Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language)

Zaimul Am

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language)

Zaimul Am

Published in International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 6, Issue 3)

Received: 19 August 2018 Accepted: 30 September 2018 Published: 31 October 2018

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This article attempts to describe and to analyse the philoshopical point of views regarding epistemology, logic and language and the possible relation bertween those three branches of philolosophical inquiries. The method used in this research is analytical method because many arguments of philosophers has to be analysed in order to portray the whole picture of the correlation between epistemology, logic and language.This article shows that there is a close connection between the study of knowledge and the study of language as a medium to express what is known. Philosophers are generally interested in discussing the relationship between mind, word and reality. Some of them have come to a conclusion that the words are at a crossroads: do they want to reflect what is in the mind or to reflect what is in reality. Then how to distinguish between the correct sentences (propositions) from the wrong ones. Grammatical analysis stops only at the limitofthe relationship between sentences and grammatical rules as a truth test of a proposition. But how to test the truth of the content (property, essence, substance) of a proposition? Many philosophical theories are put forward but still that such things as mind are a mystery, words and sentences also form their own mysteries.

Published in	International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12
Page(s)	68-75
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Epistemology, Logic, Language

References

[1]	Proops, Ian, Logic and Language in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, New York: Garland Publishing, 2000, 61.
[2]	Russel, Bertrand, “Introduction” in Ludwig Wittgenstein, TractatusLogico-Philosophicus, New York: Routledge, 1974, x.
[3]	Forster, Michael N., Kant’s Philosophy of Language, Germany: tijdschriftvoorfilosofie, 2009, 488.
[4]	Rescher, Nicholas, Epistemology, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge, New York: State University of New York Press, 2003, xiii-xiv.
[5]	Soams, Scott, Philosophy of Language, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010, 1.
[6]	Melden, A.I., “Thought and It’s Objects” in Roland Houde and Joseph P. Mullally, Philosophy of Knowledge, New York: J.B. Lippincott Co., 1960, 115.
[7]	Kenny, Anthony, A New History of Western Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, 147.
[8]	El-Ehwany, Ahmad Fouad, Al-Kindi,Sharif, MM.,History of Muslim Philosophy, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasaoit, 1963, 433.
[9]	Al-Farabi, Ihshâ al-‘Ulûm, Beirut: Dar waMaktabah al-Hilal, 1996, 53-62, 25.
[10]	Al-Farabi, al-Tsamrah al-Mardhiyyah, Beirut: Dar al-Farabi, 1982, 49-54.
[11]	Al-Farabi, Arâ’ Ahl al-Madînah al-Fâdhilah, Beirut: Dar al-Masyriq, 1986, 46-52.
[12]	FazlurRahman, IbnSina, in MM. Sharif, History of Muslim Philosophy, 433.
[13]	Hester Solomon, “The Trancendent, Function and Hegel’s Dialectical Vision”, in Journal of Analytical Psychology, vol. 39, London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 1994, 78.
[14]	Philosophy in the Modern World, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007, 208.
[15]	Sahakian, William S., History of Philosophy, New York: Barnes and Noble Books, n.d, 66-67.
[16]	Jubien, Michael, “Propositions and the Objects of Thought” in Philosophical Studies 104 Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2001, 47.
[17]	Morris, Michael, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, n.d., 15.
[18]	Lycan, William G., Philosophy of Language, New York: Routledge, 2001, 5-6.
[19]	Miller, Alexander, Philosophy of Language, New York: Routledge, 2007, 247-272.
[20]	Hale, Bob and Crispin Wright, A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Blackwell Publisher, 1998, 307-326.
[21]	Rydenfelt, Henrik, “Meaning and Pragmatism. James on the Pragmatic Consequence of Belief” Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2008, 4.
[22]	Lee, Barry (ed), Philosophy of Language: The Key Thinkers, (London: Continuum, n.d., 6.
[23]	Vygotsky, Lev, Thought and Language. London: The MIT Press, 1986, 212.
[24]	Lenci, Alessandro and Gabriel Sandu, Logic and Linguistic in the Twentieth Century, Helsinki: University of Helsinki, n.d. 3-4.
[25]	Frege, G. (), "Function and Concept", in Brian McGuiness (ed.) GottlobFrege: Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Basil: Basil Blackwell, 1984, 139, 6-9.
[26]	Al-Farabi, Kitâb fi al-Manthiq, Kairo: al-Hay’ah al-Mishriyyah al-‘Ammahlil-Kutub, 1976, 7-16.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Zaimul Am. (2018). Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language). International Journal of Philosophy, 6(3), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Zaimul Am. Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language). Int. J. Philos. 2018, 6(3), 68-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Zaimul Am. Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language). Int J Philos. 2018;6(3):68-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12,
  author = {Zaimul Am},
  title = {Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language)},
  journal = {International Journal of Philosophy},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {68-75},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20180603.12},
  abstract = {This article attempts to describe and to analyse the philoshopical point of views regarding epistemology, logic and language and the possible relation bertween those three branches of philolosophical inquiries. The method used in this research is analytical method because many arguments of philosophers has to be analysed in order to portray the whole picture of the correlation between epistemology, logic and language.This article shows that there is a close connection between the study of knowledge and the study of language as a medium to express what is known. Philosophers are generally interested in discussing the relationship between mind, word and reality. Some of them have come to a conclusion that the words are at a crossroads: do they want to reflect what is in the mind or to reflect what is in reality. Then how to distinguish between the correct sentences (propositions) from the wrong ones. Grammatical analysis stops only at the limitofthe relationship between sentences and grammatical rules as a truth test of a proposition. But how to test the truth of the content (property, essence, substance) of a proposition? Many philosophical theories are put forward but still that such things as mind are a mystery, words and sentences also form their own mysteries.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language)
AU  - Zaimul Am
Y1  - 2018/10/31
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12
T2  - International Journal of Philosophy
JF  - International Journal of Philosophy
JO  - International Journal of Philosophy
SP  - 68
EP  - 75
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7455
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12
AB  - This article attempts to describe and to analyse the philoshopical point of views regarding epistemology, logic and language and the possible relation bertween those three branches of philolosophical inquiries. The method used in this research is analytical method because many arguments of philosophers has to be analysed in order to portray the whole picture of the correlation between epistemology, logic and language.This article shows that there is a close connection between the study of knowledge and the study of language as a medium to express what is known. Philosophers are generally interested in discussing the relationship between mind, word and reality. Some of them have come to a conclusion that the words are at a crossroads: do they want to reflect what is in the mind or to reflect what is in reality. Then how to distinguish between the correct sentences (propositions) from the wrong ones. Grammatical analysis stops only at the limitofthe relationship between sentences and grammatical rules as a truth test of a proposition. But how to test the truth of the content (property, essence, substance) of a proposition? Many philosophical theories are put forward but still that such things as mind are a mystery, words and sentences also form their own mysteries.
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Zaimul Am

Department of Islamic Education, Faculty of Islamic Studies, University of Muhammadiyah, Tangerang, Indonesia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Zaimul Am. (2018). Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language). International Journal of Philosophy, 6(3), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Zaimul Am. Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language). Int. J. Philos. 2018, 6(3), 68-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Zaimul Am. Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language). Int J Philos. 2018;6(3):68-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12,
  author = {Zaimul Am},
  title = {Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language)},
  journal = {International Journal of Philosophy},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {68-75},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20180603.12},
  abstract = {This article attempts to describe and to analyse the philoshopical point of views regarding epistemology, logic and language and the possible relation bertween those three branches of philolosophical inquiries. The method used in this research is analytical method because many arguments of philosophers has to be analysed in order to portray the whole picture of the correlation between epistemology, logic and language.This article shows that there is a close connection between the study of knowledge and the study of language as a medium to express what is known. Philosophers are generally interested in discussing the relationship between mind, word and reality. Some of them have come to a conclusion that the words are at a crossroads: do they want to reflect what is in the mind or to reflect what is in reality. Then how to distinguish between the correct sentences (propositions) from the wrong ones. Grammatical analysis stops only at the limitofthe relationship between sentences and grammatical rules as a truth test of a proposition. But how to test the truth of the content (property, essence, substance) of a proposition? Many philosophical theories are put forward but still that such things as mind are a mystery, words and sentences also form their own mysteries.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Epistemology, Logic and Language (An Analysis of Logic of Language)
AU  - Zaimul Am
Y1  - 2018/10/31
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12
T2  - International Journal of Philosophy
JF  - International Journal of Philosophy
JO  - International Journal of Philosophy
SP  - 68
EP  - 75
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7455
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20180603.12
AB  - This article attempts to describe and to analyse the philoshopical point of views regarding epistemology, logic and language and the possible relation bertween those three branches of philolosophical inquiries. The method used in this research is analytical method because many arguments of philosophers has to be analysed in order to portray the whole picture of the correlation between epistemology, logic and language.This article shows that there is a close connection between the study of knowledge and the study of language as a medium to express what is known. Philosophers are generally interested in discussing the relationship between mind, word and reality. Some of them have come to a conclusion that the words are at a crossroads: do they want to reflect what is in the mind or to reflect what is in reality. Then how to distinguish between the correct sentences (propositions) from the wrong ones. Grammatical analysis stops only at the limitofthe relationship between sentences and grammatical rules as a truth test of a proposition. But how to test the truth of the content (property, essence, substance) of a proposition? Many philosophical theories are put forward but still that such things as mind are a mystery, words and sentences also form their own mysteries.
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download