The primary goal of this paper is to analyze the performance of an installed on-grid photovoltaic 100 kW system installed on the roof of a building at the Institute of Applied Sciences, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako. The system under consideration is part of a pilot project of a grid-connected system in Mali by the Renewable Energies Agency (AER). The PV system is located at 12.62°N latitude and -7.99°W longitude. It is composed of 313 monocrystalline modules of 320W for an installed power of approximately 101kWp and they are fixed on support inclined at 6 degrees orientated East-West. The system was monitored from March 2020 to February 2021. Within this period, the photovoltaic system supplied 114801.57 kWh to the grid with the final yield varying between 2.41 to 4.09 kWh/kWp/day. Additionally, the ratio of performance in this one year ranged from 53% to 89%. The annual capacity factor and efficiency are 13% and 10%, respectively. The main roots of this bad performance of the system are analyzed. The system performance is significantly affected by the soiling effects which are in other words attributed to meteorological and environmental parameters mainly dust accumulation and ambient temperature, as well as, factors like inclination (low tilt angle (6°)), the east and west orientation of the panels and finally lack of cleaning frequencies.
Published in | American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems (Volume 12, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.epes.20231201.12 |
Page(s) | 10-23 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
On-Grid Photovoltaic System, Photovoltaic System Performance, Performance Ratio and Yields, Dust Accumulation, Soiling Effects
[1] | DNE. Politique energetique nationale. Bamako: DNE, 2006. |
[2] | (BVG), Bureau du Vérificateur Général. GESTION DE LA SOCIETE ENERGIE DU MALI: VERIFICATION DE PERFORMANCE, - Période du 1er janvier 2016 au 30 septembre 2019. Bamako: Bureau du Vérificateur Général (BVG), 2020. |
[3] | Effect of tilt angle on the performance and electrical parameters of a PV module: Comparative indoor and outdoor experimental investigation. M. A. A. Mamun, M. M. Islam, M. Hasanuzzaman, Jeyraj Selvaraj. 2022, Energy and Built Environment, Vol. 3, pp. 278–290. |
[4] | A. Danu, V. Tanasiev Influence of tilt and orientation angle of the PV panels on high-energy production in Romanian climate conditions during cold season. A. Danu, V. Tanasiev, C. Ionescu, A. Badea. 2015, IEEE Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), in: Proceedings the 15th International Conference, 2015, pp. 1599–1604. |
[5] | Analysis of the optimum tilt angle for a soiled PV panel. R. Xu, K. Ni, Y. Hu, J. Si, H. Wen, D. Yu. 2017, Energy Convers. Manag, Vol. 148, pp. 100–109. |
[6] | Determination of the optimal tilt angle and orientation for solar photovoltaic arrays. E. D. Mehleri, P. L. Zervas, H. Sarimveis, J. A. Palyvos, and N. C. Markatos. 11, 2010, Renewable Energy, Elsevier, Vol. 35, pp. 2468–2475. |
[7] | The disagreement between anisotropic-isotropic diffuse solar radiation models as a function of solar declination: computing the optimum tilt angle of solar panels in the area of southern-Italy. Emanuele, C. 2012, Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, Vol. 3, pp. 253-259. |
[8] | Optimum tilt angles for photovoltaic panels during winter months in the Vaal triangle, South Africa. A. Osamede, S. James, P. Christo. 2012, Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, Vol. 3, pp. 119-125. |
[9] | Investigation of soiling effects, dust chemistry and optimum cleaning schedule for PV modules in Lahore, Pakistan. Ullah A, Amin A, Haider T, Saleem M, Butt NZ. 2020, Renewable Energy, Vol. 150, pp. 456-468. |
[10] | Effects of soiling on photovoltaic (PV) modules in the Atacama Desert. Cordero RR, Damiani A, Loroze D, MacDonell S, Jorquera J, Sepulveda E, Ferron S, Llanillo P, Labbe F, Carrasco J, Ferrer J, Torres G. 1, 2018, Scientific reports, Vol. 8. |
[11] | Floating photovoltaic powerplant: A review. Alok Sahu, Neha Yadav, K. Sudhakar. 2016, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 66, pp. 815–824. |
[12] | IEA. Renewables 2019: Analysis and Forecast to 2024, www.iea.org/renewables2019. s.l.: IEA, 2019. |
[13] | Performance analysis of a grid connected photovoltaic system in northeastern Brazil. Lutero Carmo de Lima, Leonardo de Araújo Ferreira, Francisco Hedler Barreto de Lima Morais. 2017, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 37, pp. 79-85. |
[14] | PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF GRID-CONNECTED PV SYSTEMS. Jahn, Stefan Mau and Ulrike. Dresden, Germany: s.n., 2006. 1st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibitions, 4-8 September. |
[15] | Improved Energy Capture in Series String Photovoltaics Via Smart Distributed Power Electronics. L. Linares, R. W. Erickson, S. MacAlpine and M. Brandemuehl. Washington, DC, USA, 2009, pp. 904-910: s.n., 2009. 2009 Twenty Fourth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition. |
[16] | Performance analysis of a 3 MWp grid connected solar photovoltaic power plant in India. Daniel, K. Padmavathi and S. Arul. 6, 2013, Energy for sustainable development, Vol. 17, pp. 615-625. |
[17] | Monitoring of Photovoltaic systems: good practices and systems analysis. Achim Woyte, Mauricio Richter, David Moser, Stefan Mau, Nils Reich and Ulrike Jahn. 2013, Proc. 28th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, 3686-3694. |
[18] | Analysis of the outdoor performance and efficiency of two grid connected photovoltaic systems in northern Italy. Diego Micheli, Stefano Alessandrini, Robert Radu and Losto Casula. 2014, Energy conversion and management, Vol. 80, pp. 436-445. |
[19] | An investigation of the Energy Efficiency of a Grid Connected Photovoltaic System. Koev, Konstantin. 2022, 8th International Conference on Energy Efficiency and Agricultural Engineering (EE& AE) 1-4. |
[20] | Recent advances in failure diagnosis techniques based on performance data analysis for grid-connected photovoltaic systems. Andreas Livera, Marios Theristis, George Makrides and George E. Georghiou. 2018, Renewable Energy, p. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.101. |
[21] | Marios Theristis, Venizelos Venizelou, George Makrides and George E. Georghiou. CHAPTER II-1-B: Energy Yield in Photovoltaic System. Kalogirou, S. A. (Ed.), McEvoy’s Handbook of Photovoltaics, third ed. Academic. 2018, pp. 671–713. |
[22] | Photovoltaik-Anlagen – Bewährung und Herausforderung. Jahn, Ulrike. 2003, FVS-Themen, pp. 28-35. |
[23] | THE EFFECT OF SOLAR IRRADIATION ON SOLAR CELLS. K. A. Ibrahim, P. M. Gyuk, S. Aliyu. 1, 2019, Science World Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 20-22. |
[24] | Dynamic thermal model of solar PV systems under varying. Diego Torres Lobera, Seppo Valkealahti. 2013, Solar Energy, Vol. 93, pp. 183–194. |
[25] | Dynamic thermal modelling of PV performance and effect of heat capacity on the module temperature. B. Tuncel, T. Ozden, R. S. Balog, B. G. Akinoglou. 100754, 2020, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, Vol. 22. |
[26] | Performance analysis of a 48kWp grid-connected photovoltaic plant in the Sahelian climate conditions of Nouakchott, Mauritania. Ahmed Med YAHYA, Abdel. Kader. MAHMOUD, Daha Hassan DAHER, Léon GAILLARD, Christophe MENEZO, IssakhaYOUM, Adel. MELLIT. 2021, Preprints, Vol. 2021020275 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202102.0275.v1), pp. 1-24. |
[27] | Review of the performance of residential PV systems in France. Jonathan Leloux, Luis Narvarte, David Trebosc. 16, 2012, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, pp. 1369– 1376. |
[28] | IEC, International Standard. Photovoltaic system performance monitoring –Guidelines for measurement, data exchange and analysis. 1998. |
[29] | Performance evaluation and economical analysis of three photovoltaic systems installed in an institutional building in Errachidia, Morocco. Abderrazzak Elamim, Bouchaib Hartiti, Amine Haibaoui, Abderrazak Lfakir and Philipe Thevenin. 2018, Energy procedia, Vol. 147, pp. 121-129. |
[30] | DIRECTION NATIONAL DE L'ENERGIE, DNE. PLAN D’INVESTISSEMENT SREP-Mali Pour la Valorisation à Grande Echelle des Energies Renouvelables, Volume 1: Plan d’Investissement. Bamako: DNE, 2011. |
[31] | EPIA, (European Photovoltaic Industry Association) and the Photovoltaic Technology Platform. SOLAR EUROPE INDUSTRY INITIATIVE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2010-2012. s.l.: EPIA, 2010. |
[32] | Evaluation experimentale des performances d'une centrale solaire photovoltaique de 300 KWc a Djibouti. Daha HASSAN DAHER, Léon GAILLARD, Mohamed AMARA, Bernard LIPS, Christophe MENEZO. 27, 2014, Science et Envioronnement, pp. 16-22. |
[33] | Performance Parameters for Grid-Connected PV Systems. B. Marion, J. Adelstein, K. Boyle, H. Hayden, B. Hammond, T. Fletcher, B. Canada, D. Narang, A. Kimber, L. Mitchell, G. Rich and T. Townsend. 2005. Photovoltaic Specialists Conference. |
[34] | Review of Photovoltaic Performance Influencing Factors. Bhogula Navothna, Sri Chandan Kondamudi and Sandhya Thotakura. 10, 2020, Journal of Green Engineering, Vol. 10, pp. 9052-9067. |
[35] | Council, Australian Energy. Solar report Septembre 2016. Auatralie: s.n., 2016. |
[36] | EnergySage. Evaluating solar panel quality, https://www.energysage.com/solar/decision-guide/solar-panel-efficiency/#:~:text=Solar%20cell%20efficiency,-Solar%20panel%20efficiency&text=The%20most%20efficient%20solar%20panels,panel%20efficiency%20just%20under%2023%25.&t. 2020. |
[37] | Preliminary assessment of a small-scale rooftop PV-grid tied in Norwegian climatic conditions. Vågnes, Muyiwa S. Adaramola and Emil E. T. 2015, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 90, pp. 458–465. |
[38] | Performance analysis of a 190 kWp grid interactive solar photovoltaic power plant in India. Sharma V, Chandel SS. India: s.n., 2013, Energy, Vol. 55, pp. 476–485. |
[39] | IEA-PVPS. Performance of New Photovoltaic System Designs. s.l.: IEA-PVPS, 2021. |
[40] | A Critical Appraisal of PV-Systems’ Performance: Review. Zainab Usman, Joseph Tah, Henry Abanda and Charles Nche. 192, 2020, Buildings, Vol. 10, pp. 1-22. |
[41] | Assessment of soiling impacts and cleaning frequencies of a rooftop BAPV system in composite climates of India. Satish Kumar Yadav, Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar, Aritra Ghosh, Usha Bajpai, Shauhrat S. Chopra. 2022, Solar Energy, Vol. 242, pp. 119–129. |
[42] | Performance analysis of a 11.2 kWp roof top grid-connected PV system in Eastern India. Goel, Renu Sharma and Sonali. 2017, Energy Reports, Vol. 3, pp. 76-84. |
[43] | Effect of dust deposition on the performance of photovoltaic modules in Taxila,. Hafiz Muhammad ALI, Muhammad Abdullah ZAFAR, Muhammad Anser BASHIR, Muhammad Ali NASIR, Muzaffar ALI and Aysha Maryam SIDDIQUI. 2, 2017, Thermal Science, Vol. 21, pp. 915-923. |
[44] | Performance and feasibility assessment of a 1.4 kW roof top grid-connected photovoltaic power system under desertic weather conditions. Hussein A. Kazem, Tamer Khatib, K. Sopian, Wilfried Elmenreich. 2014, Energy and Build, Vol. 82, pp. 123-129. |
[45] | Experimental investigation and modeling of photovoltaic soiling loss as a function of environmental variables: A case study of semi-arid climate. Houssain Zitouni, Alae Azouzoute, Charaf Hajjaj, Massaab El Ydrissi, Mohammed Regragui, Jesús Polo, Ayoub Oufadel, Abdellatif Bouaichi, Abdellatif Ghennioui. 2020, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 221, 110874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110874 |
[46] | An empirical study of performance characteristics of BIPV (Building Integrated Photovoltaic) system for the realization of zero energy building. J. B. Lee, J. W. Park, J. H. Yoon, N. C. Baek,& U. C. Shin. 2014, Energy, Vol. 66, pp. 24-34. |
[47] | Nouar Aoun. Performance Analysis of a 20 MW Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Installation in Adrar, South of Algeria. Advanced Statistical Modeling, Forecasting, and Fault Detection in Renewable Energy Systems. s.l.: Intechopen, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89511, 2020, pp. 1-12. |
[48] | Performance Analysis of the Mini-Grid Connected Photovoltaic System at Algiers. F. Cherfa, A. Hadj Arab, R. Oussaid, K. Abdeladim, S. Bouchakour. 83, 2015, Energy Procedia, pp. 226 – 236. |
[49] | Performance Analysis of PV Grid-Connected in Four Special Months of the Year. Mustapha Adar, Zakaria Khaouch, Amin Benouna, Mustapha Mabrouki, Ahmed Chebak. Tanger: s.n., 2017. International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC'2017). |
[50] | Performance analysis and investigation of a grid-connected photovoltaic installation in Morocco. Kamal Attari ∗, Ali Elyaakoubi, Adel Asselman. 2, 2016, Energy Reports, pp. 261-266. |
[51] | Performance of 1.4 kW Grid connected desert type PV. A. H. Al-Badi. Tenerife (Spain): s.n., 2019. International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’19) Tenerife (Spain). |
[52] | The effect of dust on solar photovoltaic systems. F. Mejia, J. Kleissl, J. L. Bosch. 49, 2014, Energy Procedia, pp. 2370 – 2376. |
[53] | Experimental Study on the Effect of Dust Deposition on a Car Park Photovoltaic System with Different Cleaning Cycles. Khaled M. Alawasa, Rashid S. AlAbri, Amer S. Al-Hinai, Mohammed H. Albadi, and Abdullah H. Al-Badi. 7636, 2021, sustainability, Vol. 13, pp. 1-16. |
[54] | Investigation of fly ash soiling effects on solar modules performances. Ivana Radonjic, Tomislav Pavlovic, Dragoljub Mirjanic, Lana Pantic. 220, 2021, Solar Energy, pp. 144–151. |
[55] | A comparison of the performance of mono-Si and poly-Si photovoltaic modules operating under Kosovo climate conditions. Vjollca Komoni, Alemayehu Gebremedhin and Njomza Ibrahimi. 013504, 2018, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, Vol. 10, pp. 1-11. |
[56] | Effects of particle sizes and tilt angles on dust deposition characteristics of a ground-mounted solar photovoltaic system. Hao Lu, Wenjun Zhao. 220, 2018, Applied Energy, pp. 514-526. |
APA Style
Bakamba dite Djeneba Sacko, Souleymane Sanogo, Abdramane Ba. (2023). Performance Evaluation of an Installed On-Grid Photovoltaic System at Bamako. American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 12(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20231201.12
ACS Style
Bakamba dite Djeneba Sacko; Souleymane Sanogo; Abdramane Ba. Performance Evaluation of an Installed On-Grid Photovoltaic System at Bamako. Am. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 12(1), 10-23. doi: 10.11648/j.epes.20231201.12
AMA Style
Bakamba dite Djeneba Sacko, Souleymane Sanogo, Abdramane Ba. Performance Evaluation of an Installed On-Grid Photovoltaic System at Bamako. Am J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2023;12(1):10-23. doi: 10.11648/j.epes.20231201.12
@article{10.11648/j.epes.20231201.12, author = {Bakamba dite Djeneba Sacko and Souleymane Sanogo and Abdramane Ba}, title = {Performance Evaluation of an Installed On-Grid Photovoltaic System at Bamako}, journal = {American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems}, volume = {12}, number = {1}, pages = {10-23}, doi = {10.11648/j.epes.20231201.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20231201.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.epes.20231201.12}, abstract = {The primary goal of this paper is to analyze the performance of an installed on-grid photovoltaic 100 kW system installed on the roof of a building at the Institute of Applied Sciences, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako. The system under consideration is part of a pilot project of a grid-connected system in Mali by the Renewable Energies Agency (AER). The PV system is located at 12.62°N latitude and -7.99°W longitude. It is composed of 313 monocrystalline modules of 320W for an installed power of approximately 101kWp and they are fixed on support inclined at 6 degrees orientated East-West. The system was monitored from March 2020 to February 2021. Within this period, the photovoltaic system supplied 114801.57 kWh to the grid with the final yield varying between 2.41 to 4.09 kWh/kWp/day. Additionally, the ratio of performance in this one year ranged from 53% to 89%. The annual capacity factor and efficiency are 13% and 10%, respectively. The main roots of this bad performance of the system are analyzed. The system performance is significantly affected by the soiling effects which are in other words attributed to meteorological and environmental parameters mainly dust accumulation and ambient temperature, as well as, factors like inclination (low tilt angle (6°)), the east and west orientation of the panels and finally lack of cleaning frequencies.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Performance Evaluation of an Installed On-Grid Photovoltaic System at Bamako AU - Bakamba dite Djeneba Sacko AU - Souleymane Sanogo AU - Abdramane Ba Y1 - 2023/04/27 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20231201.12 DO - 10.11648/j.epes.20231201.12 T2 - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems JF - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems JO - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems SP - 10 EP - 23 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9200 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20231201.12 AB - The primary goal of this paper is to analyze the performance of an installed on-grid photovoltaic 100 kW system installed on the roof of a building at the Institute of Applied Sciences, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako. The system under consideration is part of a pilot project of a grid-connected system in Mali by the Renewable Energies Agency (AER). The PV system is located at 12.62°N latitude and -7.99°W longitude. It is composed of 313 monocrystalline modules of 320W for an installed power of approximately 101kWp and they are fixed on support inclined at 6 degrees orientated East-West. The system was monitored from March 2020 to February 2021. Within this period, the photovoltaic system supplied 114801.57 kWh to the grid with the final yield varying between 2.41 to 4.09 kWh/kWp/day. Additionally, the ratio of performance in this one year ranged from 53% to 89%. The annual capacity factor and efficiency are 13% and 10%, respectively. The main roots of this bad performance of the system are analyzed. The system performance is significantly affected by the soiling effects which are in other words attributed to meteorological and environmental parameters mainly dust accumulation and ambient temperature, as well as, factors like inclination (low tilt angle (6°)), the east and west orientation of the panels and finally lack of cleaning frequencies. VL - 12 IS - 1 ER -