Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung

Ogala Harrison; Ige Ayodeji Rapheal; Elinge Cosmos Moki

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung

Ogala Harrison, Ige Ayodeji Rapheal, Elinge Cosmos Moki

Published in International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology (Volume 5, Issue 2)

Received: 16 June 2020 Accepted: 30 June 2020 Published: 30 October 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Production of sufficient sustainable sources of energy, mitigation of green house gas emissions amongst others are the aspiring goals that have led in developing technologies to produce more energy from renewable sources. This study investigated the potentials of an alternative fuel sources for biogas production, it was carried out using donkey dung and swine dung as substrates, further co-digestion of both donkey dung and swine dung was done to differentiate between independent and co-digestion of substrates. Digesters were used to digest swine dung and donkey dung respectively as single substrates as well as to co-digest swine dung and donkey dung. The operating conditions here are pH value 7.2, Temperature 32°C and retention time of 68 days. Effect of seeding with bacteria increases the rate of production and mixing is an essential part that also aids the production of biogas. This work presents the design and construction of biogas digester to treat 500g of swine dung and donkey dung. The digester is capable of producing 0.007m at average working temperature of 32°C. Digester D produces higher volume of biogas. Therefore, from the values of the physic-chemical properties with the sufficient carbon obtained, it will increase the sufficient effective biogas production as an alternative source of energy.

Published in	International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13
Page(s)	34-38
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Biogas, Digester, Production, Dung, Temperature

References

[1]	Iyagba, E. I., Mangibo, I. A. and Mohammad, Y. S. (2009) The study of cow dung as co-substrate with rice husk in biogas production. Scientific Research Essays, 4 (9), 861-868.
[2]	Muzenda E. (2014). Bio-methane Generation from Organic Waste: A Review. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, VolII, WCECS 2014, 22-24 October, 2014, San Francisco, US.
[3]	Suneerat P, Sommas K and Tharapong V. (2009). Economic assessment of biogas to Electricity generation system with H2S removal by activated carbon in small pig farm Scientific Res. And Essay, 4 (9): 861-886.
[4]	Mussoline, W., Esposito, G., Lens, P., Garuti, G., Giordano, A (2012). Design considerations for a farm-scale biogas plant based onpilot-scale anaerobic digesters loaded with rice straw and piggery wastewater, Biomass. Bioenerg., 46, 469-478.
[5]	Ebunilo, P. O., Orhorhoro, E. K., & Adegbayi, O. A (2016). Investigation of the purification of biogas from domestic wastes using local materials in Nigeria, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 2, 505-515.
[6]	Ejiroghene Kelly Orhorhoro, Patrick Okechukwu Ebunilo, Godwin Ejuvwedia Sadjere. Experimental Determination of Effect of Total Solid (TS) and Volatile Solid (VS) on Biogas Yield. American Journal of Modern Energy. Vol. 3, No. 6, 2017, pp. 131-135. doi: 10.11648/j.ajme.20170306.13.
[7]	Massé D. I., Talbot G. and Gibert Y. (2011). In farm biogas production: A method to reduce GHG emissions and develop more sustainable live stock operations, Animal Feed Sci. Techn., 166: 436-445.
[8]	Murto M., Bjornsson L., and Mattiasson B. (2004). Impact of food industrial waste anaerobicco digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure. Journal of Environmental Management, 70 (2), 101–107.
[9]	Karki AB, Shresta J. N. and Bajgain S. (2005). Biogas, As Renewable Source of Energy in Nepal, The ory and Development, BSP-Nepal Publishing, Kathmandu, 1-12.
[10]	Batstone, D, J, J, Keller, I, Angelidaki, S, V. Kalyuzhnyi, S. G, Pavlostathis, A. Rozzi, W, T. M. Sandersand V. A. Vanilin, (2002) Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADMI). IWA Task Group for Mathematical Modelling of Anaerobic Digestion Processes, IWA Publishing, London, UK.
[11]	Sadaa, B. H., Amarteyb, Y. D., Bako, S. (2013). An investigation into the use of groundnut shell as fine aggregate replacement. Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH) Vol. 32 (1), pp. 54-60.
[12]	Yavini D. T., Taura H. U., Mohammed N. and Namo M. J. (2014). Comparative Study of Mesophilic Biogas Production Potentials of Selected Agro-Wastes. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES) 3 (2), Pp. 1-6.
[13]	Dabroska, M., Swietochowski A and Lisowski, A (2019). Physicochemical properties and agglomeration parameters of biogas digestate with addition of calcium carbonate. Agronomy Research 17 (4), 1568-1576, doi.org/10.15159/AR.19.161.
[14]	Neczaj E., Bien J., Grosser A., Worwag M., and Kacprzak M. (2012). Anaerobic Treatment of Sewage Sludge and Grease Trap Sludge in Continuous Co-Digestion. Global NESTJ, 14 (2): 141-148.
[15]	Aremu, M. O. & Agarry S. E, (2012) Comparison of Biogas production from cow dung and pig dung under mesophilic condition, International Refereed journal of Engineering and science (IRJES) ISSN (Online) 2319-183X, (Print) 2319-1821 Volume1, Issue4 (December2012), PP, 16-21.
[16]	Soliu, G. A & Onunka, C. (2019). The use of solid fuel for biogas production in a biodigester. International Conference on Engineering for Sustainable World, Journal of Physics; Conference Series 1378 (2019) 022093, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1378/2/022093.
[17]	Babatola, J. O. (2008) Comparative study of biogas yield pattern in some animal and household wastes. African Research Review., 2 (4); 54-68, Odeyemi 2011, Energy commission of Nigeria 1998, Kombo 2011, C2007 A. C Wikie, Energy commission of Nigeria1997.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ogala Harrison, Ige Ayodeji Rapheal, Elinge Cosmos Moki. (2020). Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung. International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology, 5(2), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ogala Harrison; Ige Ayodeji Rapheal; Elinge Cosmos Moki. Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung. Int. J. Biochem. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2020, 5(2), 34-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ogala Harrison, Ige Ayodeji Rapheal, Elinge Cosmos Moki. Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung. Int J Biochem Biophys Mol Biol. 2020;5(2):34-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13,
  author = {Ogala Harrison and Ige Ayodeji Rapheal and Elinge Cosmos Moki},
  title = {Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung},
  journal = {International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {34-38},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbbmb.20200502.13},
  abstract = {Production of sufficient sustainable sources of energy, mitigation of green house gas emissions amongst others are the aspiring goals that have led in developing technologies to produce more energy from renewable sources. This study investigated the potentials of an alternative fuel sources for biogas production, it was carried out using donkey dung and swine dung as substrates, further co-digestion of both donkey dung and swine dung was done to differentiate between independent and co-digestion of substrates. Digesters were used to digest swine dung and donkey dung respectively as single substrates as well as to co-digest swine dung and donkey dung. The operating conditions here are pH value 7.2, Temperature 32°C and retention time of 68 days. Effect of seeding with bacteria increases the rate of production and mixing is an essential part that also aids the production of biogas. This work presents the design and construction of biogas digester to treat 500g of swine dung and donkey dung. The digester is capable of producing 0.007m at average working temperature of 32°C. Digester D produces higher volume of biogas. Therefore, from the values of the physic-chemical properties with the sufficient carbon obtained, it will increase the sufficient effective biogas production as an alternative source of energy.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung
AU  - Ogala Harrison
AU  - Ige Ayodeji Rapheal
AU  - Elinge Cosmos Moki
Y1  - 2020/10/30
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13
T2  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
JF  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
JO  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
SP  - 34
EP  - 38
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5862
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13
AB  - Production of sufficient sustainable sources of energy, mitigation of green house gas emissions amongst others are the aspiring goals that have led in developing technologies to produce more energy from renewable sources. This study investigated the potentials of an alternative fuel sources for biogas production, it was carried out using donkey dung and swine dung as substrates, further co-digestion of both donkey dung and swine dung was done to differentiate between independent and co-digestion of substrates. Digesters were used to digest swine dung and donkey dung respectively as single substrates as well as to co-digest swine dung and donkey dung. The operating conditions here are pH value 7.2, Temperature 32°C and retention time of 68 days. Effect of seeding with bacteria increases the rate of production and mixing is an essential part that also aids the production of biogas. This work presents the design and construction of biogas digester to treat 500g of swine dung and donkey dung. The digester is capable of producing 0.007m at average working temperature of 32°C. Digester D produces higher volume of biogas. Therefore, from the values of the physic-chemical properties with the sufficient carbon obtained, it will increase the sufficient effective biogas production as an alternative source of energy.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ogala Harrison

Department of Chemical Sciences, Admiralty University of Nigeria, Asaba, Nigeria
Ige Ayodeji Rapheal

Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Aliero, Nigeria
Elinge Cosmos Moki

Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Aliero, Nigeria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ogala Harrison, Ige Ayodeji Rapheal, Elinge Cosmos Moki. (2020). Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung. International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology, 5(2), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ogala Harrison; Ige Ayodeji Rapheal; Elinge Cosmos Moki. Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung. Int. J. Biochem. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2020, 5(2), 34-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ogala Harrison, Ige Ayodeji Rapheal, Elinge Cosmos Moki. Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung. Int J Biochem Biophys Mol Biol. 2020;5(2):34-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13,
  author = {Ogala Harrison and Ige Ayodeji Rapheal and Elinge Cosmos Moki},
  title = {Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung},
  journal = {International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {34-38},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbbmb.20200502.13},
  abstract = {Production of sufficient sustainable sources of energy, mitigation of green house gas emissions amongst others are the aspiring goals that have led in developing technologies to produce more energy from renewable sources. This study investigated the potentials of an alternative fuel sources for biogas production, it was carried out using donkey dung and swine dung as substrates, further co-digestion of both donkey dung and swine dung was done to differentiate between independent and co-digestion of substrates. Digesters were used to digest swine dung and donkey dung respectively as single substrates as well as to co-digest swine dung and donkey dung. The operating conditions here are pH value 7.2, Temperature 32°C and retention time of 68 days. Effect of seeding with bacteria increases the rate of production and mixing is an essential part that also aids the production of biogas. This work presents the design and construction of biogas digester to treat 500g of swine dung and donkey dung. The digester is capable of producing 0.007m at average working temperature of 32°C. Digester D produces higher volume of biogas. Therefore, from the values of the physic-chemical properties with the sufficient carbon obtained, it will increase the sufficient effective biogas production as an alternative source of energy.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparative Study of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Donkey Dung and Swine Dung
AU  - Ogala Harrison
AU  - Ige Ayodeji Rapheal
AU  - Elinge Cosmos Moki
Y1  - 2020/10/30
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13
T2  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
JF  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
JO  - International Journal of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology
SP  - 34
EP  - 38
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5862
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbbmb.20200502.13
AB  - Production of sufficient sustainable sources of energy, mitigation of green house gas emissions amongst others are the aspiring goals that have led in developing technologies to produce more energy from renewable sources. This study investigated the potentials of an alternative fuel sources for biogas production, it was carried out using donkey dung and swine dung as substrates, further co-digestion of both donkey dung and swine dung was done to differentiate between independent and co-digestion of substrates. Digesters were used to digest swine dung and donkey dung respectively as single substrates as well as to co-digest swine dung and donkey dung. The operating conditions here are pH value 7.2, Temperature 32°C and retention time of 68 days. Effect of seeding with bacteria increases the rate of production and mixing is an essential part that also aids the production of biogas. This work presents the design and construction of biogas digester to treat 500g of swine dung and donkey dung. The digester is capable of producing 0.007m at average working temperature of 32°C. Digester D produces higher volume of biogas. Therefore, from the values of the physic-chemical properties with the sufficient carbon obtained, it will increase the sufficient effective biogas production as an alternative source of energy.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download