Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping

Pieter George Manoppo

doi:doi:10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping

Pieter George Manoppo

Published in Innovation (Volume 2, Issue 4)

Received: 1 September 2021 Accepted: 23 September 2021 Published: 10 November 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This research aims to map, understand, and design comprehensively and integrally, the correlation between Advocacy Work (litigation and non-litigation) and Research, or RESEARCH-BASED ADVOCACY WORK. Factually-conventional, Advocates have been struggling, both in the Litigation Sector (court) and Non-Litigation (non-litigation) broadly, across fields and sciences, and contexts. However, it is evident that, Advocacy Work, has not been seriously based on Constructive and Contextual Research. Research uses a qualitative approach with Action Research Methods. Data collection uses in-depth interview techniques, observation, documentary studies, FGD, and research-based advocacy design. The results prove that: First. Research with decolonization methodological approaches, context of discovery, and local researchers should prioritize: (a) Immersion process, self-smelting clearly, surely, and thoroughly with the Local Community; (b) Emik process, in the process of self-smelting, the Research Subject will see the problem and its solution, based on the eyes of the Community. (c) The estuary of the Immersion and Emik Process is: together with the Community as a Local Research Subject, community-based Product-Knowledge was born in the form of Comprehensive, Integral, and Contextual Solutions. Second. Referring to the Results of research, then became the Based Design of Transformative Advocacy Service in Indonesia. Based on these findings, I as the Founder and Supervisor of National Board of Professional Organization Advocates PERHAKHI (Indonesian Legal Advisory and Consultant Association) encourages the implementation of RESEARCH-BASED ADVOCACY WORK among PERHAKHI.

Published in	Innovation (Volume 2, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13
Page(s)	67-72
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Advocacy, Research, Immersion, Emik, Solution Mapping

References

[1]	Al-Krenawi, A. (2001). The Cultural Mediator: Bridging the Gap Between a Non-Western Community and Professional Social Work Practice. British Journal of Social Work October 2001.
[2]	Albersteen, M. (2007). Forms of Mediations and Law: Cultures of Dispute Resolution. Ohia State Journal on Dispute Resolution. K, Vol. 22: 2.
[3]	Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and Capabilities: A Framework for Analysing Peasant Viability, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty. World Development, Vol. 27 (1).
[4]	Benjamin, Z. (2013). The Inner Morality of Private Law. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol. 58 No.
[5]	Binnus University. (2019). Group Immersion. Immersion, Faculty of Economic. https://www.bing.com/search?q=Group+immersion+adalah&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&pq=group+immersion+ada&sc=0-19&sk=&cvid=B195847576E24BB48B1578878C29F458.
[6]	Bogdan, R. et. al. (1992). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Terjemahan Oleh Arief Rurchan. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
[7]	Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing, 241-25.
[8]	Carey, J. (1992). Communication as Culture. Essays on Media and Society. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group. New York and London.
[9]	Carrie, M.-M. (1999). Etika dan Profesionalisme dalam Pengacara Non-Adversarial. Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 27, 153.
[10]	Cheung, S. (1999). Critical factors a ecting the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction. ADR Process, 17 (3), 189-194.
[11]	Corbett, H & Swibold, S. (2002). Guide to Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, Commentary In N. Mirovitskaya & W. L. Ascher (Eds).
[12]	Diver, S. W. (2014). Negotiating Knowledge, Shifting Access: Natural Resource Governance with Indigenous Communities and State Agencies in the Pacific Northwest. Pacific Northwest.
[13]	Human, R. (2013). Indigenous People and the Concept of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent. Articele in Impact Assessment and Project Appraizal. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2013.780373.
[14]	Kathy, Douglas & Becky, B. (2014). The Role of Lawyers in Mediation: Insights from Mediators at Victoria’s Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Faculty of Law, Monash University.
[15]	Kenneth, C. S. et. a. (2011). Indigenous People and Resources Development - A Rapidly Changing Legal Landscape. Journal: Oil, Gas & Energy Law Global Energy Law & Regulation Portal. OGEL.
[16]	Klee, C. et. a. (1998). Research and Practice in Immersion Education: Looking Back and Looking Ahead. CARLA, - Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.
[17]	Kompasiana.com. (2014). Emik and Ethic. https://www.kompasiana.com/.../emik-vs-etik%0A.
[18]	Manoppo, P. G. (2021). Reconciling Yourself with the Opportunities and Challenges of the Environmental Era and The Living Layout of Global Ecocentric Advocacy Works. Published for Professional Organizations Advocates PERHAKHI.
[19]	Merriam-Webster. (2021). Definition of Anthropocentric. Posted August 7, 2021 from: Definition of Anthropocentric.
[20]	Miles, M. B and Huberman, M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: SAGE Publication.
[21]	Ross, M. (2019). The Politics of the Resource Curse: a review. Ross - Politics of the resource curse.pdf (ucla.edu).
[22]	Tadjoeddin, M. Z. (2007). A Future Resource Curce in Indonesia: The Political Economy of Natural Resource Conflict and Developnet. CRISE (Center for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethniicity), Working Paper No. 35, October, 2007.
[23]	Vincent, S. S. and M. J. F. (2020). Ecosystem Assessment Program. Northeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA.
[24]	Wallis, Joe & Dollery, B. (n.d.). Government Failure, Social Capital and The Appropriate of New Zealand Model for Public Sector in Development Country. World Development, Vol. 29.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Pieter George Manoppo. (2021). Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping. Innovation, 2(4), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Pieter George Manoppo. Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping. Innovation. 2021, 2(4), 67-72. doi: 10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Pieter George Manoppo. Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping. Innovation. 2021;2(4):67-72. doi: 10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13,
  author = {Pieter George Manoppo},
  title = {Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping},
  journal = {Innovation},
  volume = {2},
  number = {4},
  pages = {67-72},
  doi = {10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.innov.20210204.13},
  abstract = {This research aims to map, understand, and design comprehensively and integrally, the correlation between Advocacy Work (litigation and non-litigation) and Research, or RESEARCH-BASED ADVOCACY WORK. Factually-conventional, Advocates have been struggling, both in the Litigation Sector (court) and Non-Litigation (non-litigation) broadly, across fields and sciences, and contexts. However, it is evident that, Advocacy Work, has not been seriously based on Constructive and Contextual Research. Research uses a qualitative approach with Action Research Methods. Data collection uses in-depth interview techniques, observation, documentary studies, FGD, and research-based advocacy design. The results prove that: First. Research with decolonization methodological approaches, context of discovery, and local researchers should prioritize: (a) Immersion process, self-smelting clearly, surely, and thoroughly with the Local Community; (b) Emik process, in the process of self-smelting, the Research Subject will see the problem and its solution, based on the eyes of the Community. (c) The estuary of the Immersion and Emik Process is: together with the Community as a Local Research Subject, community-based Product-Knowledge was born in the form of Comprehensive, Integral, and Contextual Solutions. Second. Referring to the Results of research, then became the Based Design of Transformative Advocacy Service in Indonesia. Based on these findings, I as the Founder and Supervisor of National Board of Professional Organization Advocates PERHAKHI (Indonesian Legal Advisory and Consultant Association) encourages the implementation of RESEARCH-BASED ADVOCACY WORK among PERHAKHI.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping
AU - Pieter George Manoppo
Y1 - 2021/11/10
PY - 2021
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13
DO - 10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13
T2 - Innovation
JF - Innovation
JO - Innovation
SP - 67
EP - 72
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2994-7138
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13
AB - This research aims to map, understand, and design comprehensively and integrally, the correlation between Advocacy Work (litigation and non-litigation) and Research, or RESEARCH-BASED ADVOCACY WORK. Factually-conventional, Advocates have been struggling, both in the Litigation Sector (court) and Non-Litigation (non-litigation) broadly, across fields and sciences, and contexts. However, it is evident that, Advocacy Work, has not been seriously based on Constructive and Contextual Research. Research uses a qualitative approach with Action Research Methods. Data collection uses in-depth interview techniques, observation, documentary studies, FGD, and research-based advocacy design. The results prove that: First. Research with decolonization methodological approaches, context of discovery, and local researchers should prioritize: (a) Immersion process, self-smelting clearly, surely, and thoroughly with the Local Community; (b) Emik process, in the process of self-smelting, the Research Subject will see the problem and its solution, based on the eyes of the Community. (c) The estuary of the Immersion and Emik Process is: together with the Community as a Local Research Subject, community-based Product-Knowledge was born in the form of Comprehensive, Integral, and Contextual Solutions. Second. Referring to the Results of research, then became the Based Design of Transformative Advocacy Service in Indonesia. Based on these findings, I as the Founder and Supervisor of National Board of Professional Organization Advocates PERHAKHI (Indonesian Legal Advisory and Consultant Association) encourages the implementation of RESEARCH-BASED ADVOCACY WORK among PERHAKHI.
VL - 2
IS - 4
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Pieter George Manoppo

The Centre for Police Science Research and Terrorism Studies, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Pieter George Manoppo. (2021). Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping. Innovation, 2(4), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Pieter George Manoppo. Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping. Innovation. 2021, 2(4), 67-72. doi: 10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Pieter George Manoppo. Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping. Innovation. 2021;2(4):67-72. doi: 10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13,
  author = {Pieter George Manoppo},
  title = {Research-based Advocacy Work: Immersion, Emik, and Solutions Mapping},
  journal = {Innovation},
  volume = {2},
  number = {4},
  pages = {67-72},
  doi = {10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20210204.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.innov.20210204.13},
  abstract = {This research aims to map, understand, and design comprehensively and integrally, the correlation between Advocacy Work (litigation and non-litigation) and Research, or RESEARCH-BASED ADVOCACY WORK. Factually-conventional, Advocates have been struggling, both in the Litigation Sector (court) and Non-Litigation (non-litigation) broadly, across fields and sciences, and contexts. However, it is evident that, Advocacy Work, has not been seriously based on Constructive and Contextual Research. Research uses a qualitative approach with Action Research Methods. Data collection uses in-depth interview techniques, observation, documentary studies, FGD, and research-based advocacy design. The results prove that: First. Research with decolonization methodological approaches, context of discovery, and local researchers should prioritize: (a) Immersion process, self-smelting clearly, surely, and thoroughly with the Local Community; (b) Emik process, in the process of self-smelting, the Research Subject will see the problem and its solution, based on the eyes of the Community. (c) The estuary of the Immersion and Emik Process is: together with the Community as a Local Research Subject, community-based Product-Knowledge was born in the form of Comprehensive, Integral, and Contextual Solutions. Second. Referring to the Results of research, then became the Based Design of Transformative Advocacy Service in Indonesia. Based on these findings, I as the Founder and Supervisor of National Board of Professional Organization Advocates PERHAKHI (Indonesian Legal Advisory and Consultant Association) encourages the implementation of RESEARCH-BASED ADVOCACY WORK among PERHAKHI.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download