This research employed a qualitative system of analysis that incorporates both nodal and economic analysis of distinct tubing sizes, their flow rates and pressure sensitivity, using tubing performance and four distinct economic profitability indicators. Furthermore, the four-profitability indicators were subjected to a cause factor sensitivity test. Results of the nodal analysis and tubing size sensitivity showed increasing flow rates with increasing tubing size from 1.90-inch tubing size to 4.275-inch and plateaued with highest flow rates within the ranges of 4.75-inch to 5.70-inch and then declined in ranges greater than 6.0-inch. while pressure sensitivity showed relative pressure decrease with increasing tubing size showing lowest pressure points within 4.75-inch to 5.70-inch tubing sizes and then increased in ranges greater than 6.0-inch. Economic profitability analysis was carried out on the tubing sizes using CAPEX, tubing cost and oil production rate through four profitability indicators which includes; NPV, IRR, PI and PP. The outcome of the analysis aided the determination of an optimal tubing size of 5.225-inch ranking it highest in all four utilized profitability tools amongst all four analyzed tubing sizes.
| Published in | Journal of Energy and Natural Resources (Volume 11, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jenr.20221103.13 |
| Page(s) | 95-106 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Tubing Sizes, Pressure, Economic Analysis, Profitability, Discount Rate
| [1] | Ba-Jaalah, K. S., & Waly, A. W. A. A. A., (2015). New Inflow Performance Relationship for Gas Condensate Reservoirs. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 16 (2), 284–291. |
| [2] | Clegg, J. D., and Lake, L. W., (2007). Petroleum Engineering Handbook, Production Operations Engineering, Society of Petroleum Engineers, USA. 101. |
| [3] | Fan, Y., Sarica, C., (2019). A novel approach for system instability prediction using nodal analysis. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Calgary, Alberta: Society of Petroleum Engineers. |
| [4] | Guo, B., (2019) Well productivity handbook: vertical, fractured, horizontal, multi-fractured and radial-fractured wells, 2nd edition. Gulf Professional Publishing, Cambridge. |
| [5] | Guo, B., Liu, X., & Tan, X., (2017). Petroleum Production Engineering, 2nd edition, Hayton J. Gulf Professional Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier, United States. |
| [6] | Guo, B., Lyons, W. C., & Ghalambor, A., (2007). Petroleum Production Engineering - A Computer-Assisted Approach, Elsevier Science & Technology Books, Lafayette. |
| [7] | Larry W. L. (2006) Petroleum Engineering Handbook, Society of Petroleum Engineering, USA. |
| [8] | Li, L, Xiong, J., (2011). Development and application of optimizing software of tubing and production casing sizes for gas and flowing wells. In: 2011 international conference on computational and information sciences. IEEE Computer Society, pp 671–674. |
| [9] | Lyons, W. C., (2010). Working Guide to Petroleum and Natural Gas Production Engineering, Gulf Professional Publishing, Elsevier. |
| [10] | Pipesim (2017) Schlumberger PIPESIM*Production System Analysis Software Version 2010.1 User Guide. |
| [11] | Renpu, W., (2011). Advanced well completion engineering, 3rd edn. Gulf Professional Publishing, Waltham. |
| [12] | Wan R (2000) Oil Production Technology Handbook (Petroleum Industry Press, China). |
| [13] | Wan R (2011) Selection and Determination of Tubing and Production Casing Sizes, Chapter 3. Advanced Well Completion Enginer, 3rd Edition, Elsevier Inc. |
APA Style
Humphrey Nnenna Amah, Uche Osokogwu. (2022). Investigating Effects of Tubing Sizes on Hydrocarbon Recovery in Niger Delta. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources, 11(3), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20221103.13
ACS Style
Humphrey Nnenna Amah; Uche Osokogwu. Investigating Effects of Tubing Sizes on Hydrocarbon Recovery in Niger Delta. J. Energy Nat. Resour. 2022, 11(3), 95-106. doi: 10.11648/j.jenr.20221103.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jenr.20221103.13,
author = {Humphrey Nnenna Amah and Uche Osokogwu},
title = {Investigating Effects of Tubing Sizes on Hydrocarbon Recovery in Niger Delta},
journal = {Journal of Energy and Natural Resources},
volume = {11},
number = {3},
pages = {95-106},
doi = {10.11648/j.jenr.20221103.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20221103.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jenr.20221103.13},
abstract = {This research employed a qualitative system of analysis that incorporates both nodal and economic analysis of distinct tubing sizes, their flow rates and pressure sensitivity, using tubing performance and four distinct economic profitability indicators. Furthermore, the four-profitability indicators were subjected to a cause factor sensitivity test. Results of the nodal analysis and tubing size sensitivity showed increasing flow rates with increasing tubing size from 1.90-inch tubing size to 4.275-inch and plateaued with highest flow rates within the ranges of 4.75-inch to 5.70-inch and then declined in ranges greater than 6.0-inch. while pressure sensitivity showed relative pressure decrease with increasing tubing size showing lowest pressure points within 4.75-inch to 5.70-inch tubing sizes and then increased in ranges greater than 6.0-inch. Economic profitability analysis was carried out on the tubing sizes using CAPEX, tubing cost and oil production rate through four profitability indicators which includes; NPV, IRR, PI and PP. The outcome of the analysis aided the determination of an optimal tubing size of 5.225-inch ranking it highest in all four utilized profitability tools amongst all four analyzed tubing sizes.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Investigating Effects of Tubing Sizes on Hydrocarbon Recovery in Niger Delta AU - Humphrey Nnenna Amah AU - Uche Osokogwu Y1 - 2022/09/28 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20221103.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jenr.20221103.13 T2 - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources JF - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources JO - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources SP - 95 EP - 106 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7404 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20221103.13 AB - This research employed a qualitative system of analysis that incorporates both nodal and economic analysis of distinct tubing sizes, their flow rates and pressure sensitivity, using tubing performance and four distinct economic profitability indicators. Furthermore, the four-profitability indicators were subjected to a cause factor sensitivity test. Results of the nodal analysis and tubing size sensitivity showed increasing flow rates with increasing tubing size from 1.90-inch tubing size to 4.275-inch and plateaued with highest flow rates within the ranges of 4.75-inch to 5.70-inch and then declined in ranges greater than 6.0-inch. while pressure sensitivity showed relative pressure decrease with increasing tubing size showing lowest pressure points within 4.75-inch to 5.70-inch tubing sizes and then increased in ranges greater than 6.0-inch. Economic profitability analysis was carried out on the tubing sizes using CAPEX, tubing cost and oil production rate through four profitability indicators which includes; NPV, IRR, PI and PP. The outcome of the analysis aided the determination of an optimal tubing size of 5.225-inch ranking it highest in all four utilized profitability tools amongst all four analyzed tubing sizes. VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: