Taking 2012-2015 Chinese A-Share listed companies as the research object, this paper studies the impact of executive influence and poverty experience on the performance of corporate social responsibility. The results show that: executive influence is positively correlated with performance of corporate social responsibility, the higher the executive influence, the better corporate social responsibility is; compared with non-state-owned enterprises, executive influence has more influence on the performance of social responsibility of state-owned enterprises. poverty experience is positively correlated with performance of corporate social responsibility, the higher the poverty experience, the better corporate social responsibility is. Further research found that: executive poverty experience helps to strengthen the positive correlation between executive influence and corporate social responsibility, we should pay attention to the role of executive influence, at the same time cannot be ignored the effect of executive poverty on promoting the performance of corporate social responsibility.
Published in | International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 7, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijber.20180703.13 |
Page(s) | 62-70 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Executive Influence, Poverty Experience, Corporate Social Responsibility
[1] | Dyck A., Volchkova N., Zinglaes L. The Corporate Governance Role of The Media: Evidence from Russia [J]. Journal of Finance, 2008, 63 (3):1093-1136. |
[2] | Joe, J., H. Louis, and D. Robinson. Managers’ and Investors’ Responses to Media Exposure of Board Ineffectiveness [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2009, 44 (3):579-605. |
[3] | Peng Yu, Chen Hongqiang. Internal Control, Marketization Process and Corporate Social Responsibility [J]. Modern Finance and Economics, 2015 (6): 43-51. |
[4] | Kuhnen C, Niessen A. Is Executive Compensation Shaped by Public Attitudes? [R]. Evanston:Northwestern University, 2009. |
[5] | Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., Zhuravskaya, E. Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia [J]. American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (7): 3253-3285. |
[6] | Porter M E, Kramer M R. Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2006 (12): 36-37. |
[7] | Yang Junjie, Cao Guohua. CEO Reputation, Earnings Management and Investment Efficiency [J]. Soft Science, 2016, 30 (11):71-77. |
[8] | Jennifer, F., H. Allen, R. Shivaram. CEO Reputation and Earnings Quality [J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2008, 25 (1): 109-147. |
[9] | Graham, J., Harvey, and M. Puri. Capital Allocation and Delegation of Decision making Authority within Firms [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, (115) 449-470. |
[10] | Steven F. Cahan, Chen Chen, Nhut H. Nguyen. Corporte Social Responsibility and Media Coverage [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2015 (59):19-27. |
[11] | Benson. What Determines Success? Examining The Human, Financial and Social Capital of Jamaican Microentrepreneurs [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1998 (13):371-394. |
[12] | Hui Zhengyi. Corporate Social Responsibility Top Management Influence [N]. China Business News, May 2008 (C05). |
[13] | Hahn, A., and B. Gawronski. Implicit Social Cognition [J]. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, (17):714-720. |
[14] | Brammer S J, Pavelin S. Building a Good Reputation [J]. European Management Journal, 2004 (12):704 -713. |
[15] | Zyglidopoulos, Georgiadis. Does Media Attention Drive Corporate Social Responsibility? [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2012, 65 (11):1622-1627. |
[16] | Ponzi L J, Fombrun C J, Gardberg N A. RepTrak Pulse:Conceptualizing and Validating a Short Form Measure of Corporate Reputation [J]. Corporate Reputation Review, 2011, 14 (1):15-35. |
[17] | Hofstede, G. The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984 (07): 389-398. |
[18] | Sen, Amartya. Social Exclusion, Critical Quest [M]. India: New Delhi, 2004. |
[19] | Elder, G., C. Gimbel. Turning Points in Life: The Case of Military Service and War [J]. Military Psychology, 1991 (3): 215-231. |
[20] | Hulme, D., and A. Shepherd. Conceptualizing Chronic Poverty [J]. World Development, 2003, 31 (3):403-423. |
[21] | Malmendier, U., Tate, and Yan. Overconfidence and Early life Experiences: The Effect of Managerial Traits on Corporate Financial Policies [J]. Journal of Finance, 2011 (66):1687-1733. |
APA Style
Bo Wang, Huaming Wang. (2018). Executive Influence, Poverty Experience and Corporate Social Responsibility—Based on Empirical Evidence of Chinese A - Share Listed Companies. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 7(3), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180703.13
ACS Style
Bo Wang; Huaming Wang. Executive Influence, Poverty Experience and Corporate Social Responsibility—Based on Empirical Evidence of Chinese A - Share Listed Companies. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2018, 7(3), 62-70. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20180703.13
AMA Style
Bo Wang, Huaming Wang. Executive Influence, Poverty Experience and Corporate Social Responsibility—Based on Empirical Evidence of Chinese A - Share Listed Companies. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2018;7(3):62-70. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20180703.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20180703.13, author = {Bo Wang and Huaming Wang}, title = {Executive Influence, Poverty Experience and Corporate Social Responsibility—Based on Empirical Evidence of Chinese A - Share Listed Companies}, journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research}, volume = {7}, number = {3}, pages = {62-70}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20180703.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180703.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20180703.13}, abstract = {Taking 2012-2015 Chinese A-Share listed companies as the research object, this paper studies the impact of executive influence and poverty experience on the performance of corporate social responsibility. The results show that: executive influence is positively correlated with performance of corporate social responsibility, the higher the executive influence, the better corporate social responsibility is; compared with non-state-owned enterprises, executive influence has more influence on the performance of social responsibility of state-owned enterprises. poverty experience is positively correlated with performance of corporate social responsibility, the higher the poverty experience, the better corporate social responsibility is. Further research found that: executive poverty experience helps to strengthen the positive correlation between executive influence and corporate social responsibility, we should pay attention to the role of executive influence, at the same time cannot be ignored the effect of executive poverty on promoting the performance of corporate social responsibility.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Executive Influence, Poverty Experience and Corporate Social Responsibility—Based on Empirical Evidence of Chinese A - Share Listed Companies AU - Bo Wang AU - Huaming Wang Y1 - 2018/07/19 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180703.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijber.20180703.13 T2 - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JF - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JO - International Journal of Business and Economics Research SP - 62 EP - 70 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-756X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180703.13 AB - Taking 2012-2015 Chinese A-Share listed companies as the research object, this paper studies the impact of executive influence and poverty experience on the performance of corporate social responsibility. The results show that: executive influence is positively correlated with performance of corporate social responsibility, the higher the executive influence, the better corporate social responsibility is; compared with non-state-owned enterprises, executive influence has more influence on the performance of social responsibility of state-owned enterprises. poverty experience is positively correlated with performance of corporate social responsibility, the higher the poverty experience, the better corporate social responsibility is. Further research found that: executive poverty experience helps to strengthen the positive correlation between executive influence and corporate social responsibility, we should pay attention to the role of executive influence, at the same time cannot be ignored the effect of executive poverty on promoting the performance of corporate social responsibility. VL - 7 IS - 3 ER -