Entrepreneurship education has proliferated in universities following empirical studies linking it to entrepreneurship practice. The University of Malawi introduced entrepreneurship and innovation course to the bachelor of business administration programme and aims to make entrepreneurship a core module across academic programmes. This study assessed the effects of the entrepreneurship and innovation course on the entrepreneurial orientation of students thereby joining research into the investigation of the effects of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial orientation of students. A questionnaire was administered on a class of 58 students before commencement of the course and at the end of the course delivery to assess movement in students knowledge about entrepreneurship, attitudes towards entrepreneurship, subjective norms, self efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions that could be attributed to entrepreneurship education holding other factors constant over the period of study. The study found that entrepreneurship education positively effects students knowledge about entrepreneurship and their self efficacy; the self confidence in skills and competences that they can engage in entrepreneurship successfully. The study however found weak correlation between entrepreneurship education and students attitudes towards entrepreneurship and their entrepreneurial intentions and did not find any relationship between entrepreneurship education and students' subjective norms. Although attitudes, subjective norms and self efficacy are factors that influence intentions,which are an antecedent of behaviour within the Theory of Planned Behaviour, the study found that entrepreneurship education positively and significantly effects self efficacy only within this framework.
Published in | International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 5, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijber.20160506.17 |
Page(s) | 235-245 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Entrepreneurship Education, Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Self Efficacy and Intentions
[1] | Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D. (2003). Innovation and technological change, in: Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 55-79. |
[2] | Aidis, R. (2005). Institutional Barriers to small to medium sized enterprises operations in transition economies, Small Business Economics, Vol. 25(4), pp 305-318. |
[3] | Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioural Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 32(4), pp665-683. |
[4] | Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50(2), pp 179-211. |
[5] | Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl and J. Beckman (eds.), Action control: From cognitions to behaviour, New York: Springer,pp 11-39. |
[6] | Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. M. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook ofSocial Psychology. Winchester, MA: Clark University Press. |
[7] | Armitage, C. J. and Conner, M. (2001b). Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499. |
[8] | Armitage, C. J. and Conner, M. (1999). Distinguishing Perceptions of Control from Self-Efficacy: Predicting Consumption of a Low-Fat Diet Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 29(1), pp 72-90. |
[9] | Autio, E. (2007). Global Report on High-Growth Entrepreneurship. London Business School/Mazars/Babson. |
[10] | Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, Vol. 84, pp 191-215. |
[11] | Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs: NJ, Prentice-Hall. |
[12] | Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. |
[13] | Benzing, C., Hung, M. C. and Orban, K. (2009). Entrepreneurs in Turkey: A Factor Analysis of Motivations, Success Factors and Problems, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 47(1): 58-91. |
[14] | Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intentions. Academic Management. Review Vol.13, pp 442–454. |
[15] | Brooksbank, D. and Jones-Evans, D. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2005 Wales Executive Summary Report, National Entrepreneurship Observatory. |
[16] | Boyd, N. G. And Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol. 18(4): pp 63-77. |
[17] | Chandrashekaran, M., Mc Neilly, K., Russ, F. A., and Marinova, D. (2000). From Uncertain Intentions to Actual Behaviour: A Threshold Model of Whether and When Salespeople Quit. Journal of Marketing Research,Vol. 37(4): 463-479. |
[18] | Collins, L. A., Smith, A. J. and Hannon, P. D. (2006). Discovering entrepreneurship: An exploration of a tripartite approach to developing entrepreneurial capacities. Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 30(3): 188-205. |
[19] | Delmar, F. and P. Davidson (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship and regional development Vol. 12: 1-23. |
[20] | Dickson, P., Solomon, G. and Weaver, K. M. (2008). Entrepreneurial section and success: does education matter? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 15(2): pp239-258. |
[21] | Dollinger, M. J. (2003). Entrepreneurship: strategies and resources. Pearson International Edition, New Jersey. |
[22] | Donckels, R., and Miettinen, A. (1997). Entrepreneurship and SME research: on its way to the next millennium. Aldershot: Ashgate. |
[23] | Douglas, E. J., and D. A. Shepherd(2002). Self-employment as a career choice: Attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. Entrepreneurship: Theory and PracticeVol. 26 (3): pp81-90. |
[24] | Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. London: Heinemann |
[25] | Dumas, C. (2001). Evaluating the outcomes of microenterprise training for low income women: A case study. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol. 6(2), pp 97-128. |
[26] | Elfving, J., Brannback, M., &Carsrud, A., (2009). Towards a contextual models of entrepreneurial intentions. In A. L. Carsrud and M. Brannback (eds) Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind (pp. 23-33)., Springer Science. |
[27] | European Commission (2008). Entrepreneurship in higher education, especially within non-business studies. Brussels: Final Report of the Expert Group. |
[28] | Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. |
[29] | Fishbein, M. And Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour. Addison- Wesley: Reading, MA, USA. |
[30] | Gird, A. and Bagraim, J. J. (2008). The theory of planned behaviour as predictor of entrepreneurial intent amongst final-year university students. South African Journal of Psychology, Vol. 38(4), pp 711-724. |
[31] | Gorman, G., and Hanlon, D. (1997). Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship education, enterprise education and education for small business management: A ten-year literature review. International Small Business Journal, Vol. 15(3): 56-77. |
[32] | Hébert, R. F. and Link, A. N. (1988). The Entrepreneur: Mainstream Views and Radical Critiques (Second ed.). New York: Praeger. |
[33] | Heinonen, J. (2007). An entrepreneurial directed approach to teaching corporate entrepreneurship at university level. Education and TrainingVol. 49(4), pp. 310-324. |
[34] | Hollenbeck, G. and Hall, D. T. (2004). Self-confidence and leader performance. Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 33(3), pp254–269. |
[35] | Hornaday, R. W. (1992). Thinking about Entrepreneurship: A Fuzzy Set Approach. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 30(4): pp 12-23. |
[36] | Johannisson, B., Landstrom, H. and Rosenberg, J. (1998). University training for entrepreneurship training – an action frame for reference, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 23(4): pp 477-496. |
[37] | Katz, J. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 18(2): 283–300. |
[38] | Kolvereid, L. (1996). Organisational employment versus self employment: Reasons for career choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and PracticeVol. 20 (3): pp23-31. |
[39] | Kolvereid, L. and Moen, O. (1997). Entrepreneurship among business graduates: does a major in entrepreneurship make a difference?Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 21(4): 154-160. |
[40] | Krueger, N. F. (2000). The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 24(3), pp 5-23. |
[41] | Krueger, N. F. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 18(1), pp 5-21. |
[42] | Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Education: Development, Trends, and Challenges. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 29(5): 577-597. |
[43] | Linan, F. and Rodríguez, J. C. (2004). Entrepreneurial attitudes of Andalusian university students.44th ERSA Conference, Porto (Portugal), 21-25 August. |
[44] | Markman, G. D., Balkin D. B. and Baron R. A. (2002). Inventors and New Venture Formation: The Effect of General Self-Efficacy and Regretful Thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 27(2), pp149-165. |
[45] | Matthews, C. H., and Moser, S. B. (1995). Family background and gender: Implications for interest in small firm ownership. Entrepreneurship Regional Development, Vol.7(3), pp65-377. |
[46] | Mc Larty, R. (2005). Entrepreneurship among graduates: Towards a measured response. The Journal of Management Development,Vol.24(3),pp 23-238. |
[47] | Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rdEds) McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. |
[48] | Osborne, S. W., Falcone, T. W., and Nagendra, P. B. (2000). From unemployed to entrepreneur: A case study in intervention. Journal of Development Entrepreneurship, Vol. 5(2), pp15-136. |
[49] | Peterman, N. E. and Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise Education: Influencing students' perception of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 28(2), pp 129-145. |
[50] | Rae, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework for technology-based enterprise. Technology Analysis & strategic Management,Vol.18(1), pp. 39-56. |
[51] | Robinson, P. and Sexton E. (1994). The effect of education and experience on self employment success, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 9(2): 141-156. |
[52] | Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
[53] | Schwarz, E., Wdowiak, M., Almer-Jarz, D. and Breitenecker, R. (2009). The effects of attitudes and, perceived environment conditions on students’ entrepreneurial intent: An Austrian perspective, Education and Training, Vol. 51(4): pp 272-291. |
[54] | Scott, M. G., and Twomey, D. F. (1988). The Long Term Supply of Entrepreneurs: Students' Career Aspirations in Relation to Entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management (October) pp 5-13. |
[55] | Shane, S., and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. The Academy of Management Review,Vol. 25(1): pp 217-226. |
[56] | Shapero, A. (1982). Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship. In C. Kent, D. Sexton and K. Vesper, eds., The Encyclopaedia of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, pp 72–90. |
[57] | Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J. and Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The Theory ofReasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research withRecommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal ofConsumer Research, Vol. 15(3). |
[58] | Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal Of Business Venturing, Vol. 22(4), pp 566-591. |
[59] | Wilson, F., Kickul, J. and Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications of entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory and PracticeVol. 31 (3): pp387- 406. |
[60] | Zeithaml, C. and Rice, G. (1987). Entrepreneurship/small business education in American Universities. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 25(1), pp 44-50. |
APA Style
Charles Mwatsika, Eric Sankhulani. (2016). Effect of Entrepreneurship Education on Students Orientation Towards Entrepreneurship at the Malawi Polytechnic. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 5(6), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20160506.17
ACS Style
Charles Mwatsika; Eric Sankhulani. Effect of Entrepreneurship Education on Students Orientation Towards Entrepreneurship at the Malawi Polytechnic. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2016, 5(6), 235-245. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20160506.17
AMA Style
Charles Mwatsika, Eric Sankhulani. Effect of Entrepreneurship Education on Students Orientation Towards Entrepreneurship at the Malawi Polytechnic. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2016;5(6):235-245. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20160506.17
@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20160506.17, author = {Charles Mwatsika and Eric Sankhulani}, title = {Effect of Entrepreneurship Education on Students Orientation Towards Entrepreneurship at the Malawi Polytechnic}, journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research}, volume = {5}, number = {6}, pages = {235-245}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20160506.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20160506.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20160506.17}, abstract = {Entrepreneurship education has proliferated in universities following empirical studies linking it to entrepreneurship practice. The University of Malawi introduced entrepreneurship and innovation course to the bachelor of business administration programme and aims to make entrepreneurship a core module across academic programmes. This study assessed the effects of the entrepreneurship and innovation course on the entrepreneurial orientation of students thereby joining research into the investigation of the effects of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial orientation of students. A questionnaire was administered on a class of 58 students before commencement of the course and at the end of the course delivery to assess movement in students knowledge about entrepreneurship, attitudes towards entrepreneurship, subjective norms, self efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions that could be attributed to entrepreneurship education holding other factors constant over the period of study. The study found that entrepreneurship education positively effects students knowledge about entrepreneurship and their self efficacy; the self confidence in skills and competences that they can engage in entrepreneurship successfully. The study however found weak correlation between entrepreneurship education and students attitudes towards entrepreneurship and their entrepreneurial intentions and did not find any relationship between entrepreneurship education and students' subjective norms. Although attitudes, subjective norms and self efficacy are factors that influence intentions,which are an antecedent of behaviour within the Theory of Planned Behaviour, the study found that entrepreneurship education positively and significantly effects self efficacy only within this framework.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Entrepreneurship Education on Students Orientation Towards Entrepreneurship at the Malawi Polytechnic AU - Charles Mwatsika AU - Eric Sankhulani Y1 - 2016/12/14 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20160506.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijber.20160506.17 T2 - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JF - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JO - International Journal of Business and Economics Research SP - 235 EP - 245 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-756X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20160506.17 AB - Entrepreneurship education has proliferated in universities following empirical studies linking it to entrepreneurship practice. The University of Malawi introduced entrepreneurship and innovation course to the bachelor of business administration programme and aims to make entrepreneurship a core module across academic programmes. This study assessed the effects of the entrepreneurship and innovation course on the entrepreneurial orientation of students thereby joining research into the investigation of the effects of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial orientation of students. A questionnaire was administered on a class of 58 students before commencement of the course and at the end of the course delivery to assess movement in students knowledge about entrepreneurship, attitudes towards entrepreneurship, subjective norms, self efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions that could be attributed to entrepreneurship education holding other factors constant over the period of study. The study found that entrepreneurship education positively effects students knowledge about entrepreneurship and their self efficacy; the self confidence in skills and competences that they can engage in entrepreneurship successfully. The study however found weak correlation between entrepreneurship education and students attitudes towards entrepreneurship and their entrepreneurial intentions and did not find any relationship between entrepreneurship education and students' subjective norms. Although attitudes, subjective norms and self efficacy are factors that influence intentions,which are an antecedent of behaviour within the Theory of Planned Behaviour, the study found that entrepreneurship education positively and significantly effects self efficacy only within this framework. VL - 5 IS - 6 ER -