This paper examines Capital Adequacy Framework that specifies the approaches for quantifying the Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) for credit risk, market risk and operational risk. The computation of the risk-weighted assets is consistent with Pillar 1 requirements set out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) in their respective documents - “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework” issued in June 2006 and the “Capital Adequacy Standard (CAS)” issued in December 2005. While the Bank believes that such customization could be justified, a pragmatic approach is adopted for implementation. Higher prudential requirements and risk management standards would be introduced gradually taking into consideration industry feedback during the consultation process.
Published in | International Journal of Finance and Banking Research (Volume 2, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15 |
Page(s) | 102-115 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Basel Agreement, Capital Adequacy, Pillars 1
[1] | “The impact of the euro on money and bond markets” by J. Santillán, M. Bayle andC. Thygesen, July 2000. |
[2] | “The effective exchange rates of the euro” by L. Buldorini, S. Makrydakis and C. Thimann,February 2002. |
[3] | “Estimating the trend of M3 income velocity underlying the reference value for monetary growth” by C. Brand, D. Gerdesmeier and B. Roffia, May 2002. |
[4] | “Labour force developments in the euro area since the 1980s” by V. Genre and R. Gómez-Salvador, July 2002. |
[5] | “The evolution of clearing and central counterparty services for exchange-tradedderivatives in the United States and Europe: a comparison” by D. Russo, T. L. Hart and A. Schönenberger, September 2002. |
[6] | “Banking integration in the euro area” by I. Cabral, F. Dierick and J. Vesala,December 2002. |
[7] | “Economic relations with regions neighbouring the euro area in the ‘Euro Time Zone’” byF. Mazzaferro, A. Mehl, M. Sturm, C. Thimann and A. Winkler, December 2002. |
[8] | “An introduction to the ECB’s survey of professional forecasters” by J. A. Garcia,September 2003. |
[9] | “Fiscal adjustment in 1991-2002: stylised facts and policy implications” by M. G. Briotti,February 2004. |
[10] | “The acceding countries’ strategies towards ERM II and the adoption of the euro:an analytical review” by a staff team led by P. Backé and C. Thimann and includingO. Arratibel, O. Calvo-Gonzalez, A. Mehl and C. Nerlich, February 2004. |
APA Style
Orobah Ali Barghouthi, Mohammed Bayyoud. (2016). Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework. International Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 2(3), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15
ACS Style
Orobah Ali Barghouthi; Mohammed Bayyoud. Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework. Int. J. Finance Bank. Res. 2016, 2(3), 102-115. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15
AMA Style
Orobah Ali Barghouthi, Mohammed Bayyoud. Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework. Int J Finance Bank Res. 2016;2(3):102-115. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15
@article{10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15, author = {Orobah Ali Barghouthi and Mohammed Bayyoud}, title = {Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework}, journal = {International Journal of Finance and Banking Research}, volume = {2}, number = {3}, pages = {102-115}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfbr.20160203.15}, abstract = {This paper examines Capital Adequacy Framework that specifies the approaches for quantifying the Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) for credit risk, market risk and operational risk. The computation of the risk-weighted assets is consistent with Pillar 1 requirements set out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) in their respective documents - “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework” issued in June 2006 and the “Capital Adequacy Standard (CAS)” issued in December 2005. While the Bank believes that such customization could be justified, a pragmatic approach is adopted for implementation. Higher prudential requirements and risk management standards would be introduced gradually taking into consideration industry feedback during the consultation process.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Overview of the Basel Capital Adequacy Framework AU - Orobah Ali Barghouthi AU - Mohammed Bayyoud Y1 - 2016/06/30 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15 T2 - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research JF - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research JO - International Journal of Finance and Banking Research SP - 102 EP - 115 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-2278 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20160203.15 AB - This paper examines Capital Adequacy Framework that specifies the approaches for quantifying the Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) for credit risk, market risk and operational risk. The computation of the risk-weighted assets is consistent with Pillar 1 requirements set out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB) in their respective documents - “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework” issued in June 2006 and the “Capital Adequacy Standard (CAS)” issued in December 2005. While the Bank believes that such customization could be justified, a pragmatic approach is adopted for implementation. Higher prudential requirements and risk management standards would be introduced gradually taking into consideration industry feedback during the consultation process. VL - 2 IS - 3 ER -