The importance of Corporate Social Responsibility cannot be overemphasized, and good Corporate Social Responsibility will constitute good relationship for both the implementing business and its stakeholders- such as customers, community, suppliers, government etc., of such business. The idea behind Corporate Social Responsibility is largely misunderstood by many to deal with only large organizations and multinational. However, even small businesses can in their own little ways be socially responsible. For instance, both large and small businesses do employ workers, operate in a community, impact on the environment on which they operate and are expected to pay taxes to the government of their nation. Consequently, by employing worker, the business is expected to maintain and services such workers in other to retain them and by operating in a community, the business owe such community among other things healthy goods and contributions to societal activities. Therefore, it doesn’t necessarily mean that a business must be large before Corporate Social Responsibility can be implemented. All the aforementioned activities are all inclusive in the Corporate Social Responsibility list. This study considered the meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility from varying authorities, reviewed literatures on previous studies- specifically those with positive relationship, negative relationship, mixed relationship and modest relationship. Following the robust literature review, gaps in studies were identified and consequently, need for further studies. Finally, conclusion was made and recommendations suggested.
Published in | International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijber.20211004.11 |
Page(s) | 110-116 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Performance, Community, Customers and Suppliers
[1] | Banerjee, B. S. (2007) CSR The good the bad and the Ugly Edward Elgar publishing limited glensanda house Montpellier parade Cheltenham uk. |
[2] | Dahlsrud, A., (2008), How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental Management, 15, 1–13. |
[3] | Comincioni N., Poddi L and Vergalli S. (2012). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Performance of Firms? Electronic Journals. |
[4] | Masaka D. (2008). Why Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is Morally Questionable. EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies Vol. 13. |
[5] | Windsor, D. (2001), “The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility”, in The International Journal of Organization Studies, 9 (3), 225-256. |
[6] | Abrams, F. (1951). Management’s Responsibilities in a Complex World; Harvard Business Review, 29 (30) 29-34. |
[7] | European Commission (2001). Green Paper—Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Bruxelles: European Commission; COM (2001) 366. |
[8] | Licandro D. O., Garcia R. G. A., Alvarado-Peña J. L., Osuna V. A. L and Correa P. (20019). Implementation of the ISO 26000 Guidelines on Active Participation and Community Development. Social Sciences, MDPi 8, 263 (2019). |
[9] | Blowfield M. and Murray A. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility, 2nd ed. Oxford university Press. |
[10] | Huczynski, A. A. and Buchanan, A. D. (2013) Organizational Behaviour. 8th ed. Pearson Education limited Edinburgh Gate United Kingdom. |
[11] | Kotler, P. and Keller, L. K. (2012) A framework for marketing management. 5th ed. Pearson education limited Edinburgh gate: Harlow England. |
[12] | Marimuthu, M., Arokiasamy, L., and Ismail, M. (2009) Human Capital Development and its Impact on Firm Performance: Evidence. |
[13] | Selvarajan, T. T., Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Guthrie, J. P., MacCurtain, S., and Liu, W. (2007). The role of human capital philosophy in promoting firm innovativeness and performance: Test of a causal model. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18 (8), pp. 1456-1470. |
[14] | Kajola, S. O. (2008). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: The Case of Nigerian Listed Firms. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences. |
[15] | James G. March and Robert I. Sutton (1997). Crossroads- Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable. Organization Science 8 (6), 698-706. |
[16] | Hopkins, T. (2012) Corporate Social Responsibility Hand book: Making CSR and Narrative Reporting Work for Your Business, 3rd ed. ICSA Information and Training Limited London. |
[17] | Margolis, J. D. and J. P. Walsh: (2003), “Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 268–305. |
[18] | Vogel, D. J. (2005). ‘Is There a Market for Virtue? The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility’. California Management Review, 47 (4), pp. 19–45. |
[19] | Fasanya, O. I. and Onakoya, O. B. A. (2013) Does Corporate Social Responsibility Improve Firm Performance of Nigeria Firms. Evidence from Triangulated Analysis. Pakistan Journal of social sciences 10 (2) pp 92-98. |
[20] | Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (3), 403-441. |
[21] | Uadiale, M. O and Fagbemi, O. T. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Developing Economies: The Nigerian Experience. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 3 (4) pp 44. |
[22] | Piatti, D. (2014) Italian Mutual Banks: Corporate Social and Financial Performance. European Scientific Journal February 2014 Edition Vol. 10 (4). ISSN: 1857 – 7881. |
[23] | Mishra and Suar (2010). Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (4), 571–601. |
[24] | Waddock, S. A., and Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4), pp. 303-310. |
[25] | McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A. and Schneeweiss, T., (1988) Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 31, pp. 854–872. |
[26] | Alexander J. G. and Buchholz A. R. (1978). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance. The academic Management Journal Vol. 21 (3), 479-486. |
[27] | McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. and Wright, P., (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies 18, pp. 1–18. |
[28] | Mwangi, I. C. And Jerotich, J. O. (2013) The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Financial Performance Of Firms In The Manufacturing, Construction And Allied Sector Of The Nairobi Securities Exchange. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology Vol. 3 No. 2 (2013). |
[29] | Nkaiwatei, A. O. (2011). Relationship between Social Accounting Practices and Profitability: The case of oil industry in Kenya, Unpublished MBA Thesis, University of Nairobi. |
[30] | Saeidi, P. S., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, P. S and Saaeidi, A. S. (2014) How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Contribute To Firm Financial Performance? the Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage, Reputation, and Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Business Research 68 (2015), pp. 341–350. |
[31] | Lean, H. H. and Chang, Y (2011) Corporate social responsibilities and stock returns: Stochastic dominance approach. African Journal of Business Management Vol. 5 (4), pp. 1277-1285. |
[32] | Lee S., Seo K., & Sharma A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance in the airline industry: The moderating role of oil prices. Tourism Management 38 (2013): 20-30. |
[33] | Akano, Y. A., Jamiu O. O., Olaniran, Y. A. and Oluwalogbon, T. O. (2013) Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Disclosure by Commercial Banks in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management Vol. 5 (7), 2222-2839. |
[34] | Okafor, C. and Oshodin, E. (2012) Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance in Nigeria. Journal of Management and Corporate Governance, Vol. 4 (2012) pp. 23-31. |
[35] | Trang T. N. H and Liafisu Sina Yekini S. L. (2014) Investigating the link between CSR and Financial performance – Evidence from Vietnamese listed companies. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, Vol. 17 (I). |
[36] | Obijuru E. U., Odimegwu B. I., and Kifordu A. A. (2017). Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Organizational Performance of the Petroleum Industry in South-South, Nigeria. University of Port Harcourt Journals of Management, 2 (1): 110-126. |
[37] | Dahlsrud, A. (2006) How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, pp. 1–13. |
[38] | Hopkins, M. (1998). The Planetary Bargain: Corporate Social Responsibility Comes of Age., Macmillan, London. |
[39] | Khoury, George, Janet Rostami, and Lynn Peri Turnbull. 1999. Corporate Social Responsibility: Turning Words into Action. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada. |
[40] | Ukpabi, D. C., Ikaba, Y. V., Enyindah, C. W., Orji, O. G., and Idatoru, A. R., (2014). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational effectiveness. Journals of Business and Management, 16 (12): 32-36. |
APA Style
Barnabas Gogo Pepple, Boniface Uzoma Emenike, Kingsley Ala Wilcox. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Review of Literatures. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 10(4), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211004.11
ACS Style
Barnabas Gogo Pepple; Boniface Uzoma Emenike; Kingsley Ala Wilcox. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Review of Literatures. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2021, 10(4), 110-116. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20211004.11
AMA Style
Barnabas Gogo Pepple, Boniface Uzoma Emenike, Kingsley Ala Wilcox. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Review of Literatures. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2021;10(4):110-116. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20211004.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20211004.11, author = {Barnabas Gogo Pepple and Boniface Uzoma Emenike and Kingsley Ala Wilcox}, title = {Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Review of Literatures}, journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research}, volume = {10}, number = {4}, pages = {110-116}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20211004.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211004.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20211004.11}, abstract = {The importance of Corporate Social Responsibility cannot be overemphasized, and good Corporate Social Responsibility will constitute good relationship for both the implementing business and its stakeholders- such as customers, community, suppliers, government etc., of such business. The idea behind Corporate Social Responsibility is largely misunderstood by many to deal with only large organizations and multinational. However, even small businesses can in their own little ways be socially responsible. For instance, both large and small businesses do employ workers, operate in a community, impact on the environment on which they operate and are expected to pay taxes to the government of their nation. Consequently, by employing worker, the business is expected to maintain and services such workers in other to retain them and by operating in a community, the business owe such community among other things healthy goods and contributions to societal activities. Therefore, it doesn’t necessarily mean that a business must be large before Corporate Social Responsibility can be implemented. All the aforementioned activities are all inclusive in the Corporate Social Responsibility list. This study considered the meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility from varying authorities, reviewed literatures on previous studies- specifically those with positive relationship, negative relationship, mixed relationship and modest relationship. Following the robust literature review, gaps in studies were identified and consequently, need for further studies. Finally, conclusion was made and recommendations suggested.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Review of Literatures AU - Barnabas Gogo Pepple AU - Boniface Uzoma Emenike AU - Kingsley Ala Wilcox Y1 - 2021/07/13 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211004.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijber.20211004.11 T2 - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JF - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JO - International Journal of Business and Economics Research SP - 110 EP - 116 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-756X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211004.11 AB - The importance of Corporate Social Responsibility cannot be overemphasized, and good Corporate Social Responsibility will constitute good relationship for both the implementing business and its stakeholders- such as customers, community, suppliers, government etc., of such business. The idea behind Corporate Social Responsibility is largely misunderstood by many to deal with only large organizations and multinational. However, even small businesses can in their own little ways be socially responsible. For instance, both large and small businesses do employ workers, operate in a community, impact on the environment on which they operate and are expected to pay taxes to the government of their nation. Consequently, by employing worker, the business is expected to maintain and services such workers in other to retain them and by operating in a community, the business owe such community among other things healthy goods and contributions to societal activities. Therefore, it doesn’t necessarily mean that a business must be large before Corporate Social Responsibility can be implemented. All the aforementioned activities are all inclusive in the Corporate Social Responsibility list. This study considered the meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility from varying authorities, reviewed literatures on previous studies- specifically those with positive relationship, negative relationship, mixed relationship and modest relationship. Following the robust literature review, gaps in studies were identified and consequently, need for further studies. Finally, conclusion was made and recommendations suggested. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -