Digital transformation often arises from the distribution of tasks among interdisciplinary teams of experts. One important factor that determines the success of digital transformation relates to an organization’s ability to innovate in an agile manner. In this article, we identify key drivers of digital transformation, which include organizational agility, knowledge management and innovation. Another crucial aspect of knowledge management relates to the coordination of knowledge. It is important for organizations to focus on knowledge coordination because the lack of coordination can dissuade them from meeting the demands for flexibility and speed during digital transformation, thereby negating the potential benefits from adopting an agile innovation methodology. To examine these issues, we introduce a model to establish how agile knowledge management practices can foster innovation in an organization’s digital transformation. Our model also highlights how knowledge coordination can create an environment that fosters organizational agility. To facilitate knowledge-driven agile innovation, we further highlight several people management practices that can play a role in fostering knowledge sharing behaviors during digital transformation. In addition, our article illustrates how agile innovation can play a key role in the knowledge management aspect of an organization’s digital transformation using case studies, including that of General & Marine Agents Pte Ltd, an insurance broker headquartered in Singapore.
Published in | International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 11, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijber.20221105.12 |
Page(s) | 276-286 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Knowledge Management, Organizational Agility, Knowledge Coordination, Digital Infrastructure, Digital Talent & Culture, Digital Transformation, Agile Innovation
[1] | Ben Chouikha, Mouna and Dakhli, Salem Ben Dhaou, "Knowledge Sharing in Computerization Projects: An Approach Based on Boundary Objects" (2015). MCIS 2015 Proceedings. |
[2] | Paul Quintas, Paul Lefrere, Geoff Jones, “Knowledge management: A strategic agenda. Long Range Planning”, 30 (3), 1997, 385-391. |
[3] | Maria Carmela Annosi, Nicolai Foss, Antonella Martini, “When agile harms learning and innovation: (And what can be done about it)”, California Management Review, 63 (1), 2020, 61-80. |
[4] | Johan Sandberg, “Digital capability: investigating coevolution of IT and business strategies”, Doctoral dissertation, Umeå universitet, 2014. |
[5] | David Rueckel, Manuel Mühlburger, Stefan Koch, “An Updated Framework of Factors Enabling Digital Transformation”, Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12 (4), 2020, 1. |
[6] | Patricia J. Guinan, Salvatore Parise, Nan Langowitz, “Creating an innovative digital project team: Levers to enable digital transformation”, Business Horizons, 62 (6), 2019, 717-727. |
[7] | Ziyadin Sayabek, Saltanat Suieubayeva, A. Utegenova, “Digital Transformation of the Economy: Challenges, Trends, New Opportunities”, Digital transformation in business, International Scientific Conference, Springer, 2019, 408-415. |
[8] | Ted Schadler, “The sorry state of digital transformation in 2018”, Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA, 2018. |
[9] | Mass Framingham, IDC Forecasts Worldwide Spending on Digital Transformation Technologies in 2018 to reach $1.3 Trillion in 2018, IDC, https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerIdZprUS43381817, 2017. |
[10] | Feng Li, “The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends”, Technovation, 92, 102012, 2020. |
[11] | Digital transformation: Creating new business models where digital meets physical, ftp://ftp.www.ibm.com/software/it/pdf/004_-_1_Digital_Transformation.pdf, IBM, 2011. |
[12] | David Tilson, Kalle Lyytinen, Carsten Sørensen, “Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda” Information systems research, 21 (4), 2010, 748-759. |
[13] | Henfridsson, O., & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS quarterly, 907-931. |
[14] | Frankiewicz, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2020). Digital transformation is about talent, not technology. Harvard Business Review, 2-6. |
[15] | Patrick Hoberg, Helmut Krcmar, Bernd Weiz, Skills for Digital Transformation, http://www.corporate-leaders.com/sitescene/sapskillsfordigitaltransformation.pdf, IDT, 2017. |
[16] | Guido Wokurka, Yvonne Banschbach, Dominic Houlder, Richard Jolly, “Digital culture: Why strategy and culture should eat breakfast together”, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 109-120, 2017. |
[17] | Jim Hemerling, Julie Kilmann, Martin Danoesastro, Liza Stutts, Cailin Ahern, “It’s not a digital transformation without a digital culture”, BCG, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2018. |
[18] | Juan Gabriel, Cegarra Navarro, Pedro Soto-Acosta, Anthony K. P. Wensley, “Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility”, Journal of Business Research, 69 (5), 1544-1549, 2016. |
[19] | Pérez Bustamante, G., “Knowledge management in agile innovative organisations”, Journal of knowledge management, 3 (1), 6-17, 1999. |
[20] | Rick Dove, “Knowledge management, response ability, and the agile enterprise”, Journal of knowledge management, 3 (1), 18-35, 1999. |
[21] | Guillermo Pérez-Bustamante, “Knowledge management in agile innovative organisations”, Journal of knowledge management, 3 (1), 1999, 6-17. |
[22] | Keeley Wilson Yves, L. Doz, “Agile innovation: A footprint balancing distance and immersion”, California Management Review, 53 (2), 2011, 6-26. |
[23] | Eli Hustad, Dag H. Olsen, “Creating a sustainable digital infrastructure: the role of service-oriented architecture”, Procedia Computer Science, 181, 2011, 597-604. |
[24] | Designing the future of HealtTech, Philips, https://www.philips.com/a-w/about/philips-design/healthtech.html. |
[25] | Cara Wrigley, Karla Straker, “Designing innovative business models with a framework that promotes experimentation”, Strategy & Leadership 44 (1), 2016, 11-19. |
[26] | Tina Bellon, Lyft launches meal, grocery delivery service in several U.S. cities, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-lyft-delivery/lyft-launches-meal-grocery-delivery-service-in-several-u-s-cities-idUSKCN21X33G, Apr 16, 2020. |
[27] | Pérez-Bustamante, G., “Knowledge management in agile innovative organisations” Journal of knowledge management, 3 (1), 1999, 6-17. |
[28] | Gwen M. Wittenbaum, Sandra I. Vaughan, Garold Strasser, “Coordination in task performing groups”, Theory and research on small groups, New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1998, 177–204. |
[29] | Robert T. Keller, “Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: a test of contingency theory”, Academy Management Journal, 37 (1), 1994, 167-179. |
[30] | Tom R. Tyler, “Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation”, Annual Review of Psychology, 57 (1), 2006, 375-400. |
[31] | Catherine Gabelica, Piet Van den Bossche, Stephen M. Fiore, Mien Segers, Wim H. Gijselaers, “Establishing team knowledge coordination from a learning perspective”, Human Performance, 29 (1), 2016, 33-53. |
[32] | Calvin M. L. Chan, Say Yen Teoh, Adrian Yeow, Gary Pan, “Agility in Responding to Disruptive Digital Innovation: Case Study of a SME,” Information Systems Journal, 29 (2), 2019, 436-455. |
[33] | Gary Pan, Say Yen Teoh, Poh Sun Seow, “Coordinating the Processes of Resource Enrichment and Capability Deployment: Lessons from IT Implementation at a Medium-Sized Accounting Firm,” International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 22 (4), 2014, 357-374. |
[34] | Chip Heath, Nancy Staudenmayer, “Coordination neglect: how lay theories of organizing complicate coordination in organizations”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 2000, 153-191. |
[35] | Dorothy E. Leidner, GaryPan, Shan L. Pan, “The Role of IT in Crisis Response: Lessons from SARS and Asian Tsunami Disasters,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, (18: 2), 2009, 80-99. |
[36] | Joan R. Rentsch, Lisa A. Delise, Eduardo Salas, Michael P. Letsky, “Facilitating knowledge building in teams: Can a new team training strategy help?” Small Group Research, 41, 2010, 505–523. |
[37] | J. Alberto Espinosa, Sandra Slaughter, Robert E. Kraut, “Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 2007, 135–169. |
[38] | Gregory A. Bigley, Karlene H. Roberts, “The incident command system: high-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments”, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6), 2001, 1281-1299. |
APA Style
Lipika Bhattacharya, Clarence Goh, Gary Pan. (2022). Introducing a Model for How Knowledge-Driven Agile Innovation Can Drive Digital Transformation in Firms. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 11(5), 276-286. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221105.12
ACS Style
Lipika Bhattacharya; Clarence Goh; Gary Pan. Introducing a Model for How Knowledge-Driven Agile Innovation Can Drive Digital Transformation in Firms. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2022, 11(5), 276-286. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20221105.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20221105.12, author = {Lipika Bhattacharya and Clarence Goh and Gary Pan}, title = {Introducing a Model for How Knowledge-Driven Agile Innovation Can Drive Digital Transformation in Firms}, journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research}, volume = {11}, number = {5}, pages = {276-286}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20221105.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221105.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20221105.12}, abstract = {Digital transformation often arises from the distribution of tasks among interdisciplinary teams of experts. One important factor that determines the success of digital transformation relates to an organization’s ability to innovate in an agile manner. In this article, we identify key drivers of digital transformation, which include organizational agility, knowledge management and innovation. Another crucial aspect of knowledge management relates to the coordination of knowledge. It is important for organizations to focus on knowledge coordination because the lack of coordination can dissuade them from meeting the demands for flexibility and speed during digital transformation, thereby negating the potential benefits from adopting an agile innovation methodology. To examine these issues, we introduce a model to establish how agile knowledge management practices can foster innovation in an organization’s digital transformation. Our model also highlights how knowledge coordination can create an environment that fosters organizational agility. To facilitate knowledge-driven agile innovation, we further highlight several people management practices that can play a role in fostering knowledge sharing behaviors during digital transformation. In addition, our article illustrates how agile innovation can play a key role in the knowledge management aspect of an organization’s digital transformation using case studies, including that of General & Marine Agents Pte Ltd, an insurance broker headquartered in Singapore.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Introducing a Model for How Knowledge-Driven Agile Innovation Can Drive Digital Transformation in Firms AU - Lipika Bhattacharya AU - Clarence Goh AU - Gary Pan Y1 - 2022/10/17 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221105.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijber.20221105.12 T2 - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JF - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JO - International Journal of Business and Economics Research SP - 276 EP - 286 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-756X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221105.12 AB - Digital transformation often arises from the distribution of tasks among interdisciplinary teams of experts. One important factor that determines the success of digital transformation relates to an organization’s ability to innovate in an agile manner. In this article, we identify key drivers of digital transformation, which include organizational agility, knowledge management and innovation. Another crucial aspect of knowledge management relates to the coordination of knowledge. It is important for organizations to focus on knowledge coordination because the lack of coordination can dissuade them from meeting the demands for flexibility and speed during digital transformation, thereby negating the potential benefits from adopting an agile innovation methodology. To examine these issues, we introduce a model to establish how agile knowledge management practices can foster innovation in an organization’s digital transformation. Our model also highlights how knowledge coordination can create an environment that fosters organizational agility. To facilitate knowledge-driven agile innovation, we further highlight several people management practices that can play a role in fostering knowledge sharing behaviors during digital transformation. In addition, our article illustrates how agile innovation can play a key role in the knowledge management aspect of an organization’s digital transformation using case studies, including that of General & Marine Agents Pte Ltd, an insurance broker headquartered in Singapore. VL - 11 IS - 5 ER -