Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller

Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi; Adepoju Gafari Abiola; Babatunde Olukotun

doi:doi:10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller

Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi, Adepoju Gafari Abiola, Babatunde Olukotun

Published in American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems (Volume 6, Issue 4)

Received: 1 April 2017 Accepted: 12 May 2017 Published: 12 July 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Transmission lines operating in steady state are prone to several challenges such as; poor steady-state power flow control, active and reactive power loss and voltage limit violations. These challenges can be solved either by the use of Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System (FACTS) controllers such as Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC) and Generalized Unified Power Flow Controller (GUPFC) or other non-economical means such as building additional generation and transmission facilities. Previous works have incorporated IPFC to solve the challenges in meshed transmission system but has not been applied to solve the inherent challenges of the longitudinal Nigerian transmission system operating in steady state. This work performs power flow analysis with the incorporation of IPFC into the Nigerian 330-kV, 28-bus transmission system to solve its steady state challenges. Steady state power system component model produces a set of algebraic equations while the steady state IPFC model in rectangular form produces another set of algebraic equations for power flow analysis. The sets of equations were solved simultaneously using Newton-Raphson numerical iteration method, due to its fast quadratic convergence and high efficiency. Newton-Raphson power flow algorithm was implemented using MATLAB 8.1.0.604 (version R2013b) and the analysis was performed without and with the incorporation of IPFC data into the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) 14-bus and the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) 330-kV, 28-bus system. The performance evaluation of IPFC was investigated using active and reactive power as performance variables. The incorporation of IPFC rectangular model into the Nigerian 330-kV, 28-Bus TCN and IEEE 14-bus system demonstrated the capability of IPFC to control active and reactive power flow. IPFC typifies effective enhancement and the maximum use of Nigerian 330-kV, 28-Bus TCN and IEEE 14-bus transmission infrastructure for better delivery of electrical power to the end users.

Published in	American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems (Volume 6, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11
Page(s)	27-42
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

FACTS, IPFC, IEEE, TCN, Newton-Raphson

References

[1]	Zhang, X. P; Rehtanz, C.; Pal B. (2012), “Flexible AC Transmission System: Modelling and Control”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London, ISSN 1612-1287.
[2]	Sanusi Ohiare. (2015), “Expanding Electricity Access to all Nigerians: A spatial planning and cost analysis”, A Springer open access journal of Energy, Sustainability and Society.
[3]	Muraliu, D.; Rajaram, M.;, Reka; N. (2010), “Comparison of FACTS Devices for Power System Stability Enhancement”, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887), Volume 8– No. 4.
[4]	Abido, M. A (2009), “Power System Stability Enhancement using Facts Controllers: A Review”, The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 34, Number 1B, pp. 12-30.
[5]	Natália, M. R.; Santos; Dias, P. O; Fernão, P V; (2011), ‘Use of an Interline Power Flow Controller Model for Power Flow Analysis’ SciVerse, Science Direct International Conference on Advances in Energy Engineering (ICAEE2011), ELSIVIER, pp 2096 – 2101.
[6]	Kamel, S.; and Jurado, F.; (2013), “Power flow analysis with easy modeling of interline power flow controller”, ELSIVIER, Electric Power Systems Research 108, pp 234–244.
[7]	Naresh, B. A. V.; Sivanagaraju; Padmanabharaju, Ch.; and Ramana, T; (2010), ‘Multi-Line Power Flow Control using Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC) in Power Transmission Systems’, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 39.
[8]	Duncan, M. S.; and Thomas, O; (2012), “Power System Analysis and Design”, Global Engineering Publisher for Cengage Learning, Fifth Edition, and ISBN: 13: 978-1-111-42577-7.
[9]	Bindeshwar, S; Verma, K. S.; Pooja, M.; Rashi M.; Utkarsha, S.; and Aanchal, B; (2012), “Introduction to FACTS Controllers: A Technological Literature Survey”, International Journal of Automation and Power Engineering Volume 1 Issue 9.
[10]	Lutful K. S. M.; Hasib C. A.; Mosaddequr R.; Jahangir A.; (2014), ‘Inclusion of Slack Bus in Newton Raphson Load Flow Study’, 8th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering Dhaka, Bangladesh, Volume 7, Number 14 pp 282-285.
[11]	Hbti, K. U. P.; BIET, J. U. P; (2012), ‘Introduction To Facts Controllers A Critical Review’, International Journal of Reviews in Computing, ISSN: 2076-3328, volume 8 number 3.
[12]	Adepoju, G. A.; Komolafe, O. A.; and Aborisade, D. O.; (2011). Power Flow Analysis of the Nigerian Transmission System Incorporating FACTS controllers. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 1 (5).
[13]	PHCN Transmission Company Nigeria (TCN) Oshogbo (2015), Generation and Transmission Grid 330kV Management and Control Centre.
[14]	Sreejith S.; Sishaj P. S.; Selvan M. P; (2013), “Optimal location of interline power flow controller in a power system network using ABC algorithm. Archives of Electrical Engineering. Volume 1, Issue 62, pp. 91-110.
[15]	Amir, G.; Seyed, Y. E.; and Morteza, G.; (2017), “Active power based distance protection scheme in the presence of series compensators”, Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, DOI 10.1186/s41601-017-0034-4.
[16]	Rakhmad, S. L.; (2012), “Digital Simulation of the Generalized Unified Power Flow Controller System with 60-Pulse GTO-Based Voltage Source Converter”, International Journal of Energy Engineering, 2012.
[17]	Rakhmad, S. L; Sasongko, P. H.; and Tumiran; (2012), “Selection of Suitable Location of the FACTS Devices for Optimal Power Flow”, International Journal of Electrical & Computer Sciences IJECS-IJENS Vol: 12 No: 03.
[18]	Radha, G.; Gopalakrishnan, V.; (2013), “Application of An Interline Power Flow Controller as AGC ” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology Vol. 54 No. 3 ISSN: 1992-8645.
[19]	Manoj, A.; and Sachin, T.; (2016), “Performances Analysis Of Interline Power Flow Controller”, International Journal Of Innovative Engineering Research, Vol 3, Issue 5, (E-Issn: 2349-882x).
[20]	Dhurvey, S. N.; and Chandrakar, V. K.; (2016), “Improvement of Power System Performance Using Fuzzy Logic Based Interline Power Flow Controller [IPFC]”, Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, Vol 4, 67-77.
[21]	National Power Training Institute of Nigeria (NAPTIN) “https://www.naptinportal.com.ng”.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi, Adepoju Gafari Abiola, Babatunde Olukotun. (2017). Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller. American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 6(4), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi; Adepoju Gafari Abiola; Babatunde Olukotun. Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller. Am. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2017, 6(4), 27-42. doi: 10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi, Adepoju Gafari Abiola, Babatunde Olukotun. Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller. Am J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2017;6(4):27-42. doi: 10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11,
  author = {Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi and Adepoju Gafari Abiola and Babatunde Olukotun},
  title = {Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller},
  journal = {American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {27-42},
  doi = {10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.epes.20170604.11},
  abstract = {Transmission lines operating in steady state are prone to several challenges such as; poor steady-state power flow control, active and reactive power loss and voltage limit violations. These challenges can be solved either by the use of Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System (FACTS) controllers such as Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC) and Generalized Unified Power Flow Controller (GUPFC) or other non-economical means such as building additional generation and transmission facilities. Previous works have incorporated IPFC to solve the challenges in meshed transmission system but has not been applied to solve the inherent challenges of the longitudinal Nigerian transmission system operating in steady state. This work performs power flow analysis with the incorporation of IPFC into the Nigerian 330-kV, 28-bus transmission system to solve its steady state challenges. Steady state power system component model produces a set of algebraic equations while the steady state IPFC model in rectangular form produces another set of algebraic equations for power flow analysis. The sets of equations were solved simultaneously using Newton-Raphson numerical iteration method, due to its fast quadratic convergence and high efficiency. Newton-Raphson power flow algorithm was implemented using MATLAB 8.1.0.604 (version R2013b) and the analysis was performed without and with the incorporation of IPFC data into the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) 14-bus and the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) 330-kV, 28-bus system. The performance evaluation of IPFC was investigated using active and reactive power as performance variables. The incorporation of IPFC rectangular model into the Nigerian 330-kV, 28-Bus TCN and IEEE 14-bus system demonstrated the capability of IPFC to control active and reactive power flow. IPFC typifies effective enhancement and the maximum use of Nigerian 330-kV, 28-Bus TCN and IEEE 14-bus transmission infrastructure for better delivery of electrical power to the end users.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller
AU  - Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi
AU  - Adepoju Gafari Abiola
AU  - Babatunde Olukotun
Y1  - 2017/07/12
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11
T2  - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
JF  - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
JO  - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
SP  - 27
EP  - 42
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9200
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11
AB  - Transmission lines operating in steady state are prone to several challenges such as; poor steady-state power flow control, active and reactive power loss and voltage limit violations. These challenges can be solved either by the use of Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System (FACTS) controllers such as Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC) and Generalized Unified Power Flow Controller (GUPFC) or other non-economical means such as building additional generation and transmission facilities. Previous works have incorporated IPFC to solve the challenges in meshed transmission system but has not been applied to solve the inherent challenges of the longitudinal Nigerian transmission system operating in steady state. This work performs power flow analysis with the incorporation of IPFC into the Nigerian 330-kV, 28-bus transmission system to solve its steady state challenges. Steady state power system component model produces a set of algebraic equations while the steady state IPFC model in rectangular form produces another set of algebraic equations for power flow analysis. The sets of equations were solved simultaneously using Newton-Raphson numerical iteration method, due to its fast quadratic convergence and high efficiency. Newton-Raphson power flow algorithm was implemented using MATLAB 8.1.0.604 (version R2013b) and the analysis was performed without and with the incorporation of IPFC data into the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) 14-bus and the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) 330-kV, 28-bus system. The performance evaluation of IPFC was investigated using active and reactive power as performance variables. The incorporation of IPFC rectangular model into the Nigerian 330-kV, 28-Bus TCN and IEEE 14-bus system demonstrated the capability of IPFC to control active and reactive power flow. IPFC typifies effective enhancement and the maximum use of Nigerian 330-kV, 28-Bus TCN and IEEE 14-bus transmission infrastructure for better delivery of electrical power to the end users.
VL  - 6
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi

Electronic and Electrical Engineering Department, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria
Adepoju Gafari Abiola

Electronic and Electrical Engineering Department, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria
Babatunde Olukotun

Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London and Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi, Adepoju Gafari Abiola, Babatunde Olukotun. (2017). Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller. American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 6(4), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi; Adepoju Gafari Abiola; Babatunde Olukotun. Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller. Am. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2017, 6(4), 27-42. doi: 10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi, Adepoju Gafari Abiola, Babatunde Olukotun. Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller. Am J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2017;6(4):27-42. doi: 10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11,
  author = {Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi and Adepoju Gafari Abiola and Babatunde Olukotun},
  title = {Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller},
  journal = {American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {27-42},
  doi = {10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.epes.20170604.11},
  abstract = {Transmission lines operating in steady state are prone to several challenges such as; poor steady-state power flow control, active and reactive power loss and voltage limit violations. These challenges can be solved either by the use of Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System (FACTS) controllers such as Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC) and Generalized Unified Power Flow Controller (GUPFC) or other non-economical means such as building additional generation and transmission facilities. Previous works have incorporated IPFC to solve the challenges in meshed transmission system but has not been applied to solve the inherent challenges of the longitudinal Nigerian transmission system operating in steady state. This work performs power flow analysis with the incorporation of IPFC into the Nigerian 330-kV, 28-bus transmission system to solve its steady state challenges. Steady state power system component model produces a set of algebraic equations while the steady state IPFC model in rectangular form produces another set of algebraic equations for power flow analysis. The sets of equations were solved simultaneously using Newton-Raphson numerical iteration method, due to its fast quadratic convergence and high efficiency. Newton-Raphson power flow algorithm was implemented using MATLAB 8.1.0.604 (version R2013b) and the analysis was performed without and with the incorporation of IPFC data into the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) 14-bus and the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) 330-kV, 28-bus system. The performance evaluation of IPFC was investigated using active and reactive power as performance variables. The incorporation of IPFC rectangular model into the Nigerian 330-kV, 28-Bus TCN and IEEE 14-bus system demonstrated the capability of IPFC to control active and reactive power flow. IPFC typifies effective enhancement and the maximum use of Nigerian 330-kV, 28-Bus TCN and IEEE 14-bus transmission infrastructure for better delivery of electrical power to the end users.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Steady State Control Enhancement and Power Flow Analysis of Longitudinal Power Systems Incorporating Interline Power Flow Controller
AU  - Olaniyi Isaiah Opeyemi
AU  - Adepoju Gafari Abiola
AU  - Babatunde Olukotun
Y1  - 2017/07/12
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11
T2  - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
JF  - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
JO  - American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
SP  - 27
EP  - 42
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9200
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.epes.20170604.11
AB  - Transmission lines operating in steady state are prone to several challenges such as; poor steady-state power flow control, active and reactive power loss and voltage limit violations. These challenges can be solved either by the use of Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System (FACTS) controllers such as Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC) and Generalized Unified Power Flow Controller (GUPFC) or other non-economical means such as building additional generation and transmission facilities. Previous works have incorporated IPFC to solve the challenges in meshed transmission system but has not been applied to solve the inherent challenges of the longitudinal Nigerian transmission system operating in steady state. This work performs power flow analysis with the incorporation of IPFC into the Nigerian 330-kV, 28-bus transmission system to solve its steady state challenges. Steady state power system component model produces a set of algebraic equations while the steady state IPFC model in rectangular form produces another set of algebraic equations for power flow analysis. The sets of equations were solved simultaneously using Newton-Raphson numerical iteration method, due to its fast quadratic convergence and high efficiency. Newton-Raphson power flow algorithm was implemented using MATLAB 8.1.0.604 (version R2013b) and the analysis was performed without and with the incorporation of IPFC data into the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) 14-bus and the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) 330-kV, 28-bus system. The performance evaluation of IPFC was investigated using active and reactive power as performance variables. The incorporation of IPFC rectangular model into the Nigerian 330-kV, 28-Bus TCN and IEEE 14-bus system demonstrated the capability of IPFC to control active and reactive power flow. IPFC typifies effective enhancement and the maximum use of Nigerian 330-kV, 28-Bus TCN and IEEE 14-bus transmission infrastructure for better delivery of electrical power to the end users.
VL  - 6
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download