Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective

Sijie Liu; Fang Yuan; Yanyu Yang; Jihao Wang

doi:doi:10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective

Sijie Liu, Fang Yuan, Yanyu Yang, Jihao Wang

Published in Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 8, Issue 3)

Received: 16 June 2023 Accepted: 10 July 2023 Published: 21 July 2023

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Since the establishment of the local amplitude planning marker rights system in 1947, the UK has continued to maintain economic growth through reforms to the planning system, institutional innovation and democratic reform experiments have accelerated since 2000, and the National Planning Policy Framework released in 2012 has guided the national planning system more streamlined and further decentralized. The UK's evolution as a practitioner and innovator in the field of planning systems reform, from land-use planning to spatial planning, and then from centralization to decentralization and devolution, reflects the UK government's institutional innovation in sustainable spatial development, but this democratic reform experiment has also generated a great deal of debate. Compared to other countries, this bottom-up The neo-liberal reforms in the field of planning triggered by this bottom-up planning system have raised concerns about the issue of urban synergy and national strategic ambiguity, but also affirm the loose economic dynamism that this approach to planning brings. This article will sort out and offer an overview of the England infrastructure planning system, analyze and discuss the challenges faced by the UK's current spatial planning system due to the neoliberal transformation, and how the various sectors collaborate, with a focus on the National Road Network.

Published in	Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 8, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13
Page(s)	48-51
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Neoliberal Reforms, England's Infrastructure, Road Infrastructure, Government Decentralization Reforms

References

[1]	Acheampong, R. A. (2018). ‘The concept of spatial planning and the planning system’, The Urban Book Series, 1 (2), pp. 11–27.
[2]	BBC News (2021). Manchester to Sheffield road tunnel may be abandoned.
[3]	Bruton, M. J., and Nicholson, D. (1987). Local planning in practice.
[4]	Campbell, H., and Marshall, R. (2002). ‘Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning’, Plan Theory, 1 (2), pp. 163–187.
[5]	Ellis, H. (2008). ‘Question of democracy’, Planning.
[6]	Gillman, S. (2007). ‘A climate of protest’, Planning.
[7]	Hall P. (2005). Urban and Regional Planning.
[8]	Luo, C., Wang G., and Sun, L. (2016). ‘From Land Use Planning to Spatial Planning: The Evolution of Planning System in the UK’, International Urban Planning, 31 (4), pp. 90-97.
[9]	Marshall, T. (2011). ‘Reforming the process for infrastructure planning in the UK/England 1990–2010’, Town Planning Review, 82 (4), pp. 441–467.
[10]	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (2021). National Planning Policy Framework.
[11]	May, C., and Hewitson, N. (2010). National Policy Statements: Ports Infrastructure.
[12]	Infrastructure and Projects Authority. (2016). National Infrastructure Plans and Delivery Plans.
[13]	National Infrastructure Planning. (2012). National Policy Statements.
[14]	HM Treasury. (2020). National Infrastructure Strategy.
[15]	Newman, P. (2009). ‘Markets, experts and depoliticizing decisions on major infrastructure’, Urban Research & Practice, 2 (2), pp. 158-168.
[16]	Phelps, N. A. and Valler, D. (2016). ‘Urban development and the politics of dissonance’, Territory, Politics, Governance, 6 (1), pp. 81–103.
[17]	Greater Manchester. (2021). Places for Everyone.
[18]	Royal Automobile Club Foundation (2008). ‘What Went Wrong? British Highway Development before Motorways’.
[19]	Tang, Z. (2000). ‘The evolution of urban core law in the UK’, Urban planning abroad, 31 (4), pp. 1-3.
[20]	Wong, C. (2021). ‘Joined up thinking in uncertain times: Links between strategic planning and transport’, Manchester: The University of Manchester.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sijie Liu, Fang Yuan, Yanyu Yang, Jihao Wang. (2023). Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective. Urban and Regional Planning, 8(3), 48-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sijie Liu; Fang Yuan; Yanyu Yang; Jihao Wang. Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective. Urban Reg. Plan. 2023, 8(3), 48-51. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sijie Liu, Fang Yuan, Yanyu Yang, Jihao Wang. Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective. Urban Reg Plan. 2023;8(3):48-51. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13,
  author = {Sijie Liu and Fang Yuan and Yanyu Yang and Jihao Wang},
  title = {Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective},
  journal = {Urban and Regional Planning},
  volume = {8},
  number = {3},
  pages = {48-51},
  doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20230803.13},
  abstract = {Since the establishment of the local amplitude planning marker rights system in 1947, the UK has continued to maintain economic growth through reforms to the planning system, institutional innovation and democratic reform experiments have accelerated since 2000, and the National Planning Policy Framework released in 2012 has guided the national planning system more streamlined and further decentralized. The UK's evolution as a practitioner and innovator in the field of planning systems reform, from land-use planning to spatial planning, and then from centralization to decentralization and devolution, reflects the UK government's institutional innovation in sustainable spatial development, but this democratic reform experiment has also generated a great deal of debate. Compared to other countries, this bottom-up The neo-liberal reforms in the field of planning triggered by this bottom-up planning system have raised concerns about the issue of urban synergy and national strategic ambiguity, but also affirm the loose economic dynamism that this approach to planning brings. This article will sort out and offer an overview of the England infrastructure planning system, analyze and discuss the challenges faced by the UK's current spatial planning system due to the neoliberal transformation, and how the various sectors collaborate, with a focus on the National Road Network.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective
AU  - Sijie Liu
AU  - Fang Yuan
AU  - Yanyu Yang
AU  - Jihao Wang
Y1  - 2023/07/21
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13
T2  - Urban and Regional Planning
JF  - Urban and Regional Planning
JO  - Urban and Regional Planning
SP  - 48
EP  - 51
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1697
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13
AB  - Since the establishment of the local amplitude planning marker rights system in 1947, the UK has continued to maintain economic growth through reforms to the planning system, institutional innovation and democratic reform experiments have accelerated since 2000, and the National Planning Policy Framework released in 2012 has guided the national planning system more streamlined and further decentralized. The UK's evolution as a practitioner and innovator in the field of planning systems reform, from land-use planning to spatial planning, and then from centralization to decentralization and devolution, reflects the UK government's institutional innovation in sustainable spatial development, but this democratic reform experiment has also generated a great deal of debate. Compared to other countries, this bottom-up The neo-liberal reforms in the field of planning triggered by this bottom-up planning system have raised concerns about the issue of urban synergy and national strategic ambiguity, but also affirm the loose economic dynamism that this approach to planning brings. This article will sort out and offer an overview of the England infrastructure planning system, analyze and discuss the challenges faced by the UK's current spatial planning system due to the neoliberal transformation, and how the various sectors collaborate, with a focus on the National Road Network.
VL  - 8
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Sijie Liu

Comprehensive Transportation Development Research Center, Tianjin Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute Co., Tianjin, China
Fang Yuan

Urban Transportation, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Yanyu Yang

Urban Design and International Planning, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Jihao Wang

Institute of Urban Planning, China Design Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sijie Liu, Fang Yuan, Yanyu Yang, Jihao Wang. (2023). Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective. Urban and Regional Planning, 8(3), 48-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sijie Liu; Fang Yuan; Yanyu Yang; Jihao Wang. Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective. Urban Reg. Plan. 2023, 8(3), 48-51. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sijie Liu, Fang Yuan, Yanyu Yang, Jihao Wang. Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective. Urban Reg Plan. 2023;8(3):48-51. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13,
  author = {Sijie Liu and Fang Yuan and Yanyu Yang and Jihao Wang},
  title = {Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective},
  journal = {Urban and Regional Planning},
  volume = {8},
  number = {3},
  pages = {48-51},
  doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20230803.13},
  abstract = {Since the establishment of the local amplitude planning marker rights system in 1947, the UK has continued to maintain economic growth through reforms to the planning system, institutional innovation and democratic reform experiments have accelerated since 2000, and the National Planning Policy Framework released in 2012 has guided the national planning system more streamlined and further decentralized. The UK's evolution as a practitioner and innovator in the field of planning systems reform, from land-use planning to spatial planning, and then from centralization to decentralization and devolution, reflects the UK government's institutional innovation in sustainable spatial development, but this democratic reform experiment has also generated a great deal of debate. Compared to other countries, this bottom-up The neo-liberal reforms in the field of planning triggered by this bottom-up planning system have raised concerns about the issue of urban synergy and national strategic ambiguity, but also affirm the loose economic dynamism that this approach to planning brings. This article will sort out and offer an overview of the England infrastructure planning system, analyze and discuss the challenges faced by the UK's current spatial planning system due to the neoliberal transformation, and how the various sectors collaborate, with a focus on the National Road Network.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Reforming England's Infrastructure Planning System from a Neoliberal Perspective
AU  - Sijie Liu
AU  - Fang Yuan
AU  - Yanyu Yang
AU  - Jihao Wang
Y1  - 2023/07/21
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13
T2  - Urban and Regional Planning
JF  - Urban and Regional Planning
JO  - Urban and Regional Planning
SP  - 48
EP  - 51
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1697
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20230803.13
AB  - Since the establishment of the local amplitude planning marker rights system in 1947, the UK has continued to maintain economic growth through reforms to the planning system, institutional innovation and democratic reform experiments have accelerated since 2000, and the National Planning Policy Framework released in 2012 has guided the national planning system more streamlined and further decentralized. The UK's evolution as a practitioner and innovator in the field of planning systems reform, from land-use planning to spatial planning, and then from centralization to decentralization and devolution, reflects the UK government's institutional innovation in sustainable spatial development, but this democratic reform experiment has also generated a great deal of debate. Compared to other countries, this bottom-up The neo-liberal reforms in the field of planning triggered by this bottom-up planning system have raised concerns about the issue of urban synergy and national strategic ambiguity, but also affirm the loose economic dynamism that this approach to planning brings. This article will sort out and offer an overview of the England infrastructure planning system, analyze and discuss the challenges faced by the UK's current spatial planning system due to the neoliberal transformation, and how the various sectors collaborate, with a focus on the National Road Network.
VL  - 8
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download