At present, the world is confronted with the twin crises of fossil fuel depletion and environmental degradation. This has made the search for alternative and renewable sources of energy inevitable. Today, examples of such efforts are seen in the production of biofuels from wastes of organic origin, often known as Lignocellulosic Biomass. Lignocellulosic wastes are generated during the industrial processing of agricultural products. These wastes are generated in large amounts throughout the year, and are the most abundant renewable resources on earth. Due to their large availability and composition rich in compounds they could be used in other processes, there is a great interest on the reuse of these wastes, both from economical and environmental viewpoints. This paper present a concise overview of lignocelluloses, their chemical composition, economical and biotechnological potentials in bio-ethanol production with special emphasis on the choice of lignocellulosic substrates, pretreatment methods and types of microorganisms that have been used for optimal, ecological and economic production of ethanol. Also reviewed are the different methods used to improve microbiological lignocellulolytic enzymatic systems including the current status of the technology for bio-conversion of lignocellulose residues by microorganisms (particularly yeasts and fungi), with focus on the most economical and eco-friendly method for ethanol production. Although the production of bioethanol offers many benefits, more research is needed in the aspects like feedstock preparation, fermentation technology modification, etc., to make bioethanol more economically viable. This paper opined that lignocellulosic waste will become the main feedstock for ethanol production in the near future. Scaling up the production of lignocellulosic ethanol, however, requires further reduction of the production cost. Conclusively, the review suggested that in order to improve the technology and reduce the production cost, two major issues have to be addressed: i) improving technologies to overcome the recalcitrance of cellulosic biomass conversion (pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation) and ii) sustainable production of biomass in very large amounts.
| Published in | International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 1, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.18 |
| Page(s) | 128-144 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Lignocellulosic Wastes, Biomass, Bio-Ethanol, Economical, Environmental, Biotechnological
| [1] | Agarwal A. K (2005) Biofuels: In wealth from waste; trends and technologies. (ed Lal andReedy), 2nd Edition. The Energy and Resources Instituted (TERI) Press. ISBNSI-7993-067-X. |
| [2] | Green, Harvey (2006) Wood: Craft, Culture, History Penguin Books, NewYork, Page 403. ISB 978-1-101-2-0185-5. |
| [3] | Raposo S, Pardao JM, Diaz I, Costa MEL (2009). Kinetic modelling of bioethanol production using agro-industrial by-products. Int J of Energy Env 3 (1): 8. |
| [4] | Sun Y. E and Cheng J, (2000). “Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production a review,” Bioresources Technology, vol. 83. pp. 1-11. |
| [5] | Gusakov A. V, Sinitsyn A. P, Manenkova J. A, and Prostas O. V, (1992). “Enzymatic saccharification of industrial and agricultural lignocelllosic wastes,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 34, pp. 65. |
| [6] | Reshamwala S, Shawky B. T, and Dale B. E, (1995). “Ethanol production from hydrolysates of AFEX-treated coastal Bermuda grass and switchgrass,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 51-52, pp. 43-55. |
| [7] | Bjerre AB, Olesen AB, Fernqvist T (1996). Pretreatment of wheat straw using combined wet oxidation and alkaline hydrolysis resulting in convertible cellulose and hemicellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 49: 568-577. |
| [8] | Duff SJB, Murray WD (1996). Bioconversion of forest products industry waste cellulosics to fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol 55: 1-33. |
| [9] | Dewes T and Hunsche, E (1998). “Composition and Microbial degradability in the soil of farmyard manure from ecological-managed farm,” Biol. Agric. Hortic. vol. 16, pp. 251-268. |
| [10] | MacCarthy J. D and Tiemann M. (1998). MTBE in gasoline: clean air and drinking water issues. CRS report for congress. [Online]. Available: http: //www. epa. gov/otaq/consumer/fuels/mtbe/crs-mtbe. pdf. |
| [11] | SECO. (2006). State Energy Conservation Office. [Online]. Available: http: //A: /Ethanol%20 production%20. |
| [12] | Jimoh S. O, Ado S. A, and Ameh J. B, (2008). “Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of yam peel to Ethanol by Co-culture of Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisae,”Biol. and J. for the Tropics, vol. 6. pp. 12-10. |
| [13] | Lal, Banwari and Reddy MRVP. (2005). Wealth from waste: Trends and Technologies, 2nd Edition. The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) press, New Delhi-110003, India. |
| [14] | Lynd LR, Jin H, Michels JG, Wyman CE, Dale B (2003). Bioenergy: background, potential, and policy. Center for Strategic & International Studies, Washington, D. C. |
| [15] | Betts WB, Dart RK, Ball AS, Pedlar SL (1991). Biosynthesis and Structure oflignocellulose. In Betts (eds) Biodegradation: Natural and Synthetic Materials. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp 139-155. |
| [16] | Ha MA, Apperley DC, Evans BW, Huxham IM, Jardine WG, Vietor RJ, Reis D, Vian B, Jarvis MC (1998). Fine structure in cellulose microfibrils: NMR evidence fromonion and quince. Plant J 16: 183-190. |
| [17] | Delmer DP and Amor Y (1995). Cellulose biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7: 987-1000. |
| [18] | Walker L P, Wilson DB (1991). Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: An Overview. Biores. Technol 36: 3-14. |
| [19] | Rabinovich ML, Melnik MS, Bolobova AV (2002a) Microbial cellulases: A review. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 38 (4): 305-321. |
| [20] | Rabinovich ML, Melnik MS, Bolobova AV (2002b). The structure and mechanism ofaction of cellulolytic enzymes. Biochemistry (Moscow) 67 (8): 850-871. |
| [21] | Esterbauer H, Steiner W, Labudova I, et al. (1991). Production of Trichoderma cellulose in laboratory and pilot scale. Biores. Technol 36: 51-65. |
| [22] | Saha BC (2003). Hemicellulose bioconversion. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 30: 279-291. |
| [23] | Persson T, Matusiak M, Zacchi G, Jonsson A-S (2006). Extraction of hemicelluloses from process water from the production of masonite. Desalination 199: 411-412. |
| [24] | Lavarack BP, Giffin GJ, Rodman D (2002). The acid hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse hemicellulose to produce xylose, arabinose, glucose, and other products. Biomass Bioenerg 23: 367-380. |
| [25] | Shallom D, Shoham Y (2003). Microbial hemicellulases. Curr Opin Microbiol 6: 219-228. |
| [26] | Withers S G (2001). Mechanisms of glycosyl transferases and hydrolases. Carbohydr. Polym 44: 325-337. |
| [27] | Henrissnt B, Davies GJ (2000). Glycoside hydrolases and glycosyltransferases Families, modules and implications for genomics. Plant Physiol. 124: 1515-1519. |
| [28] | Prates JAM, Tarbouriech N, Charnock SJ, et al., (2001). The structure of the feroylEsterase module of xylanases 10B from Clostridium thermocellum provides insight into substrate recognition. Structure 9: 1183-1190. |
| [29] | Zaldivar GJ, Nielsen J, Olsson L (2001). Fuel ethanol production fromlignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56: 17-34. |
| [30] | Hamelinck CN, Hooijdonk GV, Faaji APC (2005). Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term. Biomass Bioenergy 28: 384-410. |
| [31] | Malherbe S. Cloete TE (2003). Lignocellulose biodegradation: Fundamentals and applications: A review. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 1: 105-114. |
| [32] | Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RL, et al. (2003). Opportunities to improve fibre degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology and genomics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 797: 1-31. |
| [33] | Dhingras, Mande S, Kioshore VVN, Joshi V. (1996). Briquetting of biomass: status andPotential (Regional wood Energy Development Programme in Asia Report No. 23). In proceedings of the International Workshop on Biomass Briquetting, pp. 24 30. Bangkok: Food and Agriculture Organization. |
| [34] | Vimal OP and Tyagi P. D. (1984)-Energy from biomass. New Delhi: Agriculture publishing Academy. |
| [35] | Inyer PVR, Rao TR, and Grover PD (eds). 2002 Biomass: thermo-chemical characterization, revised third edition (The Gasifier Action Research Project, sponsored by theMinistry of Non-convention Energy Sources) New Delhi: Indian Institute of Technology. |
| [36] | Baldrian T, Gabriel J (2003). Lignocellulose degradation by Pleurotus ostreatus in the presence of cadmium FEMS microbiol. Lett. 220: 235-240. |
| [37] | Falcon MA. Rodriguez A, Carnicero A, et al. (1995). Isolation of microorganisms withlignin transformation potential from soil of Tenerife Island. Soil Biol. Biochem 272 (2): 121-126. |
| [38] | Zimmermann W (1990). Degradation of lignin by bacteria. Biotechnol. 13 (2-3): 119-130. |
| [39] | Mandels M, Sternberg D (1976). Recent advances in cellulose technology. Ferment. Technol. 54: 267-286. |
| [40] | Jorgensen H, Erriksson T, Borjesson J. et al. (2003). Purification and characterization offive cellulases and one xylanases from Penicillium brasilianum IBT 20888. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 32: 851-861. |
| [41] | Gold MH, Alic M (1993). Molecular biology of the lignin-degrading basidiomycetes Phanerochaete chrysoporium 57 (3): 605-622. |
| [42] | Ruggeri B. Sassi G (2003). Experimental sensitivity analysis of a trickle bed bioreactorfor lignin peroxidases production by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. ProcessBiochem 00: 1-8. |
| [43] | Arora DS, Chander M, Gill PK (2002). Involvement of lignin peroxidase, manganese peroxidase and laccase in the degradation and selective ligninolysis of wheat straw. Int. Bioterior. Biodegrad. 50: 115-120. |
| [44] | Miller (Jr) RC, Gilkes NR, Johnson P, et al. (1996). Similarities between bacterial and fungal cellulose systems. Proceedings often 6 International Conference on Biotechnology in the Pulp and Paper Industry: Biomass Bioenergy 22: 295-304. |
| [45] | Shen H, Gilkes NR, Kilbum DG, et al., (1995). Cellobiohydrolases B, a second exo-cello-biohydrolase from the cellulolytic bacterium Cellulomonas fimi. Biochem J. 311: 67-74. |
| [46] | Kumar NN, Deobagkar DN (1996). Multifactional glucanases. Biotechnol. Adv. 14 (1): 1-15. |
| [47] | Dawson L, Boopathy R (2007). Use of post-harvest sugarcane residue for ethanol production. Biores Technol 98: 1695-1699. |
| [48] | Dashtban M, Schraft H, Qin W (2009). Fungal bioconversion of lignocellulosic residues, opportunities & perspectives. Int J Biol Sci 5 (6): 578-595. |
| [49] | Mosier N, Wyman CE, Dale BD, Elander RT, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch CM (2005). Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96: 673-686. |
| [50] | Sun FB, and Cheng HZ (2007). Evaluation of enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw pretreated by atmospheric glycerol autocatalysis. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82: 1039-1044. |
| [51] | Yang B, Wyman CE (2008). Pretreatment: The key to unlocking low cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuel Bioprod Biorefin 2: 26-40. |
| [52] | Millet MA, Baker AJ, Scatter LD (1976). Physical and chemical pretreatment for enhancing cellulose saccharification. Biotech Bioeng Symp 6: 125-153. |
| [53] | Cadoche L, Lopez GD (1989). Assessment of size reduction as a preliminary step in the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic wastes. Biol Wastes 30: 153-157. |
| [54] | Kilzer FJ, Broido A (1965). Speculations on the nature of cellulose pyrolysis. Pyrodynamics 2: 151-163. |
| [55] | Vinatoru M, Toma M, Mason TJ (1999). Ultrasonically assisted extraction ofbioactive principles from plants and their constituents. In: Mason TJ (ed) Advances in sonochemistry, 5th edn. JAI Press, London, pp 209-248. |
| [56] | Ebringerova A, Hromadkova Z (2002). Effect of ultrasound on the extractibility of corn bran hemicelluloses. Ultrason Sonochem 9 (4): 225-229. |
| [57] | Pappas C, Tarantilis PA, Daliani I, Mavromoustakos T, Polissiou M (2002). Comparison of classical and ultrasound-assisted isolation procedures of cellulose from kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinusL.) and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus rodustrus Sm.). Ultrason Sonochem 9 (1): 19-23. |
| [58] | Sun RC, Tomkinson J (2002). Comparative study of lignins isolated by alkali and ultrasound-assisted alkali extractions from wheat straw. Ultrason Sonochem 9 (2): 85-93. |
| [59] | Scott WE, Gerber P (1995). Using ultrasound to deink xerographic waste. Tappi J 78: 125-130. |
| [60] | Wood BE, Aldrich HC, Ingram LO (1997). Ultrasound stimulates ethanol production during the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of mixed waste office paper. Biotechnol Prog 13 (3): 232-237. |
| [61] | Imai M, Ikari K, Suzuki I (2004). High-performance hydrolysis of cellulose using mixed cellulase species and ultrasonication pretreatment. Biochem Eng J 17: 79-83. |
| [62] | Cheng YS, Zheng Y, Yu CW, Dooley TM, Jenkins BM, Vander Gheynst JS (2010). Evaluation of high solids alkaline pretreatment of rice straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162 (6): 1768-1784. |
| [63] | Ibrahim MM, El-Zawawy WK, Abdel-Fattah YR, Soliman NA, Agblevor FA (2011). Comparison of alkaline pulping with steam explosion for glucose production from rice straw. Carbohydr Polym 83 (2): 720-726. |
| [64] | McIntosh S, Vancov T (2010). Enhanced enzyme saccharification of sorghum bicolor straw using dilute alkali pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 101 (17): 6718-6727. |
| [65] | Sills DL, Gossett JM (2011). Assessment of commercial hemicellulases for saccharification of alkaline pretreated perennial biomass. Bioresour Technol 102 (2): 1389-1398. |
| [66] | Zhao Y, Wang Y, Zhu JY, Ragauskas A, Deng Y (2008). Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of spruce by alkaline pretreatment at low temperature. Biotechnol and Bioengi 99 (6): 1320-1328. |
| [67] | Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2008). Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9: 1621-1651. |
| [68] | Goldstein I, Easter J (1992). An improved process for converting cellulose to ethanol. Tappi J 28: 135. |
| [69] | Zhu JY, Pan XJ, Wang GS, Gleisner R (2009). Sulfite pretreatment for robust enzymatic saccharification of spruce and red pine. Bioresour Technol. 100: 2411-2418. |
| [70] | De Moraes-Rocha GJ, Martin C, Soares IB, Maior AMS, Baudel HM, De Abreu CAM (2010). Dilute mixed-acid pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse for ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 35: 663-670. |
| [71] | Banerjee S, Sen R, Pandey RA (2009). Evaluation of wet air oxidation as a pretreatment strategy for bioethanol production from rice husk and process optimization. Biomass Bioenergy 33 (12): 1680-1686. |
| [72] | Martin C, Marcet M, Thomsen AB (2008). Comparison between wet oxidation and steam explosion as pretreatment methods for enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. BioResources 3 (3): 670-683. |
| [73] | Szijarto N, Kadar Z, Varga E, Thomsen AB, Costa-Ferreira M, Reczey K (2009). Pretreatment of reed by wet oxidationand subsequent utilization of the pretreated fibers for ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 155 (1-3): 386-396. |
| [74] | Schmidt AS, Mallon S, Thomsen AB, Hvilsted S, Lawther JM (2002). Comparison of the chemical properties of wheat straw and beech fibers following alkaline wet oxidation and laccase treatments. J of Wood Chem and Technol 22 (1): 39-53. |
| [75] | Swatloski RP, Spear SK, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD (2002). Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 124: 4974-4975. |
| [76] | Cao Y, Li H, Zhang Y, Zhang J, He J (2010). Structure and properties of novel regenerated cellulose films prepared from cornhusk cellulose in roomtemperature ionic liquids. J Appl Polymer Sci 116 (1): 547-554. |
| [77] | Zhao H, Jones CL, Baker GA, Xia S, Olubajo O, Person VN (2009). Regenerating cellulose from ionic liquids for an accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis. J Biotechnol 139 (1): 47-54. |
| [78] | Wang ZM, Li L, Xiao KJ, Wu JY (2009). Homogeneous sulfation of bagasse cellulose in an ionic liquid and anticoagulation activity. Bioresour Technol 100 (4): 1687-1690. |
| [79] | Li Q, He YC, Xian M (2009). Improving enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw using ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium diethyl phosphate pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 100 (14): 3570-3575. |
| [80] | Dadi AP, Schall CA, Varanasi S (2007). Mitigation of cellulose recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis by ionic liquid pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 12: 407-421. |
| [81] | Kuo CH, Lee CK (2009). Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse by N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 100 (2): 866-871. |
| [82] | Rosenau T, Potthast A, Sixta H, Kosma P (2001). The chemistry of side reactions and byproduct formation in the system NMMO/cellulose (lyocell process). Prog Polym Sci 26 (9): 1763-1837. |
| [83] | Yamashita Y, Sasaki C, Nakamura Y (2010). Effective enzyme saccharification and ethanol production from Japanese cedar using various pretreatment methods. J Biosci Bioeng 110: 79-86. |
| [84] | ElSeoud OA, Koschella A, Fidale LC, Dorn S, Heinze T (2007). Applications of ionic liquids in carbohydrate chemistry: a window of opportunities. Biomacromolecules 8 (9): 2629-2647. |
| [85] | McMillan JD (1994). Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Himmel ME, Baker JO, Overend RP (eds) Enzymatic conversion of biomass for fuels production. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 292-324. |
| [86] | Ballesteros I, Negro MAJ, Oliva JM, Cabanas A, Manzanares P, Ballesteros M (2006). Ethanol production from steam-explosion pretreated wheat straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 130 (1-3): 496-508. |
| [87] | Yu G, Yano S, Inoue H, Inoue S, Endo T, Sawayama S (2010). Pretreatment of rice straw by a hot-compressed water process for enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160 (2): 539-551. |
| [88] | Teymouri F, Laureano-Perez L, Alizadeh H, Dale BE (2004). Ammonia fiber explosion treatment of corn stover. Appl Biochem and Biotechnol, Part A 115 (1-3): 951-963. |
| [89] | Mosier N, Wyman CE, Dale BD, Elander RT, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch CM (2005). Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96: 673-686. |
| [90] | Kim TH, Lee YY (2005). Pretreatment and fractionation of corn stover by ammonia recycle percolation process. Bioresour Technol 96 (18): 2007-2013. |
| [91] | Iyer PV, Wu ZW, Kim SB, Lee YY (1996). Ammonia recycled percolation process for pretreatment of herbaceous biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 57-58: 121-132. |
| [92] | King JW, Srinivas K (2009). Multiple unit processing using sub- and supercritical fluids. J Supercrit Fluids 47 (3): 598-610. |
| [93] | Kim KH, Hong J (2001). Supercritical CO2pretreatment of lignocellulose enhances enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 77 (2): 139-144. |
| [94] | Alinia R, Zabihi S, Esmaeilzadeh F, Kalajahi JF (2010). Pretreatment of wheat straw by supercritical CO2 and its enzymatic hydrolysis for sugar production. Biosystems Eng 107 (1): 61-66. |
| [95] | Schurz J (1978). In: Ghose TK (ed) Bioconversion of cellulosic substances into energy chemicals and microbial protein symposium proceedings. IIT, New Delhi, p 37. |
| [96] | Anderson WF, Akin DE (2008). Structural and chemical properties of grass lignocelluloses related to conversion for biofuels. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35: 355-366. |
| [97] | Shi J, Chinn MS, Sharma-Shivappa RR (2008). Microbial pretreatment of cotton stalks by solid state cultivation ofPhanerochaete chrysosporium. Bioresour Technol 99: 6556-6564. |
| [98] | Fan LT, Gharpuray MM, Lee YH (1987). Cellulose hydrolysis biotechnology monographs. Springer, Berlin, p 57 Fenel F, Zitting AJ, Kantelinen A (2006) Increased alkali stability inTrichodermareesei endo-1, 4-beta-xylanase II by site directed mutagenesis. J Biotechnol121: 102-107. |
| [99] | Arora DS, Chander M, Gill PK (2002). Involvement of lignin peroxidase, manganese peroxidase and laccase in the degradation and selective ligninolysis of wheat straw. Int. Bioterior. Biodegrad. 50: 115-120. |
| [100] | Ferraz A, Ana M, Cordova A (2003). Machuca: wood biodegradation and enzyme production byCeriporiopsis subvermisporaduring solid-state fermentation of Eucalyptus grandis. Enzyme and Microbial Technol 32: 59-65. |
| [101] | Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD (2007). Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315 (5813): 804-807. |
| [102] | Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Khasa YP (2010). Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: an overview. In: Lal B (ed) Wealth from waste. Teri Press, New Delhi, India. |
| [103] | Sukumaran RK, Singhania RR, Pandey A (2005). Microbial cellulases—production, applications and challenges. Jr of Sci and Inds Resrch 64 (11): 832-844. |
| [104] | Bisaria VS (1998). Bioprocessing of agro-residues to value added products. In: Martin AM (ed) Bioconversion of waste materials to industrial products, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, UK, pp 197-246. |
| [105] | Kaur J, Chandha BS, Kumar BA (2007). Purification and characterization of β-glucosidase from melanocarpus Sp. MTCC3922. Elect J Biotechnol 10: 260-270. |
| [106] | Turner P, Mamo G, Karlsson EN (2007). Potential and utilization of thermophiles and thermostable enzymes in biorefining. Microb Cell Fact 6: 9. |
| [107] | Viikari L, Alapuranen M, Puranen T, Vehmaanpera J, Siika-Aho M (2007). Thermostable enzymes in lignocellulose hydrolysis. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108: 121-145. |
| [108] | Grassick A, Murray PG, Thompson R, Collins CM, Byrnes L, Birrane G, Higgins TM, Tuohy MG (2004). Three-dimensional structure of a thermostable native cellobiohydrolase, CBH IB, and molecular characterization of the cel7 gene from the filamentous fungus, Talaromyces emersonii. Eur J Biochem 271: 4495-4506. |
| [109] | Li YL, Li DC, Teng FC (2006). Purification and characterization of a cellobiohydrolase from the thermophilic fungusChaetomium thermophiles CT2. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 46: 143-146. |
| [110] | Rosgaard L, Pedersen S, Cherry JR, Harris P, Meyer AS (2006). Efficiency of new fungal cellulase systems in boosting enzymatic degradation of barley straw lignocellulose. Biotechnol Prog 22: 493-498. |
| [111] | Maheshwari R, Bharadwaj G, Bhat MK (2000). Thermophilic fungi: their physiology and enzymes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64: 461-488. |
| [112] | Martinez AT, Speranza M, Ruiz-Duenas FJ, Ferreira P, Camarero S, Guillen F, Martinez MJ, Gutierrez A, del Rio JC (2005). Biodegradation of lignocellulosics: microbial, chemical, and enzymatic aspects of the fungal attack of lignin. Int Microbiol 8: 195-204. |
| [113] | Wang ML, Choong YM, Su NW, Lee MH (2003). A rapid method for determination of ethanol in alcholic beverages using capillary Gas chromatography. Jr of Food and Drug Analysis 11 (2): 1330-140. |
| [114] | Moredo N, Lorenzo M, Domínguez A, Moldes D, Cameselle C, Sanroman A (2003). Enhanced ligninolytic enzyme production and degrading capability of Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trametes versicolor. World J Microb Biotechnol 19: 665-669. |
| [115] | Elumalia S, Thangavelu V (2010). Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of pretreated sugarcane bagasse using cellulose and Saccharomyces cerevisiae-kinetics and modeling. Chem Eng Res Bull 14: 29-35. |
| [116] | Lynd LR, van Zyl WH, McBride JE, Laser M (2005). Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16: 577-583. |
| [117] | Takagi M, Abe S, Suzuki S, Emert GH, Yata N (1977). A method for production of alcohol directly from cellulose using cellulose and yeast. Proceedings, Bioconversion Symposium, IIT, Delhi, pp 551-571. |
| [118] | Blotkamo PJ, Takaai M, Pemberton MS, Enert GS (1978). Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and simultaneous saccharification to alcohol. AIChE Symp Ser 74: 85. |
| [119] | Szczodrak J (1989). The use of cellulases from a j-glucosidasc hyperproducing mutant oftrichoderma reesei in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of wheat straw. Biorechnol Bioeng 9: 1112. |
| [120] | Philippidis GP, Smith TK, Wyman CE (1993). Study of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose for production of fuel ethanol by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. Biotechnol Bioeng 41: 846-853. |
| [121] | Ghose TK, Roychoudhury PK, Ghosh P (1984). Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of lignocellulosics to ethanol under vacuum cycling and step feeding. Biotechnol Bioeng 26: 377-381. |
| [122] | Zhu S, Wu Y, Yu Z, Zhang X, Wang C, Yu F, Jin S (2006b). Production of ethanolfrom microwave-assisted alkali pretreated wheat straw. Process Biochem41: 869-873. |
| [123] | Wyman CE, Spindler DD, Grohmann K, Lastick SM (1986). Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose with the yeastBrettanomyces clausenii. Biotechnol and Bioeng Symp No 17: 221-238. |
| [124] | Hall G, Reuter WM (2007). HPLC Analysis for the Monitoring of Fermentation Broth During Ethanol Production as a Biofuel Application brief, Perkin Elmer., http: //www. perkinelmer. com/pdfs/downloads/ABR_EthanolAsBiofuelbyHPLCAppBrief. pdf. |
| [125] | Sharma K, Sharma SP, Lahiri SC (2009). Novel method for identification and quantitation of methanol and ethanol in alcoholic beverages by gas chromatography-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and horizontal attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J AOAC Int 92: 518-526. |
| [126] | Wang ML, Choong YM, Su NW, Lee MH (2003). A rapid method for determination of ethanol in alcholic beverages using capillary Gas chromatography. Jr of Food and Drug Analysis 11 (2): 1330-140. |
| [127] | Lachenmeier DW, Godelmann R, Steiner M, Ansay B, Weigel J, Krieg G (2010). Rapid and mobile determiantion of alcoholic stregth in wine, beer, and sprits using a flow-through infrared sensor. Chem Cent J 4: 5-15. |
| [128] | Gerchman Y, Schnitzer A, Gal R, Mirsky N, Chinkov N (2012). A simple rapid gas-chromatography flame-ionization-detector (GC-FID) method for the determination of ethanol from fermentation processes African J of. Biotechnol 11 (15): 3612-3616. |
| [129] | Bothast RJ, Nichols NN, Dien BS (1999). Fermentation with new recombinant organisms. Biotechnol Prog 15: 867-875. |
| [130] | Zhang M, Eddy C, Deanda K, Finkelstein M, Picataggio S (1995). Metabolic engineering of a pentose metabolism pathway in ethanologenic Zymomonas mobilis. Science 267: 240-243. |
| [131] | Ho NWY, Chen Z, Brainard AP (1998). Genetically engineered saccharomyces yeast capable of effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 1852-1859. |
| [132] | Saha BC, Cotta MA (2011). Continuous ethanol production from wheat straw hydrolysate by recombinant Ethanologenic Escherichia colistrain FBR5. ApplMicrobiol Biotechnol 90: 477-487. |
| [133] | Dien BS, Nichols NN, O’Bryan PJ, Bothast RJ (2000). Development of newethanologenicEscherichia colistrains for fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84-86: 181-186. |
| [134] | Alterthum F, Ingram LO (1989). Efficient ethanol production from glucose, lactose, and xylose by recombinantEscherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 55: 1943-1948. |
| [135] | Mandels M, Weber J, Parizek R (1971). Enhanced cellulase production by a mutant of Trichoderma viride. Appl Microbiol 21: 152-15. |
| [136] | Kovacs K, Megyeri L, Szakacsa G, Kubicekc CP, Galbeb M, Zacchi G (2008). Trichoderma atroviride mutants with enhanced production of cellulase and β-glucosidase on pretreated willow. Enzyme Microb Technol 43: 48-55. |
| [137] | Soloveva IV, Okunev ON, Velkov VV, Koshelev AV, Bubnova TV, Kondrateva EG, Skomarovskii AA, Sinitsyn AP (2005). The selection and properties of Penicillium verruculosummutants with enhanced production of cellulases and xylanases. Mikrobiologiia 74: 172-178. |
| [138] | Stockton BC, Mitchell DJ, Grohmann K, Himmel ME (1991) Optimum β-D-glucosidase supplementation of cellulase for efficient conversion of cellulose to glucose. Biotechnol Lett 13: 57-62. |
| [139] | Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV (2008). Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35: 377-391. |
| [140] | Hahn-Hagerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Lidan G, Zacchi G (2006). Bio-ethanol-the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol 24 (12): 549-556. |
| [141] | Howard RL, Abotsi E, Jansen van Rensburg EL, Howard S (2003). Lignocellulose biotechnology: issues of bioconversion and enzyme production. African J of Biotechnol 2: 602-619. |
| [142] | Rahman Z, Shida Y, Furukawa T, Suzuki Y, Okada H, Ogasawara W, Morikawa Y (2009). Application of Trichoderma reeseicellulase and xylanase promoters through homologous recombination for enhanced production of extracellular beta-glucosidase I. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 73: 1083-1089. |
| [143] | Becker J, Boles E (2003). A modifiedSaccharomyces cerevisiaestrain that consumes L-arabinose and produces ethanol. Appl Environ Microbiol 69 (7): 4144-4150. |
| [144] | Murray P, Aro N, Collins C, Grassick A, Penttila M, Saloheimo M, Tuohy M (2004). Expression inTrichoderma reeseiand characterization of a thermostable family 3 beta-glucosidase from the moderately thermophilic fungus Talaromyces emersonii. Protein Expr Purif 38: 248-257. |
| [145] | Meena K, Raja TK (2004). Immobilization of yeast invertase by gel entrapment. Ind J of Biotechnol 3: 606-608. |
| [146] | Das S, Schlessel DB, Ji HF, Donough JM, Wei Y (2011). Enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass with recyclable use of cellobiase enzyme immobilized in sol-gel routed mesoporous silica. J Mol Catal B Enzym 70: 49-54. |
| [147] | Iso M, Chen B, Eguchi M, Kudo T, Shrestha S (2001). Production of biodiesel fuel from triglycerides and alcohol using immobilized lipase. J Mol Catal B: Enzym 16 (1): 53-58. |
| [148] | Lin Y, Tanaka S (2006). Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69: 627-642. |
| [149] | Ivanova V, Hristov J, Dobreva E, AlHassan Z, Penchev I (1996). Performance of a magnetically stabilized bed reactor with immobilized yeast cells. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 59: 187-198. |
| [150] | Perez VH, Reyes AF, Justo OR, Alvarez DC, Alegre RM (2007). Bioreactor coupled with electromagnetic field generator: effects of extremely Low frequencyelectromagnetic fields on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Progress 23: 1091-1094. |
| [151] | Ivanova V, Petrova P, Hristov J (2011). Application in the ethanol fermentation of immobilized yeast cells in matrix of alginate/magnetic nanoparticles, on chitosan-magnetite microparticles and cellulose-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Int Rev Chem Eng 3: 289-299. |
APA Style
Sokan-Adeaga Adewale Allen, Ana Godson R. E. E., Sokan-Adeaga Micheal Ayodeji, Sokan-Adeaga Eniola Deborah. (2016). Lignocelluloses: An Economical and Ecological Resource for Bio-Ethanol Production – A Review. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 1(3), 128-144. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.18
ACS Style
Sokan-Adeaga Adewale Allen; Ana Godson R. E. E.; Sokan-Adeaga Micheal Ayodeji; Sokan-Adeaga Eniola Deborah. Lignocelluloses: An Economical and Ecological Resource for Bio-Ethanol Production – A Review. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 1(3), 128-144. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.18
AMA Style
Sokan-Adeaga Adewale Allen, Ana Godson R. E. E., Sokan-Adeaga Micheal Ayodeji, Sokan-Adeaga Eniola Deborah. Lignocelluloses: An Economical and Ecological Resource for Bio-Ethanol Production – A Review. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2016;1(3):128-144. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.18
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.18,
author = {Sokan-Adeaga Adewale Allen and Ana Godson R. E. E. and Sokan-Adeaga Micheal Ayodeji and Sokan-Adeaga Eniola Deborah},
title = {Lignocelluloses: An Economical and Ecological Resource for Bio-Ethanol Production – A Review},
journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management},
volume = {1},
number = {3},
pages = {128-144},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.18},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.18},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20160103.18},
abstract = {At present, the world is confronted with the twin crises of fossil fuel depletion and environmental degradation. This has made the search for alternative and renewable sources of energy inevitable. Today, examples of such efforts are seen in the production of biofuels from wastes of organic origin, often known as Lignocellulosic Biomass. Lignocellulosic wastes are generated during the industrial processing of agricultural products. These wastes are generated in large amounts throughout the year, and are the most abundant renewable resources on earth. Due to their large availability and composition rich in compounds they could be used in other processes, there is a great interest on the reuse of these wastes, both from economical and environmental viewpoints. This paper present a concise overview of lignocelluloses, their chemical composition, economical and biotechnological potentials in bio-ethanol production with special emphasis on the choice of lignocellulosic substrates, pretreatment methods and types of microorganisms that have been used for optimal, ecological and economic production of ethanol. Also reviewed are the different methods used to improve microbiological lignocellulolytic enzymatic systems including the current status of the technology for bio-conversion of lignocellulose residues by microorganisms (particularly yeasts and fungi), with focus on the most economical and eco-friendly method for ethanol production. Although the production of bioethanol offers many benefits, more research is needed in the aspects like feedstock preparation, fermentation technology modification, etc., to make bioethanol more economically viable. This paper opined that lignocellulosic waste will become the main feedstock for ethanol production in the near future. Scaling up the production of lignocellulosic ethanol, however, requires further reduction of the production cost. Conclusively, the review suggested that in order to improve the technology and reduce the production cost, two major issues have to be addressed: i) improving technologies to overcome the recalcitrance of cellulosic biomass conversion (pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation) and ii) sustainable production of biomass in very large amounts.},
year = {2016}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Lignocelluloses: An Economical and Ecological Resource for Bio-Ethanol Production – A Review AU - Sokan-Adeaga Adewale Allen AU - Ana Godson R. E. E. AU - Sokan-Adeaga Micheal Ayodeji AU - Sokan-Adeaga Eniola Deborah Y1 - 2016/08/17 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.18 DO - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.18 T2 - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management JF - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management JO - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management SP - 128 EP - 144 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3061 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20160103.18 AB - At present, the world is confronted with the twin crises of fossil fuel depletion and environmental degradation. This has made the search for alternative and renewable sources of energy inevitable. Today, examples of such efforts are seen in the production of biofuels from wastes of organic origin, often known as Lignocellulosic Biomass. Lignocellulosic wastes are generated during the industrial processing of agricultural products. These wastes are generated in large amounts throughout the year, and are the most abundant renewable resources on earth. Due to their large availability and composition rich in compounds they could be used in other processes, there is a great interest on the reuse of these wastes, both from economical and environmental viewpoints. This paper present a concise overview of lignocelluloses, their chemical composition, economical and biotechnological potentials in bio-ethanol production with special emphasis on the choice of lignocellulosic substrates, pretreatment methods and types of microorganisms that have been used for optimal, ecological and economic production of ethanol. Also reviewed are the different methods used to improve microbiological lignocellulolytic enzymatic systems including the current status of the technology for bio-conversion of lignocellulose residues by microorganisms (particularly yeasts and fungi), with focus on the most economical and eco-friendly method for ethanol production. Although the production of bioethanol offers many benefits, more research is needed in the aspects like feedstock preparation, fermentation technology modification, etc., to make bioethanol more economically viable. This paper opined that lignocellulosic waste will become the main feedstock for ethanol production in the near future. Scaling up the production of lignocellulosic ethanol, however, requires further reduction of the production cost. Conclusively, the review suggested that in order to improve the technology and reduce the production cost, two major issues have to be addressed: i) improving technologies to overcome the recalcitrance of cellulosic biomass conversion (pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation) and ii) sustainable production of biomass in very large amounts. VL - 1 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: