International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis

| Peer-Reviewed |

Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015

Received: Aug. 22, 2018    Accepted: Sep. 19, 2018    Published: Oct. 08, 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Up to now, in the carbon industry, there is no uniform standard for the detection of chaser. In order to set up this standard the different method from each carbon company should be studied and then find out the commonalities. In the magazine CARBON TECHNIQUES No. 4, 2015, article «Discussion on detecting technology of chaser for graphite electrode machining» Zhang Baoyi of Jilin Carbon Co., Ltd. has made a detailed description of the conventional testing methods for chaser which is used in graphite electrode processing. However, due to the difference between the detection methods and parameters of the chaser in the carbon enterprises, this paper based on Kaifeng carbon company's current test specification and discussed the difference part from the original paper. This paper through analyzed the differences of two method which used in Kaifeng Carbon Co., and in the original paper, combined with the mathematical tools to discuss of the geometric meaning of measuring parameters, finally found that most parameters in both methods are same and the rest have the same geometric meaning, for another word the parameters as the representative item and other parameters can be obtained by calculations. But which are the most representative parameters are considered different from carbon companies in carbon industry.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
Published in International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis ( Volume 4, Issue 3, September 2018 )
Page(s) 108-117
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Chaser, Detection, Universal Tool Maker's Microscope

References
[1] Hu Min, Cheng Fei Yue. Several methods for evaluating straightness error [J]. Modern measurement and laboratory management, 2006, 5: 26-27.
[2] Chen Shanyuan, Shen Biao, Zhu Qiang. The causes of burning, loosening and breaking of graphite electrode-joint connection and their solutions were discussed from the point of view of mechanical processing [J]. Carbon technology, 2002(6):44-46.
[3] Suo Yuanping, Cui Zhenhua. Analysis of the factors influencing the quality of graphite electrode and joint processing [J]. Carbon technology, 2005(2): 43-45.
[4] Cai Anjiang, design of thread chaser, [J]. tool technology, 1998, (32).
[5] Zhu Wangquan. Special comb cutter design [J]. solution, 2010, (8).
[6] Song Bing, Wang Longmei. Parametric Application of Thread Card Processing Procedure [J]. Mechanical Engineer, 2010 (6).
[7] Chen Dehong, Hu Rongsheng, Yin Guomao. Research and application of casing thread comb [J]. Cemented carbide, 1999 (1): 29-33.
[8] Lin Chengsen, numerical method. Beijing: Science Press, 1998. P83, 84.
[9] Hou Xuezhi, digital image cutter measuring machine, 2004. 02. P2, 8, 9.
[10] Tong Fangsen, carbon materials production Q & a [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1991.
[11] Tang Zongjun, foundation of mechanical manufacturing [M]. Beijing: Machinery Industry Press.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Li Mingjie, Hua Mingcun. (2018). Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015. International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis, 4(3), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Li Mingjie; Hua Mingcun. Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015. Int. J. Sci. Qual. Anal. 2018, 4(3), 108-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Li Mingjie, Hua Mingcun. Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015. Int J Sci Qual Anal. 2018;4(3):108-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17,
      author = {Li Mingjie and Hua Mingcun},
      title = {Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015},
      journal = {International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis},
      volume = {4},
      number = {3},
      pages = {108-117},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsqa.20180403.17},
      abstract = {Up to now, in the carbon industry, there is no uniform standard for the detection of chaser. In order to set up this standard the different method from each carbon company should be studied and then find out the commonalities. In the magazine CARBON TECHNIQUES No. 4, 2015, article «Discussion on detecting technology of chaser for graphite electrode machining» Zhang Baoyi of Jilin Carbon Co., Ltd. has made a detailed description of the conventional testing methods for chaser which is used in graphite electrode processing. However, due to the difference between the detection methods and parameters of the chaser in the carbon enterprises, this paper based on Kaifeng carbon company's current test specification and discussed the difference part from the original paper. This paper through analyzed the differences of two method which used in Kaifeng Carbon Co., and in the original paper, combined with the mathematical tools to discuss of the geometric meaning of measuring parameters, finally found that most parameters in both methods are same and the rest have the same geometric meaning, for another word the parameters as the representative item and other parameters can be obtained by calculations. But which are the most representative parameters are considered different from carbon companies in carbon industry.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Discussion About the Article «Discussion on Detecting Technology of Chaser for Graphite Electrode Machining» in Carbon Techniques No. 4, 2015
    AU  - Li Mingjie
    AU  - Hua Mingcun
    Y1  - 2018/10/08
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
    T2  - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis
    JF  - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis
    JO  - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis
    SP  - 108
    EP  - 117
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-8164
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20180403.17
    AB  - Up to now, in the carbon industry, there is no uniform standard for the detection of chaser. In order to set up this standard the different method from each carbon company should be studied and then find out the commonalities. In the magazine CARBON TECHNIQUES No. 4, 2015, article «Discussion on detecting technology of chaser for graphite electrode machining» Zhang Baoyi of Jilin Carbon Co., Ltd. has made a detailed description of the conventional testing methods for chaser which is used in graphite electrode processing. However, due to the difference between the detection methods and parameters of the chaser in the carbon enterprises, this paper based on Kaifeng carbon company's current test specification and discussed the difference part from the original paper. This paper through analyzed the differences of two method which used in Kaifeng Carbon Co., and in the original paper, combined with the mathematical tools to discuss of the geometric meaning of measuring parameters, finally found that most parameters in both methods are same and the rest have the same geometric meaning, for another word the parameters as the representative item and other parameters can be obtained by calculations. But which are the most representative parameters are considered different from carbon companies in carbon industry.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Thermal and Power Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China

  • Department of Thermal and Power Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China

  • Section