On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice

Li Yong; Zhang Yi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11

| Peer-Reviewed

On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice

Li Yong, Zhang Yi

Published in Advances in Sciences and Humanities (Volume 5, Issue 2)

Received: 6 December 2018 Accepted: 10 January 2019 Published: 12 April 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

It is supposed that to be just in society is the intrinsic pursuit of Marxist theory in Marx’s original text. While as the result of historical context, according to Marx, the just society can be realized in a far future. Cohen holds materialism standpoint to illustrate historical materialism creatively by functional explanation in the modern history context. In a new time with much more advanced science and technology, he is keeping going with the route of Marxism for overcoming the technique alienation and argues that in order to realize freedom, equality and justice, appealing to empirical critique of technology and exploration of social theory is essential. The demonstration of that freedom, equality and justice are compatible, which is a cornerstone of practical just social theory. As Cohen is in the analytical tradition, his creative functional explanation presents obvious empiricism and analytical character. He digs out the key of resolving problem of development in moral dimension apart from the materialism, and conducts the argument to attack the political designs, which separates free distribution in market, quality in society, and just spirit from each other. This essay is intended to figure out Cohen’s argument that is based on the traditional Marxism and stand, while points out a new way to help people reach the just society at the much more near future.

Published in	Advances in Sciences and Humanities (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11
Page(s)	43-48
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Justice, Functional Explanation, Critique

References

[1]	Cohen, G., 1994. Back to Socialist Basics. New Left Review, 0(207), pp. 3-16.
[2]	Cohen, G., 2011. Why not Socialism?. Beijing: Renmin press.
[3]	Cohen, G. A., 1966. Beliefs and Roles. London, Oxford University Press.
[4]	G. A. Cohen, 1989. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics, 99(4), pp. 906-944.
[5]	G. A. Cohen, 1995. The Pareto Argument for Inequality. Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation, 12(1), pp. 160-185.
[6]	G. A. Cohen, 1997. Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(1), pp. 3-30.
[7]	G. A. Cohen, 2000. If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're so Rich?. The Journal of Ethics, 4(1/2), pp. 1-26.
[8]	G. A. Cohen, 2003. Facts and Principles. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(3), pp. 211-245.
[9]	G. A. Cohen, 2006. Review: Luck and Equality: A Reply to Hurley. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72(2), pp. 439-446.
[10]	G. A. Cohen, 2008. Self-ownership, Freedom and Equality. Beijing: Oriental press.
[11]	Gerald A. Cohen and H. B. Acton, 1970. Symposium: On Some Criticism of Historical Materialism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 44, pp. 121-156.
[12]	Hume, D., 2009. A Treatise of Human Nature. Beijing: the commercial press.
[13]	Qiao Ruijin, et al., 2013. The British Neo-Marxism. Beijing: Renmin press.
[14]	Wei, C., 2008. On Cohen's ' primary life problem'. Lanzhou Academic Journal, 4(175).
[15]	Zhongqiao, D., 2013. A Criticism of Libertarianism from the Socialist Perspective: G. A. Cohen's Rebute of Robert
[16]	Nozick's ' self-ownership' proposition. Social Sciences in China, Issue 11.
[17]	Zhongqiao, D., 2013. G. A. Cohen's Reconsideration of Historical Materialism. Philosophical Researches, Issue 2, pp. 21-28.
[18]	Zhongqiao, D., 2013. G. A. Cohen's defense of Three Basic Problems in Historical Materialism. Hebei Academic Journal, 33(2), pp. 29-34.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Li Yong, Zhang Yi. (2019). On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Li Yong; Zhang Yi. On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice. Adv. Sci. Humanit. 2019, 5(2), 43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Li Yong, Zhang Yi. On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice. Adv Sci Humanit. 2019;5(2):43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11,
  author = {Li Yong and Zhang Yi},
  title = {On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice},
  journal = {Advances in Sciences and Humanities},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {43-48},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ash.20190502.11},
  abstract = {It is supposed that to be just in society is the intrinsic pursuit of Marxist theory in Marx’s original text. While as the result of historical context, according to Marx, the just society can be realized in a far future. Cohen holds materialism standpoint to illustrate historical materialism creatively by functional explanation in the modern history context. In a new time with much more advanced science and technology, he is keeping going with the route of Marxism for overcoming the technique alienation and argues that in order to realize freedom, equality and justice, appealing to empirical critique of technology and exploration of social theory is essential. The demonstration of that freedom, equality and justice are compatible, which is a cornerstone of practical just social theory. As Cohen is in the analytical tradition, his creative functional explanation presents obvious empiricism and analytical character. He digs out the key of resolving problem of development in moral dimension apart from the materialism, and conducts the argument to attack the political designs, which separates free distribution in market, quality in society, and just spirit from each other. This essay is intended to figure out Cohen’s argument that is based on the traditional Marxism and stand, while points out a new way to help people reach the just society at the much more near future.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice
AU  - Li Yong
AU  - Zhang Yi
Y1  - 2019/04/12
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11
T2  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JF  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JO  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
SP  - 43
EP  - 48
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-0984
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11
AB  - It is supposed that to be just in society is the intrinsic pursuit of Marxist theory in Marx’s original text. While as the result of historical context, according to Marx, the just society can be realized in a far future. Cohen holds materialism standpoint to illustrate historical materialism creatively by functional explanation in the modern history context. In a new time with much more advanced science and technology, he is keeping going with the route of Marxism for overcoming the technique alienation and argues that in order to realize freedom, equality and justice, appealing to empirical critique of technology and exploration of social theory is essential. The demonstration of that freedom, equality and justice are compatible, which is a cornerstone of practical just social theory. As Cohen is in the analytical tradition, his creative functional explanation presents obvious empiricism and analytical character. He digs out the key of resolving problem of development in moral dimension apart from the materialism, and conducts the argument to attack the political designs, which separates free distribution in market, quality in society, and just spirit from each other. This essay is intended to figure out Cohen’s argument that is based on the traditional Marxism and stand, while points out a new way to help people reach the just society at the much more near future.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Li Yong

Marxist Philosophy Institute, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China
Zhang Yi

Philosophy, School of Humanities, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Li Yong, Zhang Yi. (2019). On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Li Yong; Zhang Yi. On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice. Adv. Sci. Humanit. 2019, 5(2), 43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Li Yong, Zhang Yi. On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice. Adv Sci Humanit. 2019;5(2):43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11,
  author = {Li Yong and Zhang Yi},
  title = {On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice},
  journal = {Advances in Sciences and Humanities},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {43-48},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ash.20190502.11},
  abstract = {It is supposed that to be just in society is the intrinsic pursuit of Marxist theory in Marx’s original text. While as the result of historical context, according to Marx, the just society can be realized in a far future. Cohen holds materialism standpoint to illustrate historical materialism creatively by functional explanation in the modern history context. In a new time with much more advanced science and technology, he is keeping going with the route of Marxism for overcoming the technique alienation and argues that in order to realize freedom, equality and justice, appealing to empirical critique of technology and exploration of social theory is essential. The demonstration of that freedom, equality and justice are compatible, which is a cornerstone of practical just social theory. As Cohen is in the analytical tradition, his creative functional explanation presents obvious empiricism and analytical character. He digs out the key of resolving problem of development in moral dimension apart from the materialism, and conducts the argument to attack the political designs, which separates free distribution in market, quality in society, and just spirit from each other. This essay is intended to figure out Cohen’s argument that is based on the traditional Marxism and stand, while points out a new way to help people reach the just society at the much more near future.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - On Cohen’s Critique of Technology and Social Justice
AU  - Li Yong
AU  - Zhang Yi
Y1  - 2019/04/12
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11
T2  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JF  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JO  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
SP  - 43
EP  - 48
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-0984
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20190502.11
AB  - It is supposed that to be just in society is the intrinsic pursuit of Marxist theory in Marx’s original text. While as the result of historical context, according to Marx, the just society can be realized in a far future. Cohen holds materialism standpoint to illustrate historical materialism creatively by functional explanation in the modern history context. In a new time with much more advanced science and technology, he is keeping going with the route of Marxism for overcoming the technique alienation and argues that in order to realize freedom, equality and justice, appealing to empirical critique of technology and exploration of social theory is essential. The demonstration of that freedom, equality and justice are compatible, which is a cornerstone of practical just social theory. As Cohen is in the analytical tradition, his creative functional explanation presents obvious empiricism and analytical character. He digs out the key of resolving problem of development in moral dimension apart from the materialism, and conducts the argument to attack the political designs, which separates free distribution in market, quality in society, and just spirit from each other. This essay is intended to figure out Cohen’s argument that is based on the traditional Marxism and stand, while points out a new way to help people reach the just society at the much more near future.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download