Background and Objectives: the study was conducted to evaluate the levels of stress produced in and around implants when placed at different sites for retraction and intrusion of maxillary anteriors. The other objective was to evaluate stress levels produced at implant bone interface when mini implants were placed at different angulations at the same site. Materials and Methodology: Finite element model of the maxilla and maxillary dentition was constructed using the CT skull of subject used in the study. All the accessories used like mini-implants, stainless steel wire, coil springs etc were scanned separately for obtaining detailed anatomic features. The force was given between retraction hook and mini -implant using NITI closed coil spring for intrusion and retraction of maxillary anterior teeth. The basic mechanical factors i.e. the stresses developed in mini implant, the angle of insertion of the mini implant into the bone surface were analyzed. Finite Element model was generated by Hyper mesh 9.0 software. Analysis was carried out by using Ansys 12.1 software. Results and Conclusion: All the set objectives were accomplished at the end of the study which included complete closure of extraction space by retraction and intrusion in the models. The following conclusions were drawn: The least stress was seen on an implant at middle third, when inserted at an angle of 800 to the bone surface, with application of 50-100mg of intrusive force on anterior implant and 200 gms of retractive force on posterior implant.
| Published in | International Journal of Dental Medicine (Volume 7, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijdm.20210701.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-9 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hyper Mesh, Ansys, TADs, FEM, Retraction, Intrusion
| [1] | Lindquist JT. The edgewise appliance. In: Graber TM, editor. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. St Louis: Mosby; 1985: 565-640. |
| [2] | Proffit WR. Biomechanics and mechanics. In: Profit WR, Fields HW Jr, editors. Contemporary orthodontics. St Louis: Mosby, 2000: 295-362. |
| [3] | Nanda R, Kuhlberg A. Biomechanical basis of extraction space closure. In: Nanda R, Kuhlberg A, editors. Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1996. P. 156-87. |
| [4] | Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1983; 17: 266-269. |
| [5] | Fotos PG, Spyrakos CC, Bernard DO. Orthodontic forces generated by a simulated arch wire appliance evaluated by the finite element method. Angle Orthod1987; 60 (4): 277-282. |
| [6] | Tanne K, Koenig HA, Burstone CJ. Moment to force ratios and center of rotation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 94: 426-34. |
| [7] | Cobo J, Sicilia A, Argüelles J, Suárez D, Vijande M. Initial stress induced in periodontal tissue with diverse degrees of bone loss by an orthodontic force: tridimensional analysis by means of the finite element method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Nov; 104 (5): 448-54. |
| [8] | Puente MI, Galban L, Cobo JM. Initial stress differences between tipping and torque movements. A three dimensional finite element analysis. Eur. J. Orthod, 18 (1996) 329-339. |
| [9] | Katona TR. A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Sep; 112 (3): 244-51. |
| [10] | Tanne K, Yoshida S, Kawata T, Sasaki A, Knox J, Jones ML. An evaluation of the biomechanical response of the tooth and periodontium to orthodontic forces in adolescent and adult subjects. Br J Orthod. 1998 May; 25 (2): 109-15. |
| [11] | Vasquez M, Calao E, Becerra F, Ossa J, Enriquez C, Fresneda E. Initial stress differences between sliding and sectional mechanics with an Endosseous implant as anchorage: A 3- dimensional finite element analysis. Angle Orthod2001; 71 (4): 247- 256. |
| [12] | Jones ML, Hickman J, Middleton J, Knox J, Volp C. A validated finite element method study of orthodontic tooth movement in the human subject. J Orthod. 2001 Mar; 28 (1): 29-38. |
| [13] | Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM, Sung JH. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal class I bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Orthod 2001; 35: 417422. |
| [14] | H.-J. Chun, S.-Y. Cheong, J.-H. Han, S.-J. Heo, J.-P. Chung, I.-C. Rhyu, Y.-C. Choi, H.-K. Baik, Y. Ku, M.-H. Kim. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2002 June; 29: 565-574. |
| [15] | Geramy A. Initial stress produced in the periodontal membrane by orthodontic loads in the presence of varying loss of alveolar bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2002 Feb; 24 (1): 21-33. |
| [16] | Hussein H. Ammar, Peter Ngan, Richard J. Crout, c Victor H. Mucino, and Osama M. Mukdadid. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: e59-e71. |
| [17] | Jin-Haw Lee, HyeRan Choo, Seong-Hun Kim, Kyu-Rhim Chung, Lucille A. Giannuzzi, and Peter Ngan. Replacing a failed mini-implant with a miniplate to prevent interruption during orthodontic Treatment Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 849-57 June. |
| [18] | Joseph S. Petreya; Marnie M. Saundersb; G. Thomas Kluemperc, Larry L. Cunninghamd, Cynthia S. Beemane. Temporary anchorage device insertion variables: effects on retention. Angle Orthodontist, Vol 80, No 4, 2010. |
| [19] | Telma Martins de Araújo, Mauro Henrique Andrade Nascimento, Fernanda Catharino Menezes Franco, Marcos Alan Vieira Bittencourt.: Dental Press J. Orthod. 3 v. 13, no. 5, p. 36-48, Sep./Oct. 2008. |
| [20] | Madhur Upadhyay, K. Nagaraj, Sumit Yadav, Ruchi Saxena Mini-implants for en masse intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth in a severe Class II division 2 malocclusion. Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 35, 2008, 79–89. |
| [21] | Sang-Jin Sung, Gang-Won Jang, Youn-Sic Chun, and Yoon-Shik Moon. Effective enmasse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: A finite element analysis. Am J Orthodox Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 648-57. |
| [22] | Gallas MM, Abeleira MT, Fernandez JR, Burguera M. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27: 12-16. |
| [23] | HedayatiZ, Shomali M. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study. Prog Orthod 2016; 17: 31-35. |
APA Style
Mohammed Abdul Naqeed, Swaroopa Rani Ponnada, Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta. (2021). Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis for Stress Distribution During Intrusion and Retraction Using Orthodontic Mini-implants. International Journal of Dental Medicine, 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20210701.11
ACS Style
Mohammed Abdul Naqeed; Swaroopa Rani Ponnada; Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis for Stress Distribution During Intrusion and Retraction Using Orthodontic Mini-implants. Int. J. Dent. Med. 2021, 7(1), 1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdm.20210701.11
AMA Style
Mohammed Abdul Naqeed, Swaroopa Rani Ponnada, Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis for Stress Distribution During Intrusion and Retraction Using Orthodontic Mini-implants. Int J Dent Med. 2021;7(1):1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdm.20210701.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijdm.20210701.11,
author = {Mohammed Abdul Naqeed and Swaroopa Rani Ponnada and Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta},
title = {Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis for Stress Distribution During Intrusion and Retraction Using Orthodontic Mini-implants},
journal = {International Journal of Dental Medicine},
volume = {7},
number = {1},
pages = {1-9},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijdm.20210701.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20210701.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijdm.20210701.11},
abstract = {Background and Objectives: the study was conducted to evaluate the levels of stress produced in and around implants when placed at different sites for retraction and intrusion of maxillary anteriors. The other objective was to evaluate stress levels produced at implant bone interface when mini implants were placed at different angulations at the same site. Materials and Methodology: Finite element model of the maxilla and maxillary dentition was constructed using the CT skull of subject used in the study. All the accessories used like mini-implants, stainless steel wire, coil springs etc were scanned separately for obtaining detailed anatomic features. The force was given between retraction hook and mini -implant using NITI closed coil spring for intrusion and retraction of maxillary anterior teeth. The basic mechanical factors i.e. the stresses developed in mini implant, the angle of insertion of the mini implant into the bone surface were analyzed. Finite Element model was generated by Hyper mesh 9.0 software. Analysis was carried out by using Ansys 12.1 software. Results and Conclusion: All the set objectives were accomplished at the end of the study which included complete closure of extraction space by retraction and intrusion in the models. The following conclusions were drawn: The least stress was seen on an implant at middle third, when inserted at an angle of 800 to the bone surface, with application of 50-100mg of intrusive force on anterior implant and 200 gms of retractive force on posterior implant.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis for Stress Distribution During Intrusion and Retraction Using Orthodontic Mini-implants AU - Mohammed Abdul Naqeed AU - Swaroopa Rani Ponnada AU - Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta Y1 - 2021/04/26 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20210701.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijdm.20210701.11 T2 - International Journal of Dental Medicine JF - International Journal of Dental Medicine JO - International Journal of Dental Medicine SP - 1 EP - 9 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-1387 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20210701.11 AB - Background and Objectives: the study was conducted to evaluate the levels of stress produced in and around implants when placed at different sites for retraction and intrusion of maxillary anteriors. The other objective was to evaluate stress levels produced at implant bone interface when mini implants were placed at different angulations at the same site. Materials and Methodology: Finite element model of the maxilla and maxillary dentition was constructed using the CT skull of subject used in the study. All the accessories used like mini-implants, stainless steel wire, coil springs etc were scanned separately for obtaining detailed anatomic features. The force was given between retraction hook and mini -implant using NITI closed coil spring for intrusion and retraction of maxillary anterior teeth. The basic mechanical factors i.e. the stresses developed in mini implant, the angle of insertion of the mini implant into the bone surface were analyzed. Finite Element model was generated by Hyper mesh 9.0 software. Analysis was carried out by using Ansys 12.1 software. Results and Conclusion: All the set objectives were accomplished at the end of the study which included complete closure of extraction space by retraction and intrusion in the models. The following conclusions were drawn: The least stress was seen on an implant at middle third, when inserted at an angle of 800 to the bone surface, with application of 50-100mg of intrusive force on anterior implant and 200 gms of retractive force on posterior implant. VL - 7 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: