This research explores the influence of Innovation and Entrepreneurship on Sustainable Development within African communities, utilizing a quantitative methodology characterized by an explanatory framework. A total of 370 participants provided data through structured questionnaires, which were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The findings indicate an adjusted R-squared value of 96.0 percent, suggesting that96.0 percent of the variation in Sustainable Development can be accounted for by the factors examined. Significant results demonstrate that Entrepreneurial Education and Training, Investment in Research and Development, Collaborative Partnerships, and Intellectual Property Rights have a positive impact on Sustainable Development. However, Access to Finance and Access to Market present challenges, illustrated by their negative coefficients, and R&D Investment and the Innovation Ecosystem were deemed insignificant. The study acknowledges that the model does not account for the remaining 0.04 percent of variation, suggesting further investigation is needed. Practical implications point to the necessity for strategic planning in areas with significant positive impacts and the importance of improving Access to Finance and Market conditions. The research highlights the need for a supportive Regulatory Environment and networks to foster Sustainable Development, offering valuable insights and paving the way for future studies in this domain.
Published in | European Business & Management (Volume 10, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ebm.20241005.12 |
Page(s) | 85-96 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Innovation, Entrepreneurship, Sustainable Development, African Communities, Regression Analysis
[1] | Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494. |
[2] | Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges, and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. |
[3] | United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). (2017). Innovation, Competitiveness and Regional Integration: The Future of African Economies. Addis Ababa: UNECA. |
[4] | Naudé, W. (2013). Entrepreneurship and economic development: Theory, evidence, and policy. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7507. |
[5] | Toma, S. G., Grigore, A. M., & Marinescu, P. (2014). Economic development and entrepreneurship. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 436-443. |
[6] | OECD. (2010). Entrepreneurship and Innovation in the Green Economy: What We Can Learn from EU Instruments. OECD Green Growth Papers. |
[7] | Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy+Business, 26, 1-14. |
[8] | World Bank. (2020). Africa’s Pulse: An Analysis of Issues Shaping Africa’s Economic Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. |
[9] | International Labour Organization (ILO). (2016). The Role of Entrepreneurship Education and Training in Driving Sustainable Development. Geneva: ILO. |
[10] | Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press. |
[11] | Mbaku, J. M. (2010). Entrepreneurship and economic development in Africa: A way forward. |
[12] | Ncube, M. & Fairbanks, M. (2012). The African Entrepreneur: Overcoming Challenges, Building a Future. |
[13] | World Bank (2020). Doing Business in Africa. |
[14] | Kiggundu, M. N. (2002). Entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship in Africa: What is known and what needs to be done. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 239-258. |
[15] | GEM (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor) (2019). Africa’s Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. |
[16] | Thompson, M. P. A., & Johnson, P. (2016). Entrepreneurship and the Informal Economy: A Study of Nigeria’s BoP Entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 21(2). |
[17] | Chigunta, F. (2002). Youth Entrepreneurship: Meeting the Key Policy Challenges. |
[18] | Chataway, J., Hanlin, R., & Kaplinsky, R. (2014). Inclusive innovation: An architecture for policy development. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 33-54. |
[19] | George, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661-683. |
[20] | United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). (2015). Innovative approaches to financing sustainable development in Africa. UNECA. |
[21] | Simanis, E., & Hart, S. (2008). The Base of the Pyramid Protocol: Toward Next Generation BoP Strategy (2nd Edition). Cornell University: Ithaca, NY. |
[22] | Adegbite, E., Ilori, M. O., Irefin, I. A., Abereijo, I. O., & Aderemi, H. A. (2007). Evaluation of the impact of entrepreneurial characteristics on the performance of small-scale manufacturing industries in Nigeria. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 3(1), 1-22. |
[23] | Turok, I. (2014). Linking urbanization and development in Africa’s economic revival. UN-Habitat. |
[24] | Mutula, S. M. (2013). Innovative Approaches to Knowledge Management for Community Development in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 23(1), 73-83. |
[25] | World Bank. (2019). The Future of Work in Africa: Harnessing the Potential of Digital Technologies for All. World Bank Group. |
[26] | Mbiti, I. M. (2016). The Impact of Mobile Phones on Economic Development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 207-232. |
[27] | International Labour Organization (ILO). (2021). The Role of Entrepreneurship in Promoting Decent Work for Youth in Africa. ILO. |
[28] | De Lange, R., Timmerman, C., & Verheul, H. (2021). The effect of regulatory environments on sustainable entrepreneurship: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Business Research, 130, 854-862. |
[29] | Gupta, A., Singh, V., & Chandwani, R. (2019). Technology adoption for sustainable development: A review. Environmental Science and Policy, 101, 145-153. |
[30] | Hall, B. H., & Van Reenen, J. (2010). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 39(5), 688-709. |
[31] | Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge. |
[32] | Kauffman, J. (2018). Entrepreneurial education for sustainable development: A global perspective. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(2), 265-280. |
[33] | Park, W. G. (2008). International patent protection: 1960–2005. Research Policy, 37(4), 761-766. |
[34] | Reddy, K. M., Balan, P., & Reddy, V. (2020). Market access and sustainable community development: An analysis of barriers and facilitators. Community Development Journal, 55(2), 209-227. |
[35] | Stam, E., & van den Berg, J. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: The role of institutions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(1), 9-42. |
[36] | Tschiene, D., Campo, M., & Rauscher, S. (2019). Networking for sustainable development: Factors influencing the effectiveness of support networks. Sustainability. 11(9), 2678. |
[37] | Zins, A. H., & Weill, L. (2016). The impact of financial inclusion on sustainable development. World Development. 78, 274-284. |
[38] | Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of innovation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Research Policy. 43(7), 1239-1251. |
[39] | Chataway, J., Hanlin, R., & Kaplinsky, R. (2014). Inclusive innovation: An architecture for policy development. Innovation and Development. 4(2), 223-238. |
[40] |
Chigunta, F., Schnurr, J., James-Wilson, D., & Torres, V. (2005). Being ‘real’ about youth entrepreneurship in Eastern and Southern Africa: Implications for adults, institutions, and policy. International Labour Organization. Retrieved from
https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/youth-employment/lang--en/index.htm |
[41] |
International Labour Organization. (2021). World employment and social outlook 2021: Trends 2021.
https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/weso/2021/lang--en/index.htm |
[42] |
United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship for sustainable development in Africa.
https://www.uneca.org/publications/innovation-and-entrepreneurship-sustainable-development-africa |
[43] | Yamane, Taro, (1967). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 2nd ed., New York: Harper and Row. |
[44] | Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–324. |
APA Style
Lambert, E., Deyganto, K. O. (2024). Fostering Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development in African Communities. European Business & Management, 10(5), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20241005.12
ACS Style
Lambert, E.; Deyganto, K. O. Fostering Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development in African Communities. Eur. Bus. Manag. 2024, 10(5), 85-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ebm.20241005.12
AMA Style
Lambert E, Deyganto KO. Fostering Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development in African Communities. Eur Bus Manag. 2024;10(5):85-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ebm.20241005.12
@article{10.11648/j.ebm.20241005.12, author = {Edward Lambert and Kanbiro Orkaido Deyganto}, title = {Fostering Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development in African Communities }, journal = {European Business & Management}, volume = {10}, number = {5}, pages = {85-96}, doi = {10.11648/j.ebm.20241005.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20241005.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ebm.20241005.12}, abstract = {This research explores the influence of Innovation and Entrepreneurship on Sustainable Development within African communities, utilizing a quantitative methodology characterized by an explanatory framework. A total of 370 participants provided data through structured questionnaires, which were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The findings indicate an adjusted R-squared value of 96.0 percent, suggesting that96.0 percent of the variation in Sustainable Development can be accounted for by the factors examined. Significant results demonstrate that Entrepreneurial Education and Training, Investment in Research and Development, Collaborative Partnerships, and Intellectual Property Rights have a positive impact on Sustainable Development. However, Access to Finance and Access to Market present challenges, illustrated by their negative coefficients, and R&D Investment and the Innovation Ecosystem were deemed insignificant. The study acknowledges that the model does not account for the remaining 0.04 percent of variation, suggesting further investigation is needed. Practical implications point to the necessity for strategic planning in areas with significant positive impacts and the importance of improving Access to Finance and Market conditions. The research highlights the need for a supportive Regulatory Environment and networks to foster Sustainable Development, offering valuable insights and paving the way for future studies in this domain. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Fostering Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development in African Communities AU - Edward Lambert AU - Kanbiro Orkaido Deyganto Y1 - 2024/11/28 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20241005.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ebm.20241005.12 T2 - European Business & Management JF - European Business & Management JO - European Business & Management SP - 85 EP - 96 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5811 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20241005.12 AB - This research explores the influence of Innovation and Entrepreneurship on Sustainable Development within African communities, utilizing a quantitative methodology characterized by an explanatory framework. A total of 370 participants provided data through structured questionnaires, which were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The findings indicate an adjusted R-squared value of 96.0 percent, suggesting that96.0 percent of the variation in Sustainable Development can be accounted for by the factors examined. Significant results demonstrate that Entrepreneurial Education and Training, Investment in Research and Development, Collaborative Partnerships, and Intellectual Property Rights have a positive impact on Sustainable Development. However, Access to Finance and Access to Market present challenges, illustrated by their negative coefficients, and R&D Investment and the Innovation Ecosystem were deemed insignificant. The study acknowledges that the model does not account for the remaining 0.04 percent of variation, suggesting further investigation is needed. Practical implications point to the necessity for strategic planning in areas with significant positive impacts and the importance of improving Access to Finance and Market conditions. The research highlights the need for a supportive Regulatory Environment and networks to foster Sustainable Development, offering valuable insights and paving the way for future studies in this domain. VL - 10 IS - 5 ER -