This study critically examines the productivity dynamics within Ghana’s public sector, focusing on the factors influencing worker efficiency, institutional performance, and service delivery. Employing a qualitative-dominant mixed-methods design, data were collected through interviews, focus group discussions, institutional audits, and document reviews across five key ministries. The research is grounded in constructivist and public value management theories, offering a nuanced exploration of systemic, organizational, and behavioural contributors to low productivity. The study identified leadership quality, lack of accountability, rigid bureaucratic structures, digital inefficiencies, and weak motivation as central impediments to productivity. Findings revealed that while many public servants demonstrate capacity and commitment, the institutional environment often stifles initiative and rewards compliance over innovation. A significant gap was also observed between staff perceptions and citizen experiences, highlighting the need for robust feedback mechanisms. Comparative analysis with international best practices from Rwanda, Singapore, and South Korea illuminated potential pathways for reform, emphasizing the importance of performance contracts, digital integration, and continuous professional development. The study offers pragmatic recommendations including the institutionalization of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), leadership reform, investment in digital infrastructure, and the adoption of non-monetary incentive schemes. This research contributes to public administration literature by contextualizing productivity within the Ghanaian public service and bridging theoretical constructs with actionable policy insights. It emphasizes that enhancing productivity is not solely a technical endeavour but one that requires political will, cultural change, and systemic transformation. By reimagining public sector work as a vehicle for public value rather than mere compliance, Ghana can make meaningful strides towards a more responsive, efficient, and citizen-centric administration.
| Published in | International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 13, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijefm.20251306.13 |
| Page(s) | 373-383 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Public Sector Productivity, Ghana, Leadership, Accountability, Bureaucracy, Digital Governance, Motivation, Public Administration
| [1] | AfDB. (2020). Institutional capacity development in Africa: Ghana case study. Abidjan: African Development Bank. |
| [2] | Amoako, G. K. (2020). Performance appraisal in the Ghanaian civil service: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 12(2), 2539. |
| [3] | Amoako, K. (2020). Training and job satisfaction in Ghana’s public sector. African Journal of Public Administration, 12(3), 145163. |
| [4] | Appiah-Agyekum, N. (2015). Appraisal systems and motivation in the Ghana Health Service. Health Policy & Planning, 30(3), 417425. |
| [5] | Ayee, J. R. A. (2001). Public sector management in Ghana. Accra: Ghana Universities Press. |
| [6] | Ayee, J. R. A. (2001). Civil service reform in Ghana: A case study. African Journal of Political Science, 6(1), 141. |
| [7] | Boachie-Danquah, Y. (2017). Leadership and institutional reforms in Ghana’s civil service. Ghana Journal of Governance, 4(2), 2339. |
| [8] | Boachie-Danquah, Y. (2017). Transformational leadership in the Ghanaian public sector. Ghana Journal of Development Studies, 14(1), 7594. |
| [9] | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77101. |
| [10] | DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147160. |
| [11] | Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). (2020). Ghana Living Standards Survey Round 7 (GLSS 7). Accra: GSS. |
| [12] | GSS. (2021). Ghana Living Standards Survey Round 7. Accra: Ghana Statistical Service. |
| [13] | Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review. |
| [14] | Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 319. |
| [15] | IMF. (2021). Fiscal transparency in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. |
| [16] | ISSER. (2022). State of the Ghanaian economy report. Accra: Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana. |
| [17] | McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill. |
| [18] | MDPI. (2022). Annual productivity survey report. Accra: Management Development and Productivity Institute. |
| [19] | MDPI. (2022). Institutional culture audit report. Accra: Management Development and Productivity Institute. |
| [20] | Ministry of Employment and Labour Relations. (2019). Annual report on employment and productivity. Accra: Government of Ghana. |
| [21] | Ministry of Health. (2020). Sector performance review report. Accra: Government of Ghana. |
| [22] | Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development. (2021). Decentralization and local governance performance evaluation. Accra: Government of Ghana. |
| [23] | Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press. |
| [24] | Mutabazi, E. (2019). Digital governance and public sector efficiency in East Africa. International Journal of e-Governance, 7(2), 3449. |
| [25] | Mutabazi, T. (2019). Public sector digitization in Rwanda: Lessons for Sub-Saharan Africa. Kigali: Kigali Institute of Governance. |
| [26] | Njiru, H. (2021). E-government and public service efficiency in Kenya. African Technology Review, 10(1), 3347. |
| [27] | Njiru, H. (2021). E-government services and citizen satisfaction in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Information Systems, 13(1), 5876. |
| [28] | OECD. (2020). Public service leadership for the 21st century. Paris: OECD Publishing. |
| [29] | Owusu, A. (2016). Factors affecting productivity in Ghana’s public institutions. Journal of African Governance, 3(1), 90107. |
| [30] | Owusu, G. (2016). Bureaucracy and service delivery in Africa. Journal of African Governance, 8(1), 7794. |
| [31] | Public Services Commission (PSC). (2021). Annual performance report. Accra: Government of Ghana. |
| [32] | Public Services Commission (PSC). (2021). Performance evaluation guidelines. Accra: Public Services Commission. |
| [33] | UNDP. (2019). Governance for inclusive development in Africa: Case studies from Ghana and Kenya. New York: United Nations Development Programme. |
| [34] | UNDP. (2019). Reimagining public administration in Africa. New York: United Nations. |
| [35] | World Bank. (2018). Improving service delivery in Ghana’s public sector. Washington, DC: World Bank. |
| [36] | World Bank. (2018). Public expenditure review: Efficiency in service delivery. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. |
APA Style
Myers, B. S. (2025). Improving the Productivity of the Public Sector Worker in Ghana. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 13(6), 373-383. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20251306.13
ACS Style
Myers, B. S. Improving the Productivity of the Public Sector Worker in Ghana. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2025, 13(6), 373-383. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20251306.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20251306.13,
author = {Benjamin Saka Myers},
title = {Improving the Productivity of the Public Sector Worker in Ghana},
journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
volume = {13},
number = {6},
pages = {373-383},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20251306.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20251306.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20251306.13},
abstract = {This study critically examines the productivity dynamics within Ghana’s public sector, focusing on the factors influencing worker efficiency, institutional performance, and service delivery. Employing a qualitative-dominant mixed-methods design, data were collected through interviews, focus group discussions, institutional audits, and document reviews across five key ministries. The research is grounded in constructivist and public value management theories, offering a nuanced exploration of systemic, organizational, and behavioural contributors to low productivity. The study identified leadership quality, lack of accountability, rigid bureaucratic structures, digital inefficiencies, and weak motivation as central impediments to productivity. Findings revealed that while many public servants demonstrate capacity and commitment, the institutional environment often stifles initiative and rewards compliance over innovation. A significant gap was also observed between staff perceptions and citizen experiences, highlighting the need for robust feedback mechanisms. Comparative analysis with international best practices from Rwanda, Singapore, and South Korea illuminated potential pathways for reform, emphasizing the importance of performance contracts, digital integration, and continuous professional development. The study offers pragmatic recommendations including the institutionalization of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), leadership reform, investment in digital infrastructure, and the adoption of non-monetary incentive schemes. This research contributes to public administration literature by contextualizing productivity within the Ghanaian public service and bridging theoretical constructs with actionable policy insights. It emphasizes that enhancing productivity is not solely a technical endeavour but one that requires political will, cultural change, and systemic transformation. By reimagining public sector work as a vehicle for public value rather than mere compliance, Ghana can make meaningful strides towards a more responsive, efficient, and citizen-centric administration.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Improving the Productivity of the Public Sector Worker in Ghana AU - Benjamin Saka Myers Y1 - 2025/12/17 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20251306.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20251306.13 T2 - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences JF - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences JO - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences SP - 373 EP - 383 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9561 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20251306.13 AB - This study critically examines the productivity dynamics within Ghana’s public sector, focusing on the factors influencing worker efficiency, institutional performance, and service delivery. Employing a qualitative-dominant mixed-methods design, data were collected through interviews, focus group discussions, institutional audits, and document reviews across five key ministries. The research is grounded in constructivist and public value management theories, offering a nuanced exploration of systemic, organizational, and behavioural contributors to low productivity. The study identified leadership quality, lack of accountability, rigid bureaucratic structures, digital inefficiencies, and weak motivation as central impediments to productivity. Findings revealed that while many public servants demonstrate capacity and commitment, the institutional environment often stifles initiative and rewards compliance over innovation. A significant gap was also observed between staff perceptions and citizen experiences, highlighting the need for robust feedback mechanisms. Comparative analysis with international best practices from Rwanda, Singapore, and South Korea illuminated potential pathways for reform, emphasizing the importance of performance contracts, digital integration, and continuous professional development. The study offers pragmatic recommendations including the institutionalization of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), leadership reform, investment in digital infrastructure, and the adoption of non-monetary incentive schemes. This research contributes to public administration literature by contextualizing productivity within the Ghanaian public service and bridging theoretical constructs with actionable policy insights. It emphasizes that enhancing productivity is not solely a technical endeavour but one that requires political will, cultural change, and systemic transformation. By reimagining public sector work as a vehicle for public value rather than mere compliance, Ghana can make meaningful strides towards a more responsive, efficient, and citizen-centric administration. VL - 13 IS - 6 ER -