Most Asian countries like South Korea have transformed themselves from poor agrarian nations into one of the fastest-growing industrialized economies in the world. Rural transformation poses great challenges to rural people and areas, but also it also provides great opportunities for sustainable rural development. The evolution of South Korea's rural policies is embedded through the different national institutions with different sectors. Diversification of rural economic opportunities may further extend to the industries for economic development in rural regions alongside efforts to improve living. Examined the rural transformation in South Korea, mainly the rural development with land, agriculture, truism, political and strategy they used that shaped the structure of the rural transformation and its activities over time and Ethiopia takes lessons is the objective of the study. Document analysis is a tool for achieving the information. Ethiopia takes lessons from South Korea from the general sector of rural development to the particular agricultural development sector, rural truism development, land reform which is the core asset for the world people, health care reform, and market and trade transformation (indicates that the base for developed country development was trade reform from import to export), rural job employment transformation (which have the multidimensional impact to the development of nation) and rural political transformation are the basic areas of rural transformation in which Ethiopia focused to do. The country can grow with the integrated/ collaborative work of the stakeholders. The government of Ethiopia applying a functional regional strategy to shape the socio-economic and cultural changes of the rural people and working with civil societies and with other non-governmental stakeholders must be the primary tasks.
Published in | International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis (Volume 9, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20230901.13 |
Page(s) | 23-31 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Rural Transformation, South Korea, Ethiopia, Rural
[1] | Ahn Y, Kim N, Kim CB, Ham (2013), factors affecting unmet healthcare needs of older people in Korea, Int Nurs Rev Vol 60 (4), p 510–9. |
[2] | Anderson GF., (1989), Universal health care coverage in Korea, Health Aff (Millwood), 8 (2): 24–34. |
[3] | Antonio Almeida and Luis pinto Machado (2021) Rural Development and Rural Tourism: The Impact of Infrastructure Investments. |
[4] | Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) website: http://www.aseansec.org/64.htm (accessed 28 October 2005). |
[5] | Atakile Beyene (2004), Land Tenure and its Challenges to Agricultural Development: A Case Study of a Smallholder-Farming System in Tigray, Ethiopia. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Ethiopian Economy, Volume II Seyoum, A. et al., eds. Addis Ababa: Ethiopian Economic Association (EEA). |
[6] | Berhanu A., (2002), Fieldwork an Ethiopian Experience, Postgraduate Forum, Campus Review Vol 12 No. 12 April 3-9, 2002. |
[7] | Cho Seok-gon (2001), Changes in the Korean Land System in the 20th Century and the Farmer-owner Ideology, “in Byeong-jik Ahn (ed.) The Korean Economic History: A Preliminary Study, Seoul National University Press,, pp. 329-364. |
[8] | Daniel A. Pinkston (2016), the Evolution of South Korea's Rural Institutions: The Political Economy of Export Promotion and Market Protection. |
[9] | Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, and Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (2014), Growth and Transformation Plan Annual Progress Report for FY 2012/13. |
[10] | Federal Ministry of Health (2010), the role of increased financing for improved quality of health care: evidences from multi-dimensional HCF studies in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[11] | Global Donor Platform, (2016), Agenda 2030 –New Momentum for Rural Transformation: The future of Donor Programmes in Rural Development on 13-14. October, Botanical Garden, Rome, Italy. |
[12] | Jeon, Y. D., Y. Y. Kim (2000), Land Reform, Income Redistribution, and Agricultural Production in Korea, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48: 253-68. |
[13] | Jung Gap-jin (2009), Policy Experiences and Applications of Korea’s Samuel Undoing in the 1970s, in Korean, Seoul: Korea Development Institute. |
[14] | Kim BY., (2000), Korean experiment for the unification of multiple medical insurers: a road to success or failure. In: International Symposium on National Health Insurance, Korea Health and Welfare Forum p 3–39. |
[15] | Kim, T. and J. Lim (2016), Regional Policy in the Republic of Korea: Principles and Experiences. |
[16] | Lee W., (2015), Korea’s national territorial and regional development policies. |
[17] | Lee, K. (2013), Capability-based View ‘of a Role Model for Development, Achieving Development Success: Strategies and Lessons from the Developing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, South Korea. |
[18] | Mohammed Yimer (2015), Economic and Social Transformations of Korea; Lessons for Developing Countries With a particular Relevance to Ethiopia, Department of Civic and Ethical Studies, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. |
[19] | Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2012), The Fourth Comprehensive National Territorial Plan (modified version), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. |
[20] | Park Sihyun (2007), Changes in the Korean Rural Development Policy Unpublished document. |
[21] | Ramirez, L., & Rubio, J. (2010), Culture, Government and Development in South Korea, Asian Culture and History, 2 (1), 71-81. |
[22] | Rudolf Robert (2012), Rural Reforms, Agricultural Productivity, and the Biological Standard of Living in South Korea, 1941-1974. |
[23] | So, S.-Y., 2007, Direction for Rural Development Policy and Countermeasure of Community People Unpublished Technical. |
[24] | Taebyung Kim and Junghwan Lim June (2016), Regional Policy in the Republic of Korea: Principles and Experiences. |
[25] | United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2011) Foreign Direct Investment, the Transfer and Diffusion of Technology, Sustainable Development and Trade, Geneva, pp. 16–18. |
[26] | United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2014), The Role of International Trade in the Post-2015 Development Agenda, Trade and Development Commission 6th Session Geneva, pp. 5–9, World Tourism Organization (WTO) Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Annual Reports. |
[27] | Yeshineh, A. K., (2016), Determinants and Potentials of Foreign Trade in Ethiopia: A Gravity Model Analysis, MPRA Paper No. 74509. |
[28] | Yoon Seokjin Lee Sangyun Park Sihyun (2013), Modularization of Korea’s Development Experience: Policy for Promotion of Agricultural Mechanization and Technology Development” Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Korea Rural Economic Institute. |
APA Style
Dagim Amare Awoke, Ketemaw Melkamu. (2023). Review on the Rural Transformation Experiences of South Korea: Main Lessons That Ethiopia Have Enhanced to Take into Considerations Regarding Rural Transformation. International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis, 9(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20230901.13
ACS Style
Dagim Amare Awoke; Ketemaw Melkamu. Review on the Rural Transformation Experiences of South Korea: Main Lessons That Ethiopia Have Enhanced to Take into Considerations Regarding Rural Transformation. Int. J. Sci. Qual. Anal. 2023, 9(1), 23-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20230901.13
AMA Style
Dagim Amare Awoke, Ketemaw Melkamu. Review on the Rural Transformation Experiences of South Korea: Main Lessons That Ethiopia Have Enhanced to Take into Considerations Regarding Rural Transformation. Int J Sci Qual Anal. 2023;9(1):23-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20230901.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijsqa.20230901.13, author = {Dagim Amare Awoke and Ketemaw Melkamu}, title = {Review on the Rural Transformation Experiences of South Korea: Main Lessons That Ethiopia Have Enhanced to Take into Considerations Regarding Rural Transformation}, journal = {International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis}, volume = {9}, number = {1}, pages = {23-31}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsqa.20230901.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20230901.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsqa.20230901.13}, abstract = {Most Asian countries like South Korea have transformed themselves from poor agrarian nations into one of the fastest-growing industrialized economies in the world. Rural transformation poses great challenges to rural people and areas, but also it also provides great opportunities for sustainable rural development. The evolution of South Korea's rural policies is embedded through the different national institutions with different sectors. Diversification of rural economic opportunities may further extend to the industries for economic development in rural regions alongside efforts to improve living. Examined the rural transformation in South Korea, mainly the rural development with land, agriculture, truism, political and strategy they used that shaped the structure of the rural transformation and its activities over time and Ethiopia takes lessons is the objective of the study. Document analysis is a tool for achieving the information. Ethiopia takes lessons from South Korea from the general sector of rural development to the particular agricultural development sector, rural truism development, land reform which is the core asset for the world people, health care reform, and market and trade transformation (indicates that the base for developed country development was trade reform from import to export), rural job employment transformation (which have the multidimensional impact to the development of nation) and rural political transformation are the basic areas of rural transformation in which Ethiopia focused to do. The country can grow with the integrated/ collaborative work of the stakeholders. The government of Ethiopia applying a functional regional strategy to shape the socio-economic and cultural changes of the rural people and working with civil societies and with other non-governmental stakeholders must be the primary tasks.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Review on the Rural Transformation Experiences of South Korea: Main Lessons That Ethiopia Have Enhanced to Take into Considerations Regarding Rural Transformation AU - Dagim Amare Awoke AU - Ketemaw Melkamu Y1 - 2023/07/20 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20230901.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsqa.20230901.13 T2 - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis JF - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis JO - International Journal of Science and Qualitative Analysis SP - 23 EP - 31 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-8164 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsqa.20230901.13 AB - Most Asian countries like South Korea have transformed themselves from poor agrarian nations into one of the fastest-growing industrialized economies in the world. Rural transformation poses great challenges to rural people and areas, but also it also provides great opportunities for sustainable rural development. The evolution of South Korea's rural policies is embedded through the different national institutions with different sectors. Diversification of rural economic opportunities may further extend to the industries for economic development in rural regions alongside efforts to improve living. Examined the rural transformation in South Korea, mainly the rural development with land, agriculture, truism, political and strategy they used that shaped the structure of the rural transformation and its activities over time and Ethiopia takes lessons is the objective of the study. Document analysis is a tool for achieving the information. Ethiopia takes lessons from South Korea from the general sector of rural development to the particular agricultural development sector, rural truism development, land reform which is the core asset for the world people, health care reform, and market and trade transformation (indicates that the base for developed country development was trade reform from import to export), rural job employment transformation (which have the multidimensional impact to the development of nation) and rural political transformation are the basic areas of rural transformation in which Ethiopia focused to do. The country can grow with the integrated/ collaborative work of the stakeholders. The government of Ethiopia applying a functional regional strategy to shape the socio-economic and cultural changes of the rural people and working with civil societies and with other non-governmental stakeholders must be the primary tasks. VL - 9 IS - 1 ER -