacts of conventional practice and conservational practice under different cropping systems. Split plot treatment design with 3 replication was used. Two tillage levels were assigned to the main plots and four maize-legume systems were assigned to the sub plots. Results implied that conservation agriculture plot was early in maize emergence and late in maize tasseling, silking and physiological maturity than conventional practice. Maize bean intercropping under conservational was better in maize yield, biomass and harvest index than maize bean intercropping under conventional practice. High normalized difference vegetative index value was recorded under conventional practice for the earlier periods and low value was recorded under conservational practice during earlier periods of maize growing periods. However, Normal difference vegetative index was become higher for conservational practice during grain filling maize grain filling stage. Better soil moisture content at various soil depth was obtained from maize rotation system under conservational practice than cropping system under conventional practice.
},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Conservation Agriculture Effects on Crop and Moisture in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia AU - Yaya Tesfa AU - Jemal Abdulahi Y1 - 2024/12/23 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20241004.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajbes.20241004.12 T2 - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics JF - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics JO - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics SP - 105 EP - 113 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2471-979X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20241004.12 AB - Cropping systems of maize-legume crops which mostly practiced under conventional practice has resulted in soil degradation and loss of crop yield in Ethiopia. This practice may be inversed by Conservation Agriculture. Optical sensor techniques particularly normalized difference vegetative index is immediate, non-devastative and quantitative assessment method; which opposes conventional plant tissue sampling analysis which is devastating and needs more time. CA practice may enhance soil water and crop yield. CA can improve soil health and crop productivity. It was suggested that CA should be studied by considering both crop and soil parameters in Ethiopia. By considering this field experiment was done at Melkassa agricultural research center during the rainy season of 2018 and 2019 to study the impacts of conventional practice and conservational practice under different cropping systems. Split plot treatment design with 3 replication was used. Two tillage levels were assigned to the main plots and four maize-legume systems were assigned to the sub plots. Results implied that conservation agriculture plot was early in maize emergence and late in maize tasseling, silking and physiological maturity than conventional practice. Maize bean intercropping under conservational was better in maize yield, biomass and harvest index than maize bean intercropping under conventional practice. High normalized difference vegetative index value was recorded under conventional practice for the earlier periods and low value was recorded under conservational practice during earlier periods of maize growing periods. However, Normal difference vegetative index was become higher for conservational practice during grain filling maize grain filling stage. Better soil moisture content at various soil depth was obtained from maize rotation system under conservational practice than cropping system under conventional practice. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -
Melkassa Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Information