Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism

Irina Gennadievna Mikailova; Maria Romanovna Zobova

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism

Irina Gennadievna Mikailova, Maria Romanovna Zobova

Published in International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 6, Issue 3)

Received: 3 October 2018 Accepted: 29 October 2018 Published: 26 November 2018

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The article, Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism, is focused on discussing a new methodological approach to the study on specific regularities of global development of humanity from the Synergetic Philosophy of History perspective. Such an approach to the speculation on interconnected problems both of human origins in the Universe and mankind’s global future allows to be concentrated on self-organizing interconversions between poles of the cardinal dual opposition of Order and Chaos. The investigation in question is based on such a progressive methodology as the Law of Self- Organizing Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals, as well as the Method of Dual Oppositions. The Law of Self-Organizing Ideals contributes to overcome a vicious Utopian Circle and obtain identity between the absolute ideal common to all mankind and individual ideals of every member of society, according to the principle of self-similarity of dissipative systems. Substantiating rationality of the universal spiral pattern in the Universe from the Synergetic Historicism Viewpoint assists in considering life as a well-balanced system of both biological and sociological aspects. However, disturbing this balance results in both negation of life and self-destruction of a system itself. Considering Self-expressing Subjects called “Homo Faber” as a kind of ideological as well as social and political “animals” permits to demonstrate that any idealization is inherent in human beings’ mental activity only, since the only society is characterized by reproducing ideals and values. The methodological base created by the authors, is oriented not only towards grounding the inevitability of transforming “Homo Sapiens” as biological animals into “Homo Faber” as ideological animals in the first stage, as well as of transforming "Homo Faber" into “Homo Super”, in the second stage of global development. Such a transformation assists not only in overwhelming barriers of evolution processes, intruded on by natural laws, but also in investigating the most important theoretical prerequisites of synthesizing social and cultural as well as Scientific and Technological progress. Revealing interrelationships between the problem of a sense of social history and the meaning-of-life of society members allows to substantiate specific regularities of reproducing the genetic code and its transforming into the ideological code in a transitional stage from synthesizing Social and Cultural as well as Scientific and Technological Progress to a self-organizing Superhuman society.

Published in	International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14
Page(s)	84-106
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Law of Self-Organizing Ideals, Dual Oppositions, Social and Cultural Progress, Global Development, Scientific and Technological Progress, Ideological Code, Anthropic Principles, Cosmological Model

References

[1]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Organization in Social and Cultural Dynamics of Reproducing Russian Mentality / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2011. – Vol. 2. P. 51–60. (In Russian). P. 51–52.
[2]	Synergetic Philosophy of History. Collective Monograph. V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky (eds.). – Ryazan’: Copy-Print, 2009. (In Russian). P. 13–17.
[3]	Bransky. V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Development from the Synergetic Philosophy of History Perspective / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Issues of Philosophy. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – P. 55–65. (In Russian). P. 56.
[4]	Prigogine, I., Stengers, I. Order Out of Chaos. Man’s Dialogue With Nature / I. Prigogine, I. Stengers. – New York: Bantam Books, 1984. P. 277.
[5]	Bransky. V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Development from the Synergetic Philosophy of History Perspective / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Issues of Philosophy. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – P. 55–65. (In Russian). P. 57.
[6]	Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. The Truth and Ideal Seen from the Problem of Russian Future Perspective / S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // The Future of Russia: Strategies of Philosophical Speculation. Collection of Papers. – SPb.: SPb State University Press, 2011. – P. 307–315. (In Russian).
[7]	Mikailova, I. G. Art Modelling as a Factor in Fantastic Seeing Reality / I. G. Mikhailova. – SPb.: B&K, 2005. (In Russian). P. 63–71.
[8]	Bransky. V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Development from the Synergetic Philosophy of History Perspective / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Issues of Philosophy. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – P. 55–65. (In Russian). P. 57].
[9]	Synergetic Philosophy of History. Collective Monograph. V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky (eds.). – Ryazan’: Copy-Print, 2009. (In Russian). P. 93–113.
[10]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G., Zobova, M. R. The Problem of the Meaning-of-life: The Significance Common to All Mankind and of General Science. – SPb.: SPb State University, 2017. (In Russian). P. 18–19.
[11]	Bransky. V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Development from the Synergetic Philosophy of History Perspective / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Issues of Philosophy. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – P. 55–65. (In Russian). P. 58.
[12]	Global Future 2045. Convergent Technologies and Transhumanism Evolution. – M.: MBA, 2013. (In Russian).
[13]	Bransky, V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Future, Transhumanism, and Synergetic Philosophy of History / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technique: History and Modernity. Collection of Scientific Transactions. – SPb.: LETI Press, 2015. (In Russian).
[14]	Bransky, V. P. Synergetics and Cosmology (Philosophical Foundations of the Cosmological Model of the Universe / V. P. Bransky // Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 17. – 2014. – Issue 4. – P. 12–29. (In Russian). P. 18–21.
[15]	Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. The Anthropic Principle from the Evolutionism and Synergetics Positions / S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova. – SPb.: SPb National Research University of Information Technology, Mechanics, and Optics Press, 2016. (In Russian). P. 362–363.
[16]	Bransky. V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Development from the Synergetic Philosophy of History Perspective / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Issues of Philosophy. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – P. 55–65. (In Russian). P. 58.
[17]	Bransky. V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Development from the Synergetic Philosophy of History Perspective / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Issues of Philosophy. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – P. 55–65. (In Russian). P. 59.
[18]	Bransky. V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Development from the Synergetic Philosophy of History Perspective / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Issues of Philosophy. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – P. 55–65. (In Russian). P. 59.
[19]	Eden, A., Moor, J. Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment / A. Eden, J. Moor. – Dordrecht: Springer Verlag, 2012. P. 1–2.
[20]	Chalmers, D. The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis / D. Chalmers // Journal of Consciousness Studies. – 2010. – Vol. 17. – Issue 9–10. – P. 7–65; Vinge, V. The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era / V. Vinge // Vision-21 Symposium: Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace. March 30–31, 1993. – Washington: NASA Special Publications, 1993. – P. 11–22;
[21]	Desmond, A., Moore, J. Darwin / A. Desmond, J. Moore. – London: Penguin Group, 1991. P. 263–274.
[22]	Roughgarden, J. The Social Selection Alternative to Sexual Selection / J. Roughgarden // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences. – 2012. – Vol.367. – Issue 1600. – P. 2294–2303.
[23]	Mikailova, I. G. A Book as Bearer of the Idea of Reproducing National, Devotional, and Civilization Identity By Means of an Example of Realizing the Peter I’s of Russia Reforms / I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 4. – P. 33–46. (In Russian). P. 43–44.
[24]	Mikailova, I. G. Dynamics of Reproducing the Russian Statehood and Its Interrelationship with Specifics of Russian Mentality / I. G. Mikailova // Russia: Tendencies and Perspectives of Development. In two parts. The Annual, Part One. – 2010. – Issue 5. – P. 454–458. (In Russian).
[25]	Die List der Vernunft // Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. – Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, 1970. V, S. 343.
[26]	Plantinga, A. God, Freedom, and Evil / A. Plantinga. – Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1974.
[27]	Mikailova, I. G. Social and Cultural Ideals and Global Artistic Culture. Vol. I. Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals and Their Role in Dynamic Reproducing Human Civilization / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2016. (In Russian). P. 122.
[28]	The Cultural Life of Catastrophes and Crises. – Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, Ltd., 2012. P. 1–3.
[29]	Zobova, M. R. Self-Organization of the Metagalaxy and the Emergence of Complex Dissipative Structures: Synergistic Analysis / M. R. Zobova // Scientific Journal of Volgograd State University. Series 7. Philosophe, Sociology, and Social Technologies. – 2016. – Vol. 4. – Issue 34. – P. 53–60. (In Russian). P. 54–55.
[30]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 204.
[31]	Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. The Anthropic Principle and the Problem of Antinomies / S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Perm’ University Bulletin. Series Philosophy, Psychology, Sociology. – 2017. – Vol. 3. – P. 318–327. (In Russian).
[32]	Bransky, V. P. Synergetics and Cosmology (Philosophical Foundations of the Cosmological Model of the Universe / V. P. Bransky // Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 17. – 2014. – Issue 4. – P. 12–29. (In Russian). P. 18–21.
[33]	Carter, B., McCrea, W. H. The Anthropic Principle and Its Implications for Biological Evolution / B. Carter, W. H. McCrea // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. – 1983. – Vol. 310. – P. 347–363.
[34]	Barrow, J. D., Tipler, F. J. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle / J. D. Barrow, F. J. Tipler. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. P. 288–457.
[35]	Wheeler, J. A. At Home in the Universe / J. A. Wheeler. – New York: American Institute of Physics Press, 1994. P. 272–309.
[36]	Barrow, J. D. Anthropic Definition / J. D. Barrow // Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. – 1997. – Vol. 24. – P. 146–153.
[37]	Abecasis, G. R., Auton, A., Brooks, L. D. An Integrated Map of Genetic Variation From 1,092 Human Genoms / G. R. Abecasis, A. Auton, L. D. Brooks // Nature. – 2012. – Vol. 491. – Issue 7422. – P. 56–65.
[38]	Mikailova, I. G. Social and Cultural Ideals and Global Artistic Culture. Vol. I. Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals and Their Role in Dynamic Reproducing Human Civilization / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2016. (In Russian).
[39]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 204–205.
[40]	Barrow, J. D., Tipler, F. J. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle / J. D. Barrow, F. J. Tipler. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. P. 23.
[41]	Tipler, F. J. The Physics of Immortality: Modern Cosmology, God, and the Resurrection of the Dead / F. J. Tipler. – New York: Doubleday, 1994. P. 560.
[42]	Tipler, F. The Omega Point as Eschaton: Answers to Pannenberg’s Questions for Scientists / F. Tipler // Zygon. – 1989. – Vol. 24. – Issue 2. – P. 217–253.
[43]	Boundry, M., Blancke, S., Braeckman, J. Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look Into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience / M. Boundry, S. Blancke, J. Braeckman // The Quarterly Review of Biology. – 2010. – Vol. 85. – Issue 4. – P. 473–482.
[44]	Ayres, R. Information, Entropy, and Progress. A New Evolutionary Paradigm / R. Ayres. – New York: AIP Press, 1994. P. 18.
[45]	Ayres, R. Information, Entropy, and Progress. A New Evolutionary Paradigm / R. Ayres. – New York: AIP Press, 1994. P. 12.
[46]	Podolinsky, S. Human Labour and Dissipation of Energy / S. Podolinsky. – M.: Noosphere, 1991. (In Russian). P. 10.
[47]	Vernadsky, V. P. Philosophical Thoughts of Naturalist / V. P. Vernadsky. – M.: Science, 1988. (In Russian). P. 69.
[48]	Correspondence Between Vladimir I. Vernadsky and Pavel A. Florensky // The New World. – 1989. – Issue 2. – P. 194–303. (In Russian).
[49]	Vernadsky, V. La Géochimie / V. Vernadsky. – Paris: Felix Alcan, 1924.
[50]	Vernadsky, V. The Transition From the Biosphere to the Noosphere. Excerpts from Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon, 1938 / V. Vernadsky. – Washington 21st Century Science and Technology, 2012. P. 18.
[51]	Macklem, P. T. Emergent Phenomena and the Secrets of Life / P. T. Macklem // Journal of Applied Physiology. – 2008. – Vol. 104. – Issue 6. – P. 1844–1846.
[52]	Keizer, J., Fox, R. F. Qualms Regarding the Range of Validity of the Glansdorf-Prigogine Criterion for Stability of Non-Equilibrium States / J. Keizer, R. F. Fox // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. – 1974. – Vol. 71. – Issue 1. – P. 192–196.
[53]	Prigogine, I. Introduction to Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes / I. Prigogine. – New York: Wiley Interscience, 1955. P. V–VI, 118–119, 133–134.
[54]	Mahulikar, S. P., Herwig, H. Exact Thermodynamic Principles for Dynamic Order Existence and Evolution in Chaos / S. P. Mahulikar, H. Herwig // Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals. – 2009. – Vol. 41. – Issue 4. – P. 1939–1948.
[55]	Schrödinger, E. What is Life – the Physical Aspect of the Living Cell / E. Schrödinger. – Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press, 1944. P. 24–25.
[56]	Brillouin, L. Negentropy Principle of Information / L. Brillouin // Journal of Applied Physics. – 1953. – Vol.24. – Issue 9. – P. 1152–1163.
[57]	Mahulikar, S. P., Herwig, H. Exact Thermodynamic Principles for Dynamic Order Existence and Evolution in Chaos / S. P. Mahulikar, H. Herwig // Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals. – 2009. – Vol. 41. – Issue 4. – P. 1939–1948.
[58]	Levit, G. S. The Biosphere and the Noosphere Theories of V. I. Vernadsky and P. Teilhard de Chardin: A Methodological Essay / G. S. Levit // Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences. – 2000. – Vol. 50. – Issue 144. – P. 160–177.
[59]	Le Roy, E. Les origines humaines et 1’évolution de 1’intelligence. III. La Noosphère et l’Hominisation / E. Le Roy. – Paris: Boivin & Cie, 1928. P. 37–57. P. 46.
[60]	Hamilton, C., Grinevald, J. Was the Anthropocene Anticipated? / C. Hamilton, J. Grinevald // The Anthropocene Review. – 2015. – Vol. 2. – Issue 1. – P. 1–14.; Suess, E. La face de la Terre (Das Antlitz der Erde). En cinq volumes / E. Suess. – Paris: Armand Colin et Cie, 1897–1918. IV, P. 1709–1724.
[61]	Le Roy, E. Les origines humaines et 1’évolution de 1’intelligence. III. La Noosphère et l’Hominisation / E. Le Roy. – Paris: Boivin & Cie, 1928. P. 37–57.
[62]	Chardin, P. Teilhard de. Le Phénomène humain / P. Teilhard de Chardin. – Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1955. P. 300.
[63]	Olivier, G. Teilhard de Chardin et le Transformism / G. O1ivier // Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris. – 1965. – T. 7. – Série XIe. – P. 351–359. P. 356–359.
[64]	Chardin, P. Teilhard de. Le Phénomène humain / P. Teilhard de Chardin. – Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1955. P. 269.
[65]	Chardin, P. Teilhard de. La vision du passé / P. Teilhard de Chardin // 0euvres de Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Vol. 3. – Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1957. III, P. 230–261.
[66]	Chardin, P. Teilhard de. L’avenir de l’Homme / P. Teilhard de Chardin. – Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1959. P. 163; Chardin, P. Teilhard de. L’Hominisation. Introduction à une étude scientifique du Phénomène humain / P.Teilhard de Chardin // 0euvres de Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, T. 3. – Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1957. P. 75–111; Hamilton, C., Grinevald, J. Was the Anthropocene Anticipated? / C. Hamilton, J. Grinevald // The Anthropocene Review. – 2015. – Vol. 2. – Issue 1. – P. 1–14. P. 7–8.
[67]	Sideris, L. H. Consecrating Science: Wonder, Knowledge, and the Natural World / L. H. Sideris. – Oakland: University of California Press, 2017. P. 116.
[68]	Sideris, L. H. Consecrating Science: Wonder, Knowledge, and the Natural World / L. H. Sideris. – Oakland: University of California Press, 2017. P. 119.
[69]	Sideris, L. H. Consecrating Science: Wonder, Knowledge, and the Natural World / L. H. Sideris. – Oakland: University of California Press, 2017. P. 121.
[70]	Sideris, L. H. Consecrating Science: Wonder, Knowledge, and the Natural World / L. H. Sideris. – Oakland: University of California Press, 2017. P. 122.
[71]	Mikailova, I. G. Social and Cultural Ideals and Global Artistic Culture. Vol. I. Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals and Their Role in Dynamic Reproducing Human Civilization / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2016. (In Russian). P. 115–116.
[72]	Vernadsky, V. P. Philosophical Thoughts of Naturalist / V. P. Vernadsky. – M.: Science, 1988. (In Russian). P. 130–132.
[73]	Ayres, R. Information, Entropy, and Progress. A New Evolutionary Paradigm / R. Ayres. – New York: AIP Press, 1994. P. 18–19.
[74]	Pokrovsky, V. N. Extended Thermodynamics in a Discrete-System Approach / V. N. Pokrovsky // European Journal of Physics. – 2005. – Vol. 26. – P. 769–781.
[75]	Vernadsky, V. The Transition From the Biosphere to the Noosphere. Excerpts from Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon, 1938 / V. Vernadsky. – Washington 21st Century Science and Technology, 2012. P. 27–28.
[76]	Vernadsky, V. The Biosphere and the Noosphere / V. Vernadsky // American Scientist. – 1945. – Vol. 33. – Issue 1. – P. 1–12. P. 8–10.
[77]	Hamilton, C., Grinevald, J. Was the Anthropocene Anticipated? / C. Hamilton, J. Grinevald // The Anthropocene Review. – 2015. – Vol. 2. – Issue 1. – P. 1–14. P. 9.
[78]	Mikailova, I. G. Social and Cultural Ideals and Global Artistic Culture. Vol. I. Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals and Their Role in Dynamic Reproducing Human Civilization / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2016. (In Russian). P. 115–116.
[79]	Correspondence Between Vladimir I. Vernadsky and Pavel A. Florensky // The New World. – 1989. – Issue 2. – P. 194–303. (In Russian).
[80]	Podolinsky, S. Human Labour and Dissipation of Energy / S. Podolinsky. – M.: Noosphere, 1991. (In Russian). P. 12–19.
[81]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 205–206.
[82]	Hamilton, C., Grinevald, J. Was the Anthropocene Anticipated? / C. Hamilton, J. Grinevald // The Anthropocene Review. – 2015. – Vol. 2. – Issue 1. – P. 1–14. P. 9.
[83]	Zwierlein, E. The Paradigm of Self-Organization and Its Philosophical Foundation / E. Zwierlein // Springer Series in Synergetics. – 1994. – Vol. 61. On Self-Organization. – P. 288–298; Näpinen, L. The Problem of the Relationship Between Human and Physical Realities in Ilya Prigogine’s Paradigm of Self-Organization / L. Näpinen // Boston Studies on the History and Philosophy of Science. – Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. – P. 151–164.
[84]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 206.
[85]	Näpinen, L. The Problem of the Relationship Between Human and Physical Realities in Ilya Prigogine’s Paradigm of Self-Organization / L. Näpinen // Boston Studies on the History and Philosophy of Science. – Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. – P. 151–164. P. 158.
[86]	Prigogine, I., Stengers, I. Order Out of Chaos. Man’s Dialogue With Nature / I. Prigogine, I. Stengers. – New York: Bantam Books, 1984. P. 119.
[87]	Pokrovsky, V. N. Extended Thermodynamics in a Discrete-System Approach / V. N. Pokrovsky // European Journal of Physics. – 2005. – Vol. 26. – P. 769–781.
[88]	Clausius, R. The Mechanical Theory of Heat – With Its Applications to the Steam-Engine and to Physical Properties of Bodies / R. Clausius. – London: John van Voorst, 1867. P. 14–69.
[89]	Pokrovsky, V. N. Extended Thermodynamics in a Discrete-System Approach / V. N. Pokrovsky // European Journal of Physics. – 2005. – Vol. 26. – P. 769–781.
[90]	Mikailova, I. G. Dynamics and Statics of Reception and Reflexion of Reproducing Religious Mentality / I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2013. – Vol. 1. – P. 155–167. (In Russian). P. 153.
[91]	Eddington, A. S., Sir. The Nature of the Physical World / Sir A. S. Eddington. – London: Cambridge University Press, 1948. P. 20–25.
[92]	Eddington, A. S., Sir. The Nature of the Physical World / Sir A. S. Eddington. – London: Cambridge University Press, 1948. P. 37.
[93]	Näpinen, L. The Problem of the Relationship Between Human and Physical Realities in Ilya Prigogine’s Paradigm of Self-Organization / L. Näpinen // Boston Studies on the History and Philosophy of Science. – Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. – P. 151–164. P. 162–163.
[94]	Contini, R. M. The Paradigm of the Complex Dynamic Systems and Sociological Analysis / R. M. Contini // Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences. – 2013. – Vol. 92. – P. 207–214.
[95]	Näpinen, L. The Problem of the Relationship Between Human and Physical Realities in Ilya Prigogine’s Paradigm of Self-Organization / L. Näpinen // Boston Studies on the History and Philosophy of Science. – Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. – P. 151–164. P. 160.
[96]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 206–207.
[97]	Bransky, V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Future, Transhumanism, and Synergetic Philosophy of History / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technique: History and Modernity. Collection of Scientific Transactions. – SPb.: LETI Press, 2015. (In Russian). P. 151.
[98]	Mikailova, I. G. Memory as a Dynamic Factor of Reproducing Civilization Identity / I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2015. – Vol. 2. – P. 191–204. (In Russian). P. 191–204.
[99]	Giustiniani, V. Homo, Humanus and the Meanings of Humanism / V. Guistiniani // Journal of the History of Ideas. – 1985. – Vol. 46. – Issue 2. – P. 167–195.
[100]	Synergetic Philosophy of History. Collective Monograph. V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky (eds.). – Ryazan’: Copy-Print, 2009. (In Russian). P. 113–167.
[101]	Bransky, V. P. Synergetics and Cosmology (Philosophical Foundations of the Cosmological Model of the Universe / V. P. Bransky // Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 17. – 2014. – Issue 4. – P. 12–29. (In Russian).
[102]	Global Future 2045. Convergent Technologies and Transhumanism Evolution. – M.: MBA, 2013. (In Russian). P. 263–269.
[103]	Mikailova, I. G. Social and Cultural Ideals and Global Artistic Culture. Vol. I. Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals and Their Role in Dynamic Reproducing Human Civilization / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2016. (In Russian). P. 91–106.
[104]	Bransky, V. P., Pozharsky, S. D. Globalization and Synergetic Historicism / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky. – SPb.: Polytechnique, 2004. (In Russian). P. 33–36.
[105]	Bransky, V. P. Synergetics and Cosmology (Philosophical Foundations of the Cosmological Model of the Universe / V. P. Bransky // Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 17. – 2014. – Issue 4. – P. 12–29. (In Russian). P. 22.
[106]	Giroux, H. Utopian Thinking Under the Sign of Neoliberalism: Towards a Critical Pedagogy of Educated Hope / H. Giroux // Democracy and Nature. – 2003. – Vol. 9. – Issue 1. – P. 91–105.
[107]	Mandelbrot, B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature / B. Mandelbrot. – New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1977. P. 44–57.
[108]	Eddington, A. S., Sir. The Nature of the Physical World / Sir A. S. Eddington. – London: Cambridge University Press, 1948. P. 35.
[109]	Doob, J. L. Stochastic Processes / J. L. Doob. – Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 1953. P. 37; Doob, J. L. Stochastic Process Measurability Conditions / J. L. Doob // Annales de l’Institut Fourier. – 1975. – Vol. 25. – Issue 3–4. – P. 163–176.
[110]	Bransky. V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Development from the Synergetic Philosophy of History Perspective / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Issues of Philosophy. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – P. 55–65. (In Russian). P. 60.
[111]	Levine, G. Realism, Ethics and Secularism Essays on Victorian Literature and Science / G. Levine. – Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press, 2008. P. 115.
[112]	Devenish, Ph. Theodicy and Cosmodicy: The Contribution of Neoclassical Theism / Ph. Devenish // Journal of Empirical Theology. – 1992. – Vol. 4. – P. 5–23.
[113]	Leibniz, G. W. Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l’homme et l’origine du mal / G. W. Leibniz.- Amsterdam: David Mortier, Librairie, 1720.
[114]	Sierra, D. P., Weir, N. A., Jones, J. F. A Review of Research in the Field of Nanorobotics / D. P. Sierra, N. A. Weir, J. F. Jones. – Oak Ridge: US Department of Energy, 2005. P. 1–50.
[115]	Ignatyev, M. B. Necessary and Sufficient Conditions of Nanorobot Synthesis/ M. B. Ignatyev // Mathematical Reports. – 2010. – Vol. 82. – Issue 1. – P. 671–675.
[116]	Mikailova, I. G. Self-Organizing Aesthetic Ideals. Their Part in the Aestheticization of Global Society in Terms of Synergetic Historicism / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2017. P. 3; Murray, D., Schwarz, J. Alarmism is an Infectious Disease / D. Murray, J. Schwarz // Society. – 2008. – Vol. 34.- Issue 4. – P. 35–40.
[117]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 208.
[118]	Mikailova, I. G. Social and Cultural Ideals and Global Artistic Culture. Vol. I. Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals and Their Role in Dynamic Reproducing Human Civilization / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2016. (In Russian). P. 114.
[119]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 209.
[120]	Bostrom, N. A History of Transhumanist Thought / N. Bostrom // Journal of Evolution and Technology. – 2005. – Vol.14. – Issue 1. – P.1–30.
[121]	Bostrom, N. Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective / N. Bostrom // Journal of Value Inquiry. – 2003. – Vol. 37. – Issue 4. – P. 493–506.
[122]	Nisbet, R. History of the Idea of Progress / R. Nisbet. – London: Transaction Publishers, 1994. P. 169–237.
[123]	Mikailova, I. G. Social and Cultural Ideals and Global Artistic Culture. Vol. I. Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals and Their Role in Dynamic Reproducing Human Civilization / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2016. (In Russian). P. 114.
[124]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 209.
[125]	Mikailova, I. G. Human Value Orientations. Their Role in Dynamics of Reproducing Russian Civilization and Its Culture from the Synergetic Historicism Perspective / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2017. (In Russian). P. 74–78.
[126]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 210.
[127]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G., Zobova, M. R. The Problem of the Meaning-of-life: The Significance Common to All Mankind and of General Science. – SPb.: SPb State University, 2017. (In Russian). P. 14–15.
[128]	Bransky. V. P., Pozharsky, S. D., Mikailova, I. G., Busov, S. V., Zobova, M. R. Global Development from the Synergetic Philosophy of History Perspective / V. P. Bransky, S. D. Pozharsky, I. G. Mikailova, S. V. Busov, M. R. Zobova // Issues of Philosophy. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – P. 55–65. (In Russian). P. 58–59.
[129]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 211.
[130]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Organization in Social and Cultural Dynamics of Reproducing Russian Mentality / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2011. – Vol. 2. P. 51–60. (In Russian). P. 54–55.
[131]	Mikailova, I. G. Human Value Orientations. Their Role in Dynamics of Reproducing Russian Civilization and Its Culture from the Synergetic Historicism Perspective / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2017. (In Russian). P. 85–86.
[132]	Mikailova, I. G. Ideals and Their Role in Social and Cultural Reproduction of Civilization from Synergetic Philosophy of History Positions / I. G. Mikailova. – SPb.: Aletheia, 2015. (In Russian). P. 611–613.
[133]	Crick, F. H. C. On Protein Synthesis / F. H. C. Crick // Sanders, F. K. Symposis of the Society for Experimental Biology, XII: The Biological Replication of Macromolecules. – Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press, 1958. – P. 138–163.
[134]	Bransky, V. P., Mikailova, I. G. Self-Determining Subjects and Their Role in Dynamical Globalization Progress / V. P. Bransky, I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2018, – Vol. 1. – Issue 93. – P. 203–217. (In Russian). P. 212.
[135]	Freeland, S. J., Knight, R. D., Landweber, L. F., Hurst, L. D. Early Fixation of an Optimal Genetic Code / S. J. Freeland, R. D. Knight, L. F. Landweber, L. D. Hurst // Molecular Biology and Evolution. – 2000. – Vol. 17. – Issue 4. – P. 511–518.
[136]	Mikailova, I. G. Ideals and Their Role in Social and Cultural Reproduction of Civilization from Synergetic Philosophy of History Positions / I. G. Mikailova. – SPb.: Aletheia, 2015. (In Russian). P. 611–612; Mikailova, I. G. Human Value Orientations. Their Role in Dynamics of Reproducing Russian Civilization and Its Culture from the Synergetic Historicism Perspective / I. G. Mikailova. – Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2017. (In Russian). P. 222–223.
[137]	Mikailova, I. G. Ideals and Their Role in Social and Cultural Reproduction of Civilization from Synergetic Philosophy of History Positions / I. G. Mikailova. – SPb.: Aletheia, 2015. (In Russian). P. 612–613.
[138]	Shu, J-J. A New Integrated Symmetrical Table for Genetic Code / J-J. Shu // Biosystems. – 2017. –Vol. 151. – P. 21–26.
[139]	Crick, F. Central Dogma of Molecular Biology / F. Crick // Nature. – 1970. – Vol. 227. – Issue 5258. – P. 561–563.
[140]	Brosius, J. The Fragmental Gene / J. Brosius // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. – 2009. – Vol. 1178. – P. 186–193.
[141]	Winkler, H. Verbreitung und Ursache der Parthenogenesis im Pflanzen- und Tierreiche / H. Winkler. – Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1920. P. 165–166.
[142]	Abecasis, G. R., Auton, A., Brooks, L. D. An Integrated Map of Genetic Variation From 1,092 Human Genoms / G. R. Abecasis, A. Auton, L. D. Brooks // Nature. – 2012. – Vol. 491. – Issue 7422. – P. 56–65.
[143]	Mikailova, I. G. Dynamics and Statics of Reception and Reflexion of Reproducing Religious Mentality / I. G. Mikailova // The World of Psychology. – 2013. – Vol. 1. – P. 155–167. (In Russian). P. 159.
[144]	Biggs, R. D. Inscriptions from Tell Abu Salabikh / R. D. Biggs. – Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1974. P. 30–32, 57–61.
[145]	Basham, A. L. The Origins and Development of Classical Hinduism / A. L. Basham. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. P. 82–97.
[146]	Parkinson, R. B. Poetry and Culture in Middle Kingdom Egypt: A Dark Side to Perfection / R. B. Parkinson. – London: Continuum, 2002. P. 313–319; Verhoeven, U. Von der Loyalistischen Lehre zur “Lehre des Kaisu” / U. Verhoeven // Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde. – 2009. – Bd. 136. – S. 87–97.
[147]	Simpson, W. K. The Literature of Ancient Egypt: An Anthology of Stories, Instructions, and Poetry / W. K. Simpson. –New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972. P. 7–8; Global Future 2045. Convergent Technologies and Transhumanism Evolution. – M.: MBA, 2013. (In Russian). P. 83; Verhoeven, U. Von der Loyalistischen Lehre zur “Lehre des Kaisu” / U. Verhoeven // Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde. – 2009. – Bd. 136. – S. 87–97; Fischer-Elfert, H. Die Lehre eines Mannes für seinen Sohn: eine Etappe auf dem Gottesweg des loyalen und solidarischen Beamten der frühen 12. Dynastie. Ägyptologische Abhandlungen 60. – Wiesbaden: Harrosowitz, 1999. S. 418–420.
[148]	Enmarch. R. The Reception of a Middle Egyptian Poem: The Dialogue of Ipuwer and the Lord of All in the Ramesside Period and Beyond / R. Enmarch. – Bolton: Rutherford Press, 2011. P. 169–175; Gardiner, A. Egypt of the Pharaohs: an Introduction / A. Gardiner. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1961. P. 109–110; Grimal, N. A History of Ancient Egypt / N. Grimal. – Oxford: Blackwell Books, 1992. P. 138.
[149]	Prince, J. D. Review: The Code of Hammurabi / J. D. Prince // The American Journal of Theology. – 1904. – Vol.8. – Issue 3. – P. 601–609.
[150]	Virtue Ethics and Moral Education. – London: Routledge, 1999. P. 22.
[151]	Chan, W. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy / W. Chan. – Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963. P. 790.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Irina Gennadievna Mikailova, Maria Romanovna Zobova. (2018). Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism. International Journal of Philosophy, 6(3), 84-106. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Irina Gennadievna Mikailova; Maria Romanovna Zobova. Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism. Int. J. Philos. 2018, 6(3), 84-106. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Irina Gennadievna Mikailova, Maria Romanovna Zobova. Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism. Int J Philos. 2018;6(3):84-106. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14,
  author = {Irina Gennadievna Mikailova and Maria Romanovna Zobova},
  title = {Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism},
  journal = {International Journal of Philosophy},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {84-106},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20180603.14},
  abstract = {The article, Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism, is focused on discussing a new methodological approach to the study on specific regularities of global development of humanity from the Synergetic Philosophy of History perspective. Such an approach to the speculation on interconnected problems both of human origins in the Universe and mankind’s global future allows to be concentrated on self-organizing interconversions between poles of the cardinal dual opposition of Order and Chaos. The investigation in question is based on such a progressive methodology as the Law of Self- Organizing Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals, as well as the Method of Dual Oppositions. The Law of Self-Organizing Ideals contributes to overcome a vicious Utopian Circle and obtain identity between the absolute ideal common to all mankind and individual ideals of every member of society, according to the principle of self-similarity of dissipative systems. Substantiating rationality of the universal spiral pattern in the Universe from the Synergetic Historicism Viewpoint assists in considering life as a well-balanced system of both biological and sociological aspects. However, disturbing this balance results in both negation of life and self-destruction of a system itself. Considering Self-expressing Subjects called “Homo Faber” as a kind of ideological as well as social and political “animals” permits to demonstrate that any idealization is inherent in human beings’ mental activity only, since the only society is characterized by reproducing ideals and values. The methodological base created by the authors, is oriented not only towards grounding the inevitability of transforming “Homo Sapiens” as biological animals into “Homo Faber” as ideological animals in the first stage, as well as of transforming "Homo Faber" into “Homo Super”, in the second stage of global development. Such a transformation assists not only in overwhelming barriers of evolution processes, intruded on by natural laws, but also in investigating the most important theoretical prerequisites of synthesizing social and cultural as well as Scientific and Technological progress. Revealing interrelationships between the problem of a sense of social history and the meaning-of-life of society members allows to substantiate specific regularities of reproducing the genetic code and its transforming into the ideological code in a transitional stage from synthesizing Social and Cultural as well as Scientific and Technological Progress to a self-organizing Superhuman society.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism
AU  - Irina Gennadievna Mikailova
AU  - Maria Romanovna Zobova
Y1  - 2018/11/26
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14
T2  - International Journal of Philosophy
JF  - International Journal of Philosophy
JO  - International Journal of Philosophy
SP  - 84
EP  - 106
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7455
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14
AB  - The article, Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism, is focused on discussing a new methodological approach to the study on specific regularities of global development of humanity from the Synergetic Philosophy of History perspective. Such an approach to the speculation on interconnected problems both of human origins in the Universe and mankind’s global future allows to be concentrated on self-organizing interconversions between poles of the cardinal dual opposition of Order and Chaos. The investigation in question is based on such a progressive methodology as the Law of Self- Organizing Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals, as well as the Method of Dual Oppositions. The Law of Self-Organizing Ideals contributes to overcome a vicious Utopian Circle and obtain identity between the absolute ideal common to all mankind and individual ideals of every member of society, according to the principle of self-similarity of dissipative systems. Substantiating rationality of the universal spiral pattern in the Universe from the Synergetic Historicism Viewpoint assists in considering life as a well-balanced system of both biological and sociological aspects. However, disturbing this balance results in both negation of life and self-destruction of a system itself. Considering Self-expressing Subjects called “Homo Faber” as a kind of ideological as well as social and political “animals” permits to demonstrate that any idealization is inherent in human beings’ mental activity only, since the only society is characterized by reproducing ideals and values. The methodological base created by the authors, is oriented not only towards grounding the inevitability of transforming “Homo Sapiens” as biological animals into “Homo Faber” as ideological animals in the first stage, as well as of transforming "Homo Faber" into “Homo Super”, in the second stage of global development. Such a transformation assists not only in overwhelming barriers of evolution processes, intruded on by natural laws, but also in investigating the most important theoretical prerequisites of synthesizing social and cultural as well as Scientific and Technological progress. Revealing interrelationships between the problem of a sense of social history and the meaning-of-life of society members allows to substantiate specific regularities of reproducing the genetic code and its transforming into the ideological code in a transitional stage from synthesizing Social and Cultural as well as Scientific and Technological Progress to a self-organizing Superhuman society.
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Irina Gennadievna Mikailova

Department of Philosophy of Science and Technologies, St. Petersburg Humanitarian Centre for Education and Development, St. Petersburg, Russia
Maria Romanovna Zobova

Department of Philosophy, St. Petersburg State University of Telecommunications, St. Petersburg, Russia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Irina Gennadievna Mikailova, Maria Romanovna Zobova. (2018). Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism. International Journal of Philosophy, 6(3), 84-106. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Irina Gennadievna Mikailova; Maria Romanovna Zobova. Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism. Int. J. Philos. 2018, 6(3), 84-106. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Irina Gennadievna Mikailova, Maria Romanovna Zobova. Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism. Int J Philos. 2018;6(3):84-106. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14,
  author = {Irina Gennadievna Mikailova and Maria Romanovna Zobova},
  title = {Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism},
  journal = {International Journal of Philosophy},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {84-106},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20180603.14},
  abstract = {The article, Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism, is focused on discussing a new methodological approach to the study on specific regularities of global development of humanity from the Synergetic Philosophy of History perspective. Such an approach to the speculation on interconnected problems both of human origins in the Universe and mankind’s global future allows to be concentrated on self-organizing interconversions between poles of the cardinal dual opposition of Order and Chaos. The investigation in question is based on such a progressive methodology as the Law of Self- Organizing Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals, as well as the Method of Dual Oppositions. The Law of Self-Organizing Ideals contributes to overcome a vicious Utopian Circle and obtain identity between the absolute ideal common to all mankind and individual ideals of every member of society, according to the principle of self-similarity of dissipative systems. Substantiating rationality of the universal spiral pattern in the Universe from the Synergetic Historicism Viewpoint assists in considering life as a well-balanced system of both biological and sociological aspects. However, disturbing this balance results in both negation of life and self-destruction of a system itself. Considering Self-expressing Subjects called “Homo Faber” as a kind of ideological as well as social and political “animals” permits to demonstrate that any idealization is inherent in human beings’ mental activity only, since the only society is characterized by reproducing ideals and values. The methodological base created by the authors, is oriented not only towards grounding the inevitability of transforming “Homo Sapiens” as biological animals into “Homo Faber” as ideological animals in the first stage, as well as of transforming "Homo Faber" into “Homo Super”, in the second stage of global development. Such a transformation assists not only in overwhelming barriers of evolution processes, intruded on by natural laws, but also in investigating the most important theoretical prerequisites of synthesizing social and cultural as well as Scientific and Technological progress. Revealing interrelationships between the problem of a sense of social history and the meaning-of-life of society members allows to substantiate specific regularities of reproducing the genetic code and its transforming into the ideological code in a transitional stage from synthesizing Social and Cultural as well as Scientific and Technological Progress to a self-organizing Superhuman society.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism
AU  - Irina Gennadievna Mikailova
AU  - Maria Romanovna Zobova
Y1  - 2018/11/26
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14
T2  - International Journal of Philosophy
JF  - International Journal of Philosophy
JO  - International Journal of Philosophy
SP  - 84
EP  - 106
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7455
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.14
AB  - The article, Dynamic Self-Organizing Social and Cultural Processes in Global Development of Humanity in Terms of Synergetic Historicism, is focused on discussing a new methodological approach to the study on specific regularities of global development of humanity from the Synergetic Philosophy of History perspective. Such an approach to the speculation on interconnected problems both of human origins in the Universe and mankind’s global future allows to be concentrated on self-organizing interconversions between poles of the cardinal dual opposition of Order and Chaos. The investigation in question is based on such a progressive methodology as the Law of Self- Organizing Social, Cultural, and Religious Ideals, as well as the Method of Dual Oppositions. The Law of Self-Organizing Ideals contributes to overcome a vicious Utopian Circle and obtain identity between the absolute ideal common to all mankind and individual ideals of every member of society, according to the principle of self-similarity of dissipative systems. Substantiating rationality of the universal spiral pattern in the Universe from the Synergetic Historicism Viewpoint assists in considering life as a well-balanced system of both biological and sociological aspects. However, disturbing this balance results in both negation of life and self-destruction of a system itself. Considering Self-expressing Subjects called “Homo Faber” as a kind of ideological as well as social and political “animals” permits to demonstrate that any idealization is inherent in human beings’ mental activity only, since the only society is characterized by reproducing ideals and values. The methodological base created by the authors, is oriented not only towards grounding the inevitability of transforming “Homo Sapiens” as biological animals into “Homo Faber” as ideological animals in the first stage, as well as of transforming "Homo Faber" into “Homo Super”, in the second stage of global development. Such a transformation assists not only in overwhelming barriers of evolution processes, intruded on by natural laws, but also in investigating the most important theoretical prerequisites of synthesizing social and cultural as well as Scientific and Technological progress. Revealing interrelationships between the problem of a sense of social history and the meaning-of-life of society members allows to substantiate specific regularities of reproducing the genetic code and its transforming into the ideological code in a transitional stage from synthesizing Social and Cultural as well as Scientific and Technological Progress to a self-organizing Superhuman society.
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download