Psychology and Behavioral Sciences

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Research Article |

When Perceived Official Terror Drives People out of Politics: A Systemic Analysis of Political Alienation in the Context of Authoritarian Democracy

The paradox of political alienation as a social and scientific phenomenon is that, if on the social level it has remained a topical subject, perceptible through many citizens’ non-participation in formalized political activities, on the scientific level, on the other hand, it has experienced a long period of hibernation over several decades. Despite the recent revival of academic interest in this construct, methodological and theoretical gaps are perceptible. These relate respectively to the absence of a standardized instrument allowing it to be evaluated and to the fact that the data available until then, and which underlie the theoretical propositions on this construct, have been exclusively collected in democratic contexts, excluding authoritarian contexts, within which citizens’ disaffection for political activities is nevertheless a remarkable fact. This research aims to fill these gaps, through two studies carried out in Cameroon; an authoritarian democracy where institutional authoritarianism generates, among populations, a model of behavior consistent with the manifestations of political alienation. Study 1 (N= 1184) proposes a psychometric measure to assess individuals’ tendencies towards political alienation. The data collected provide satisfactory empirical evidence of its factorial and confirmatory structure, internal consistency, as well as convergent and discriminant validity. Study 2 (N= 513) focuses on the link between perceived official terror and political alienation. It provides support for the hypothesis that perceived official terror generates political alienation in the context of authoritarian democracy. The theoretical and empirical implications of political alienation in the context of authoritarian democracy are discussed.

Political Alienation, Political Inefficacy, Political Distrust, Authoritarian Democracy, Perceived Official Terror, Cameroon

APA Style

Mouafo, A. V. D., Nemboué, W. T., Messanga, G. A. (2023). When Perceived Official Terror Drives People out of Politics: A Systemic Analysis of Political Alienation in the Context of Authoritarian Democracy. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 12(6), 88-98.

ACS Style

Mouafo, A. V. D.; Nemboué, W. T.; Messanga, G. A. When Perceived Official Terror Drives People out of Politics: A Systemic Analysis of Political Alienation in the Context of Authoritarian Democracy. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2023, 12(6), 88-98. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20231206.11

AMA Style

Mouafo AVD, Nemboué WT, Messanga GA. When Perceived Official Terror Drives People out of Politics: A Systemic Analysis of Political Alienation in the Context of Authoritarian Democracy. Psychol Behav Sci. 2023;12(6):88-98. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20231206.11

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Amnesty International. (2019). Cameroun. Il faut libérer les manifestants pacifiques pris pour cibles dans le cadre d’une violente répression [Cameroon. We must release the peaceful demonstrators targeted in violent repression].
2. Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77-85.
3. Braud, P. (2008). Le jardin des délices démocratiques [The Garden of democratic delights]. Revue des Sciences Sociales du Politique, 17, 163-175.
4. Catterberg, G., & Moreno, A. (2006). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 31-48.
5. Citrin, J. (1977). Political alienation as a social indicator: Attitudes and action. Social Indicators Research, 4, 381-419.
6. Citrin, J., McClosky, H., Shanks, M., & Sniderman, P. (1975). “Personal and Political Sources of Political Alienation.” British Journal of Political Science, 5(1), 1-31.
7. Cohen, C. J. (2010). Democracy Remixed. Oxford University Press.
8. Dahl, V., Amna, E., Banaji, S., Landberg, M., Serek, J., & Ribeiro, N., Beilmann, M., Pavlopoulos, V., & Zani, B. (2018). Apathy or alienation? Political passivity among youths accross eight European Union countries. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(3), 284-301.
9. Dalton, R. J. (2007). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The Erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press.
10. Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and the democratic peace. Cambridge University Press.
11. Davenport, C., Daryakenari, B. R., & Wood, R. M. (2021). Tenure through tyranny? Repression, dissent, and leader removal in Africa and Latin America, 1990-2006. Journal of Global Security Studies, 7(1).
12. De Vreese, C. H. (2005). The spiral of cynicism reconsidered. European Journal of Communication, 20(3), 283-301.
13. Dermody, J., Hanmer-Lloyd, S., & Scullion, R. (2010). Young people and voting behaviour: Alienated youth and (or) an interested and critical citizenry? European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 421-435. https://doi:10.1108/03090561011020507
14. Economist Intelligence Unit. (2022). Democracy Index 2021: The China challenge.
15. Finifter, A. W. (1970). Dimensions of Political Alienation. The American Political Science Review, 64(2), 389-410.
16. Fox, S. (2015). Apathy, alienation and young people: The political engagement of British Millennials. Retrieved February 10, 2021, from http://eprints.nottingham.,%20Alienation%2 and%20Young%20People%20The%20Political%20Engagement%20of%20British%20 Millennials.pdf
17. Fox, S. (2021). Political alienation and referendums: How political alienation was related to support for Brexit. British Politics, 16, 16-35.
18. Geschwender, J. A., Rinehart, J. W., & George, P. M. (1974). Socialization, alienation, and student activism. Youth & Society, 5(3), 303-325.
19. Gniewosz, B., Noack, P., & Buhl, M. (2009). Political alienation in adolescence: Associations with parental role models, parenting styles, and classroom climate. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(4), 337-346.
20. Guèye, B. (2009). La démocratie en Afrique: Succès et résistances [Democracy in Africa: Success and resistance]. Pouvoirs, 129, 5-26.
21. Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29.
22. Herring, C. (1989). Splitting the middle. Praeger Publishers.
23. Hooghe, M., Sofe M., & Teun P. (2011). Where do distrusting voters turn if there is no viable exit or voice option? The Impact of political trust on electoral behaviour in the Belgian regional elections of June 2009. Government and Opposition, 46 (2), 245-273.
24. Howard, M. C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51-62.
25. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
26. International Crisis Group. (2018). Élection présidentielle au Cameroun: Les fractures se multiplient [Presidential election in Cameroon: fractures are increasing].
27. Jaume, L. (2021). L’idée de démocratie autoritaire: Quelques réflexions [The idea of authoritarian democracy: Some reflections]. Jus politicum. Revue de droit politique, 25, 9-15.
28. Jost, J. T. (2019). A Quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, critiques, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 263-314.
29. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401-415.
30. Kim, C. (2005). A sense of alienation towards government. International Review of Public Administration, 9(2), 55-64.
31. Lane, R. E. (1962). Political ideology: Why the American common man believes what he does. Free Press.
32. Liniger-Goumaz, M. (1992). «La démocrature. Dictature camouflée, démocratie truquée» [Democrature. Camouflaged dictatorship, fake democracy]. L’Harmattan.
33. Logan, C., & Bratton, M. (2006). The political gender gap in Africa: Similar attitudes, different behaviors. Afrobarometer Working Paper, 58.
34. Magnani, V., & Vircoulon, T. (2019). Vers un retour de l’autoritarisme en Afrique ? [Towards a return of authoritarianism in Africa?]. Politique Étrangère, 2(84), 11-23.
35. Manga, J. M., & Mbassi, A. R. (2017). De la fin des manifestations à la faim de manifester: Revendications publiques, rémanence autoritaire et procès de la démocratie au Cameroun [From the end of demonstrations to the hunger to demonstrate: Public demands, authoritarian persistence and the trial of democracy in Cameroon]. Politique Africaine, 2 (126), 73-97. https://doi:10.3917/polaf.146.0073
36. Mason, W. M., House, J. S., & Martin, S. S. (1985). On the Dimensions of Political Alienation in America. Sociological Methodology, 15, 111-151.
37. Mauk, M. (2017). The political culture of authoritarian regimes: How macro-political context affects citizens’ political value orientations.'_political_value_orientations
38. Messanga, G. A., & Ekango Nzekaih, H. K. (2022). When society deteriorates: Political intolerance, perceived anomic threat and participation in anti-system collective actions in the context of authoritarian democracy. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 11(3), 92-104. DOI: 10.11648/j.pbs.20221103.14
39. Messanga, G. A., Fotso Magne, P., & Taffo Nemboue, W. (2020). Adhésion aux théories conspirationnistes et soutien aux politiques répressives à l’égard des libertés politiques en contexte de démocratie autoritaire: Le cas du Cameroun [Adherence to conspiracy theories and support for repressive policies against political freedoms in the context of authoritarian democracy: The case of Cameroon]. European Scientific Journal, 16(26), 51-73.
40. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Research Report Series, 2, 1-28.
41. Mix, T. (2014). Lethal repression of peaceful protest in Africa. Why do (non-) Accountable and military regimes shoot.
42. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
43. Nwatchock A Birema, O. (2018). La démocratie en Afrique subsaharienne. Une question de volonté ? [Democracy in sub-Saharan Africa. A question of will?].
44. Paige, J. (1971). Political orientation and riot participation. American Sociological Review, 5(36), 810-820.
45. Plane, D. L., & Gershtenson, J. (2004). Candidates’ ideological locations, abstention, and turnout in U.S. Midterm Senate Elections. Political Behavior, 26(1), 69-93.
46. Quantin, P. (2009). La démocratie en Afrique à la recherche d’un modèle [Democracy in Africa in search of a model]. Pouvoirs, 129, 65-76.
47. Quayle, M., Pautz, N., & Mhlongo, B. (2020). A coauthorship analysis of internationalization in Political Psychology through the lens of ISPP dissemination activities. Political Psychology, 41(5), 901-921.
48. Reef, M. J., & D. Knoke (1999). Political alienation and efficacy. Measures of political attitudes. San Diego Academic Press.
49. Rutto, F., Russo, S., & Mosso, C. (2014). Development and validation of a democratic system justification scale. Social Indicators Research, 118 (2), 645-655.
50. Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., and Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological assessment, 12 (1), 102-111. https://doi:10.1037/1040 3590.12.1.102
51. Southwell, P. L., & Everest, P. (1998). The electoral consequences of alienation: Disenfranchised voting and protest in the 1992 presidential race. The Social Science Journal, 35 (1), 44-51. https://doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(98)90058-1
52. Stoker, G. (2008). Explaining political disenchantment: Finding pathways to democratic renewal. The Political Quarterly, 2 (77), 184-94. https://doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00761.x
53. Tahri, N. (2014). Chapitre IV. Validation des instruments de mesure. In N. Tahri, Responsabilité sociale des entreprises et comportements citoyens: Application au cas de la mutuelle (pp. 159-187) [Chapter IV. Validation of measuring instruments. In N. Tahri, Corporate social responsibility and citizen behavior: Application to the case of mutual insurance (pp. 159-187)]. EMS Editions.
54. Thompson, W. E., & Horton, J. E. (1960). Political alienation as a force in political action. Social Forces, 190-195.
55. Uskul, A. K., Bernardo, A. B. I., González, R., Kende, A… & Cooper, M. L. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities for Psychological Research in the Majority World. DOI: 10.31234/
56. Van Noord, J., Spruyt, B., Kuppens, T., & Spears, R. (2023). Classified out of society? How educational classification induces political alienation through feelings of misrecognition. British Journal of Sociology. Advance online publication.
57. Vodinelić, V. R. (2016). The reign of terror – ruling by fear or the rule of fear? In V. Dimitrijević, The reign of terror: A study on human rights and state terror (pp. 7-9). Peščanik and Fabrika Knjiga.
58. Weakliem, D. L., & Borch, C. (2006). Alienation in the United States: Uniform or group-specific change? Sociological Forum, 21, 415-438.
59. Wood, M. J. (2014). Political Alienation in American Society. [Theses, UVM Honors College Senior].
60. Wright, J. D. (1976). The dissent of the governed: Alienation and democracy in America. New York Academic Press.