This paper reports on a hydro backed-up (HPBU) hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) for a rural off-grid community in Kwara State Nigeria with an average demand load of 550.9 kWh (90.7 kW peak) per day. By using HOMER Pro software, the formulation and identification of the best reliable system architecture for attaining technical and economic viability while using nearby existing RE sources such as hydro, wind and solar energy are appropriately modelled and optimized based on the minimal net present cost (NPC) and cost of energy (COE). It was determined that the three best feasible configurations of a HPBU-HRES for the site have an annual output ranging from 1,642,979 – 1,749,272 kWh/yr and a cost of electricity (COE) in the range of 0.34 – 0.64 $/kWh. The best optimal HPBU-HRES (system 1) is a combination of 184 kW of solar PV (PV), 4,545 kWh of battery capacity (BB), 81.3 kW of converter (Conv) and 277 kW of hydro generation capacity (HPP). A comparison study undertaken to illustrate the economic benefits of the studied systems shows that about 288,116, 88,342 and 53, 88 kg/yr of CO2 savings is possible against diesel only, grid extension and first best equivalent diesel engine backed-up (DEBU) system respectively. In furtherance of the study, a sensitivity analysis of the likely variation associated with the metrological parameters, load and cost of components was undertaken. The Outcomes show that system 1 (PV/HPP-BB) is the optimal system for small to medium loads (≤600 kWh/day), irrespective of the solar radiation. In addition, it is established that a decrease in the system’s total initial cost by half will lead to a decline of COE to $0.177 per kWh at a corresponding NPC of $3,029.
Published in | American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems (Volume 11, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.epes.20221102.12 |
Page(s) | 31-47 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Wind Energy, Solar PV, Nigeria Energy Resources, Techno-economic Analysis, Rural Electrification
[1] | USAID. Power Africa fact sheet : Nigeria 2022. https://www.usaid.gov/powerafrica/nigeria (accessed March 17, 2022). |
[2] | Corfee-Morlot J, Parks P, Ogunleye J, Ayeni F. Achieving clean energy access in sub-saharan Africa. 2019. |
[3] | International Energy Agency. Africa Energy Outlook 2019 - Overview Nigeria. World Energy Outlook Spec Rep 2019: 288. |
[4] | EIA. Country analysis executive summary: Nigeria. 2020. |
[5] | Mohammed YS, Mustafa MW, Bashir N, Mokhtar AS. Renewable energy resources for distributed power generation in Nigeria: A review of the potential. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013; 22: 257–68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.020. |
[6] | Capehart B. Distributed Energy Resources (DER). Whole Build Des Guid 2016. https://www.wbdg.org/resources/distributed-energy-resources-der (accessed February 27, 2022). |
[7] | Ibrahim ID, Hamam Y, Alayli Y, Jamiru T, Sadiku ER, Kupolati WK, et al. A review on Africa energy supply through renewable energy production: Nigeria, Cameroon, Ghana and South Africa as a case study. Energy Strateg Rev 2021; 38: 100740. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100740. |
[8] | Yakubu, Abdulmumin; Ayandele, Ebun; Sherwood, James; Olu, Aruike; Graber S. Mini grid investment report: Scaling the Nigerian market. 2018. |
[9] | Jon, Lane; Hudson, William; Walley, Luke; Hamden YL. Mini-Grid Market Opportunity Assessment: Nigeria. 2018. |
[10] | Diyoke C, Ngwaka U, Onah TO. Comparative assessment of a hybrid of gas turbine and biomass power system for sustainable multi-generation in Nigeria. Sci African 2021; 13: e00899. doi: 10.1016/J.SCIAF.2021.E00899. |
[11] | Diyoke C, Wu C. Thermodynamic analysis of hybrid adiabatic compressed air energy storage system and biomass gasification storage (A-CAES + BMGS) power system. Fuel 2020; 271: 117572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117572. |
[12] | Come Zebra EI, van der Windt HJ, Nhumaio G, Faaij APC. A review of hybrid renewable energy systems in mini-grids for off-grid electrification in developing countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2021; 144: 111036. doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2021.111036. |
[13] | Ugwu CO, Ozor PA, Mbohwa C. Small hydropower as a source of clean and local energy in Nigeria: Prospects and challenges. Fuel Commun 2022; 10: 100046. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfueco.2021.100046. |
[14] | Adesanya AA, Schelly C. Solar PV-diesel hybrid systems for the Nigerian private sector: An impact assessment. Energy Policy 2019; 132: 196–207. doi: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2019.05.038. |
[15] | Adaramola MS, Paul SS, Oyewola OM. Assessment of decentralized hybrid PV solar-diesel power system for applications in Northern part of Nigeria. Energy Sustain Dev 2014; 19: 72–82. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2013.12.007. |
[16] | Esan AB, Agbetuyi AF, Oghorada O, Ogbeide K, Awelewa AA, Afolabi AE. Reliability assessments of an islanded hybrid PV-diesel-battery system for a typical rural community in Nigeria. Heliyon 2019; 5: e01632. doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2019.E01632. |
[17] | Sanni SO, Oricha JY, Oyewole TO, Bawonda FI. Analysis of backup power supply for unreliable grid using hybrid solar PV/diesel/biogas system. Energy 2021; 227: 120506. doi: 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2021.120506. |
[18] | Oladigbolu JO, Al-Turki YA, Olatomiwa L. Comparative study and sensitivity analysis of a standalone hybrid energy system for electrification of rural healthcare facility in Nigeria. Alexandria Eng J 2021; 60: 5547–65. doi: 10.1016/J.AEJ.2021.04.042. |
[19] | Olatomiwa L, Mekhilef S, Huda ASN, Ohunakin OS. Economic evaluation of hybrid energy systems for rural electrification in six geo-political zones of Nigeria. Renew Energy 2015; 83: 435–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.04.057. |
[20] | Olatomiwa L, Mekhilef S, Huda ASN, Sanusi K. Techno-economic analysis of hybrid PV-diesel-battery and PV-wind-diesel-battery power systems for mobile BTS: the way forward for rural development. Energy Sci Eng 2015; 3: 271–85. doi: 10.1002/ese3.71. |
[21] | Das BK, Hasan M, Rashid F. Optimal sizing of a grid-independent PV/diesel/pump-hydro hybrid system: A case study in Bangladesh. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 2021; 44: 100997. doi: 10.1016/J.SETA.2021.100997. |
[22] | Nfah EM, Ngundam JM. Feasibility of pico-hydro and photovoltaic hybrid power systems for remote villages in Cameroon. Renew Energy 2009; 34: 1445–50. doi: 10.1016/J.RENENE.2008.10.019. |
[23] | Wang Y, Zhao M, Chang J, Wang X, Tian Y. Study on the combined operation of a hydro-thermal-wind hybrid power system based on hydro-wind power compensating principles. Energy Convers Manag 2019; 194: 94–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.040. |
[24] | Kenfack J, Neirac FP, Tatietse TT, Mayer D, Fogue M, Lejeune A. Microhydro-PV-hybrid system: Sizing a small hydro-PV-hybrid system for rural electrification in developing countries. Renew Energy 2009; 34: 2259–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.038. |
[25] | Kittner N, Gheewala SH, Kammen DM. Energy return on investment (EROI) of mini-hydro and solar PV systems designed for a mini-grid. Renew Energy 2016; 99: 410–9. doi: 10.1016/J.RENENE.2016.07.023. |
[26] | Syahputra R, Soesanti I. Renewable energy systems based on micro-hydro and solar photovoltaic for rural areas: A case study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Energy Reports 2021; 7: 472–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.015. |
[27] | Odou ODT, Bhandari R, Adamou R. Hybrid off-grid renewable power system for sustainable rural electrification in Benin. Renew Energy 2020; 145: 1266–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.032. |
[28] | Vanguard. NERC approves new tariff increase for IBEDC in minor review 2021. https://www.vanguardngr.com/2021/01/nerc-approves-new-tariff-increase-for-ibedc-in-minor-review/ (accessed March 13, 2022). |
[29] | Oladeji A, Akorede M, … AM-… ZJO, 2020 undefined. Investigation of Small Hydropower Potential of River Oshin in Kwara State, North Central, Nigeria. AzojeteComNg 2020; 16: 321–36. |
[30] | Egbon OC. Optimal Sizing of a Standalone Photovoltaic (PV) System for Residential Customers Considering Electricity Consumption Patterns: A Case Study of Ibadan City, Nigeria. Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand., 2019. |
[31] | HOMER. HOMER Pro User Manual 2022. https://www.homerenergy.com/products/pro/docs/index.html (accessed February 13, 2022). |
[32] | Al-Najjar H, El-Khozondar HJ, Pfeifer C, Al Afif R. Hybrid grid-tie electrification analysis of bio-shared renewable energy systems for domestic application. Sustain Cities Soc 2022; 77: 103538. doi: 10.1016/J.SCS.2021.103538. |
[33] | Tiwary A, Spasova S, Williams ID. A community-scale hybrid energy system integrating biomass for localised solid waste and renewable energy solution: Evaluations in UK and Bulgaria. Renew Energy 2019; 139: 960–7. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.129. |
[34] | Diyoke Chidiebere; Ugwu Kenneth C; Nnaji Anthony C. Techno economic analysis of a grid connected solar PV for a University Departmental Building in Enugu Nigeria. Int J Sci Eng Res 2021; Volume 12: 744–51. |
[35] | Manyonge AW, Ochieng RM, Onyango FN, Shichikha JM. Mathematical Modelling of Wind Turbine in a Wind Energy Conversion System: Power Coefficient Analysis. Appl Math Sci 2012; 6 (91): 4527–36. |
[36] | Diyoke C, Idogwu S, Ngwaka UC. An Economic assessment of biomass gasification for rural electrification in Nigeria. Int J Renew Energy Technol Res 2014; 3 (1): 1–17. |
[37] | Oladigbolu JO, Ramli MAM, Al-Turki YA. Optimal design of a hybrid pv solar/micro-hydro/diesel/battery energy system for a remote rural village under tropical climate conditions. Electron 2020; 9: 1–22. doi: 10.3390/electronics9091491. |
[38] | Ejoh E. How off-grid devt ’ll rescue Nigeria power sector. Vanguard 2019. https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/02/how-off-grid-devt-ll-rescue-nigeria-power-sector/ (accessed March 26, 2020). |
[39] | Brander AM, Sood A, Wylie C, Haughton A, Lovell J, Reviewers I, et al. Electricity-specific emission factors for grid electricity. 2011. |
APA Style
Chidiebere Diyoke, Lesodah Esther Eja, Ugwu Kenneth Chikwado. (2022). Hydro Backed-up Hybrid Renewable System for Off-grid Power in Nigeria. American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 11(2), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20221102.12
ACS Style
Chidiebere Diyoke; Lesodah Esther Eja; Ugwu Kenneth Chikwado. Hydro Backed-up Hybrid Renewable System for Off-grid Power in Nigeria. Am. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 11(2), 31-47. doi: 10.11648/j.epes.20221102.12
AMA Style
Chidiebere Diyoke, Lesodah Esther Eja, Ugwu Kenneth Chikwado. Hydro Backed-up Hybrid Renewable System for Off-grid Power in Nigeria. Am J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2022;11(2):31-47. doi: 10.11648/j.epes.20221102.12
@article{10.11648/j.epes.20221102.12, author = {Chidiebere Diyoke and Lesodah Esther Eja and Ugwu Kenneth Chikwado}, title = {Hydro Backed-up Hybrid Renewable System for Off-grid Power in Nigeria}, journal = {American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems}, volume = {11}, number = {2}, pages = {31-47}, doi = {10.11648/j.epes.20221102.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20221102.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.epes.20221102.12}, abstract = {This paper reports on a hydro backed-up (HPBU) hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) for a rural off-grid community in Kwara State Nigeria with an average demand load of 550.9 kWh (90.7 kW peak) per day. By using HOMER Pro software, the formulation and identification of the best reliable system architecture for attaining technical and economic viability while using nearby existing RE sources such as hydro, wind and solar energy are appropriately modelled and optimized based on the minimal net present cost (NPC) and cost of energy (COE). It was determined that the three best feasible configurations of a HPBU-HRES for the site have an annual output ranging from 1,642,979 – 1,749,272 kWh/yr and a cost of electricity (COE) in the range of 0.34 – 0.64 $/kWh. The best optimal HPBU-HRES (system 1) is a combination of 184 kW of solar PV (PV), 4,545 kWh of battery capacity (BB), 81.3 kW of converter (Conv) and 277 kW of hydro generation capacity (HPP). A comparison study undertaken to illustrate the economic benefits of the studied systems shows that about 288,116, 88,342 and 53, 88 kg/yr of CO2 savings is possible against diesel only, grid extension and first best equivalent diesel engine backed-up (DEBU) system respectively. In furtherance of the study, a sensitivity analysis of the likely variation associated with the metrological parameters, load and cost of components was undertaken. The Outcomes show that system 1 (PV/HPP-BB) is the optimal system for small to medium loads (≤600 kWh/day), irrespective of the solar radiation. In addition, it is established that a decrease in the system’s total initial cost by half will lead to a decline of COE to $0.177 per kWh at a corresponding NPC of $3,029.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Hydro Backed-up Hybrid Renewable System for Off-grid Power in Nigeria AU - Chidiebere Diyoke AU - Lesodah Esther Eja AU - Ugwu Kenneth Chikwado Y1 - 2022/05/26 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20221102.12 DO - 10.11648/j.epes.20221102.12 T2 - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems JF - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems JO - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems SP - 31 EP - 47 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9200 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20221102.12 AB - This paper reports on a hydro backed-up (HPBU) hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) for a rural off-grid community in Kwara State Nigeria with an average demand load of 550.9 kWh (90.7 kW peak) per day. By using HOMER Pro software, the formulation and identification of the best reliable system architecture for attaining technical and economic viability while using nearby existing RE sources such as hydro, wind and solar energy are appropriately modelled and optimized based on the minimal net present cost (NPC) and cost of energy (COE). It was determined that the three best feasible configurations of a HPBU-HRES for the site have an annual output ranging from 1,642,979 – 1,749,272 kWh/yr and a cost of electricity (COE) in the range of 0.34 – 0.64 $/kWh. The best optimal HPBU-HRES (system 1) is a combination of 184 kW of solar PV (PV), 4,545 kWh of battery capacity (BB), 81.3 kW of converter (Conv) and 277 kW of hydro generation capacity (HPP). A comparison study undertaken to illustrate the economic benefits of the studied systems shows that about 288,116, 88,342 and 53, 88 kg/yr of CO2 savings is possible against diesel only, grid extension and first best equivalent diesel engine backed-up (DEBU) system respectively. In furtherance of the study, a sensitivity analysis of the likely variation associated with the metrological parameters, load and cost of components was undertaken. The Outcomes show that system 1 (PV/HPP-BB) is the optimal system for small to medium loads (≤600 kWh/day), irrespective of the solar radiation. In addition, it is established that a decrease in the system’s total initial cost by half will lead to a decline of COE to $0.177 per kWh at a corresponding NPC of $3,029. VL - 11 IS - 2 ER -