This research aimed to assess village chicken production systems, health constraints, and ethno-veterinary practices in the three agro-ecologies of the Benishangul-Gumuz regional state. The woredas included were Assosa and Bambasi for midland, Kamash, and Dembie for lowland, and Maokomo special woreda for highland agro-ecologies. They were selected purposively based on agro-ecology, chicken production potential, and accessibility. The respondents who have experience in chicken production were included. Semi-structured interviews, field observations, and group discussions were used to collect data. About 91 respondents participated in the survey study. All of them were extensive chicken producers, and the average flock size was 10, ranging from 3 to 43 chicken per household, with a hen to cock ratio of 0.8:1, 2.46:1, and 2.3:1 for hybrid, local, and exotic chicken respectively, with the overall hen to cock ratio of 2.37:1. Only 22% of respondents construct proper chicken houses. The major constraints identified in the area were chicken diseases (54.8%), lack of improved breeds, feed shortages, lack of veterinary service, and loss of chicken by predators. Diarrhea and respiratory signs were the major symptoms observed during infection. Disease occurrence was higher in the wet (69.8%) than in the dry (30.2%) season, and the severity of disease as a constraint was higher in the long-rainy season. About 46.4% and 44.3% of respondents visit veterinary clinics and use traditional medicines respectively to treat their chicken. Plant species from the families Alliaceae (23.9%), Rutaceae (23.9%), Solanaceae (21.1%), and Zingiberaceae (11.1%) were commonly used in traditional medicine practices to treat infected chicken. Common chicken predators identified in the area were the accipitrine, wild cat, and eagle. Prevention methods practiced are keeping chicken in the house, and making the area clean. And a large body of information has been generated regarding traditional practices in the area to take care of their chicken. Thus, further studies should be conducted to evaluate the chemical composition and efficacy of active ingredients against chicken pathogens to facilitate the discovery of alternative medicines. Proper chicken management, improvement of veterinary service, and the introduction of improved chicken are mandatory for better chicken performance. Extra care is also recommended in the rainy than the dry season.
Published in | Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (Volume 7, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.bsi.20220702.12 |
Page(s) | 23-30 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Benishangul-Gumuz Region, Chicken, Ethno-veterinary Practice, Health
[1] | CSA. Agricultural sample survey. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2016; 2 (583): 20-21. |
[2] | Fitsum M. Poultry Production System and Role of Poultry Production in Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopia: A Review. J Biol Agric Healthc. 2014; 4 (27): 154–60. |
[3] | FAO. Review of the new features of the Ethiopian poultry sector Biosecurity implications. 2008; (March): 1–24. |
[4] | Dinka H, Chala R, Dawo F, Bekana E, Leta S. Major constraints and health management of village poultry production in rift valley of Oromia, Ethiopia. Glob Vet. 2010; 5 (1): 6–10. |
[5] | Emebet M, Harpal S, Tesefaye S, Anna Maria J. Phenotypic Characterization of Indigenous Chicken Population in South West and South Part of Ethiopia. Br J Poult Sci. 2014; 3 (1): 15–9. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.bjps.2014.3.1.8370 |
[6] | Yirgu T, Adamu M, Amare A. Small-scale Poultry Production in Sidama Zone: Challenges, Ethnoveterinary Practices and Coping Mechanisms. African J Basic Appl Sci. 2016; 8 (4): 212–219. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ajbas.2016.212.219 |
[7] | Yirgu T, Tesfaye E, Assefa G. Poultry Feed Resources and Coping Mechanisms of Challenges in Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Food Sci Qual Manag. 2017; 60: 77–86. |
[8] | Giday M, Ameni G. An Ethnobotanical Survey on Plants of Veterinary Importance in two woredas of southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Sci. 2003; 26 (2): 123–36. |
[9] | Balaji NS, Chakravarthi P V. Ethnoveterinary Practices in India: A Review. Vet World. 2010; 3 (12): 549–51. https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2010.549-551 |
[10] | Eshetu GR, Dejene TA, Telila LB, Bekele DF. Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants: Preparation and application methods by traditional healers in selected districts of southern Ethiopia. Vet World. 2015; 8 (5): 674–84. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.674-684 |
[11] | Moliso MM, Tessema F, Yilma M, Getachew T, Asrat M. Documentation of Ethno Veterinary Practices in Selected Sites of Wolaita and Dawuro Zones, Ethiopia. Glob J Sci Front Res D Agric Vet. 2016; 16 (5): 1–9. |
[12] | Tekle Y. An ethno-veterinary botanical survey of medicinal plants in Kochore district of Gedeo Zone, Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Regional State (SNNPRs), Ethiopia. J Sci Innov Res. 2014; 3 (4): 433–45. |
[13] | Oyda S. Review on Traditional Ethno-Veterinary Medicine and Medicinal Plants Used By Indigenous People in Ethiopia: Practice and Application System. Int J Res [Internet]. 2017; 5 (8): 109–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i8.2017.2193 |
[14] | Menegesha A. A Review on Ethno-Veterinary Medicine Practices and Indigenous Knowledge. J Vet Med Anim Sci. 2020; 3 (1): 1–10. |
[15] | Teklay A, Abera B, Giday M. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used in Kilte Awulaelo District, Tigray Region of Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013; 9 (65): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-65 |
[16] | Dulo F, Mekonnen A. Ethnoveterinary Medicine Practices in Ethiopia: Review. Adv Biol Res (Rennes). 2017; 11 (3): 154–60. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.abr.2017.154.160 |
[17] | Ravikumar RK, Kumar V, Khuman LY, Kinhekar AS, Thakur D, Kumar V. Integrating Indigenous Knowledge Research System (IKRS) and/ with Livestock Health Intervention Program to Complement Natural Resource Conservation. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 2016; 4 (1s): 32–42. |
[18] | Moges F, Melesse A, Dessie T. Assessment of village chicken production system and evaluation of the productive and reproductive performance of local chicken ecotype in Bure district, North west Ethiopia. African J Agric Res. 2010; 5 (13): 1739–48. |
[19] | Mohammed A. Major Constraints and Health Management of Village Poultry Production in Ethiopia: Review School of Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. Int J Res Stud Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018; 4 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-9428.0401001 |
[20] | Yemane N, Tamir B, Belihu K. Characterization of village chicken production performance under scavenging system in Halaba district of southern Ethiopia. EthiopVetJ. 2013; 17 (1): 69–80. |
[21] | Meskerem A. Major health constraints and ethno-veterinary practices of small scale and backyard chicken production in some selected regions of Ethiopia. Rev Méd Vét. 2017; 1–3 (168): 63–71. |
[22] | Markos S. Ethno Veterinary Medicine and Common Diseases of Chicken Producers in Western Zone of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. J Agric Ecol Res Int. 2019; 20 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.9734/JAERI/2019/v20i130096 |
APA Style
Dessie Abera. (2022). Chicken Health and Ethno-veterinary Practices in Benishangul-gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia. Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, 7(2), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bsi.20220702.12
ACS Style
Dessie Abera. Chicken Health and Ethno-veterinary Practices in Benishangul-gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia. Biomed. Stat. Inform. 2022, 7(2), 23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.bsi.20220702.12
@article{10.11648/j.bsi.20220702.12, author = {Dessie Abera}, title = {Chicken Health and Ethno-veterinary Practices in Benishangul-gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia}, journal = {Biomedical Statistics and Informatics}, volume = {7}, number = {2}, pages = {23-30}, doi = {10.11648/j.bsi.20220702.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bsi.20220702.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.bsi.20220702.12}, abstract = {This research aimed to assess village chicken production systems, health constraints, and ethno-veterinary practices in the three agro-ecologies of the Benishangul-Gumuz regional state. The woredas included were Assosa and Bambasi for midland, Kamash, and Dembie for lowland, and Maokomo special woreda for highland agro-ecologies. They were selected purposively based on agro-ecology, chicken production potential, and accessibility. The respondents who have experience in chicken production were included. Semi-structured interviews, field observations, and group discussions were used to collect data. About 91 respondents participated in the survey study. All of them were extensive chicken producers, and the average flock size was 10, ranging from 3 to 43 chicken per household, with a hen to cock ratio of 0.8:1, 2.46:1, and 2.3:1 for hybrid, local, and exotic chicken respectively, with the overall hen to cock ratio of 2.37:1. Only 22% of respondents construct proper chicken houses. The major constraints identified in the area were chicken diseases (54.8%), lack of improved breeds, feed shortages, lack of veterinary service, and loss of chicken by predators. Diarrhea and respiratory signs were the major symptoms observed during infection. Disease occurrence was higher in the wet (69.8%) than in the dry (30.2%) season, and the severity of disease as a constraint was higher in the long-rainy season. About 46.4% and 44.3% of respondents visit veterinary clinics and use traditional medicines respectively to treat their chicken. Plant species from the families Alliaceae (23.9%), Rutaceae (23.9%), Solanaceae (21.1%), and Zingiberaceae (11.1%) were commonly used in traditional medicine practices to treat infected chicken. Common chicken predators identified in the area were the accipitrine, wild cat, and eagle. Prevention methods practiced are keeping chicken in the house, and making the area clean. And a large body of information has been generated regarding traditional practices in the area to take care of their chicken. Thus, further studies should be conducted to evaluate the chemical composition and efficacy of active ingredients against chicken pathogens to facilitate the discovery of alternative medicines. Proper chicken management, improvement of veterinary service, and the introduction of improved chicken are mandatory for better chicken performance. Extra care is also recommended in the rainy than the dry season.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Chicken Health and Ethno-veterinary Practices in Benishangul-gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia AU - Dessie Abera Y1 - 2022/05/24 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bsi.20220702.12 DO - 10.11648/j.bsi.20220702.12 T2 - Biomedical Statistics and Informatics JF - Biomedical Statistics and Informatics JO - Biomedical Statistics and Informatics SP - 23 EP - 30 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8728 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bsi.20220702.12 AB - This research aimed to assess village chicken production systems, health constraints, and ethno-veterinary practices in the three agro-ecologies of the Benishangul-Gumuz regional state. The woredas included were Assosa and Bambasi for midland, Kamash, and Dembie for lowland, and Maokomo special woreda for highland agro-ecologies. They were selected purposively based on agro-ecology, chicken production potential, and accessibility. The respondents who have experience in chicken production were included. Semi-structured interviews, field observations, and group discussions were used to collect data. About 91 respondents participated in the survey study. All of them were extensive chicken producers, and the average flock size was 10, ranging from 3 to 43 chicken per household, with a hen to cock ratio of 0.8:1, 2.46:1, and 2.3:1 for hybrid, local, and exotic chicken respectively, with the overall hen to cock ratio of 2.37:1. Only 22% of respondents construct proper chicken houses. The major constraints identified in the area were chicken diseases (54.8%), lack of improved breeds, feed shortages, lack of veterinary service, and loss of chicken by predators. Diarrhea and respiratory signs were the major symptoms observed during infection. Disease occurrence was higher in the wet (69.8%) than in the dry (30.2%) season, and the severity of disease as a constraint was higher in the long-rainy season. About 46.4% and 44.3% of respondents visit veterinary clinics and use traditional medicines respectively to treat their chicken. Plant species from the families Alliaceae (23.9%), Rutaceae (23.9%), Solanaceae (21.1%), and Zingiberaceae (11.1%) were commonly used in traditional medicine practices to treat infected chicken. Common chicken predators identified in the area were the accipitrine, wild cat, and eagle. Prevention methods practiced are keeping chicken in the house, and making the area clean. And a large body of information has been generated regarding traditional practices in the area to take care of their chicken. Thus, further studies should be conducted to evaluate the chemical composition and efficacy of active ingredients against chicken pathogens to facilitate the discovery of alternative medicines. Proper chicken management, improvement of veterinary service, and the introduction of improved chicken are mandatory for better chicken performance. Extra care is also recommended in the rainy than the dry season. VL - 7 IS - 2 ER -