This study is to determine cutting points for the Chinese version of the MBI-HSS and to design an online assessment tool that instantly measures a nurse’s burnout level. We illustrate (1) the traditional way for determining the cutting points of a scale when the binary classification groups was still known, and (2) the norm-reference approach without groups of binary classifications was used to determine the cutting points on three subscales for the MBIO-HSS. An online MBIO-HSS assessment APP for smartphones was incorporated with the cutting points to instantly display the level of burnout for nurses. The cutoff points of the MBI-HSS were ≤ 21 and ≤ 32 for the Emotional subscale, ≤ 23 and ≤ 30 for the Reduced Personal Accomplishment subscale, ≤ 6 and ≤ 12 for the Depersonalization subscale, and ≤ 15 and ≤ 17 (i.e., low, moderate, and high level) for the overall scores. An available-for-download online MBI-HSS APP for nurses was developed and demonstrated.
Published in | History Research (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.history.20170501.11 |
Page(s) | 1-8 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Nurse Burnout, MBI-HSS Chinese Version, Cutting Points, Prevalence
[1] | Abushaikha L, Saca-Hazboun H. Job satisfaction and burnout among Palestinian nurses. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2009; 15 (1): 190–197. |
[2] | Demir, A, Ulusoy M, Ulusoy MF. Investigation of factors influencing burnout levels in the professional and private lives of nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2003; 40 (8): 807–827. |
[3] | Lee HF, Chien TW, Yen M. Examining factor structure of Maslach burnout inventory among nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Management 2013; 21: 648–656. |
[4] | Hsu H, Chen S, Yu H, Lou J. Job stress, achievement motivation and occupational burnout among male nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2010; 66 (7): 1592–1601. |
[5] | Laschinger HK, Leiter MP. The impact of nursing work environments on patient safety outcomes: the mediating role of burnout engagement. Journal of Nursing Administration 2006; 5: 259–267. |
[6] | Trinkoff AM, Geiger-Brown J, Brady B, Lipscomb JA, Muntaner C. How long and how much are nurses now working? American Journal of Nursing 2006; 10 6 (4): 60–71. |
[7] | Alacacioglu A, YavuzsenT, Dirioz M, Oztop I, Yilmaz U. Burnout in nurses and physicians working at an oncology department. Psychooncology 2009; 18 (5): 543–548. |
[8] | Garrett C. The effect of nurse staffing patterns on medical errors and nurse burnout. AORN 200; 87 (6): 1191-1204. |
[9] | Halbesleben JR, Wakefield BJ, Wakefield DS, Cooper LB. Nurse burnout and patient safety outcomes: nurse safety perception versus reporting behavior. Western Journal of Nursing Research 2008; 30 (5): 560–577. |
[10] | Spence Laschinger HK, Leiter M, Day A, Gilin D. Workplace empowerment, incivility, and burnout: impact on staff nurse recruitment and retention outcomes. Journal of Nursing Management 2009; 17 (3): 302–311. |
[11] | Maslach C. The Cost of Caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982. |
[12] | Maslach C, Jackson S. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 2nd edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1986. |
[13] | Li XM, Liu YJ. Job stressors and burnout among staff nurses. Chinese Journal of Nursing 2000; 35 (11): 645. (in Chinese) |
[14] | Lin F, St John W, McVeigh C. Burnout among hospital nurses in China. Journal of Nursing Management 2009; 17 (3): 294–301. |
[15] | Tourangeau AE, Cummings G, Cranley LA, Ferron EM, Harvey S. Determinants of hospital nurse intention to remain employed: broadening our understanding. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2010; 66 (1): 22–32. |
[16] | Beckstead JW. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Maslach Burnout Inventory among Florida nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2002; 39: 785–792. |
[17] | Kanste O, Miettunen J, Kyngas H. Factor structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory among Finnish nursing staff. Nursing & Health Sciences 2006; 8 (4): 201–207. |
[18] | Poghosyan L, Aiken LH, Sloane DM. Factor structure of the Maslach burnout inventory: an analysis of data from large scale cross-sectional surveys of nurses from eight countries. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009; 46: 894–902. |
[19] | Vanheule S, Rosseel Y, Vlerick P. The factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for human services. Stress and Health 2007; 23 (2): 87–91. |
[20] | Worley JA, Vassar M, Wheeler DL, Barnes LL. Factor structure of scores from the Maslach Burnout Inventory: a review and meta-analysis of 45 exploratory and confirmatory factor-analytic studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2008, 68 (5): 97–823. |
[21] | Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. The Annual Review of Psychology 2001; 52: 397–422. |
[22] | Schaufeli WB, Van Dierendonck D. A cautionary note about the cross-national and clinical validity of cut-off points for the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Psychological Reports 1995; 76 (3): 1083–1090. |
[23] | Golembiewski RT, Deckard G, Roundtree B. The stability of burnout assignment: measurement properties of the phase model. The Journal of Health and Human Services Administration 1989; 12: 63–78. |
[24] | Mitchel SJ, Godoy L, Shabazz K, Horn IB. Internet and mobile technology use among urban African American parents: survey study of a clinical population. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16 (1): e9. |
[25] | Carsten S, Wesseling S, Schink T, Jung K. Comparison of eight computer programs for receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Clin Chem 2003; 49: 433-439. |
[26] | Fisher W Jr. Reliability, separation, strata statistics. Rasch Meas Trans 1992; 6 (3): 238. |
[27] | Wright BD, Masters GN. Number of person or item strata. Rasch Meas Trans 2002; 16 (3): 888. |
[28] | Wright BD. Reliability and separation. Rasch Meas Trans 1996; 9 (4): 472. |
[29] | Fisher WP Jr. The cash value of reliability. Rasch Meas Trans 2008; 22 (1): 1160-3. |
[30] | McManus IC, Smithers E, Partridge P, Keeling A, Fleming PR. A levels and intelligence as predictors of medical careers in UK doctors: 20 year prospective study. British Medical Journal 2003; 327: 139-142. |
[31] | Ferguson GA. On the theory of test discrimination. Psychometrika 1949; 4: 61-68. |
[32] | Hankins M. Questionnaire discrimination: (re)-introducing coefficient Delta. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2007; 7: 19. |
[33] | Hankins M. How discriminating are discriminative instruments? Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 36. |
[34] | Hankins M. Discrimination and reliability: equal partners? Understanding the role of discriminative instruments in HRQoL research: can Ferguson's Delta help? A response. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 83. |
[35] | Chien TW, Djaja N. Using Rasch simulation Data to verify whether Ferguson’s Delta coefficient can report students’ abilities are equal in a class. Rasch Measurement Transactions 2014; 28 (3): 484-5. |
[36] | Schaufeli WB, Janczur B. Burnout among nurses: a Polish-Dutch comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1994; 25: 95–113. |
[37] | Mitchell JS, Godoy L, Shabazz K, Horn BI. Internet and Mobile Technology Use Among Urban African American Parents: Survey Study of a Clinical Population. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014/01/13 2014; 16 (1): e9. |
[38] | Williams MV, Davis T, Parker RM, Weiss BD. The role of health literacy in patient-physician communication. Fam Med. 2002; 34 (5): 383-9. |
[39] | Cutilli CC, Bennett IM. Understanding the Health Literacy of America Results of the National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Orthop Nurs. 2009; 28 (1): 27–34. |
[40] | Chien TW, Lin WS. Simulation study of activities of daily living functions using online computerized adaptive testing. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16 (1):130. |
APA Style
Huan-Fang Lee, Hui-Ting Kuo, Cheng-Li Chang, Chia-Chen Hsu, Tsair-Wei Chien. (2017). Determining Cutting Points of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Nurses to Measure Their Level of Burnout Online. History Research, 5(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20170501.11
ACS Style
Huan-Fang Lee; Hui-Ting Kuo; Cheng-Li Chang; Chia-Chen Hsu; Tsair-Wei Chien. Determining Cutting Points of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Nurses to Measure Their Level of Burnout Online. Hist. Res. 2017, 5(1), 1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.history.20170501.11
AMA Style
Huan-Fang Lee, Hui-Ting Kuo, Cheng-Li Chang, Chia-Chen Hsu, Tsair-Wei Chien. Determining Cutting Points of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Nurses to Measure Their Level of Burnout Online. Hist Res. 2017;5(1):1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.history.20170501.11
@article{10.11648/j.history.20170501.11, author = {Huan-Fang Lee and Hui-Ting Kuo and Cheng-Li Chang and Chia-Chen Hsu and Tsair-Wei Chien}, title = {Determining Cutting Points of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Nurses to Measure Their Level of Burnout Online}, journal = {History Research}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, pages = {1-8}, doi = {10.11648/j.history.20170501.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20170501.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.history.20170501.11}, abstract = {This study is to determine cutting points for the Chinese version of the MBI-HSS and to design an online assessment tool that instantly measures a nurse’s burnout level. We illustrate (1) the traditional way for determining the cutting points of a scale when the binary classification groups was still known, and (2) the norm-reference approach without groups of binary classifications was used to determine the cutting points on three subscales for the MBIO-HSS. An online MBIO-HSS assessment APP for smartphones was incorporated with the cutting points to instantly display the level of burnout for nurses. The cutoff points of the MBI-HSS were ≤ 21 and ≤ 32 for the Emotional subscale, ≤ 23 and ≤ 30 for the Reduced Personal Accomplishment subscale, ≤ 6 and ≤ 12 for the Depersonalization subscale, and ≤ 15 and ≤ 17 (i.e., low, moderate, and high level) for the overall scores. An available-for-download online MBI-HSS APP for nurses was developed and demonstrated.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Determining Cutting Points of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Nurses to Measure Their Level of Burnout Online AU - Huan-Fang Lee AU - Hui-Ting Kuo AU - Cheng-Li Chang AU - Chia-Chen Hsu AU - Tsair-Wei Chien Y1 - 2017/02/24 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20170501.11 DO - 10.11648/j.history.20170501.11 T2 - History Research JF - History Research JO - History Research SP - 1 EP - 8 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-6719 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.history.20170501.11 AB - This study is to determine cutting points for the Chinese version of the MBI-HSS and to design an online assessment tool that instantly measures a nurse’s burnout level. We illustrate (1) the traditional way for determining the cutting points of a scale when the binary classification groups was still known, and (2) the norm-reference approach without groups of binary classifications was used to determine the cutting points on three subscales for the MBIO-HSS. An online MBIO-HSS assessment APP for smartphones was incorporated with the cutting points to instantly display the level of burnout for nurses. The cutoff points of the MBI-HSS were ≤ 21 and ≤ 32 for the Emotional subscale, ≤ 23 and ≤ 30 for the Reduced Personal Accomplishment subscale, ≤ 6 and ≤ 12 for the Depersonalization subscale, and ≤ 15 and ≤ 17 (i.e., low, moderate, and high level) for the overall scores. An available-for-download online MBI-HSS APP for nurses was developed and demonstrated. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -