This study examines how disinformation campaigns circulating on TikTok during Indonesia’s 2024 presidential election shaped public opinion and intensified societal polarization. The research aims to identify dominant forms of disinformation, explain how these messages operate within social identity dynamics, and analyze their influence on public perceptions of competing candidates. Using a qualitative approach, the study collected and analyzed videos, images, captions, and user interactions that contained elements of hoax, false context, satire, propaganda, and scaremongering. Data were interpreted through thematic analysis supported by Social Identity Theory to understand how in-group and out-group categorizations were reinforced through misleading content. The findings show that TikTok became a key arena for political manipulation, where edited videos, recycled footage, fabricated narratives, and emotive framing were strategically used to mobilize supporters and attack opponents. These disinformation practices heightened affective polarization, reduced trust in democratic processes, and generated widespread confusion among voters. The study concludes that TikTok-based disinformation significantly contributed to deepening social divisions and shaping negative public opinion during the election period. Strengthening media literacy and developing rapid response mechanisms are essential to mitigate future disinformation impacts.
| Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 14, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20251406.14 |
| Page(s) | 601-609 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Disinformation, Communication, Campaign, Misleading, Satire, False Connection, False Context, Scaremongering
| [1] | A. Hamid, D. Darwis, and S. Andriyani, “Fenomena Politik Cebong Dan Kampret Di Indonesia: Sebuah Analisis Dari Perspektif Pemikiran Politik Dalam Islam,” Politea, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 29, 2018. |
| [2] | M. Tazri, “Politik Hujat dalam Sistem Komunikasi Politik Indonesia (Studi Fenomenologi Cebong-Kampret),” J. Communiverse, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 9-15, 2019. |
| [3] | M. Wildan, “Cebong, Kampret, and Kadrun in the 2019 Presidential Election Contestation: A Review of the Harmony Between Speaking Theory and Ooe Want to Talk,” 2022. |
| [4] | M. Tazri, “‘Cebong’dan ‘Kampret’dalam Pespektif Komunikasi Politik,” J. PIKMA Publ. ILMU Komun. MEDIA DAN Cine., vol. 1, no. 2, 2020. |
| [5] | N. Hayat and N. Nurhakki, “Religion Identity And Political Polarization: How Does Labeling Make It Worst?,” Palita J. Soc. Relig. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 51-66, 2022. |
| [6] | F. A. Dharma, D. Hariyanto, and F. Muharram, “Construction of Political Identity on Instagram: Unveiling the Kadrun Hashtag Movement in Indonesia’s 2024 Presidential Election,” Acad. Open, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 10-21070, 2023. |
| [7] | R. Masykuri and M. F. S. Ramadlan, “Analysis of the manifestations of political segregation, labeling and polarization among Islamic groups throughout 2014-2019,” Polit. J. Ilmu Polit., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 68-87, 2021. |
| [8] | M. K. Fata, “Membaca polarisasi santri dalam kontestasi pilpres 2019,” Din. Penelit. Media Komun. Penelit. Sos. Keagamaan, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 325-346, 2018. |
| [9] | G. Yudha, “The Dutch Devide et Impera Political Strategy and Its Relevance to Post-2019 Religious Polarization in Indonesia,” J. Tapis J. Teropong Aspir. Polit. Islam, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 19-38, 2022. |
| [10] | P. Syarwi, “Polarization of Issues, Identity Politics and Public Division in the 2019 Presidential Election,” Communitarian J. Prodi Ilmu Polit., vol. 4, no. 1, 2022. |
| [11] | H. Aswar, F. W. Zamzami, A. K. Widjayanti, and A. Priyansyah, “Pertarungan Narasi Islam Dalam Pemilihan Presiden Tahun 2019,” Politea, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 34-54, 2022. |
| [12] | V. S. Handoko and A. Budisusila, “MEDIA SOSIAL DAN NON-SOCIAL MEDIA: PERTARUNGAN KEKUASAAN ANTAR BAKAL CALON PRESIDEN DALAM PENINGKATAN KAPITAL SIMBOLIK,” Pros. Konf. Nas. Sosiol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 101-114, 2023. |
| [13] | N. Faradis, N. A. Al Fauzah, and M. I. Al Anshori, “Media Sosial dan Persepsi Publik: Analisis Strategi Kampanye Digital Calon Presiden Indonesia 2024,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Ilmu Sosial (SNIIS), 2023, vol. 2, pp. 643-652. |
| [14] | A. Firly, “IMPLEMENTASI CLICKJACKING DALAM SERANGAN TAUTAN PALSU UNTUK EKSPLORASI MEDIA SOSIAL,” J. TIMES, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 15-18, 2023. |
| [15] | S. B. Agus et al., “Disinformasi Berita Politik dalam Media Massa.” Bigraf Publishing, 2010. |
| [16] | W. Akmaliah, “Kebenaran yang terbelah: Populisme Islam dan disinformasi politik elektoral,” Maarif, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 129-149, 2019. |
| [17] | F. Febriansyah and N. N. Muksin, “Fenomena Media Sosial: Antara Hoax, Destruksi Demokrasi, dan Ancaman Disintegrasi Bangsa,” Sebatik, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 193-200, 2020. |
| [18] | R. Gustrinanda and T. Tanjung, “Pengaruh Berita Hoax Terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat Dalam Pemilu di Indonesia,” BULLET J. Multidisiplin Ilmu, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 158-163, 2023. |
| [19] | S. Mawarti, “The Phenomenon of Hate Speech Impact of Hate Speech,” Toler. Media Ilm. Komun. Umat Beragama, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 83-95, 2018. |
| [20] | M. A. Hogg, Social identity theory. Springer, 2016. |
| [21] | N. Ellemers and S. A. Haslam, “Social identity theory,” Handb. Theor. Soc. Psychol., vol. 2, pp. 379-398, 2012. |
| [22] | S. Trepte, “Social identity theory,” in Psychology of entertainment, Routledge, 2013, pp. 255-271. |
| [23] | S. Hasibuan, “Makna Dan Fungsi Label Kehormatan Israel Dalam Keluaran 19: 6 Ditinjau Dari Teori Identitas Sosial,” J. Apokal., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 166-187, 2021. |
| [24] | K. Kusyadi, M. Jufri, and J. Yadi, “Dinamika posisi identitas Etnis Tionghoa di Tanjungpinang dalam tinjauan teori identitas sosial,” Naut. J. Ilm. Multidisiplin Indones., vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 722-728, 2022. |
| [25] | X. Jia, “Sharing information, political self-presentation, and enjoyment as predictors of political identity formation on social media,” Front. Polit. Sci., vol. 4, 2025. |
| [26] | L. Kyrychenko, M. Samoilov, and O. Bogachenko, “Measuring online polarization through engagement and group identity signals in social media posts: A machine learning approach,” Nat. Commun., vol. 15, 2024. |
| [27] | M. Rizanul, A. Egistin, R. Jasmine, and A. Juniarto, “TikTok’s dual role in youth political participation and disinformation exposure,” J. Soc. Commun., vol. 7, no. 1, 2025. |
| [28] | A. Arkana, “Strategi Partai Solidaritas Indonesia dalam Menggunakan Konten Jenaka dan Meme di TikTok sebagai Komunikasi Politik,” J. MediaKom, 2024. |
| [29] | M. Rijanul, R. Fatgehipon, and S. Martini, “TikTok, emotional politics, and post-truth behaviour among university students,” JIC Nusant., vol. 8, no. 1, 2025. |
| [30] | A. Wulandari, F. Abdul, A. Tayibnapis, and V. Muzykant, “Hoaxes in TikTok political discourse during Indonesia’s 2024 election: A sentiment and content analysis approach,” J. Ekon. dan Polit., vol. 12, no. 3, 2024. |
| [31] | S. Locatelli and P. Calais, “Detecting politicization trends in TikTok using computational topic-shift analysis,” arXiv Prepr., 2023. |
| [32] | V. Solovev, N. Drolsbach, M. Demirel, and N. Pröllochs, “Emotional content and political polarization in German politicians’ TikTok videos: A computational analysis of 25,000 clips,” arXiv Prepr., 2025. |
| [33] | C. Condren, J. M. Davis, S. McCausland, and R. Phiddian, “Defining parody and satire: Australian copyright law and its new exception,” Media Arts Law Rev., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 273-292, 2008. |
| [34] | C. Condren, “Satire and definition,” Humor, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 375-399, 2012. |
| [35] | V. Cuartero, D. Satorius, and M. Donaldson, “Parody, Satire, and Jokes,” Ent. Sport. Law., vol. 32, p. 66, 2015. |
| [36] | G. Baym and P. J. Jeffrey, “News parody in global perspective: Politics, power, and resistance,” in News Parody and Political Satire Across the Globe, Routledge, 2013, pp. 1-12. |
| [37] | A. Day and E. Thompson, “Live from New York, it’s the fake news! Saturday Night Live and the (non) politics of parody,” in News Parody and Political Satire Across the Globe, Routledge, 2013, pp. 169-181. |
| [38] | S. Kumar and K. Combe, “Political parody and satire as subversive speech in the global digital sphere,” International Communication Gazette, vol. 77, no. 3. Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England, pp. 211-214, 2015. |
| [39] | L. Basu, “News satire: Giving the news a memory,” TripleC Commun. Capital. Crit. Open Access J. a Glob. Sustain. Inf. Soc., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 241-255, 2018. |
| [40] | C. Fleming and J. O’Carroll, “The art of the hoax,” parallax, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 45-59, 2010. |
| [41] | J. Golbeck et al., “Fake news vs satire: A dataset and analysis,” in Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, 2018, pp. 17-21. |
| [42] | P. L. Thomas, “The ethical dilemma of satire in an era of fake news and the brave new world of social media,” ethics Digit. Lit. Dev. Knowl. Ski. across grade levels, pp. 171-177, 2019. |
| [43] | I. Ermida, “News satire in the press: Linguistic construction of humour,” Lang. humour media, pp. 185-210, 2012. |
| [44] | C. Sinclair, “Parody: fake news, regeneration and education,” Postdigital Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61-77, 2020. |
| [45] | M. C. Wagner and P. J. Boczkowski, “The reception of fake news: The interpretations and practices that shape the consumption of perceived misinformation,” Digit. Journal., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 870-885, 2019. |
| [46] | I. Picton and A. Teravainen, “Fake news and critical literacy,” An Evid. Rev. Natl. Lit. Trust Res. Rep., 2017. |
| [47] | A. C. Brisola and A. Doyle, “Critical information literacy as a path to resist ‘fake news’: Understanding disinformation as the root problem,” Open Inf. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 274-286, 2019. |
| [48] | E. Georgiadou et al., “Fake news and critical thinking in information evaluation,” 2018. |
| [49] | F. Giglietto, L. Iannelli, A. Valeriani, and L. Rossi, “‘Fake news’ is the invention of a liar: How false information circulates within the hybrid news system,” Curr. Sociol., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 625-642, 2019. |
| [50] | B. McNair, Fake news: Falsehood, fabrication and fantasy in journalism. Routledge, 2017. |
| [51] | A. Khan, K. Brohman, and S. Addas, “The anatomy of ‘fake news’: Studying false messages as digital objects,” J. Inf. Technol., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 122-143, 2022. |
| [52] | D. N. Rapp and N. A. Salovich, “Can’t we just disregard fake news? The consequences of exposure to inaccurate information,” Policy Insights from Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 232-239, 2018. |
| [53] | S. Huckle and M. White, “Fake news: A technological approach to proving the origins of content, using blockchains,” Big data, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 356-371, 2017. |
| [54] | P. Machete and M. Turpin, “The use of critical thinking to identify fake news: A systematic literature review,” in Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology: 19th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2020, Skukuza, South Africa, April 6-8, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 19, 2020, pp. 235-246. |
| [55] | J. M. Burkhardt, Combating fake news in the digital age, vol. 53, no. 8. American Library Association Chicago, IL, USA, 2017. |
| [56] | S. Kasman, “Sistem Verifikasi Menangkal Berita Hoax di Media Cetak,” J. Mimb. Kesejaht. Sos., vol. 2, no. 1, 2019. |
| [57] | R. Pakpahan, “Analisis Fenomena Hoax Diberbagai Media Sosial Dan Cara Menanggulangi Hoax,” Konf. Nas. Ilmu Sos. dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 1, 2017. |
| [58] | M. U. Batoebara, E. Suyani, and C. A. Nuraflah, “Media Literacy in Responding to Fake News (Study on Students of SMKN 5 Medan),” War. Dharmawangsa, vol. 14, no. 1, 2020. |
| [59] | B. Prayitno, “Langkah Pemerintah Menangkal Diseminasi Berita Palsu,” J. Wacana Kinerja Kaji. Prakt. Kinerja Dan Adm. Pelayanan Publik, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 17-40, 2018. |
| [60] | C. A. Dralega, P. Amia, G. B. Kidanu, K. B. Santigie, D. K. Mpala, and W. K. Osei, “From Scaremongering to Messages of Hope: How State Authorities in Ghana, Sierra Leone, Ethiopia and Zimbabwe Framed the COVID-19 Crisis on Facebook,” in COVID-19 and the Media in Sub-Saharan Africa: Media Viability, Framing and Health Communication, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2022, pp. 127-143. |
| [61] | R. Palmer, B. Toff, and R. K. Nielsen, “‘The media covers up a lot of things’: Watchdog ideals meet folk theories of journalism,” Journal. Stud., vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 1973-1989, 2020. |
| [62] | D. Trimithiotis and C. Voniati, “(Un) Reporting Xenophobia: Normalising and Resisting Officials’ Discriminatory Discourse on Migration in Online Journalism in Cyprus,” Journal. Pract., pp. 1-21, 2023. |
| [63] | F. Krüger, “Ethical journalism in a time of AIDS,” African J. AIDS Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 125-133, 2005. |
| [64] | T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, “The coronavirus crisis—crisis communication, meaning-making, and reputation management,” Int. Public Manag. J., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 713-729, 2020. |
| [65] | B. López, “Creating fear: the ‘doping deaths’, risk communication and the anti-doping campaign,” Int. J. Sport policy Polit., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 213-225, 2014. |
| [66] | P. Wooding, “Misinformation during the UK Brexit Referendum.” Bournemouth University, 2018. |
| [67] | R. Kirschen and P. Mossey, “Whistleblowing or scaremongering?,” Br. Dent. J., vol. 189, no. 11, p. 584, 2000. |
| [68] | B. Toff and R. K. Nielsen, “How news feels: Anticipated anxiety as a factor in news avoidance and a barrier to political engagement,” Polit. Commun., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 697-714, 2022. |
| [69] | R. Coomber, “How social fear of drugs in the non-sporting world creates a framework for doping policy in the sporting world,” Int. J. Sport Policy Polit., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 171-193, 2014. |
| [70] | M. Y. Samad, F. Hilman, A. Yakub, I. A. Yoda, and O. S. Harahap, “Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Dalam Komunikasi Politik: Propaganda Isu Sistem Pemilu Proporsional,” J. IPTEKKOM J. Ilmu Pengetah. Teknol. Inf., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 257-270, 2023. |
| [71] | E. Susanti and A. Ismira, “Analisis Propaganda Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) di Indonesia Melalui Jalur Media Sosial,” Hasanuddin J. Int. Aff., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 123-138, 2023. |
| [72] | A. Y. Bachtiar, D. H. Perkasa, and M. R. Sadikun, “The role of the media in propaganda,” KOMUNIKOLOGI J. Ilm. Ilmu Komun., vol. 13, no. 2, 2016. |
| [73] | R. Palupi, “Penyalahgunaan media sosial sebagai alat propaganda,” J. Komun., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 69-76, 2019. |
| [74] | Y. Hwang, J. Y. Ryu, and S.-H. Jeong, “Effects of disinformation using deepfake: The protective effect of media literacy education,” Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 188-193, 2021. |
| [75] | Z. Guo, J. Valinejad, and J.-H. Cho, “Effect of disinformation propagation on opinion dynamics: A game theoretic approach,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 3775-3790, 2022. |
| [76] | A. Jungherr and A. Rauchfleisch, “Negative downstream effects of disinformation discourse: Evidence from the US,” 2022. |
| [77] | I. M. Aditia, D. A. Dewi, and Y. F. Furnamasari, “Runtuhnya Nilai-Nilai Persatuan Dan Kesatuan Bangsa Bernegara Akibat Merajarelanya Hoax,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 8995-9003, 2021. |
APA Style
Rustanta, A. (2025). Disinformation Campaigns Trough Social Media Tik Tok in Shaping Public Opinion and Polarizing Societies. Social Sciences, 14(6), 601-609. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.14
ACS Style
Rustanta, A. Disinformation Campaigns Trough Social Media Tik Tok in Shaping Public Opinion and Polarizing Societies. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(6), 601-609. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20251406.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ss.20251406.14,
author = {Agustinus Rustanta},
title = {Disinformation Campaigns Trough Social Media Tik Tok in Shaping Public Opinion and Polarizing Societies},
journal = {Social Sciences},
volume = {14},
number = {6},
pages = {601-609},
doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20251406.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20251406.14},
abstract = {This study examines how disinformation campaigns circulating on TikTok during Indonesia’s 2024 presidential election shaped public opinion and intensified societal polarization. The research aims to identify dominant forms of disinformation, explain how these messages operate within social identity dynamics, and analyze their influence on public perceptions of competing candidates. Using a qualitative approach, the study collected and analyzed videos, images, captions, and user interactions that contained elements of hoax, false context, satire, propaganda, and scaremongering. Data were interpreted through thematic analysis supported by Social Identity Theory to understand how in-group and out-group categorizations were reinforced through misleading content. The findings show that TikTok became a key arena for political manipulation, where edited videos, recycled footage, fabricated narratives, and emotive framing were strategically used to mobilize supporters and attack opponents. These disinformation practices heightened affective polarization, reduced trust in democratic processes, and generated widespread confusion among voters. The study concludes that TikTok-based disinformation significantly contributed to deepening social divisions and shaping negative public opinion during the election period. Strengthening media literacy and developing rapid response mechanisms are essential to mitigate future disinformation impacts.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Disinformation Campaigns Trough Social Media Tik Tok in Shaping Public Opinion and Polarizing Societies AU - Agustinus Rustanta Y1 - 2025/12/17 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20251406.14 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 601 EP - 609 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.14 AB - This study examines how disinformation campaigns circulating on TikTok during Indonesia’s 2024 presidential election shaped public opinion and intensified societal polarization. The research aims to identify dominant forms of disinformation, explain how these messages operate within social identity dynamics, and analyze their influence on public perceptions of competing candidates. Using a qualitative approach, the study collected and analyzed videos, images, captions, and user interactions that contained elements of hoax, false context, satire, propaganda, and scaremongering. Data were interpreted through thematic analysis supported by Social Identity Theory to understand how in-group and out-group categorizations were reinforced through misleading content. The findings show that TikTok became a key arena for political manipulation, where edited videos, recycled footage, fabricated narratives, and emotive framing were strategically used to mobilize supporters and attack opponents. These disinformation practices heightened affective polarization, reduced trust in democratic processes, and generated widespread confusion among voters. The study concludes that TikTok-based disinformation significantly contributed to deepening social divisions and shaping negative public opinion during the election period. Strengthening media literacy and developing rapid response mechanisms are essential to mitigate future disinformation impacts. VL - 14 IS - 6 ER -
Communication Department, Binus University, West Jakarta, Indonesia
Information