Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal

Paul Nathan Goldwater

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16

| Peer-Reviewed

Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal

Paul Nathan Goldwater

Published in American Journal of Pediatrics (Volume 4, Issue 4)

Received: 31 October 2018 Accepted: 15 November 2018 Published: 17 December 2018

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The cardiorespiratory paradigm is used to explain the aetiology of SIDS and has been the focus of intense research for many decades without providing consistent and meaningful data to support such an hypothesis. Despite this, papers citing central nervous system, cardiac and sleep arousal findings continue to be unremittingly published but without addressing SIDS risk and other factors. This paper is a succinct analysis of current cardiorespiratory SIDS research and its relationship (or not) to the established clinicopathological data and epidemiological risk factors. Epidemiological research into the aetiology of SIDS produced a milestone with the discovery of the prone sleep position risk factor which provided support for the cardiorespiratory control hypothesis which in itself defines the approach used by mainstream researchers. Since then mainstream research has stalled. The question is why? This analysis shows that there is very poor correlation between brainstem and other central nervous system pathological findings and other clinicopathological data and SIDS risk factors. A few studies show a link to a small number of risk factors, however, for the majority of papers there remains a glaring absence of data to link central nervous system pathology findings with the key risk factor of prone sleep position which is the central column upon which the cardiorespiratory paradigm stands. Nor do the studies correlate central nervous system findings with recent infection, contaminated sleeping surfaces, maternal/obstetric/higher birth, ethnicity, non-breast-feeding, etc. or with the usual gross pathological findings of SIDS (intrathoracic petechiae, liquid blood, congested fluid-laden lungs). Because of these shortcomings, this paper should provoke questions over current research directions and invites research into other more plausible hypotheses, such as the infection paradigm.

Published in	American Journal of Pediatrics (Volume 4, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16
Page(s)	104-109
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, Research, Cardiorespiratory Control, Infection

References

[1]	Goldwater PN. Infection: the neglected paradigm in SIDS Research. Arch Dis Child 2017;102(8):767-772. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312327.
[2]	Kinney HC, Cryan JB, Haynes RL et al. Dentate gyrus abnormalities in sudden unexplained death in infants: morphological marker of underlying brain vulnerability. Acta Neuropathol 2015;129: 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-014-1357-0.
[3]	Krous HF, Nadeau JM, Silva PD, Blackbourne BD. Intrathoracic petechiae in sudden infant death syndrome: relationship to face position when found. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2001;4:160-166.
[4]	Becroft DM, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA. Epidemiology of intrathoracic petechial hemorrhages in sudden infant death syndrome. Pediatr Dev Path. 1998;1:200-209.
[5]	Goldwater PN. Intrathoracic Petechial Haemorrhages in sudden infant death syndrome and other infant deaths: Time for re-examination? Pediatr Dev Pathol 2008;11:450-455.
[6]	Tester DJ, Ackerman MJ. Sudden infant death syndrome: how significant are the cardiac channelopathies? Cardiovasc Res 2005;67:388–96.
[7]	Arnestad M, Crotti L, Rognum TO, et al. Prevalence of long-QT syndrome gene variants in sudden infant death syndrome. Circulation 2007;115:361–7.
[8]	Tester DJ, Dura M, Carturan E, et al. A mechanism for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): stress-induced leak via ryanodine receptors. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:733–9.
[9]	Cronk LB, Ye B, Kaku T, et al. Novel mechanism for sudden infant death syndrome: persistent late sodium current secondary to mutations in caveolin-3. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:161–6.
[10]	Crotti L, Tester DJ, White WM, et al. Long QT syndrome-associated mutations in intrauterine fetal death. JAMA 2013;309:1473–82.
[11]	Machaalani R, Waters KA: Increased neuronal cell death after intermittent hypercapnic hypoxia in the developing piglet brainstem. Brain Res 2003, 985: 127-134. 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)03003-8.
[12]	Machaalani R, Waters KA. Neuronal cell death in the sudden infant death syndrome brainstem and associations with risk factors. Brain 2008;131(1):218-228. doi:10.1093/brain/awm290.
[13]	Machaalani R, Say M, Waters KA. Serotoninergic receptor 1A in the sudden infant death syndrome brainstem medulla and associations with clinical risk factors. Acta Neuropathol 2009;117(3):257-65. doi: 10.1007/s00401-008-0468-x. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
[14]	Duncan, JR, Byard, RW (eds) (2018). SIDS - Sudden infant and early childhood death: The past, the present and the future. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press. DOI: https:/ /doi.org/10.20851/sids License: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.
[15]	Charriaut-Marlangue C, Ben-Ari Y: A cautionary note on the use of the TUNEL stain to determine apoptosis. Neuroreport 1995;7:61-64.
[16]	Sawaguchi T. Comprehensive study on the epidemiological, physiological, and pathological aspects of sudden infant death syndrome. Pathophysiol 2004;10(3-4):147.
[17]	Kinney HC, Richerson GB, Dymecki SM, Darnall RA, Nattie EE. The Brainstem and Serotonin in the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Ann Rev Pathol 2009;4:517-550.doi:10.1146/annurev.pathol.4.110807.092322
[18]	Duncan JR, Paterson DS, Hoffman JM, Mokler DJ, Borenstein NS, Belliveau RA, Krous HF, Haas EA, Stanley C, Nattie EE, Trachtenberg FL, Kinney HC. Brainstem Serotonergic Deficiency in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. JAMA 2010;303(5):430–37. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.45.
[19]	Kinney HC, McHugh T, Miller K, Belliveau RA, Assmann SF. Subtle Developmental Abnormalities in the Inferior Olive: An Indicator of Prenatal Brainstem Injury in the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. J Neuropathol & Exp Neurol 2002;61(5):427-441.
[20]	Sparks DL, Hunsaker JC. Increased ALZ-50-reactive neurons in brains of SIDS infants: An indicator of greater neuronal death? J Child Neurol 1991;6:123-127.
[21]	Randall BB, Paterson DS, Haas EA, Broadbelt KG, Duncan JR, Mena OJ, Krous HF, Trachtenberg FL, Kinney HC. Pediatr 2013;132(6):e1616-e1625. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-0700.
[22]	Ozawa Y, Takashima S. Developmental neurotransmitter pathology in the brainstem of sudden infant death syndrome: a review and sleep position. Forensic Sci Int 2002;130:S53-9. doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00139-1.
[23]	Krous HF, Haas E, Hampton CF, Chadwick AE, Stanley C, Langston C. Pulmonary arterial medial smooth muscle thickness in sudden infant death syndrome: an analysis of subsets of 73 cases. Forens Sci Med Pathol 2009;5(4) 261-268; doi: 10.1007/s12024-009-9116-6.
[24]	Hunt NJ, Waters KA, Rodriguez ML, Machaalani R. Decreased orexin (hypocretin) immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus and pontine nuclei in sudden infant death syndrome. Acta Neuropathol 2015;130(2):185-98. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1437-9. Epub 2015 May 8.
[25]	Huang J, Waters KA, Machaalani R. in the human infant brain and changes in the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Neurobiol Dis 2017;103:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
[26]	Tang S, Machaalani R, Waters KA. Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and TrkB receptor in the sudden infant death syndrome brainstem. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2012;15:180(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
[27]	Garcia AJ, Koschnitzky JE, Ramirez J-M. The physiological determinants of sudden infant death syndrome. Respiratrory Physiology and Neurobiology. 2013;189(2):doi:10.1016/j.resp.2013.05.032.
[28]	Horne RSC Autonomic Cardiorespiratory Physiology and Arousal of the Fetus and Infant. In: Duncan JR, Byard RW, editors. SIDSSuddenInfant and Early Childhood Death: The Past, the Present and the Future. Adelaide (AU): University of Adelaide Press; 2018 May. Chapter 22.
[29]	Fyfe KL, Stephanie R. Yiallourou SR, Wong FY, Rosemary Horne RSC. The development of cardiovascular and cerebral vascular control in preterm infants. Sleep Medicine Reviews 2014;18(4):299-310.
[30]	Shepherd KL, Yiallourou SR, Horne RSC, Wong FY. Prone sleeping position in infancy: Implications for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular function. Sleep Medicine Reviews 2018;39:174-186.
[31]	Bright FM, Vink R, Byard RW. The potential role of substance P in brainstem homeostatic control in the pathogenesis of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Neuropeptides 2018;70.
[32]	Mage DT, Latorre ML, Jenik AG, Donner M. The Role of Respiratory Infection in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Scand J Forensic Sci 2016;22(1);15-20 - doi: 10.1515/sjfs-2016-0004.
[33]	Mage DT, Donner M. A genetic basis for the sudden infant death syndrome sex ratio. Med Hypoth 1997;48(2);137-42.
[34]	Ponsonby A-L, Dwyer T, Gibbons LE, Cochrane JA, Wang Y-G. Factors potentiating the risk of sudden infant death syndrome associated with the prone position. N Engl J Med1993;329:377–82. doi:10.1056/NEJM199308053290601.
[35]	Davis RB, Meeker WK, Bailey WL. Serotonin release by bacterial Endotoxin. Exp Biol Med 1961; 108:774-776.
[36]	Bryant VA, Sebire NJ. Natural Diseases Causing Sudden Death in Infancy and Early Childhood. In Duncan, JR, Byard, RW (eds) (2018). SIDS - Sudden infant and early childhood death: The past, the present and the future. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press. pp 540-588. DOI: https:/ /doi.org/10.20851/sids License: CC-BY-NC-ND.
[37]	Poets CF, Samuels MP, Noyes JP, Hewertson J, Hartmannm H, Holder A, Southall DP. Home event recordings of oxygenation, breathing movements and electrocardiogram in infants and young children with recurrent apparent life-threatening events. J Pediatr 1993;123:693-701.
[38]	Goldwater PN. SIDS, infection, prone sleep position and Vagal neuroimmunology. Front Pediatr 2017 14 November 2017https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2017.00223.
[39]	Kruger MM, Martin LJ, Maistry S, Heathfield LJ. A systematic review exploring the relationship between infection and sudden unexpected death between 2000 and 2016: A forensic perspective. Forensic Science International 2018; 289: 108-119. doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.023.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Paul Nathan Goldwater. (2018). Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal. American Journal of Pediatrics, 4(4), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Paul Nathan Goldwater. Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal. Am. J. Pediatr. 2018, 4(4), 104-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Paul Nathan Goldwater. Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal. Am J Pediatr. 2018;4(4):104-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16,
  author = {Paul Nathan Goldwater},
  title = {Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal},
  journal = {American Journal of Pediatrics},
  volume = {4},
  number = {4},
  pages = {104-109},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajp.20180404.16},
  abstract = {The cardiorespiratory paradigm is used to explain the aetiology of SIDS and has been the focus of intense research for many decades without providing consistent and meaningful data to support such an hypothesis. Despite this, papers citing central nervous system, cardiac and sleep arousal findings continue to be unremittingly published but without addressing SIDS risk and other factors. This paper is a succinct analysis of current cardiorespiratory SIDS research and its relationship (or not) to the established clinicopathological data and epidemiological risk factors. Epidemiological research into the aetiology of SIDS produced a milestone with the discovery of the prone sleep position risk factor which provided support for the cardiorespiratory control hypothesis which in itself defines the approach used by mainstream researchers. Since then mainstream research has stalled. The question is why? This analysis shows that there is very poor correlation between brainstem and other central nervous system pathological findings and other clinicopathological data and SIDS risk factors. A few studies show a link to a small number of risk factors, however, for the majority of papers there remains a glaring absence of data to link central nervous system pathology findings with the key risk factor of prone sleep position which is the central column upon which the cardiorespiratory paradigm stands. Nor do the studies correlate central nervous system findings with recent infection, contaminated sleeping surfaces, maternal/obstetric/higher birth, ethnicity, non-breast-feeding, etc. or with the usual gross pathological findings of SIDS (intrathoracic petechiae, liquid blood, congested fluid-laden lungs). Because of these shortcomings, this paper should provoke questions over current research directions and invites research into other more plausible hypotheses, such as the infection paradigm.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal
AU  - Paul Nathan Goldwater
Y1  - 2018/12/17
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16
T2  - American Journal of Pediatrics
JF  - American Journal of Pediatrics
JO  - American Journal of Pediatrics
SP  - 104
EP  - 109
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-0909
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16
AB  - The cardiorespiratory paradigm is used to explain the aetiology of SIDS and has been the focus of intense research for many decades without providing consistent and meaningful data to support such an hypothesis. Despite this, papers citing central nervous system, cardiac and sleep arousal findings continue to be unremittingly published but without addressing SIDS risk and other factors. This paper is a succinct analysis of current cardiorespiratory SIDS research and its relationship (or not) to the established clinicopathological data and epidemiological risk factors. Epidemiological research into the aetiology of SIDS produced a milestone with the discovery of the prone sleep position risk factor which provided support for the cardiorespiratory control hypothesis which in itself defines the approach used by mainstream researchers. Since then mainstream research has stalled. The question is why? This analysis shows that there is very poor correlation between brainstem and other central nervous system pathological findings and other clinicopathological data and SIDS risk factors. A few studies show a link to a small number of risk factors, however, for the majority of papers there remains a glaring absence of data to link central nervous system pathology findings with the key risk factor of prone sleep position which is the central column upon which the cardiorespiratory paradigm stands. Nor do the studies correlate central nervous system findings with recent infection, contaminated sleeping surfaces, maternal/obstetric/higher birth, ethnicity, non-breast-feeding, etc. or with the usual gross pathological findings of SIDS (intrathoracic petechiae, liquid blood, congested fluid-laden lungs). Because of these shortcomings, this paper should provoke questions over current research directions and invites research into other more plausible hypotheses, such as the infection paradigm.
VL  - 4
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Paul Nathan Goldwater

Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Australia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Paul Nathan Goldwater. (2018). Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal. American Journal of Pediatrics, 4(4), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Paul Nathan Goldwater. Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal. Am. J. Pediatr. 2018, 4(4), 104-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Paul Nathan Goldwater. Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal. Am J Pediatr. 2018;4(4):104-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16,
  author = {Paul Nathan Goldwater},
  title = {Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal},
  journal = {American Journal of Pediatrics},
  volume = {4},
  number = {4},
  pages = {104-109},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajp.20180404.16},
  abstract = {The cardiorespiratory paradigm is used to explain the aetiology of SIDS and has been the focus of intense research for many decades without providing consistent and meaningful data to support such an hypothesis. Despite this, papers citing central nervous system, cardiac and sleep arousal findings continue to be unremittingly published but without addressing SIDS risk and other factors. This paper is a succinct analysis of current cardiorespiratory SIDS research and its relationship (or not) to the established clinicopathological data and epidemiological risk factors. Epidemiological research into the aetiology of SIDS produced a milestone with the discovery of the prone sleep position risk factor which provided support for the cardiorespiratory control hypothesis which in itself defines the approach used by mainstream researchers. Since then mainstream research has stalled. The question is why? This analysis shows that there is very poor correlation between brainstem and other central nervous system pathological findings and other clinicopathological data and SIDS risk factors. A few studies show a link to a small number of risk factors, however, for the majority of papers there remains a glaring absence of data to link central nervous system pathology findings with the key risk factor of prone sleep position which is the central column upon which the cardiorespiratory paradigm stands. Nor do the studies correlate central nervous system findings with recent infection, contaminated sleeping surfaces, maternal/obstetric/higher birth, ethnicity, non-breast-feeding, etc. or with the usual gross pathological findings of SIDS (intrathoracic petechiae, liquid blood, congested fluid-laden lungs). Because of these shortcomings, this paper should provoke questions over current research directions and invites research into other more plausible hypotheses, such as the infection paradigm.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Why Mainstream SIDS Research Is Not Achieving Its Goal
AU  - Paul Nathan Goldwater
Y1  - 2018/12/17
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16
T2  - American Journal of Pediatrics
JF  - American Journal of Pediatrics
JO  - American Journal of Pediatrics
SP  - 104
EP  - 109
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-0909
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20180404.16
AB  - The cardiorespiratory paradigm is used to explain the aetiology of SIDS and has been the focus of intense research for many decades without providing consistent and meaningful data to support such an hypothesis. Despite this, papers citing central nervous system, cardiac and sleep arousal findings continue to be unremittingly published but without addressing SIDS risk and other factors. This paper is a succinct analysis of current cardiorespiratory SIDS research and its relationship (or not) to the established clinicopathological data and epidemiological risk factors. Epidemiological research into the aetiology of SIDS produced a milestone with the discovery of the prone sleep position risk factor which provided support for the cardiorespiratory control hypothesis which in itself defines the approach used by mainstream researchers. Since then mainstream research has stalled. The question is why? This analysis shows that there is very poor correlation between brainstem and other central nervous system pathological findings and other clinicopathological data and SIDS risk factors. A few studies show a link to a small number of risk factors, however, for the majority of papers there remains a glaring absence of data to link central nervous system pathology findings with the key risk factor of prone sleep position which is the central column upon which the cardiorespiratory paradigm stands. Nor do the studies correlate central nervous system findings with recent infection, contaminated sleeping surfaces, maternal/obstetric/higher birth, ethnicity, non-breast-feeding, etc. or with the usual gross pathological findings of SIDS (intrathoracic petechiae, liquid blood, congested fluid-laden lungs). Because of these shortcomings, this paper should provoke questions over current research directions and invites research into other more plausible hypotheses, such as the infection paradigm.
VL  - 4
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download