In contemporary economic activities, international trade is evolved from perfect protection to perfect free global trade among countries to bring balanced. International trade in general and export in particular is the most important economic activities to secure economic growth and development. However, sub-Saharan African countries including Ethiopia exports agricultural products balky in volume low in value leads to low performance and also low in diversity. To improve Ethiopian export performance, the government has been taking different policy options among them is export diversification. Flower commodity export is one of the diversification policy options. Each commodity export has its own constraints and opportunities affecting its export performance. The objective of this paper was to identify factors affecting flower export performance in the Ethiopian economy using five years balanced panel data ranging between 2010 and 2014 to Ethiopian flower importing countries. The result of the statistical analysis indicated that even though there is variation among years, the average five years export performance was about $ 4.79 million from exporting about 96.48 tons of flowers. The result of the gravity model econometric regression results revealed that domestic gross product (GDP) and the domestic population growth had positive effects while the exchange rate had a negative effect on the Ethiopian export performance dynamics. The result, it is suggests that all the factors affecting Ethiopian flower export performance are domestic factors or supply side factors. Therefore, the export economic policy should focus on boosting the GDP, efficient and effectiveness of human power through education and training, and stabilizing the exchange rate to enhance the Ethiopian flower export performance in particular and national export performance in general.
Published in | International Journal of Finance and Banking Research (Volume 7, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20210705.11 |
Page(s) | 101-110 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Gravity Model, Flower, Export, GDP, Exchange, Ethiopia
[1] | Agosin, M. R., 1991. Trade Policy Reform and Economic Performance: A Review of the Issues and some Preliminary Evidence, UNCTAD Discussion Papers No. 41, UNCTAD. |
[2] | Aitken, N. D., 1973. The Effect of the EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis, American Economic Review, Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 881-892. |
[3] | Alam, R., 2010. The Link between Real Exchange Rate and Export Earning: A Co-integration and Granger Causality Analysis on Bangladesh, International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 205-214. |
[4] | Alemayehu Geda, 2006. Openness, Inequality and Poverty in Africa, DESA Working Paper No. 25. |
[5] | Anderson J. E., 2011. The Gravity Model. National Bureau of Economic Research no. 16576. |
[6] | Anderson, J. E., 1979. A theoretical foundation for the Gravity Equation, American Economic Review, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 106-116. |
[7] | Andrew, R., and M. Spiegel. 2004. A Gravity Model of Sovereign Lending Trade, Default and Credit, IMF Staff Papers, Volume 51, Special Issue pp 50-63. |
[8] | Bacchetta, M., 2007. Releasing Export Constraints: The Role of Governments, AERC Research Project on Export Supply Response Capacity Constraints in Africa. Accessed on June 19, 2013. |
[9] | Baldwin R., and D. Taglioni, 2006. Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity equations. Working Paper 12516. Also available on http://www.nber.org/papers/w12516. |
[10] | Bano, S., 2002. Intra-industry Trade and Trade Intensities: Evidence from New Zealand. Working Paper Series, Number 5/02. |
[11] | Bergsten F., and J. Williamson (Eds), 2003. Dollar Overvaluation and the World Economy, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC. |
[12] | Bergstrand, J. H., 1985. The Gravity Equation in International Trade, Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics Vol. 67 pp. 474–81. |
[13] | Bergstrand, J. H., 1989. The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistic Vo. 71 pp. 143–53. |
[14] | Biggs, T., 2007. Assessing Export Supply Constraints: Methodology, Data, and Measurement, AERC Research Project on Export Supply Response Capacity Constraints in Africa, Paper No. ESWP_02. Available at http://www.aercafrica.org/documents/export_supply_working_papers/BiggsT_Assessing.pdf. Accessed on June 19, 2013. |
[15] | Breton, R., S. Galanti, C. Hurlin, and G., Vaubourg, 2007. Does soft information matter? An application of gravity models to financial analysts' forecasts. |
[16] | Carrillo, C. and Li, C. A. 2002. Trade Blocs and the Gravity Model: Evidence from Latin American Countries. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Essex, UK. |
[17] | Deardorff, A. V., 1995. Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neo-classic world? National Bureau for Economic Research Working Paper No. 5377. |
[18] | Deardorff, A. V., 1998. Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassic World?” in J. A. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 7–28. |
[19] | Derosa, D. A., 2007. Gravity Model Analysis, Maghreb Regional Integration Peterson Institute. |
[20] | Egger, P., 2000. A Note on the Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation, Economic Letters, 66, 25-31. |
[21] | Elliott, R. J. R. and K. Ikemoto, 2004. “AFTA and the Asian Crisis: Help or Hindrance to ASEAN Intra- Regional Trade?”. Asian Economic Journal 2004, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1–23. |
[22] | Endoh, M., 1999. “Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA and the CMEA: 1960-1994”, Applied Economics, No. 31, pp. 207–16. |
[23] | ERCA, (Ethiopian Revenue and Customs Authority), 2012. Disaggregate Data on Export and Import of the Country from 1997 to 2011. Also available on http://www.erca.gov.et/index.jsp?id=import_export_info. Accessed on June 30, 2013. |
[24] | Feenstra, R. C., 2002. Border Effects and the Gravity Equation: Consistent Methods for Estimation. Scottish Journal o Political Economy49: 491–506. |
[25] | Feenstra, R. C., J. R. Markusen and A. K. Rose, 1998. Understanding the Home Market Effect and the Gravity Equation: The Role of Differentiating Goods. |
[26] | Feenstra, R. C., J. R. Markusen and A. K. Rose, 2001. Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate Among Alternative Theories of Trade, Canadian Journal of Economics 34: 430–47. |
[27] | Frankel, J., E. Stein, and S. Wei, 1995. The Natural, the Unnatural and Super-Natural, Journal of Development Economics, No. 47, pp. 61-95. |
[28] | Helpman E., and P. Krugman, 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and the International Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
[29] | Henry Tumwebaze Karamuriro, Wilfred Nahamya Karukuza. Determinants of Uganda’s Export. |
[30] | Hsiao, C., 2003. Analysis of Panel Data. Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, USA. |
[31] | IMF and World Bank, 2001. Market Access for Developing Countries’ Exports, Prepared by IMF and World Bank Staff. Available at http://imf.org/external/np/madc/eng/042701.pdf. Accessed on July 1, 2013. |
[32] | Jurajda, S., 2003. Econometrics of Panel Data and Limited Dependent Variable Models. Lecture Notes Series Charles University Czech Republic. |
[33] | Krugman, P., M. Obstfeld and M., Melitz, 2012. International Economics: Theory and Policy, The Pearson series in economics. |
[34] | Lewer, J., and H. Van der Berg, 2008. A Gravity Model of Migration Management, Department Faculty Publications University of Nebraska Lincoln. Published in Economics Letters, Volume 99 number 1. |
[35] | Lueth E., and M. Ruiz-Arranz, 2006. A Gravity Model of Workers’ Remittances, Working Paper number 06/290. |
[36] | Matyas, L., L. Konya and M. N. Harris, 2000. Modelling export activities of eleven APEC Countries, Melbourne institute working paper no.5/00. |
[37] | MoFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs), 2007. Foreign Trade Promotion Manual for Ethiopian Diplomatic Missions, Economic and Business Affairs General Directorate, Addis Ababa, November 2007. |
[38] | Performance: A Gravity Model Analysis. International Journal of Business and Economics Research. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2015, pp. 45-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20150402.14. |
[39] | Poyhonen, P., 1963. A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 90, No. 93-99. |
[40] | Redding, S. and A. J. Venables, 2003. Geography and Export Performance: External Market Access and Internal Supply Capacity, NBER Working Paper 9637. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w9637. Accessed on June 30, 2013. |
[41] | Shepherd, B., 2013. The Gravity Model of International Trade: A Use Guide, United Nations for Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. |
[42] | Shinyekwa I., and L, Othieno, 2013. Comparing the Performance of Uganda’s Intra-East African Community Trade and Other Trading Blocs: A Gravity Model Analysis. Research Series Number 100. |
[43] | Tewodros Mekonnen, 2012. Determinants of Export Commodity Concentration and Trade Dynamics in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Economics Association/ Ethiopian Economics Policy Research Institute (EEA/EEPRI), Working Paper No 2/ 2012. |
[44] | Tinbergen, J., 1962. Shaping the world economy: suggestions for an international economic policy, new York: The twentieth century fund. |
[45] | Todaro M., and S. Smith, 2012. Development Economics. 11th Editions, Addison – Wesley Publishers. |
[46] | UNCTAD, 2005. Determinants of Export Performance: Developing Countries in International Trade, Trade and Development Index 2, pp. 49-79. |
[47] | UNCTAD, 2007. Market Access, Market Entry and Competitiveness, Background note by the UNCTAD Secretariat, TD/B/COM.1/83. |
[48] | UNCTAD, 2008. Export Competitiveness and Development in LDCs: Policies, Issues and Priorities for LDCs for Action During and Beyond UNCTAD XII, UNCTAD/ALDC/2008/1. Available at http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/aldc20081_en.pdf.Accessed on June 20, 2013. |
[49] | UNESCAP, 2012. Interactive Trade Indicators http://www.unescap.org/tid/aptiad/trade%20intensity.pdf accessed on July 13, 2013. |
[50] | Westerlund J., and F. Wilhelmsson, 2006. Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. |
[51] | Yishak Tekalign, 2009. Determinants of Ethiopia's Export Performance: A Gravity Model Analysis. Trade and Development Discussion Paper Number 01/2009. |
APA Style
Fisseha Seyoum. (2021). Determinants of Ethiopian Flower Export Performance: The Case of Gravity Model Application. International Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 7(5), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20210705.11
ACS Style
Fisseha Seyoum. Determinants of Ethiopian Flower Export Performance: The Case of Gravity Model Application. Int. J. Finance Bank. Res. 2021, 7(5), 101-110. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20210705.11
AMA Style
Fisseha Seyoum. Determinants of Ethiopian Flower Export Performance: The Case of Gravity Model Application. Int J Finance Bank Res. 2021;7(5):101-110. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20210705.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijfbr.20210705.11, author = {Fisseha Seyoum}, title = {Determinants of Ethiopian Flower Export Performance: The Case of Gravity Model Application}, journal = {International Journal of Finance and Banking Research}, volume = {7}, number = {5}, pages = {101-110}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijfbr.20210705.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20210705.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfbr.20210705.11}, abstract = {In contemporary economic activities, international trade is evolved from perfect protection to perfect free global trade among countries to bring balanced. International trade in general and export in particular is the most important economic activities to secure economic growth and development. However, sub-Saharan African countries including Ethiopia exports agricultural products balky in volume low in value leads to low performance and also low in diversity. To improve Ethiopian export performance, the government has been taking different policy options among them is export diversification. Flower commodity export is one of the diversification policy options. Each commodity export has its own constraints and opportunities affecting its export performance. The objective of this paper was to identify factors affecting flower export performance in the Ethiopian economy using five years balanced panel data ranging between 2010 and 2014 to Ethiopian flower importing countries. The result of the statistical analysis indicated that even though there is variation among years, the average five years export performance was about $ 4.79 million from exporting about 96.48 tons of flowers. The result of the gravity model econometric regression results revealed that domestic gross product (GDP) and the domestic population growth had positive effects while the exchange rate had a negative effect on the Ethiopian export performance dynamics. The result, it is suggests that all the factors affecting Ethiopian flower export performance are domestic factors or supply side factors. Therefore, the export economic policy should focus on boosting the GDP, efficient and effectiveness of human power through education and training, and stabilizing the exchange rate to enhance the Ethiopian flower export performance in particular and national export performance in general.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Determinants of Ethiopian Flower Export Performance: The Case of Gravity Model Application AU - Fisseha Seyoum Y1 - 2021/09/23 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20210705.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20210705.11 T2 - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research JF - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research JO - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research SP - 101 EP - 110 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-2278 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20210705.11 AB - In contemporary economic activities, international trade is evolved from perfect protection to perfect free global trade among countries to bring balanced. International trade in general and export in particular is the most important economic activities to secure economic growth and development. However, sub-Saharan African countries including Ethiopia exports agricultural products balky in volume low in value leads to low performance and also low in diversity. To improve Ethiopian export performance, the government has been taking different policy options among them is export diversification. Flower commodity export is one of the diversification policy options. Each commodity export has its own constraints and opportunities affecting its export performance. The objective of this paper was to identify factors affecting flower export performance in the Ethiopian economy using five years balanced panel data ranging between 2010 and 2014 to Ethiopian flower importing countries. The result of the statistical analysis indicated that even though there is variation among years, the average five years export performance was about $ 4.79 million from exporting about 96.48 tons of flowers. The result of the gravity model econometric regression results revealed that domestic gross product (GDP) and the domestic population growth had positive effects while the exchange rate had a negative effect on the Ethiopian export performance dynamics. The result, it is suggests that all the factors affecting Ethiopian flower export performance are domestic factors or supply side factors. Therefore, the export economic policy should focus on boosting the GDP, efficient and effectiveness of human power through education and training, and stabilizing the exchange rate to enhance the Ethiopian flower export performance in particular and national export performance in general. VL - 7 IS - 5 ER -