Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design

Rob Roggema

doi:doi:10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design

Rob Roggema

Published in Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Received: 19 December 2020 Accepted: 31 December 2020 Published: 12 January 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

While many are convinced striving for resilient cities is worth pursuing, the majority of the research in this field focuses on risks and vulnerabilities or on social resilience. The attention for the spatial necessities to create cities that are able to accommodate the impacts of climate change is rare. The core objective of this paper is to learn from resilient urban precedents so design beyond disaster can be practiced. This article focuses therefore on the inclusion of spatial redundancy in urbanism. It uses the example of Western Sydney, where in the future approximately 800,000 new inhabitants will live, to illustrate how certain space can be kept free of developments, in other words remains available for future (changed, unexpected) use. This future use could well be temporary, in the case of climate impacts, such as floods or fires. A total of eight urban neighborhoods have been analyzed as precedents of ecological urbanism and densities. The design principles derived from these precedents are subsequently deconstructed and reconstructed to design the Master Plan and plans at urban design level. Out of this design process, five design principles emerge as determinants of redundancy: use space temporarily so it can be used differently when needed, full integration of the rural and urban landscape (water) systems; developing fluid densities in the city so these can be densified when required in the future; see landscape as an amenity being the space that residents can use when they need; and create accessible communal urban spaces and can be used for shared purposes.

Published in	Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12
Page(s)	15-25
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Redundancy, Urban Design, Climate Adaptation, Resilient Cities, Research by Design, Western Sydney

References

[1]	UN (2005) Report of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction. Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2005. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/17671_finalreportconference1.pdf
[2]	UN (2015) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. Geneva: UNISDR https://www.undrr.or/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030
[3]	Lizarralde, G. (2020) Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience or investing in disaster risk consultants for visibility? Preliminary introduction to the book ‘Investing in Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience’.
[4]	Wisner, B. (2020) Five Years Beyond Sendai—Can We Get Beyond Frameworks? Int J Disaster Risk Sci 11 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00263-0
[5]	Roggema, R. (Ed.) (2013) The Design Charrette: Ways to Envision Sustainable Futures. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer, 335 pp.
[6]	Uehara, M. Roggema, R. and Fuiji, M. (2020) Effectiveness of sublational discussion-based swarm planning process in the 2011 Japan disaster area: Creating new planning directions combining polarized opinions. International Journal of GEOMATE 19(76) 98–106 (Dec 2020) ISSN: 2186-2982 (P), 2186-2990 (O), Japan, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21660/2020.74.9151
[7]	Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S. (Eds) (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature, Island Press, Washington, DC.
[8]	Bisker, J., Chester, A. and Eisenberg, T. (2015), “Rebuild by design”, New York, NY, available at: www. rebuildbydesign.org/data/files/500.pdf (accessed 27 July 2019).
[9]	Taleb, N. N. (2012), Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder, Random House, New York, NY.
[10]	De Jong, T. M. (2010), “The role of art in science”, METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 23-44, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2010.1.2
[11]	Roggema, R. (2018) Design with voids; How inverted urbanism increases urban resilience. Architectural Science Review 61 5: 349-357. DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2018.1502153
[12]	Roggema, R. (2015), “Three urbanisms in one city: accommodating the paces of change”, Journal of Environmental Protection, Vol. 6 No. 9, pp. 946-956, available at: www.scirp.org/journal/jep; http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.69084
[13]	Boer, F. (2014). De URBANISTEN, Water-square Benthemplein. A+U Architecture and Urbanism 529. 14:10 Recent Projects. 20-27.
[14]	Roggema, R. (ed.) (2012). Swarming Landscapes: The Art of Designing for Climate Adaptation. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer, 260 pp.
[15]	Greater Sydney Commission (2018) A Metropolis of Three Cities; Greater Sydney Regional Plan. Sydney: State of New South Wales.
[16]	EAAE/AEEA Research Charter (undated) Research by design, definition. URL: http://reseaaerch.wikidot.com/research-by-design. Accessed: 9 July 2018
[17]	Roggema, R. (2016) Research by Design: Proposition for a Methodological Approach. Urban Science 1 2 doi:10.3390/urbansci1010002
[18]	Grossman, D. (2015) A Tale of Two Northern European Cities: Meeting the Challenges of Sea Level Rise. Yale Environment 360, 3 November 2015. URL: http://e360.yale.edu/features/a_tale_of_two_northern_european_cities_meeting_the_challenges_of_sea_level_rise. Accessed: 26 February 2018.
[19]	Serre, D., B. Barroca, M. Balsells and V. Becue (2018), Contributing to urban resilience to floods with neighbourhood design: the case of Am Sandtorkai/Dalmannkai in Hamburg. Journal of Flood Risk Management 11 (1) S69–S83. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12253
[20]	Iverot, S. P., A. Vernay, K. F. Mulder and N. Brandt (2013) Implications of systems integration at the urban level: The case of Hammarby Sjöstad, Stockholm. Journal of Cleaner Production 48 220–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.012
[21]	Brogren, M. and A. Green (2003) Hammarby Sjöstad–an interdisciplinary case study of the integration of photovoltaics in a new ecologically sustainable residential area in Stockholm. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 75 761–765.
[22]	Van Veldhuizen, D. and Meier, S. (2014) Modern castles and country houses: the use of history in ‘gated communities’ in The Netherlands. International Journal of Heritage Studies 20 (7-8) 813-833. DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2013.860391
[23]	Borret, K. (2001) Amsterdam, Borneo e Sporenburg. Abitare (Milano) 402 48-49. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-143259.
[24]	Yoshida, N. (2002) West-8 Master-Plan of Borneo/Sporenburg, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 1993-1997. A+U-Architecture and Urbanism
[25]	Roggema, R. and C. Allchin (2017) GO WEST! Masters Design Studio, School of Architecture, UTS. Autumn 2017.
[26]	Roggema, R. and R. Simpson (2017) GO SOUTHWEST! Masters Design Studio, School of Architecture, UTS. Spring 2017.
[27]	Julian, H. (2017) Gully City. Sydney: Masters Design Studio GO WEST! Lead by Roggema and Allchin, School of Architecture, UTS, Autumn 2017
[28]	Veringa, G. (2017) Hydraulic City. Sydney: Masters Design Studio GO SOUTHWEST! Lead by Roggema and Simpson, School of Architecture, UTS, Spring, 2017.
[29]	Young, J. (2017) RidgCity. Sydney: Masters Design Studio GO WEST! Lead by Roggema and Allchin, School of Architecture, UTS, Autumn 2017
[30]	Zappia, M. (2017) Resilient City. Sydney: Masters Design Studio GO SOUTHWEST! Lead by Roggema and Simpson, School of Architecture, UTS, Spring, 2017.
[31]	Roggema, R. (2017) Design for the third city, Western Sydney. Badgerys Urbanism; winter elective. School of Architecture, UTS.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Rob Roggema. (2021). Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design. Urban and Regional Planning, 6(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Rob Roggema. Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design. Urban Reg. Plan. 2021, 6(1), 15-25. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Rob Roggema. Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design. Urban Reg Plan. 2021;6(1):15-25. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12,
  author = {Rob Roggema},
  title = {Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design},
  journal = {Urban and Regional Planning},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {15-25},
  doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20210601.12},
  abstract = {While many are convinced striving for resilient cities is worth pursuing, the majority of the research in this field focuses on risks and vulnerabilities or on social resilience. The attention for the spatial necessities to create cities that are able to accommodate the impacts of climate change is rare. The core objective of this paper is to learn from resilient urban precedents so design beyond disaster can be practiced. This article focuses therefore on the inclusion of spatial redundancy in urbanism. It uses the example of Western Sydney, where in the future approximately 800,000 new inhabitants will live, to illustrate how certain space can be kept free of developments, in other words remains available for future (changed, unexpected) use. This future use could well be temporary, in the case of climate impacts, such as floods or fires. A total of eight urban neighborhoods have been analyzed as precedents of ecological urbanism and densities. The design principles derived from these precedents are subsequently deconstructed and reconstructed to design the Master Plan and plans at urban design level. Out of this design process, five design principles emerge as determinants of redundancy: use space temporarily so it can be used differently when needed, full integration of the rural and urban landscape (water) systems; developing fluid densities in the city so these can be densified when required in the future; see landscape as an amenity being the space that residents can use when they need; and create accessible communal urban spaces and can be used for shared purposes.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design
AU  - Rob Roggema
Y1  - 2021/01/12
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12
T2  - Urban and Regional Planning
JF  - Urban and Regional Planning
JO  - Urban and Regional Planning
SP  - 15
EP  - 25
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1697
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12
AB  - While many are convinced striving for resilient cities is worth pursuing, the majority of the research in this field focuses on risks and vulnerabilities or on social resilience. The attention for the spatial necessities to create cities that are able to accommodate the impacts of climate change is rare. The core objective of this paper is to learn from resilient urban precedents so design beyond disaster can be practiced. This article focuses therefore on the inclusion of spatial redundancy in urbanism. It uses the example of Western Sydney, where in the future approximately 800,000 new inhabitants will live, to illustrate how certain space can be kept free of developments, in other words remains available for future (changed, unexpected) use. This future use could well be temporary, in the case of climate impacts, such as floods or fires. A total of eight urban neighborhoods have been analyzed as precedents of ecological urbanism and densities. The design principles derived from these precedents are subsequently deconstructed and reconstructed to design the Master Plan and plans at urban design level. Out of this design process, five design principles emerge as determinants of redundancy: use space temporarily so it can be used differently when needed, full integration of the rural and urban landscape (water) systems; developing fluid densities in the city so these can be densified when required in the future; see landscape as an amenity being the space that residents can use when they need; and create accessible communal urban spaces and can be used for shared purposes.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Rob Roggema

Research Centre for the Built Environment Noorder Ruimte, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, the Netherlands

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Rob Roggema. (2021). Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design. Urban and Regional Planning, 6(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Rob Roggema. Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design. Urban Reg. Plan. 2021, 6(1), 15-25. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Rob Roggema. Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design. Urban Reg Plan. 2021;6(1):15-25. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12,
  author = {Rob Roggema},
  title = {Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design},
  journal = {Urban and Regional Planning},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {15-25},
  doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20210601.12},
  abstract = {While many are convinced striving for resilient cities is worth pursuing, the majority of the research in this field focuses on risks and vulnerabilities or on social resilience. The attention for the spatial necessities to create cities that are able to accommodate the impacts of climate change is rare. The core objective of this paper is to learn from resilient urban precedents so design beyond disaster can be practiced. This article focuses therefore on the inclusion of spatial redundancy in urbanism. It uses the example of Western Sydney, where in the future approximately 800,000 new inhabitants will live, to illustrate how certain space can be kept free of developments, in other words remains available for future (changed, unexpected) use. This future use could well be temporary, in the case of climate impacts, such as floods or fires. A total of eight urban neighborhoods have been analyzed as precedents of ecological urbanism and densities. The design principles derived from these precedents are subsequently deconstructed and reconstructed to design the Master Plan and plans at urban design level. Out of this design process, five design principles emerge as determinants of redundancy: use space temporarily so it can be used differently when needed, full integration of the rural and urban landscape (water) systems; developing fluid densities in the city so these can be densified when required in the future; see landscape as an amenity being the space that residents can use when they need; and create accessible communal urban spaces and can be used for shared purposes.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Towards Redundancy in Urban Landscapes: Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Through Design
AU  - Rob Roggema
Y1  - 2021/01/12
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12
T2  - Urban and Regional Planning
JF  - Urban and Regional Planning
JO  - Urban and Regional Planning
SP  - 15
EP  - 25
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1697
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.12
AB  - While many are convinced striving for resilient cities is worth pursuing, the majority of the research in this field focuses on risks and vulnerabilities or on social resilience. The attention for the spatial necessities to create cities that are able to accommodate the impacts of climate change is rare. The core objective of this paper is to learn from resilient urban precedents so design beyond disaster can be practiced. This article focuses therefore on the inclusion of spatial redundancy in urbanism. It uses the example of Western Sydney, where in the future approximately 800,000 new inhabitants will live, to illustrate how certain space can be kept free of developments, in other words remains available for future (changed, unexpected) use. This future use could well be temporary, in the case of climate impacts, such as floods or fires. A total of eight urban neighborhoods have been analyzed as precedents of ecological urbanism and densities. The design principles derived from these precedents are subsequently deconstructed and reconstructed to design the Master Plan and plans at urban design level. Out of this design process, five design principles emerge as determinants of redundancy: use space temporarily so it can be used differently when needed, full integration of the rural and urban landscape (water) systems; developing fluid densities in the city so these can be densified when required in the future; see landscape as an amenity being the space that residents can use when they need; and create accessible communal urban spaces and can be used for shared purposes.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download