An examination is a means of assessing people’s knowledge, competence, or skills in a particular field. It can be through manual or physical contact or a computer-based approach. Achieving the purpose of high-standard examination can only be fulfilled when adequate measures are put in place and steps are taken to implement them. This study presents findings from the baseline study of security agents’ perspectives on conducting and administering examinations in Nigeria. The study adopted a survey approach that was based on the administration of a questionnaire which was carefully formulated to capture the views and opinions of the respondents on the available indices. The administered questionnaire was structured to curate information from the respondents about their knowledge of the stakeholders’ level of infractions and conformity with regulations. The survey attempted to know the extent of deterrent strategies against infractions and corrupt practices, the welfare packages available to security agents, and the examination bodies’ general performances, among others. Twenty thousand and two hundred (20,200) respondents across the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria from different categories of security agencies including the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC), Nigerian Civil Defense Corps (NCDC), Police Force, and private security outfits participated in the survey. The statistical-based analysis of data obtained from the survey revealed that the educational system has a competent workforce with a significant number of tertiary-educated individuals, a significant level of compliance of stakeholders to examination regulations, and effective enforcement of rules by security agencies. The analysis also revealed a substantial level of inadequacies with the operating environment and mechanisms for welfare and mobility packages as well as gaps in certain aspects of the examination process which may be connected to inefficient communication, logistical challenges and inadequate resources. The study justified the need for more attention to improving on the deterrent measures against examination misconduct through increased vigilance and addressing some factors that militate against the existing measures for curbing corrupt practices during the examination.
Published in | International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20251101.13 |
Page(s) | 35-44 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Examination Conducts, Candidates, Security Agents, Measures, Performances
Region | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
North Central | 3,898 | 19.3 |
North East | 2,404 | 11.9 |
North West | 1,111 | 05.5 |
South East | 1,111 | 05.5 |
South South | 3,111 | 15.4 |
South West | 8,565 | 42.4 |
Security Agency | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
FRSC | 7,595 | 37.6 |
NCDC | 4,808 | 23.8 |
Police | 5,797 | 28.7 |
Private Agencies | 1,394 | 06.9 |
Others | 606 | 03.0 |
Categories of Security Agency | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
No formal education | 0 | 0 |
Primary School | 0 | 0 |
Secondary School | 5,797 | 28.7 |
Advanced Level | 2,000 | 09.9 |
NCE | 3,596 | 17.8 |
HND | 4,989 | 24.7 |
B.Sc./B, Tech. | 3,111 | 15.4 |
M.Sc./M.Tech. | 505 | 2.5 |
PhD | 202 | 1 |
Level | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Very Low | 182 | 0.9 |
Low | 0 | 0 |
Average | 2,808 | 13.9 |
High | 14,907 | 73.8 |
Very High | 2,303 | 11.4 |
Level | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Very Low | 101 | 0.5 |
Low | 505 | 2.5 |
Average | 3,293 | 16.3 |
High | 12,605 | 62.4 |
Very High | 3,696 | 18.3 |
Level | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Very Low | 101 | 0.5 |
Low | 606 | 3 |
Average | 1,798 | 8.9 |
High | 12,201 | 60.4 |
Very High | 5,494 | 27.2 |
Level | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Very Low | 3,697 | 18.3 |
Low | 10,201 | 50.5 |
Average | 4,808 | 23.8 |
High | 1,494 | 7.4 |
Very High | 0 | 0 |
Level | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Very Low | 6,201 | 30.7 |
Low | 10,201 | 50.5 |
Average | 2,909 | 14.4 |
High | 707 | 3.5 |
Very High | 182 | 0.9 |
Level | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Very Low | 9,494 | 47.0 |
Low | 8,201 | 40.6 |
Average | 1,596 | 7.9 |
High | 909 | 4.5 |
Very High | 0 | 0 |
Level | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Very Low | 10,100 | 50 |
Low | 7,797 | 38.6 |
Average | 1,596 | 7.9 |
High | 707 | 3.5 |
Very High | 0 | 0 |
Parameters/Level | Very Low | Low | Average | High | Very High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Impact of Existing Deterrent Strategies | 303 (1.5%) | 1,596 (7.9%) | 9,595 (47.5%) | 7,797 (38.6%) | 909 (4.5%) |
Rate of Cases of Deterrent | 606 (3%) | 6,100 (30.2%) | 9.595 (47.5%) | 3,596 (17.8%) | 303 (1.5%) |
Efficiency of Deterrent System | 121 (0.6%) | 1,293 (6.4%) | 10,403 (51.5%) | 7,494 (37.1%) | 909 (4.5%) |
Effectiveness of Deterrent Strategies | 202 (1%) | 1,010 (5%) | 10,908 (54%) | 6,888 (34.1%) | 1,192 (5.9%) |
Timeliness of Deterrent Strategies | 404 (2%) | 2,303 (11.4%) | 10,302 (51%) | 6,080 (30.1%) | 1,111 (5.5%) |
Vulnerability of Deterrent Strategies to Attack | 1,111 (5.5%) | 8,100 (40.1%) | 8,201 (40.6%) | 2,788 (13.8%) | 0 (0%) |
Level | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Very Low | 404 | 02.0 |
Low | 1,717 | 08.5 |
Average | 9,494 | 47.0 |
High | 7,393 | 36.6 |
Very High | 1,192 | 05.9 |
Parameters/Level | Very Low | Low | Average | High | Very High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Welfare Packages | 3,192 (15.8%) | 10,302(51%) | 6,504(32.2%) | 202(1%) | 0(0%) |
Mobility Packages | 2,707(13.4%) | 10,706(53%) | 5,595(27.7%) | 1,192(5.9%) | 0(0%) |
Suitability of Operating Environment | 1,010(5%) | 4,686(23.2%) | 9,999(49.5%) | 4,303(21.3%) | 202(1%) |
Parameters/Level | Very Low | Low | Average | High | Very High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adequacy of Pre-examination Arrangements | 202 (1%) | 2,303 (11.4%) | 10,706 (53%) | 6,686 (33.1%) | 303 (1.5%) |
Relationships of Security Personnel with Examination Personnel | 101 (0.5%) | 505 (2.5%) | 6,605 (32.7%) | 11,898 (58.9%) | 1.091 (5.4%) |
Information Dissemination by Security Personnel | 202 (1%) | 808 (4%) | 8,302 (41.1%) | 10,383 (51.4%) | 505 (2.5%) |
Information Management by Security Personnel | 0 (0%) | 909 (4.5%) | 8,383 (41.5%) | 10,403 (51.5%) | 505 (2.5%) |
Experiences of Security Personnel on Examination Matter | 0 (0%) | 1,192 (5.9%) | 9,110 (45.1%) | 8,787 (43.5%) | 1,111 (5.5%) |
Competency of Security Personnel | 101 (0.5%) | 606 (3%) | 3,192 (15.8%) | 12.302 (60.9%) | 3,999 (19.8%) |
Professionalism Among Security Personnel | 0 (0%) | 909 (4.5%) | 3,979 (19.7%) | 10,908 (54%) | 4,404 (21.8%) |
FRSC | Federal Road Safety Commission |
NCDC | Nigerian Civil Defense Corps |
WASSCE | West African Senior School Certificate Examination |
SSCE | Senior Secondary Certificate Examination |
UTME | Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination |
SCT | Social Cognitive Theory |
[1] | Dajwan, R. L. D., Sunday, M. B., Pam, D. B., Davou, M. B., & Mwantiyi, D. E. (2020). Examination Malpractices: A Threat to Educational Reforms in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria. Oracle of Wisdom Journal of Philosophy and Public Affairs (OWIJOPPA), 4(5). |
[2] | Ikechukwu, A. (2020). Endemic Malpractices in Examination Administration in Nigeria: A Dissection of Implications on Emerging Human Resource Productivity. Journal of Security Studies and Global Politics, 4(1), 37-48. |
[3] |
World Economic Forum, (2019). Top 10 African Countries with the Best Education Systems.
https://www.afterschoolafrica.com/42898/top-10-african-countries-with-the-best-education-systems/ |
[4] | Iwasokun G. B., Akinyede R. O., Alese B. K., Ayinde F. O., Odeniyi O. A., Afolabi O. O., Ehineni O. J., Gbale M. O., Balogun T. E. (2024), Current and Prospective Views of Electronic and Remote Invigilation of Examinations. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS). Vol. 8 Issue 9, pp: 3141-3152, |
[5] |
Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999. Examination malpractices act. Retrieved from
https://www.lawyard.ng/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/examinationmalpractices-ACT.pdf |
[6] | Agwu, P., Orjiakor, C. T., Odii, A., Onalu, C., Nzeadibe, C., Roy, P., & Okoye, U. (2022). “Miracle Examination Centres” as hubs for malpractices in Senior Secondary School Certificate Examination in Nigeria: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Educational Development, 88, |
[7] | Mireku, D. O., Bervell, B., & Dzamesi, P. D. (2024). Examination malpractice behaviours in Higher Education (EMALBiHE) in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 108 (c), |
[8] | Osayekemwen T. O. B. And ADEOLUWA, T. A. (2025), Threat Assessment and National Security in Nigeria: EFCC in Perspective, African Journal of Social Issues 8(1), |
[9] | Adam I. M., Sallee K. W. and Adaramaja S. M. (2023), Assessment of Insecurity on Quality Education in Nigeria Tertiary Institutions, KWASU International Journal of Education, 6(1): 178-184. |
[10] | Akinwumi F. S. and Itobore A. A. (2024), Education Security and Security Education in Nigeria: Conjectures, Re-Conceptualization and Expectations, EKSU Journal of Education, 9(1): 107-114. |
[11] |
Aworanti O. A. (2024), Security Breach: A Threat to the Quality of Examination and Assessment. Available: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/
https://earnia.org/e4e356ef6f4f9e939e06f04e06f60ef3ef0560f0de6/Security%20Breach.pdf |
[12] | Gulesh, J. O., Mallam A. S. Y. and Aledare S. E. (2022), Education and Security: Exploring Areas of Collaboration between Schools and Security Agencies in Nigeria, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 6(3): 461-465. |
[13] | Devi B., Pradhan S., Giri D., Lepcha N. (2022), Concept of Social cognitive theory and its application in the field of Medical and Nursing education: a framework to guide Research, Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4): 5161 – 5168, |
[14] | Islam, K., Awal, A., Mazumder, H. Social Cognitive Theory-Based Health Promotion in Primary Care Practice: A Scoping Review, Heliyon, 9(4). |
[15] | Richard E., and Darlene R. (2011). Applying Social Cognitive Theory to Academic Advising to Assess Student Learning Outcomes. NACADA Journal. 31. 5-15. |
[16] | Okoh J. O., and Nwachukwu G. O. (2024) Financing Education in Nigeria: Implications for National Integration and Economic Recovery, British Journal of Education, Vol. 12, Issue 8, 31-37, |
[17] | Olawuyi Olushola F., Rasheed A. Tomori and Oluwatosin O. Bamigboye (2018), Students’ Suitability of Computer Based Test (CBT) Mode for Undergraduate Courses in Nigerian Universities: A Case Study of University of Ilorin, Int J Edu Sci, 20(1-3): 18-24. |
[18] | Steve-Beke, V. E. K. (2019). Effective information dissemination and communication in educational planning in Nigeria. International Journal of Institutional Leadership, Policy and Management, 1(2), 378-390. |
APA Style
Iwasokun, G. B., Afolabi, O. O., Adegoke, M. A., Adewole, D. B., Ohwobeno, O. (2025). Security Agents Insight Analysis of the Educational Assessment in Nigeria. International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies, 11(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20251101.13
ACS Style
Iwasokun, G. B.; Afolabi, O. O.; Adegoke, M. A.; Adewole, D. B.; Ohwobeno, O. Security Agents Insight Analysis of the Educational Assessment in Nigeria. Int. J. Sustain. Manag. Inf. Technol. 2025, 11(1), 35-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20251101.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijsmit.20251101.13, author = {Gabriel Babatunde Iwasokun and Olaitan Omowumi Afolabi and Michael Abejide Adegoke and David Bamidele Adewole and Omohwo Ohwobeno}, title = {Security Agents Insight Analysis of the Educational Assessment in Nigeria }, journal = {International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {35-44}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsmit.20251101.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20251101.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsmit.20251101.13}, abstract = {An examination is a means of assessing people’s knowledge, competence, or skills in a particular field. It can be through manual or physical contact or a computer-based approach. Achieving the purpose of high-standard examination can only be fulfilled when adequate measures are put in place and steps are taken to implement them. This study presents findings from the baseline study of security agents’ perspectives on conducting and administering examinations in Nigeria. The study adopted a survey approach that was based on the administration of a questionnaire which was carefully formulated to capture the views and opinions of the respondents on the available indices. The administered questionnaire was structured to curate information from the respondents about their knowledge of the stakeholders’ level of infractions and conformity with regulations. The survey attempted to know the extent of deterrent strategies against infractions and corrupt practices, the welfare packages available to security agents, and the examination bodies’ general performances, among others. Twenty thousand and two hundred (20,200) respondents across the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria from different categories of security agencies including the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC), Nigerian Civil Defense Corps (NCDC), Police Force, and private security outfits participated in the survey. The statistical-based analysis of data obtained from the survey revealed that the educational system has a competent workforce with a significant number of tertiary-educated individuals, a significant level of compliance of stakeholders to examination regulations, and effective enforcement of rules by security agencies. The analysis also revealed a substantial level of inadequacies with the operating environment and mechanisms for welfare and mobility packages as well as gaps in certain aspects of the examination process which may be connected to inefficient communication, logistical challenges and inadequate resources. The study justified the need for more attention to improving on the deterrent measures against examination misconduct through increased vigilance and addressing some factors that militate against the existing measures for curbing corrupt practices during the examination. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Security Agents Insight Analysis of the Educational Assessment in Nigeria AU - Gabriel Babatunde Iwasokun AU - Olaitan Omowumi Afolabi AU - Michael Abejide Adegoke AU - David Bamidele Adewole AU - Omohwo Ohwobeno Y1 - 2025/03/13 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20251101.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20251101.13 T2 - International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies JF - International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies JO - International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies SP - 35 EP - 44 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5110 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20251101.13 AB - An examination is a means of assessing people’s knowledge, competence, or skills in a particular field. It can be through manual or physical contact or a computer-based approach. Achieving the purpose of high-standard examination can only be fulfilled when adequate measures are put in place and steps are taken to implement them. This study presents findings from the baseline study of security agents’ perspectives on conducting and administering examinations in Nigeria. The study adopted a survey approach that was based on the administration of a questionnaire which was carefully formulated to capture the views and opinions of the respondents on the available indices. The administered questionnaire was structured to curate information from the respondents about their knowledge of the stakeholders’ level of infractions and conformity with regulations. The survey attempted to know the extent of deterrent strategies against infractions and corrupt practices, the welfare packages available to security agents, and the examination bodies’ general performances, among others. Twenty thousand and two hundred (20,200) respondents across the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria from different categories of security agencies including the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC), Nigerian Civil Defense Corps (NCDC), Police Force, and private security outfits participated in the survey. The statistical-based analysis of data obtained from the survey revealed that the educational system has a competent workforce with a significant number of tertiary-educated individuals, a significant level of compliance of stakeholders to examination regulations, and effective enforcement of rules by security agencies. The analysis also revealed a substantial level of inadequacies with the operating environment and mechanisms for welfare and mobility packages as well as gaps in certain aspects of the examination process which may be connected to inefficient communication, logistical challenges and inadequate resources. The study justified the need for more attention to improving on the deterrent measures against examination misconduct through increased vigilance and addressing some factors that militate against the existing measures for curbing corrupt practices during the examination. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -