In its targets for sustainable development, the UN urges to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation, stemming to a very large part from resource use and CO2-emissions. The EU implemented a number of political measures to foster such decoupling and also advocates the concept of “green growth”. In this study, we analyse the development of important consumption-based indicators of resource use (including domestic material consumption, raw iron and energy) for the EU-15 from 1970 to 2019. We show that they have all absolutely decoupled from economic growth (i.e. GDP) in the last 15-20 years. Unlike many studies before, we thus do find absolute, permanent decoupling of important resource uses in a prominent economic region of the world. In many cases, the development over the past 50 years actually follows an inverted U-shape. We also compare today’s per-capita-levels of resource use of EU-15 to the world average; we find that - despite the striking difference in industrial output and standard of living – they are actually quite similar, with the exception of energy use. Finally, we stress that, while our findings strongly support the feasibility of green growth, decoupling of CO2-emissions at a rate much faster than today remains of central importance to a sustainable economic development of the EU-15 countries.
Published in | International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijema.20221003.12 |
Page(s) | 59-67 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Decoupling, Resource Use Assessment, Footprint Accounts, Sustainable Development Goal 12, Sustainable Development Goal 8.4
[1] | Sanye-Mengual, M. Secchi, S. Corrado, A. Beylot, S. Sala Assessing the decoupling of economic growth from environmental impacts in the European Union: a consumption-based approach J. Clean. Prod., 236 (117535) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.010 |
[2] | T. Vadén, V. Lähde, A. Majava, P. Järvensivu, T. Toivanen, E. Hakala, J. T. Eronen, Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature Environmental Science & Policy, Volume 112, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016 |
[3] | H. Haberl, D. Wiedenhofer, D. Virág, G. Kalt, B. Plank, P. Brockway, T. Fishman, D. Hausknost, F. Krausmann, B. Leon-Gruchalski, A. Mayer, M. Pichler, A. Schaffartzik, T. Sousa, J. Streeck and F. Creutzig A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights Environ. Res. Lett. 15 (2020) 065003 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a |
[4] | Parrique, J. Barth, F. Briens, C. Kerschner, A. Kraus-Polk, A. Kuokkanen, J. H. Spangenberg Decoupling Debunked: Evidence and Arguments Against Green Growth As a Sole Strategy for Sustainability European Environmental Bureau (2019) https://eeb.org/library/decoupling-debunked/ |
[5] | S. K. Steinberger, F. Krausmann, M. Getzner, H. Schandl, J. West Development and dematerialization: an international study PLoS One, 8 (10) (2013), Article e70385 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070385 |
[6] | S. Bringezu, A. Ramaswami, H. Schandl, M. O’Brien, R. Pelton, J. Acquatella, E. Ayuk, A. Chiu, R. Flanegin, J. Fry, S. Giljum, S. Hashimoto, S. Hellweg, K. Hosking, Y. Hu, M. Lenzen, M. Lieber, S. Lutter, A. Miatto, A. Singh Nagpure, M. Obersteiner, L. van Oers, S. Pfister, P. Pichler, A. Russell, L. Spini, H. Tanikawa, E. van der Voet, H. Weisz, J. West, A. Wiijkman, B. Zhu, R. Zivy Assessing global resource use: A systems approach to resource efficiency and pollution reduction A Report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi, Kenya. 2017. |
[7] | O. Wiedmann, H. Schandl, M. Lenzen, D. Moran, S. Suh, J. West, K. Kanemoto The material footprint of nations Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 112 (20) (2015), pp. 6271-6276 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110 |
[8] | United Nations Statistics Division National Accounts Main Aggregates Database (Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Basic, Accessed 20.4.2022). |
[9] | H. Weisz, Amann, C., Eisenmenger, N., Krausmann, F., and Hubacek, K. Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts and Indicators of Resource Use for the EU 1970-2001 Wien: IFF Social Ecology (2003) https://mdgs.un.org/unsd/envAccounting/ceea/archive/MFA/IFF_Development_material_use_EU-15_1970-2001.PDF |
[10] | EUROSTAT (Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Material_flow_accounts_and_resource_productivity#Consumption_by_material_category, Accessed 10.2.2022). |
[11] | Steel Statistical Yearbooks (Available at: https://www.worldsteel.org/steel-by-topic/statistics/steel-statistical-yearbook.html, Accessed 10.1.2022). |
[12] | World Steel Association Indirect Trade in Steel March 2015 Report. |
[13] | S. Dworak, J. Fellner Steel Scrap Generation in the EU-28 since 1946 – Sources and composition Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 173, 2021, 105692 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105692 |
[14] | M. Wackernagel, C. Monfreda, D. Moran National Footprint and Biocapacity accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method Land Use Policy 21 (2004). |
[15] | Global Footprint Network Database (Available at: https://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.142971965.963175576.1641829874-1344705031.1640624207#/, Accessed 10.1.2022). |
[16] | BP Statistical Review of World Energy (Available at: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html Accessed 10.1.2022). |
[17] | Our World in Data (Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/energy-embedded-traded-goods?tab=chart, Accessed 10.1.2022). |
[18] | Our World in Data (Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/trade-openness?tab=chart, Accessed 10.1.2022). |
[19] | A. McAfee, More from Less Scribner, New York 2019. |
APA Style
Thomas Unnerstall. (2022). Permanent Absolute Decoupling of Economic Growth from Resource Consumption in the EU-15, 1970-2019. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 10(3), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20221003.12
ACS Style
Thomas Unnerstall. Permanent Absolute Decoupling of Economic Growth from Resource Consumption in the EU-15, 1970-2019. Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 2022, 10(3), 59-67. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20221003.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijema.20221003.12, author = {Thomas Unnerstall}, title = {Permanent Absolute Decoupling of Economic Growth from Resource Consumption in the EU-15, 1970-2019}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {59-67}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijema.20221003.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20221003.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijema.20221003.12}, abstract = {In its targets for sustainable development, the UN urges to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation, stemming to a very large part from resource use and CO2-emissions. The EU implemented a number of political measures to foster such decoupling and also advocates the concept of “green growth”. In this study, we analyse the development of important consumption-based indicators of resource use (including domestic material consumption, raw iron and energy) for the EU-15 from 1970 to 2019. We show that they have all absolutely decoupled from economic growth (i.e. GDP) in the last 15-20 years. Unlike many studies before, we thus do find absolute, permanent decoupling of important resource uses in a prominent economic region of the world. In many cases, the development over the past 50 years actually follows an inverted U-shape. We also compare today’s per-capita-levels of resource use of EU-15 to the world average; we find that - despite the striking difference in industrial output and standard of living – they are actually quite similar, with the exception of energy use. Finally, we stress that, while our findings strongly support the feasibility of green growth, decoupling of CO2-emissions at a rate much faster than today remains of central importance to a sustainable economic development of the EU-15 countries.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Permanent Absolute Decoupling of Economic Growth from Resource Consumption in the EU-15, 1970-2019 AU - Thomas Unnerstall Y1 - 2022/05/26 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20221003.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijema.20221003.12 T2 - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis JF - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis JO - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis SP - 59 EP - 67 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7667 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20221003.12 AB - In its targets for sustainable development, the UN urges to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation, stemming to a very large part from resource use and CO2-emissions. The EU implemented a number of political measures to foster such decoupling and also advocates the concept of “green growth”. In this study, we analyse the development of important consumption-based indicators of resource use (including domestic material consumption, raw iron and energy) for the EU-15 from 1970 to 2019. We show that they have all absolutely decoupled from economic growth (i.e. GDP) in the last 15-20 years. Unlike many studies before, we thus do find absolute, permanent decoupling of important resource uses in a prominent economic region of the world. In many cases, the development over the past 50 years actually follows an inverted U-shape. We also compare today’s per-capita-levels of resource use of EU-15 to the world average; we find that - despite the striking difference in industrial output and standard of living – they are actually quite similar, with the exception of energy use. Finally, we stress that, while our findings strongly support the feasibility of green growth, decoupling of CO2-emissions at a rate much faster than today remains of central importance to a sustainable economic development of the EU-15 countries. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -