Central African Journal of Public Health

| Peer-Reviewed |

An Assessment of Level of Compliance with Smoke-Free Provision of the Tobacco Control Act 2007 in Licensed Liquor Establishments in Nakuru County, Kenya

Received: Sep. 10, 2018    Accepted: Oct. 04, 2018    Published: Oct. 30, 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The study sought to assess the level of compliance with smoke-free environment provisions of the Tobacco Control Act, 2007 in licensed liquor establishments in Nakuru East sub-County. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The target population consisted of 264 licensed liquor establishments in Nakuru East Sub County. Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaire and observational checklist. The independent variables were awareness of Smoke-Free Environment provisions of TCA, 2007, awareness about health impacts of SHS and type of licensed liquor establishment. The dependent variable was the level of compliance with SFE provisions of TCA, 2007. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23. Measures of strength of association between the independent and dependent variables were evaluated using the Pearson’s chi-square test. Ninety-six point three percent of the licensed liquor establishments allowed smoking within their premises. Presence of ‘no smoking' sign displayed in non-designated smoking areas within the premise was found to be in (42.0% (21) restaurants, 50.0% (4) nightclubs and 57.7% (45) bars). Very few licensed liquor establishments were compliant with the SFE provisions of TCA, 2007 that require the signs to be written in both English and Swahili only 9.1% (2) of restaurants complied with no bar or nightclub complying. For the provision that penalty should be indicated in the sign, only a few (2.6% (1) bars, none in nightclubs and restaurants) establishments had met the requirement of the provision. Majority of the licensed liquor establishments had designated smoking area (66% (33) restaurants, 75% (6) nightclubs and 45.1% (42) bars). Fifty-four percent (73) of the owners and/or managers were aware of the provisions of the TCA, 2007. Employees accessed designated smoking area (80% (28) restaurants, 66.7% (4) nightclubs and 100% bars (42) while smoking was ongoing. Challenges to compliance of the TCA, 2007 were found to be the fear of losing clients, use of abusive language in the premises and lack of proper implementation of the policy. Conclusion and recommendations: The level of awareness is high but compliance with TCA, 2007 is low. Based on the findings of the study, recommendations are made that; owners and managers of licensed liquor establishments should attend training organized by the government to improve their understanding of TCA, 2007 and be made aware of the penalty for contravention of the provisions of the act.

DOI 10.11648/j.cajph.20180405.15
Published in Central African Journal of Public Health ( Volume 4, Issue 5, October 2018 )
Page(s) 159-167
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Compliance, Smoke-free Provisions, Tobacco Control Act 2007, Licensed Liquor Establishments

References
[1] World Health Organization. Joint national capacity assessment on the implementation of effective tobacco control policies in Kenya, 2012.
[2] World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic: warnings about the danger of tobacco. Geneva, 2015.
[3] World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic: The MPOWER package, 2010.
[4] Kel W. Nakuru fails to implement smoking by-laws, 2014.
[5] John, Musau Kyanesa, And Richard Bosire. "Compliance With The Tobacco Control Act, 2007 In Kenya: The Role Of The Tobacco Control Board." (2013).
[6] Karimi KJ, Ayah R, Olewe T. Adherence to the Tobacco Control Act, 2007: the presence of a workplace policy on tobacco use in bars and restaurants in Nairobi, Kenya. BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 1;6(9):e012526.
[7] Rufiz H. Turkey impose new buns on consumption of tobacco product, 2014.
[8] Manel N, Maria JP, Carles A, Monica P, Marcela F, Anna S, Gloria M, Esteve S. Impact of the Spanish smoking laws on exposure to second-hand smoke in offices and hospitality venues, 2008.
[9] Lalit J, Prakash C, Mangesh S. smoking bans and indoor air quality in restaurants in Mumbai, India, May- Aug 2011.
[10] Nemakhavhani, T. R., & Akinsola, H. A. (2016). Survey of bar-lounges and restaurants regarding compliance with the current smoke-free regulation in Thulamela Municipality, South Africa. African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 8(2), 1-6.
[11] Rachna D, Chandora. Changes in Georgia Restaurant and Bar Smoking Policies between 2006 and 2012, 2013.
[12] Alaaeddine G, Al Kuhaimi T, Al Assaad R, Dany M, Diab R, Hanna E, Hirmas N, Ismail H, Mohmassani D, Sleiman TR, Nakkash R. Assessing knowledge and attitudes of owners or managers of hospitality venues regarding a policy banning indoor smoking, 2013.
[13] Olanrewaju O, Oluwakemi O, Modupe O, Ouwakemi S. Knowledge and attitude toward smoke-free legislation and second-hand smoking exposure among workers in indoor bars, beer parlors and discotheque in the Osun State of Nigeria, 2015.
[14] Samuel AO, Ebenezer GA, Olalere OG. Awareness and Attitude to the law banning smoking in public places in Osun State, Nigeria, 2014.
[15] Vinay KG, Monika A, Indrani S, Gaurang PN, Bhavesh M, Deepti S, Christopher M, Srinath R. Knowledge and opinion about smoke-free laws and second-hand smoke among hospitality venue managers in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh, India, 2013.
[16] Laura AL, Bryan JW, Michael B, Erin MB. Views about second-hand smoke-free policies among North Carolina restaurant owners before the passage of a law to prohibit smoking, 2010.
[17] Sarah MR, Julianne C, Peter B, Graham C, Deren P, Joaquin B. Secondhand smoke exposure in St. Louis and need for comprehensive smoke-free laws adoption across Missouri, 2012.
[18] Koç E, Aslan D. A Survey on Public Reaction to the Establishment of a Smoke-Free Zone in a Hospital Garden. Turk Toraks Dergisi. 2014 Oct 1;15(4):162.
[19] Olalekan A, Ayo Y, Olubodo O, Israel TA. Exposure to secondhand smoke and voluntary adoption of smoke-free home and cars rules among non-smoking South Africans adults, 2014.
[20] Liu, R., Hammond, S. K., Hyland, A., Travers, M. J., Yang, Y., Nan, Y., ... & Jiang, Y. (2011). Restaurant and bar owners’ exposure to secondhand smoke and attitudes regarding smoking bans in five Chinese cities. International journal of environmental research and public health, 8(5), 1520-1533.
[21] Drope J. Tobacco Control in Africa. People, politics, policies (1st edition). Anthem Press: London and New York, 2011.
[22] Baleta A. Africa's struggle to be smoke-free. The Lancet, 2010.
[23] Global Voices report. Rebutting the tobacco industry, winning smokefree air, Global Smokefree Partnership, 2009.
[24] Movsisyan NK, Thompson ME, Petrosyan V. Attitudes, practices and beliefs towards worksite smoking among administrators of private and public enterprises in Armenia. Tobacco control. 2010 Jan 1:tc-2009.
[25] Satterlund TD, Cassady D, Treiber J, Lemp C. Barriers to adopting and implementing local-level tobacco control policies. Journal of community health. 2011 Aug 1;36(4):616-23.
[26] Owusu-Dabo E. Status of implementation of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in Ghana: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 2010.
[27] Action on Smoking and Health. 2011a. Tobacco Policy and the European action on smoking (action on smoking and health 2012) Union. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ash.org.uk. [Accessed 28 Aug 2012].
[28] Action on Smoking and Health. 2011b. Tobacco regulation. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ash.org.uk. [Accessed 28 Aug 2012].
[29] Asare BE. Tobacco regulation in South Africa: African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 2009.
[30] Chang SH, Delgermaa V, Mungun K, Erdenekhuu N, Odkhuu E, Haung SL: support for smoke free policy among restaurant owners and managers in Ulaaanbaatar, Mongolia, 2009.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Josephine Githaiga, Mutuku A. Mwanthi, Tom Olewe. (2018). An Assessment of Level of Compliance with Smoke-Free Provision of the Tobacco Control Act 2007 in Licensed Liquor Establishments in Nakuru County, Kenya. Central African Journal of Public Health, 4(5), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cajph.20180405.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Josephine Githaiga; Mutuku A. Mwanthi; Tom Olewe. An Assessment of Level of Compliance with Smoke-Free Provision of the Tobacco Control Act 2007 in Licensed Liquor Establishments in Nakuru County, Kenya. Cent. Afr. J. Public Health 2018, 4(5), 159-167. doi: 10.11648/j.cajph.20180405.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Josephine Githaiga, Mutuku A. Mwanthi, Tom Olewe. An Assessment of Level of Compliance with Smoke-Free Provision of the Tobacco Control Act 2007 in Licensed Liquor Establishments in Nakuru County, Kenya. Cent Afr J Public Health. 2018;4(5):159-167. doi: 10.11648/j.cajph.20180405.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.cajph.20180405.15,
      author = {Josephine Githaiga and Mutuku A. Mwanthi and Tom Olewe},
      title = {An Assessment of Level of Compliance with Smoke-Free Provision of the Tobacco Control Act 2007 in Licensed Liquor Establishments in Nakuru County, Kenya},
      journal = {Central African Journal of Public Health},
      volume = {4},
      number = {5},
      pages = {159-167},
      doi = {10.11648/j.cajph.20180405.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cajph.20180405.15},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cajph.20180405.15},
      abstract = {The study sought to assess the level of compliance with smoke-free environment provisions of the Tobacco Control Act, 2007 in licensed liquor establishments in Nakuru East sub-County. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The target population consisted of 264 licensed liquor establishments in Nakuru East Sub County. Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaire and observational checklist. The independent variables were awareness of Smoke-Free Environment provisions of TCA, 2007, awareness about health impacts of SHS and type of licensed liquor establishment. The dependent variable was the level of compliance with SFE provisions of TCA, 2007. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23. Measures of strength of association between the independent and dependent variables were evaluated using the Pearson’s chi-square test. Ninety-six point three percent of the licensed liquor establishments allowed smoking within their premises. Presence of ‘no smoking' sign displayed in non-designated smoking areas within the premise was found to be in (42.0% (21) restaurants, 50.0% (4) nightclubs and 57.7% (45) bars). Very few licensed liquor establishments were compliant with the SFE provisions of TCA, 2007 that require the signs to be written in both English and Swahili only 9.1% (2) of restaurants complied with no bar or nightclub complying. For the provision that penalty should be indicated in the sign, only a few (2.6% (1) bars, none in nightclubs and restaurants) establishments had met the requirement of the provision. Majority of the licensed liquor establishments had designated smoking area (66% (33) restaurants, 75% (6) nightclubs and 45.1% (42) bars). Fifty-four percent (73) of the owners and/or managers were aware of the provisions of the TCA, 2007. Employees accessed designated smoking area (80% (28) restaurants, 66.7% (4) nightclubs and 100% bars (42) while smoking was ongoing. Challenges to compliance of the TCA, 2007 were found to be the fear of losing clients, use of abusive language in the premises and lack of proper implementation of the policy. Conclusion and recommendations: The level of awareness is high but compliance with TCA, 2007 is low. Based on the findings of the study, recommendations are made that; owners and managers of licensed liquor establishments should attend training organized by the government to improve their understanding of TCA, 2007 and be made aware of the penalty for contravention of the provisions of the act.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - An Assessment of Level of Compliance with Smoke-Free Provision of the Tobacco Control Act 2007 in Licensed Liquor Establishments in Nakuru County, Kenya
    AU  - Josephine Githaiga
    AU  - Mutuku A. Mwanthi
    AU  - Tom Olewe
    Y1  - 2018/10/30
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cajph.20180405.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.cajph.20180405.15
    T2  - Central African Journal of Public Health
    JF  - Central African Journal of Public Health
    JO  - Central African Journal of Public Health
    SP  - 159
    EP  - 167
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-5781
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cajph.20180405.15
    AB  - The study sought to assess the level of compliance with smoke-free environment provisions of the Tobacco Control Act, 2007 in licensed liquor establishments in Nakuru East sub-County. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The target population consisted of 264 licensed liquor establishments in Nakuru East Sub County. Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaire and observational checklist. The independent variables were awareness of Smoke-Free Environment provisions of TCA, 2007, awareness about health impacts of SHS and type of licensed liquor establishment. The dependent variable was the level of compliance with SFE provisions of TCA, 2007. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23. Measures of strength of association between the independent and dependent variables were evaluated using the Pearson’s chi-square test. Ninety-six point three percent of the licensed liquor establishments allowed smoking within their premises. Presence of ‘no smoking' sign displayed in non-designated smoking areas within the premise was found to be in (42.0% (21) restaurants, 50.0% (4) nightclubs and 57.7% (45) bars). Very few licensed liquor establishments were compliant with the SFE provisions of TCA, 2007 that require the signs to be written in both English and Swahili only 9.1% (2) of restaurants complied with no bar or nightclub complying. For the provision that penalty should be indicated in the sign, only a few (2.6% (1) bars, none in nightclubs and restaurants) establishments had met the requirement of the provision. Majority of the licensed liquor establishments had designated smoking area (66% (33) restaurants, 75% (6) nightclubs and 45.1% (42) bars). Fifty-four percent (73) of the owners and/or managers were aware of the provisions of the TCA, 2007. Employees accessed designated smoking area (80% (28) restaurants, 66.7% (4) nightclubs and 100% bars (42) while smoking was ongoing. Challenges to compliance of the TCA, 2007 were found to be the fear of losing clients, use of abusive language in the premises and lack of proper implementation of the policy. Conclusion and recommendations: The level of awareness is high but compliance with TCA, 2007 is low. Based on the findings of the study, recommendations are made that; owners and managers of licensed liquor establishments should attend training organized by the government to improve their understanding of TCA, 2007 and be made aware of the penalty for contravention of the provisions of the act.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Public Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Department of Public Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Department of Public Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Section