Engineering education professional certification is an internationally accepted engineering education quality assurance system and an important basis for realizing international mutual recognition of engineering education and engineer qualification. The purpose is to ensure that engineering graduates have the comprehensive ability to adapt to social engineering work. The evaluation is oriented by training objectives and graduation requirements. There are seven aspects of engineering education professional certification, of which the most core is students. The ultimate goal is to meet the graduation requirements, and the specific guarantee is the training goal. Passing the engineering education certification has become an important work of undergraduate education and training. Based on engineering certification and under the guidance of the goal of software engineering major of Software College of Beijing University of technology, this paper compares the syllabus of software process and project management in 2015 and 2020. This paper makes a detailed comparative analysis from the aspects of teaching objectives, teaching contents, teaching methods and assessment methods. The comparison results show that the revision of the curriculum according to the engineering certification has brought more positive changes. It is hoped that the results of the reform can provide some inspiration to relevant teaching personnel.
| Published in | Higher Education Research (Volume 6, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.her.20210605.13 |
| Page(s) | 114-118 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Engineering Education Professional Certification, Teaching Objectives, Teaching Contents, Teaching Methods, Assessment Methods
| [1] | Haitao Yu, You Xie, Wei Liu, Study on Systematic Design and Implementation of Curriculum Ideology and Politics in the Context of Engineering Education Accreditation. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, Vol 3, 2021, pp. 100-103, 151. |
| [2] | Zhiyi Li, The "last mile" of professional certification of Engineering Education in China. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, Vol 3, 2020, pp. 1-13. |
| [3] | Fei Wang, Shenghui Liu, Yuxiang Cui, houghts on the construction of new engineering courses in Local Engineering Colleges under the background of engineering education professional certification. Journal of Higher Education, Vol 3, 2021, pp. 63-66. |
| [4] | Yang Liu, Xia Tian, Research on professional practice teaching standard from the perspective of engineering education professional certification. University Education, Vol 3, 2021, pp. 11-15. |
| [5] | Qilin Zhang, Yongbiao Zhao, Dongsheng Xiang, Integration path of curriculum ideological and political education and engineering education professional certification. Computer Education, Vol 3, 2021, pp. 76-80. |
| [6] | Guobin Zeng, Research on professional certification of engineering education and CDIO training mode. Journal of Higher Education, Vol 7, 2021, pp. 77-80. |
| [7] | Jian Zhang, Research on continuous improvement operation mechanism and evaluation system under engineering education professional certification standard. Heilongjiang Education, Vol 57, 2021, pp. 52-53. |
| [8] | Rongcun Guo, Research on promoting the construction of first-class undergraduate specialty in local universities with engineering education certification. Science & Technology Vision, Vol 9, 2021, pp. 67-69. |
| [9] | Jing Bai, Yangnan Liu, Analysis on the construction of innovative education and teaching system under the background of engineering education professional certification. China Economist, Vol 7, 2021, pp. 143-144. |
| [10] | Chenzhong Bin, Deming Li, Jianhua Huang, Research on the Innovative and Entrepreneurial Student Training Mode under the Engineering Education Certification. The Theory and Pracice of Innovation And Entreptrneurship, Vol 4, 2021, pp. 119-120, 123. |
| [11] | Shujun Ding, Junying Wei, Xiaojun Meng, Research on the teaching of professional comprehensive innovative design course based on engineering education professional certification. University Education, Vol 6, 2021, pp. 65-67. |
| [12] | Chen Gu, Heming Chen, Exploration of Teachers' Responsibility in Engineering Education Accreditation. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, Vol 3, 2020, pp. 104-108. |
| [13] | Wei Chen, The Relationship Between Innovation Ability Training and Engineering Education Specialty Certification. jiaoyu jiaoxue luntan, Vol 9, 2020, pp. 143-144. |
| [14] | Hong Li, Research on the Cultivation of University Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ability under the Background of Engineering Education Accreditation. jiaoyu jiaoxue luntan, Vol 38, 2020, pp. 321-322. |
| [15] | Lei Gui, Huaging He, Wei Wang, Thoughts on the Status of the Engineering Education Professional Certification Work in Mainland China. jiaoyu jiaoxue luntan, Vol 7, 2020, pp. 339-341. |
APA Style
Yan Changshun, Shao Yong. (2021). Teaching Reform of Software Process and Project Management. Higher Education Research, 6(5), 114-118. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.13
ACS Style
Yan Changshun; Shao Yong. Teaching Reform of Software Process and Project Management. High. Educ. Res. 2021, 6(5), 114-118. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20210605.13
AMA Style
Yan Changshun, Shao Yong. Teaching Reform of Software Process and Project Management. High Educ Res. 2021;6(5):114-118. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20210605.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.her.20210605.13,
author = {Yan Changshun and Shao Yong},
title = {Teaching Reform of Software Process and Project Management},
journal = {Higher Education Research},
volume = {6},
number = {5},
pages = {114-118},
doi = {10.11648/j.her.20210605.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20210605.13},
abstract = {Engineering education professional certification is an internationally accepted engineering education quality assurance system and an important basis for realizing international mutual recognition of engineering education and engineer qualification. The purpose is to ensure that engineering graduates have the comprehensive ability to adapt to social engineering work. The evaluation is oriented by training objectives and graduation requirements. There are seven aspects of engineering education professional certification, of which the most core is students. The ultimate goal is to meet the graduation requirements, and the specific guarantee is the training goal. Passing the engineering education certification has become an important work of undergraduate education and training. Based on engineering certification and under the guidance of the goal of software engineering major of Software College of Beijing University of technology, this paper compares the syllabus of software process and project management in 2015 and 2020. This paper makes a detailed comparative analysis from the aspects of teaching objectives, teaching contents, teaching methods and assessment methods. The comparison results show that the revision of the curriculum according to the engineering certification has brought more positive changes. It is hoped that the results of the reform can provide some inspiration to relevant teaching personnel.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Teaching Reform of Software Process and Project Management AU - Yan Changshun AU - Shao Yong Y1 - 2021/09/14 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.13 DO - 10.11648/j.her.20210605.13 T2 - Higher Education Research JF - Higher Education Research JO - Higher Education Research SP - 114 EP - 118 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-935X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210605.13 AB - Engineering education professional certification is an internationally accepted engineering education quality assurance system and an important basis for realizing international mutual recognition of engineering education and engineer qualification. The purpose is to ensure that engineering graduates have the comprehensive ability to adapt to social engineering work. The evaluation is oriented by training objectives and graduation requirements. There are seven aspects of engineering education professional certification, of which the most core is students. The ultimate goal is to meet the graduation requirements, and the specific guarantee is the training goal. Passing the engineering education certification has become an important work of undergraduate education and training. Based on engineering certification and under the guidance of the goal of software engineering major of Software College of Beijing University of technology, this paper compares the syllabus of software process and project management in 2015 and 2020. This paper makes a detailed comparative analysis from the aspects of teaching objectives, teaching contents, teaching methods and assessment methods. The comparison results show that the revision of the curriculum according to the engineering certification has brought more positive changes. It is hoped that the results of the reform can provide some inspiration to relevant teaching personnel. VL - 6 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: