| Peer-Reviewed

On the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory of Relativity

Received: 22 February 2017    Accepted: 14 April 2017    Published: 13 June 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity requires systems of clock-synchronised stationary observers and the Lorentz Transformation. Without both, the Theory of Relativity fails. A system of clock-synchronised stationary observers is proven inconsistent with the Lorentz Transformation, because it is Galilean. The Special Theory of Relativity insists that Galilean systems must transform not by the Galilean Transformation, but by the non-Galilean Lorentz Transformation. The Theory of Relativity is therefore invalid due to an intrinsic logical contradiction.

Published in American Journal of Modern Physics (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajmp.20170603.12
Page(s) 43-48
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Special Relativity, Simultaneity, Stationary Observers, Clock-Synchronised Observers, Lorentz Transformation, Time

References
[1] W. Engelhardt, Physics Essays, 29, 4, 2016
[2] S. J. Crothers, Einstein’s Anomalous Clock Synchronisation, http://vixra.org/pdf/1702.0214v1.pdf
[3] A. Einstein, On the electrodynamics of moving bodies, Ann. Phys, 17, 1905
[4] D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, 4th Ed., PearsonEducation Inc., 2013
[5] A. Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity, Princeton University Press, 1988
[6] A. Einstein, Relativity the Special and the General Theory, Methuen, London, 1954
[7] E. F. Taylor, J. A. Wheeler, Spacetime Physics, 2nd ed., W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1992
[8] R. d’Inverno, Introducing Einstein’s Relativity, Oxford University Press, 1992
[9] B. W. Carroll, D. A. Ostlie, Modern Astrophysics, Addison Wesley Longman, 1996
[10] R. A. Mould, Basic Relativity, Springer, 1994
[11] R. C. Tolman, Relativity Thermodynamics and Cosmology, Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1987
[12] S. H. Radin, R. T. Folk, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Prentice Hall Inc., 1982
[13] D. McMahon, Relativity Demystified, McGraw-Hill, 2006
[14] B. Schutz, A First Course in General Relativity, Cambridge University Press, 2009
[15] A. Shadowitz, Special Relativity, Dover Publications Inc., 1988
[16] W. Rindler, Introduction to Special Relativity, Clarendon Press, 1982
[17] W. Pauli, The Theory of Relativity, Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1981
[18] R. E. Turner, Relativity Physics, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Stephen John Crothers. (2017). On the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory of Relativity. American Journal of Modern Physics, 6(3), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20170603.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Stephen John Crothers. On the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory of Relativity. Am. J. Mod. Phys. 2017, 6(3), 43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20170603.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Stephen John Crothers. On the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory of Relativity. Am J Mod Phys. 2017;6(3):43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20170603.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajmp.20170603.12,
      author = {Stephen John Crothers},
      title = {On the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory of Relativity},
      journal = {American Journal of Modern Physics},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {43-48},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajmp.20170603.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20170603.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmp.20170603.12},
      abstract = {Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity requires systems of clock-synchronised stationary observers and the Lorentz Transformation. Without both, the Theory of Relativity fails. A system of clock-synchronised stationary observers is proven inconsistent with the Lorentz Transformation, because it is Galilean. The Special Theory of Relativity insists that Galilean systems must transform not by the Galilean Transformation, but by the non-Galilean Lorentz Transformation. The Theory of Relativity is therefore invalid due to an intrinsic logical contradiction.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - On the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory of Relativity
    AU  - Stephen John Crothers
    Y1  - 2017/06/13
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20170603.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajmp.20170603.12
    T2  - American Journal of Modern Physics
    JF  - American Journal of Modern Physics
    JO  - American Journal of Modern Physics
    SP  - 43
    EP  - 48
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-8891
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20170603.12
    AB  - Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity requires systems of clock-synchronised stationary observers and the Lorentz Transformation. Without both, the Theory of Relativity fails. A system of clock-synchronised stationary observers is proven inconsistent with the Lorentz Transformation, because it is Galilean. The Special Theory of Relativity insists that Galilean systems must transform not by the Galilean Transformation, but by the non-Galilean Lorentz Transformation. The Theory of Relativity is therefore invalid due to an intrinsic logical contradiction.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Theoretical Physics Unit, Institute for Basic Research, Palm Harbor, USA

  • Sections