Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model

Yunhong Lei; Jinglan Liu; Qing Tang; Liu Qiong; Zuyang Xi; ChaXiang Li; Yakong Liu; Minmin Chen; Fei Tian; Zhaohui Zhang; Zifeng Li; Luhuan Yang

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13

Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model

Yunhong Lei, Jinglan Liu, Qing Tang, Liu Qiong, Zuyang Xi, ChaXiang Li, Yakong Liu, Minmin Chen, Fei Tian, Zhaohui Zhang, Zifeng Li, Luhuan Yang

Published in International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology (Volume 2, Issue 2)

Received: 6 November 2018 Accepted: 14 December 2018 Published: 11 January 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Objective: To construct a set of objective, relatively perfect and clinically applicable ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system, and to provide practical basis and reference for clinical nurses to implement ECMO nursing. Methods: The literature was analyzed and semi-structured interviews were used, through systematic references and searching keywords. Based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional theoretical model, the prototype of the ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system was constructed. 28 experts were selected and 2-round Delphi study on ECMO nursing quality evaluation indicators was performed, to evaluate the enthusiasm, authoritativeness, concentration and coordination of opinion of the experts, and to test the reliability and validity of the evaluation index system. The AHP method was used to determine the mean importance ratings, the standard variation of importance ratings, the coefficient of variation (CV) and full-score frequency K (%) of indicators at all levels in the evaluation index system. Results: Through literature review and searching keywords, an questionnaire including 3 first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators and 62 third-level indicators was initially formed. The positive coefficient of the experts was 100% (20/20) and 96.42% (19/20) respectively, and the authoritative coefficient was 0.926 and 0.934 respectively in the first and second round of expert consultation. The weights of the three first-level indicators were 0.34, 0.52, and 0.31, respectively. The ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system including three first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators, and 66 third-level indicators was determined. The effective recycling rates of the two rounds of Delphi surveys were 80% and 90%, respectively. The authoritative coefficients of experts in the two rounds were 0.889 and 0.88, respectively. The Kendall coordination coefficients of the two rounds of surveys were 0.259 and 0.161, respectively (P<0.05). Finally, an ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system including three first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators and 66 third-level indicators was constructed, based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional model. Conclusion:The ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system is constructed based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional theoretical model, which is provided as a practical and operational assessment tool for clinical nurses in the implementation of ECMO care.

Published in	International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology (Volume 2, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13
Page(s)	27-35
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

ECMO, Theoretical Model, Nursing Quality, Evaluation Index System

References

[1]	Fong K M, Au S Y, Wu H, et al. A potential source of cerebral emboli in patients supported with peripheral VA-ECMO [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2018.
[2]	Park Y G, Ha C W, Han C D, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparative study on the safety and efficacy of Celecoxib and GCSB-5, dried extracts of six herbs, for the treatment of osteoarthritis of knee joint [J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2013,149(3):816-824.
[3]	Hayes K, Holland A E, Pellegrino V A, et al. Acute skeletal muscle wasting and relation to physical function in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [J]. J Crit Care, 2018,48:1-8.
[4]	Mazzeffi M A, Tanaka K, Roberts A, et al. Bleeding, Thrombosis, and Transfusion With Two Heparin Anticoagulation Protocols in Venoarterial ECMO Patients [J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2018.
[5]	Schilcher G, Valentin T, Eisner F, et al. Candida infection of membrane oxygenator during ECMO therapy [J]. J Infect, 2018.
[6]	Brizmohun A M, Sidhu H S, Dikaios N, et al. Characterizing indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone prostate lesions with PSA density, PI-RADS scoring and qualitative descriptors on multiparametric MRI [J]. Br J Radiol, 2018,91(1083):20170645.
[7]	Ben-Horin S, Andrews J M, Katsanos K H, et al. Combination of corticosteroids and 5-aminosalicylates or corticosteroids alone for patients with moderate-severe active ulcerative colitis: A global survey of physicians' practice [J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017,23(16):2995-3002.
[8]	Barrigon M L, Rico-Romano A M, Ruiz-Gomez M, et al. Comparative study of pencil-and-paper and electronic formats of GHQ-12, WHO-5 and PHQ-9 questionnaires [J]. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment, 2017,10(3):160-167.
[9]	Herborn C U, Watkins D M, Baumann S, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: P792 blood pool agent versus Gd-DOTA in rabbits at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T [J]. Invest Radiol, 2007,42(9):622-628.
[10]	Cairo S B, Arbuthnot M, Boomer L A, et al. Controversies in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair using a Delphi approach: from the American Pediatric Surgical Association Critical Care Committee (APSA-CCC) [J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2018.
[11]	Liu S W, Singer S J, Sun B C, et al. A conceptual model for assessing quality of care for patients boarding in the emergency department: structure-process-outcome [J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2011,18(4):430-435.
[12]	Levine A D, Boulet S L, Berry R M, et al. Assessing the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States by non-United States residents [J]. Fertil Steril, 2017,108(5):815-821.
[13]	Levine R B, Levy A P, Lubin R, et al. Evaluation of a course to prepare international students for the United States Medical Licensing Examination step 2 clinical skills exam [J]. J Educ Eval Health Prof, 2017,14:25.
[14]	Witzig T E, Johnston P B, LaPlant B R, et al. Long-term follow-up of chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab, oxaliplatin, cytosine arabinoside, dexamethasone (ROAD) in patients with relapsed CD20+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Results of a study of the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Research Consortium (MCCRC) MC0485 now known as academic and community cancer research united (ACCRU) [J]. Am J Hematol, 2017,92(10):1004-1010.
[15]	Stys T, Stys A, Raizada A, et al. Rural United States Experience of Incorporation of a Technologically Advanced and Procedurally Complex Cardiovascular Program - the Sanford Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement Experience [J]. S D Med, 2016,69(8):351-357.
[16]	Hatamleh M M, Alnazzawi A A, Abbariki M, et al. Survey of Ocular Prosthetics Rehabilitation in the United Kingdom, Part 2: Anophthalmic Patients' Satisfaction and Acceptance [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2017, 28(5):1297-1301.
[17]	Fuehner T, Kuehn C, Welte T, et al. ICU Care Before and After Lung Transplantation [J]. Chest, 2016,150(2):442-450.
[18]	Yen C C, Kao C H, Tsai C S, et al. Identifying the Risk Factor and Prevention of Limb Ischemia in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation with Femoral Artery Cannulation [J]. Heart Surg Forum, 2018,21(1):E18-E22.
[19]	Greathouse K C, Sakellaris K T, Tumin D, et al. Impact of Early Initiation of Enteral Nutrition on Survival During Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation [J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2018,42(1):205-211.
[20]	Knight S, Aggarwal R, Agostini A, et al. Development of an objective assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A Delphi method among experts and evaluation on a virtual reality simulator [J]. PLoS One, 2018,13(1):e190580.
[21]	Conchin S, Carey S. The expert's guide to mealtime interventions - A Delphi method survey [J]. Clin Nutr, 2017.
[22]	Van den Bulcke B, Piers R, Jensen H I, et al. Ethical decision-making climate in the ICU: theoretical framework and validation of a self-assessment tool [J]. BMJ Qual Saf, 2018.
[23]	Olchanski N, Dziadzko M A, Tiong I C, et al. Can a Novel ICU Data Display Positively Affect Patient Outcomes and Save Lives? [J]. J Med Syst, 2017,41(11):171.
[24]	Heyland D K, Davidson J, Skrobik Y, et al. Improving partnerships with family members of ICU patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J]. Trials, 2018,19(1):3.
[25]	Oczkowski S, Centofanti J E, Durepos P, et al. Organ donation in the ICU: A document analysis of institutional policies, protocols, and order sets [J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2018.
[26]	Robinson J R, Conroy P C, Hardison D, et al. Rapid resolution of hyperammonemia in neonates using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a platform to drive hemodialysis [J]. J Perinatol, 2018.
[27]	Muszynski J A, Reeder R W, Hall M W, et al. RBC Transfusion Practice in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018.
[28]	Patel S M, Lipinski J, Al-Kindi S G, et al. Simultaneous Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Percutaneous Left Ventricular Decompression Therapy with Impella Is Associated with Improved Outcomes in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock [J]. ASAIO J, 2018.
[29]	Sivam S, Dentice R, Reddy N, et al. Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cystic fibrosis in an Australian cystic fibrosis centre [J]. Intern Med J, 2018,48(3):340-343.
[30]	Ling L, Chan K M. Weaning adult patients with cardiogenic shock on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation by pump-controlled retrograde trial off [J]. Perfusion, 2018:1051836464.
[31]	Rubino A, Costanzo D, Stanszus D, et al. Central Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (C-VA-ECMO) After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Single-Center Experience [J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2017.
[32]	Liu C, Sun W, Wang C, et al. Delivery during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support of pregnant woman with severe respiratory distress syndrome caused by influenza: a case report and review of the literature [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2018:1-5.
[33]	Diedrich D A, Brown D R. Analytic reviews: propofol infusion syndrome in the ICU [J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2011,26(2):59-72.
[34]	Schwartz S P, Bonadonna D, Hartwig M G, et al. Bedside Tracheostomy on Pediatric ICU Subjects Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation [J]. Respir Care, 2017,62(11):1447-1455.
[35]	Huygh J, Clotman K, Malarvannan G, et al. Considerable exposure to the endocrine disrupting chemicals phthalates and bisphenol-A in intensive care unit (ICU) patients [J]. Environ Int, 2015,81:64-72.
[36]	Darocha T, Kosinski S, Podsiadlo P, et al. EMS, HEMS, ECMO Center, ICU Team: Are You Ready for Hypothermic Patients?: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Accidental Hypothermia [J]. JACC Heart Fail, 2016,4(10):829-830.
[37]	Fukuhara S, Takeda K, Kurlansky P A, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a direct bridge to heart transplantation in adults [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017.
[38]	Ebrahim S, Singh S, Hutchison J S, et al. Adaptive behavior, functional outcomes, and quality of life outcomes of children requiring urgent ICU admission [J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2013,14(1):10-18.
[39]	MacGowan L, Smith E, Elliott-Hammond C, et al. Adequacy of nutrition support during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [J]. Clin Nutr, 2018.
[40]	Barbaro R P, Xu Y, Borasino S, et al. Does Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Improve Survival in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure? [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2018.
[41]	Distelmaier K, Wiedemann D, Binder C, et al. Duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and survival in cardiovascular surgery patients [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017.
[42]	Sinnah F, Dalloz M A, Magalhaes E, et al. Early Electroencephalography Findings in Cardiogenic Shock Patients Treated by Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018.
[43]	Kai M C, Koon N L. Endogenous carbon monoxide production in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-related hemolysis: potential use of point-of-care CO-oximetry carboxyhemoglobin to detect hemolysis [J]. Clin Case Rep, 2018,6(2):346-349.
[44]	Keller D, Lotz C, Kippnich M, et al. [Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in an awake patient : Use of the mobile ECMO team for fulminant pulmonary embolism] [J]. Anaesthesist, 2015,64(5):385-389.
[45]	Gutsche J T, Vernick W J. Cardiac and Critical Care Anesthesiologists May Be Ideal Members of the Mobile ECMO Team [J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2016, 30(6):1439-1440.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yunhong Lei, Jinglan Liu, Qing Tang, Liu Qiong, Zuyang Xi, et al. (2019). Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model. International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology, 2(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yunhong Lei; Jinglan Liu; Qing Tang; Liu Qiong; Zuyang Xi, et al. Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model. Int. J. Food Eng. Technol. 2019, 2(2), 27-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yunhong Lei, Jinglan Liu, Qing Tang, Liu Qiong, Zuyang Xi, et al. Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model. Int J Food Eng Technol. 2019;2(2):27-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13,
  author = {Yunhong Lei and Jinglan Liu and Qing Tang and Liu Qiong and Zuyang Xi and ChaXiang Li and Yakong Liu and Minmin Chen and Fei Tian and Zhaohui Zhang and Zifeng Li and Luhuan Yang},
  title = {Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model},
  journal = {International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {27-35},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfet.20180202.13},
  abstract = {Objective: To construct a set of objective, relatively perfect and clinically applicable ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system, and to provide practical basis and reference for clinical nurses to implement ECMO nursing. Methods: The literature was analyzed and semi-structured interviews were used, through systematic references and searching keywords. Based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional theoretical model, the prototype of the ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system was constructed. 28 experts were selected and 2-round Delphi study on ECMO nursing quality evaluation indicators was performed, to evaluate the enthusiasm, authoritativeness, concentration and coordination of opinion of the experts, and to test the reliability and validity of the evaluation index system. The AHP method was used to determine the mean importance ratings, the standard variation of importance ratings, the coefficient of variation (CV) and full-score frequency K (%) of indicators at all levels in the evaluation index system. Results: Through literature review and searching keywords, an questionnaire including 3 first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators and 62 third-level indicators was initially formed. The positive coefficient of the experts was 100% (20/20) and 96.42% (19/20) respectively, and the authoritative coefficient was 0.926 and 0.934 respectively in the first and second round of expert consultation. The weights of the three first-level indicators were 0.34, 0.52, and 0.31, respectively. The ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system including three first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators, and 66 third-level indicators was determined. The effective recycling rates of the two rounds of Delphi surveys were 80% and 90%, respectively. The authoritative coefficients of experts in the two rounds were 0.889 and 0.88, respectively. The Kendall coordination coefficients of the two rounds of surveys were 0.259 and 0.161, respectively (P<0.05). Finally, an ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system including three first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators and 66 third-level indicators was constructed, based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional model. Conclusion:The ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system is constructed based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional theoretical model, which is provided as a practical and operational assessment tool for clinical nurses in the implementation of ECMO care.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model
AU  - Yunhong Lei
AU  - Jinglan Liu
AU  - Qing Tang
AU  - Liu Qiong
AU  - Zuyang Xi
AU  - ChaXiang Li
AU  - Yakong Liu
AU  - Minmin Chen
AU  - Fei Tian
AU  - Zhaohui Zhang
AU  - Zifeng Li
AU  - Luhuan Yang
Y1  - 2019/01/11
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13
T2  - International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology
JF  - International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology
JO  - International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology
SP  - 27
EP  - 35
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-1584
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13
AB  - Objective: To construct a set of objective, relatively perfect and clinically applicable ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system, and to provide practical basis and reference for clinical nurses to implement ECMO nursing. Methods: The literature was analyzed and semi-structured interviews were used, through systematic references and searching keywords. Based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional theoretical model, the prototype of the ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system was constructed. 28 experts were selected and 2-round Delphi study on ECMO nursing quality evaluation indicators was performed, to evaluate the enthusiasm, authoritativeness, concentration and coordination of opinion of the experts, and to test the reliability and validity of the evaluation index system. The AHP method was used to determine the mean importance ratings, the standard variation of importance ratings, the coefficient of variation (CV) and full-score frequency K (%) of indicators at all levels in the evaluation index system. Results: Through literature review and searching keywords, an questionnaire including 3 first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators and 62 third-level indicators was initially formed. The positive coefficient of the experts was 100% (20/20) and 96.42% (19/20) respectively, and the authoritative coefficient was 0.926 and 0.934 respectively in the first and second round of expert consultation. The weights of the three first-level indicators were 0.34, 0.52, and 0.31, respectively. The ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system including three first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators, and 66 third-level indicators was determined. The effective recycling rates of the two rounds of Delphi surveys were 80% and 90%, respectively. The authoritative coefficients of experts in the two rounds were 0.889 and 0.88, respectively. The Kendall coordination coefficients of the two rounds of surveys were 0.259 and 0.161, respectively (P<0.05). Finally, an ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system including three first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators and 66 third-level indicators was constructed, based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional model. Conclusion:The ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system is constructed based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional theoretical model, which is provided as a practical and operational assessment tool for clinical nurses in the implementation of ECMO care.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Yunhong Lei

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
Jinglan Liu

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
Qing Tang

The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
Liu Qiong

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
Zuyang Xi

The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
ChaXiang Li

The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
Yakong Liu

The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
Minmin Chen

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
Fei Tian

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
Zhaohui Zhang

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
Zifeng Li

The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China
Luhuan Yang

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yunhong Lei, Jinglan Liu, Qing Tang, Liu Qiong, Zuyang Xi, et al. (2019). Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model. International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology, 2(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yunhong Lei; Jinglan Liu; Qing Tang; Liu Qiong; Zuyang Xi, et al. Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model. Int. J. Food Eng. Technol. 2019, 2(2), 27-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yunhong Lei, Jinglan Liu, Qing Tang, Liu Qiong, Zuyang Xi, et al. Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model. Int J Food Eng Technol. 2019;2(2):27-35. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13,
  author = {Yunhong Lei and Jinglan Liu and Qing Tang and Liu Qiong and Zuyang Xi and ChaXiang Li and Yakong Liu and Minmin Chen and Fei Tian and Zhaohui Zhang and Zifeng Li and Luhuan Yang},
  title = {Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model},
  journal = {International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {27-35},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfet.20180202.13},
  abstract = {Objective: To construct a set of objective, relatively perfect and clinically applicable ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system, and to provide practical basis and reference for clinical nurses to implement ECMO nursing. Methods: The literature was analyzed and semi-structured interviews were used, through systematic references and searching keywords. Based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional theoretical model, the prototype of the ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system was constructed. 28 experts were selected and 2-round Delphi study on ECMO nursing quality evaluation indicators was performed, to evaluate the enthusiasm, authoritativeness, concentration and coordination of opinion of the experts, and to test the reliability and validity of the evaluation index system. The AHP method was used to determine the mean importance ratings, the standard variation of importance ratings, the coefficient of variation (CV) and full-score frequency K (%) of indicators at all levels in the evaluation index system. Results: Through literature review and searching keywords, an questionnaire including 3 first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators and 62 third-level indicators was initially formed. The positive coefficient of the experts was 100% (20/20) and 96.42% (19/20) respectively, and the authoritative coefficient was 0.926 and 0.934 respectively in the first and second round of expert consultation. The weights of the three first-level indicators were 0.34, 0.52, and 0.31, respectively. The ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system including three first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators, and 66 third-level indicators was determined. The effective recycling rates of the two rounds of Delphi surveys were 80% and 90%, respectively. The authoritative coefficients of experts in the two rounds were 0.889 and 0.88, respectively. The Kendall coordination coefficients of the two rounds of surveys were 0.259 and 0.161, respectively (P<0.05). Finally, an ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system including three first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators and 66 third-level indicators was constructed, based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional model. Conclusion:The ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system is constructed based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional theoretical model, which is provided as a practical and operational assessment tool for clinical nurses in the implementation of ECMO care.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Constructing ECMO Care Quality Evaluation Index System Based on "Structure-Process-Outcome" Three-Dimensional Theoretical Model
AU  - Yunhong Lei
AU  - Jinglan Liu
AU  - Qing Tang
AU  - Liu Qiong
AU  - Zuyang Xi
AU  - ChaXiang Li
AU  - Yakong Liu
AU  - Minmin Chen
AU  - Fei Tian
AU  - Zhaohui Zhang
AU  - Zifeng Li
AU  - Luhuan Yang
Y1  - 2019/01/11
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13
T2  - International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology
JF  - International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology
JO  - International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology
SP  - 27
EP  - 35
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-1584
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20180202.13
AB  - Objective: To construct a set of objective, relatively perfect and clinically applicable ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system, and to provide practical basis and reference for clinical nurses to implement ECMO nursing. Methods: The literature was analyzed and semi-structured interviews were used, through systematic references and searching keywords. Based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional theoretical model, the prototype of the ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system was constructed. 28 experts were selected and 2-round Delphi study on ECMO nursing quality evaluation indicators was performed, to evaluate the enthusiasm, authoritativeness, concentration and coordination of opinion of the experts, and to test the reliability and validity of the evaluation index system. The AHP method was used to determine the mean importance ratings, the standard variation of importance ratings, the coefficient of variation (CV) and full-score frequency K (%) of indicators at all levels in the evaluation index system. Results: Through literature review and searching keywords, an questionnaire including 3 first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators and 62 third-level indicators was initially formed. The positive coefficient of the experts was 100% (20/20) and 96.42% (19/20) respectively, and the authoritative coefficient was 0.926 and 0.934 respectively in the first and second round of expert consultation. The weights of the three first-level indicators were 0.34, 0.52, and 0.31, respectively. The ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system including three first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators, and 66 third-level indicators was determined. The effective recycling rates of the two rounds of Delphi surveys were 80% and 90%, respectively. The authoritative coefficients of experts in the two rounds were 0.889 and 0.88, respectively. The Kendall coordination coefficients of the two rounds of surveys were 0.259 and 0.161, respectively (P<0.05). Finally, an ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system including three first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators and 66 third-level indicators was constructed, based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional model. Conclusion:The ECMO nursing quality evaluation index system is constructed based on the "Structrue-Process-Outcome" three-dimensional theoretical model, which is provided as a practical and operational assessment tool for clinical nurses in the implementation of ECMO care.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download