Journal of Surgery

| Peer-Reviewed |

Quantitative Assessment of Prognosticators for Rectal Cancer’s Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases

Received: 30 October 2018    Accepted: 12 November 2018    Published: 19 December 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Rectal cancer treatment outcome has improved considerably in the TME era often with the use neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, the risk of local recurrence/distant metastases could be as high as 10%. We have designed a retrospective cohort study to assess risk factors associated with local recurrence/distant metastasis after primary curative rectal resection. Our analysis of the colorectal database in a district general hospital involved review of 131 patients who had a curative resection between 2007 and 2013. 22 patients of the 131 had local recurrence/distant metastases. We reviewed the risk factors as gender, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, type of operation, anastomotic leak, tumour differentiation, EMVI, CRM and Dukes C and performed a quantitative assessment. Looking at risk factors, the presence of EMVI was found to have a statistically significant association with recurrence and distant metastases (p=0.0006) followed by poor differentiation (p= 0.038) and Dukes C (p=0.045) while CRM involvement (p=0.054), Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p=0.657), type of resection (p=0.740), Anastomotic leak (p=0.761) and gender (p=0.901) shown no obvious statistical association with recurrence or distant metastases A larger multi-centre study may help in validating our observation.

DOI 10.11648/j.js.20180606.15
Published in Journal of Surgery (Volume 6, Issue 6, December 2018)
Page(s) 167-172
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Distant Metastases, Local Recurrence, Rectal Cancer, Risk Factors

References
[1] Cancer registration statistics, England: 2016, Office of National Statistics.
[2] Cancer in Wales, Welsh Cancer Intelligence & Surveillance Unit, Public Health Wales NHS Trust February 2017.
[3] Scottish Cancer Registry.
[4] American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2018. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society, 2018.
[5] Macfarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The Lancet, Feb 1993, 341: 457-460.
[6] Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, Macfarlane JK. Rectal Cancer: The Basingstoke Experience of Total Mesorectal Excision, 1978-97. ARCH Surg 1998, 133: 894-899.
[7] Chau I, Brown G, Cunningham D, Tait W, Wotherspoon A, Norman Ar et al. Neoadjuvant Capecitabine and Oxilaplatin Followed by Synchronous Chemoradiation and Total Mesorectal Excision in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Defined Poor-Risk Rectal Cancer. J Clinical Oncology 2006, 24(4): 668-674.
[8] Van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Meershoek-klein Kranenbarg E, Putter H, Wiggers T et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised control TME trial. Lancet Oncol 2011, 12: 575-582.
[9] Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and Survival after Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer. The Lancet 1986, 1479-1482.
[10] Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery- the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br. J. Surg 1982, 69: 613-616.
[11] Siddiqui MRS, Simillis C, Hunter C, Chand M, Bhoday J, Garant A, Vuong T, Artho G, Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Abulafi AM, Brown G. A meta-analysis comparing the risk of metastases in patients with rectal cancer and MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) vs mrEMVI-negative cases, Br J Cancer. 2017 Jun 6, 116(12): 1513-1519. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.99. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
[12] Chand M, Swift RI, Tekkis PP, Chau I, Brown G. Extramural venous invasion is a potential imaging predictive biomarker of neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 2014, 110(1): 19-25. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.603.
[13] Chand M, Rasheed S, Heald R, Swift I, West N, Rao S, Tekkis P, Brown G. Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve disease-free survival in patients with mrEMVI-positive rectal cancer following chemoradiation, Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jun, 19(6): 537-543. doi: 10.1111/codi.13535.
[14] Rory F. Kokelaar, Huw G. Jones, Jeremy Williamson, Namor Williams, A. Paul Griffiths, John Beynon, Gareth J. Jenkins & Dean A. Harris (2018) DNA hypermethylation as a predictor of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) in rectal cancer, Cancer Biology & Therapy, 19:3, 214.
[15] Dresen RC, Peters EE, Rutten HJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Demeyere TA, Van Den Brule AJ et al. Local Recurrence in Rectal Cancer can be Predicted by Histopathological Factors. EJSO 2009, 35: 1071-1077.
[16] Das P, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-bigas MA, Feig BW, Chang GJ, Hoff PM et al. Clinical and pathologic predictors of locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in patients treated with chemoradiation and mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2006, 29(3): 219-224.
[17] Pilipshen SJ, Heilwell M, Quan SH, Sternberg SS, Enker WE. Patterns of Pelvic Recurrence Following Definitive Resections for Rectal Cancer. Cancer 1984, 53: 1354-1362.
[18] Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the Role for Circumferential Margin in the Modern Treatment of Rectal Cancer? J Clin Oncology 2008, 26(2): 303-312.
[19] Nagtegaal ID, Van De Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, Van Krieken Jh, Quirke P. Low Rectal Cancer: A Call for Change of Approach in Abdominoperineal Resection. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23(36): 9257-64.
[20] Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D et al. Role of Circumferential Margin Involvement in the Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994, 344: 707-711.
[21] Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005, 365: 1718–1726.
[22] Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 3061–3068.
[23] Iris D. Nagtegaal, Cornelius J. H. van de Velde, Corrie A. M. Marijnen, Jan H. J. M. van Krieken, Philip Quirke. Low Rectal Cancer: A Call for a Change of Approach in Abdominoperineal Resection. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23, no. 36 (December 20, 2005) 9257-9264.
[24] Wilkins S1, Haydon A, Porter I, Oliva K, Staples M, Carne P, McMurrick P, Bell S. Complete Pathological Response After Neoadjuvant Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer and Its Relationship to the Degree of T3 Mesorectal Invasion. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 May, 59(5): 361-8.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Haytham Abudeeb, Ajogwu Ugwu, Lucy Campbell, Arijit Mukherjee. (2018). Quantitative Assessment of Prognosticators for Rectal Cancer’s Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases. Journal of Surgery, 6(6), 167-172. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20180606.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Haytham Abudeeb; Ajogwu Ugwu; Lucy Campbell; Arijit Mukherjee. Quantitative Assessment of Prognosticators for Rectal Cancer’s Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases. J. Surg. 2018, 6(6), 167-172. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20180606.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Haytham Abudeeb, Ajogwu Ugwu, Lucy Campbell, Arijit Mukherjee. Quantitative Assessment of Prognosticators for Rectal Cancer’s Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases. J Surg. 2018;6(6):167-172. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20180606.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.js.20180606.15,
      author = {Haytham Abudeeb and Ajogwu Ugwu and Lucy Campbell and Arijit Mukherjee},
      title = {Quantitative Assessment of Prognosticators for Rectal Cancer’s Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases},
      journal = {Journal of Surgery},
      volume = {6},
      number = {6},
      pages = {167-172},
      doi = {10.11648/j.js.20180606.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20180606.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.js.20180606.15},
      abstract = {Rectal cancer treatment outcome has improved considerably in the TME era often with the use neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, the risk of local recurrence/distant metastases could be as high as 10%. We have designed a retrospective cohort study to assess risk factors associated with local recurrence/distant metastasis after primary curative rectal resection. Our analysis of the colorectal database in a district general hospital involved review of 131 patients who had a curative resection between 2007 and 2013. 22 patients of the 131 had local recurrence/distant metastases. We reviewed the risk factors as gender, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, type of operation, anastomotic leak, tumour differentiation, EMVI, CRM and Dukes C and performed a quantitative assessment. Looking at risk factors, the presence of EMVI was found to have a statistically significant association with recurrence and distant metastases (p=0.0006) followed by poor differentiation (p= 0.038) and Dukes C (p=0.045) while CRM involvement (p=0.054), Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p=0.657), type of resection (p=0.740), Anastomotic leak (p=0.761) and gender (p=0.901) shown no obvious statistical association with recurrence or distant metastases A larger multi-centre study may help in validating our observation.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Quantitative Assessment of Prognosticators for Rectal Cancer’s Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases
    AU  - Haytham Abudeeb
    AU  - Ajogwu Ugwu
    AU  - Lucy Campbell
    AU  - Arijit Mukherjee
    Y1  - 2018/12/19
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20180606.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.js.20180606.15
    T2  - Journal of Surgery
    JF  - Journal of Surgery
    JO  - Journal of Surgery
    SP  - 167
    EP  - 172
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0930
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20180606.15
    AB  - Rectal cancer treatment outcome has improved considerably in the TME era often with the use neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, the risk of local recurrence/distant metastases could be as high as 10%. We have designed a retrospective cohort study to assess risk factors associated with local recurrence/distant metastasis after primary curative rectal resection. Our analysis of the colorectal database in a district general hospital involved review of 131 patients who had a curative resection between 2007 and 2013. 22 patients of the 131 had local recurrence/distant metastases. We reviewed the risk factors as gender, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, type of operation, anastomotic leak, tumour differentiation, EMVI, CRM and Dukes C and performed a quantitative assessment. Looking at risk factors, the presence of EMVI was found to have a statistically significant association with recurrence and distant metastases (p=0.0006) followed by poor differentiation (p= 0.038) and Dukes C (p=0.045) while CRM involvement (p=0.054), Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p=0.657), type of resection (p=0.740), Anastomotic leak (p=0.761) and gender (p=0.901) shown no obvious statistical association with recurrence or distant metastases A larger multi-centre study may help in validating our observation.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Surgery, Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride, UK; Department of Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK

  • Department of Surgery, Monklands Hospital, Monkland, UK

  • Department of Surgery, Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride, UK

  • Department of Surgery, Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride, UK

  • Sections