Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Assessment of the Production System of Indigenous Dairy Cattle Breeds in Metekel and Some Parts of the Awi Zone, Ethiopia

Received: 27 September 2024     Accepted: 21 October 2024     Published: 18 November 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study was conducted in Mtekel and some parts of the Awi Zone to assess indigenous dairy cattle production patterns in the study area. The majority of respondents (98.3% and 53.95%) were male and literate, respectively. Land holdings varied significantly, ranging from landless households to those owning up to 280 hectares. The predominant farming activity was mixed farming (69%). Agriculture was the primary source of income for 79.3% of respondents across all districts. The trend in cattle productivity was increasing, with the main objective of cattle production being income generation. Cattle were the major contributors to household income, followed by crop production, and were considered the most important livestock species in the area. Crop residues and communal grazing lands were the primary feed resources during the dry and wet seasons, respectively. Overall, cattle production was identified as the major income source, a significant contributor to household income, and a multifunctional agricultural activity for the farming community in rural, peri-urban, and urban areas of the study area. The relevant authorities should focus on improving cattle production in terms of feed, breeding, health, and management practices to enhance productivity and improve livelihoods.

Published in World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (Volume 2, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.wjast.20240204.15
Page(s) 147-154
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Guba, Wombera, Income Contribution, Cattle Productivity

References
[1] LID (1999) Livestock in Poverty Focused Development. (Crewkerne: Livestock in Development (LID)).
[2] FAO (2010) The State of Food and Agriculture: Livestock in the Balance. (Rome: FAO).
[3] Brown, A. G. (ed.) (2003) The livestock revolution: a pathway from poverty? Proceedings of a conference held at the ATSE Crawford Fund, Parliament House, Canberra. (Canberra: ATSE Crawford Fund).
[4] Catley, A. (2008) The growing demand for livestock. Will policy and institutional changes benefit poor people? ID21 Insights, 72, pp. 1-2.
[5] Delgado, C., Narrod, C. and Tiongco, M. (2008) Determinants and Implications of the Growing Scale of Livestock Farms in Four Fast-Growing Developing Countries. Research Report 157. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington D. C.
[6] ILRI (2003) Livestock, a pathway out of poverty: ILRI strategy to 2010. (Nairobi: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)).
[7] ILRI (2007) ILRI Annual Report 2007 – Markets that Work (Nairobi: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)).
[8] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2019. The future of livestock in Ethiopia Opportunities and challenges in the face of uncertainty.
[9] CSA. (2021). Agency Agricultural Sample Survey 2020 / 21 [2013 E. C.] report on livestock and livestock characteristics. II (February).
[10] Alary, V., Corniaux, C., Gautier, D., 2011. Livestock’s contribution to poverty alleviation: how to measure it? World Development 39, 1638–1648.
[11] Moll, H. A. J., 2005. Costs and benefits of livestock systems and the role of market and nonmarket relationships. Agricultural Economics 32, 181–193.
[12] Moll, H. A. J., Staal, S. and Ibrahim, M. N. M. (2007) Smallholder dairy production and markets: A comparison of production systems in Zambia, Kenya and Sri Lanka. Agricultural Systems, 94(2), pp. 593-603.
[13] Fentahun S, Urge M, Mekuriaw Y (2020) Assessment of Seasonality Availability of Livestock Feed Resources and Feeding System in Bahir Dar Zuria District of Amhara Region, Ethiopia. J Fisheries Livest Prod 8: 293.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Getnet, M., Worku, B., Shitaneh, E. (2024). Assessment of the Production System of Indigenous Dairy Cattle Breeds in Metekel and Some Parts of the Awi Zone, Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2(4), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240204.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Getnet, M.; Worku, B.; Shitaneh, E. Assessment of the Production System of Indigenous Dairy Cattle Breeds in Metekel and Some Parts of the Awi Zone, Ethiopia. World J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2024, 2(4), 147-154. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20240204.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Getnet M, Worku B, Shitaneh E. Assessment of the Production System of Indigenous Dairy Cattle Breeds in Metekel and Some Parts of the Awi Zone, Ethiopia. World J Agric Sci Technol. 2024;2(4):147-154. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20240204.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wjast.20240204.15,
      author = {Mezgebu Getnet and Bainesagn Worku and Esubalew Shitaneh},
      title = {Assessment of the Production System of Indigenous Dairy Cattle Breeds in Metekel and Some Parts of the Awi Zone, Ethiopia
    },
      journal = {World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology},
      volume = {2},
      number = {4},
      pages = {147-154},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wjast.20240204.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240204.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjast.20240204.15},
      abstract = {This study was conducted in Mtekel and some parts of the Awi Zone to assess indigenous dairy cattle production patterns in the study area. The majority of respondents (98.3% and 53.95%) were male and literate, respectively. Land holdings varied significantly, ranging from landless households to those owning up to 280 hectares. The predominant farming activity was mixed farming (69%). Agriculture was the primary source of income for 79.3% of respondents across all districts. The trend in cattle productivity was increasing, with the main objective of cattle production being income generation. Cattle were the major contributors to household income, followed by crop production, and were considered the most important livestock species in the area. Crop residues and communal grazing lands were the primary feed resources during the dry and wet seasons, respectively. Overall, cattle production was identified as the major income source, a significant contributor to household income, and a multifunctional agricultural activity for the farming community in rural, peri-urban, and urban areas of the study area. The relevant authorities should focus on improving cattle production in terms of feed, breeding, health, and management practices to enhance productivity and improve livelihoods.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Assessment of the Production System of Indigenous Dairy Cattle Breeds in Metekel and Some Parts of the Awi Zone, Ethiopia
    
    AU  - Mezgebu Getnet
    AU  - Bainesagn Worku
    AU  - Esubalew Shitaneh
    Y1  - 2024/11/18
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240204.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wjast.20240204.15
    T2  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    JF  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    JO  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    SP  - 147
    EP  - 154
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7332
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240204.15
    AB  - This study was conducted in Mtekel and some parts of the Awi Zone to assess indigenous dairy cattle production patterns in the study area. The majority of respondents (98.3% and 53.95%) were male and literate, respectively. Land holdings varied significantly, ranging from landless households to those owning up to 280 hectares. The predominant farming activity was mixed farming (69%). Agriculture was the primary source of income for 79.3% of respondents across all districts. The trend in cattle productivity was increasing, with the main objective of cattle production being income generation. Cattle were the major contributors to household income, followed by crop production, and were considered the most important livestock species in the area. Crop residues and communal grazing lands were the primary feed resources during the dry and wet seasons, respectively. Overall, cattle production was identified as the major income source, a significant contributor to household income, and a multifunctional agricultural activity for the farming community in rural, peri-urban, and urban areas of the study area. The relevant authorities should focus on improving cattle production in terms of feed, breeding, health, and management practices to enhance productivity and improve livelihoods.
    
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections