| Peer-Reviewed

Ecosystem Services, Local People Perception and Preferences in Chilimo Forest of Ethiopia

Received: 8 October 2021    Accepted: 29 October 2021    Published: 17 November 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Site and situation specific assessments of such services are crucial to sustainably conserve and manage forest resources. In this study, using Chilmo forest as a case study site, an attempt has been made to identify the main ecosystem services which are perceived and preferred by local communities. The study triangulated primary data collection methods such as field observations, household surveys, key informant interviews and pebble-distribution methods. In addition, secondary data was used to support and verify the primary data. Combination of techniques were employed for data analyses. Five lanscapes and four forest ecosystem services were identified. Out of which, provisioning services are the main source of livelihood and subsistence incomes for local communities. Forests are the sole source of water and fuel wood services in the study area. According to the perception and preferences of local people forest land received the highest scores compared to other landscapes for all services except provisioning services. We conclude that local communities are highly dependent on forests’ ecosystem services in the study area. This finding is expected to contribute towards management of the Chilmo forest and to be used as an input for further valuation study.

Published in American Journal of Environmental Protection (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.12
Page(s) 127-135
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Ecosystem Service, Forest, Management, Ethiopia, Valuation

References
[1] Adhikari, S., & Baral, H. (2018). Governing forest ecosystem services for sustainable environmental governance: A review. Environments, 5 (5), 53.
[2] Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farberk, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M.(1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.
[3] Costanza, R., Groot, R. de, Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., Turner, R. K., (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26, 152–158.
[4] Cummings, A. R., & Read, J. M. (2016). Drawing on traditional knowledge to identify and describe ecosystem services associated with Northern Amazon’s multiple-use plants. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 12 (1-2), 39-56.
[5] Daniel Gamachu. (1977). Aspects of Climate and Water Budget in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa University Press, Addis Ababa.
[6] FAO, 2020. Global Forest Resource Assessment (2020). Rome.
[7] Förster, J., Barkmann, J., Fricke, R., Hotes, S., Kleyer, M., Kobbe, S., Kübler, D., Rumbaur, C., Siegmund-Schultze, M., Seppelt, R., Settele, J., Spangenberg, J. H., Tekken, V., Václavík, T., Wittmer, H., (2015). Assessing ecosystem services for informing land-use decisions: a problem-oriented approach. E & S 20 (3).
[8] Gouwakinnou, G. N., Biaou, S., Vodouhe, F. G., Tovihessi, M. S., Awessou, B. K., & Biaou, H. S. (2019). Local perceptions and factors determining ecosystem services identification around two forest reserves in Northern Benin. Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 15 (1), 1-12.
[9] De Groot, R. S. (1992). Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Wolters-Noordhoff BV.
[10] De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological economics, 41 (3), 393-408.
[11] Groot, R. de, (2006). Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 75 (3-4), 175–186.
[12] Groot, R. S. de, Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L., (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7 (3), 260–272.
[13] Harrison, P. A., Berry, P. M., Simpson, G., Haslett, J. R., Blicharska, M., Bucur, M., Dunford, R., Egoh, B., Garcia-Llorente, M., Geamănă, N., Geertsema, W., Lommelen, E., Meiresonne, L., Turkelboom, F., (2014). Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services 9, 191–203.
[14] Hein, L., van Koppen, K., Groot, R. S. de, van Ierland, E. C., (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 57 (2), 209–228.
[15] Kindu, M., Schneider, T., Teketay, D., Knoke, T., (2013). Land Use/Land Cover Change Analysis Using Object-Based Classification Approach in Munessa-Shashemene Landscape of the Ethiopian Highlands. Remote Sensing 5 (5), 2411–2435.
[16] Kindu, M., Schneider, T., Teketay, D., Knoke, T., (2016). Changes of ecosystem service values in response to land use/land cover dynamics in Munessa-Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian highlands. The Science of the total environment 547, 137–147.
[17] Loft, L., (2011). Market mechanisms for financing the reduction of emissions from deforestation and degradation in developing countries (REDD) – learning from payments for ecosystem services schemes. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 7 (3), 204–216.
[18] Mbow, C., Smith, P., Skole, D., Duguma, L., & Bustamante, M. (2014). Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 8-14.
[19] MEFCC, (2016). Ethiopia Forest Reference Level submission to the UNFCCC, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MEFCC), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[20] Mehari Alebachew Tesfaye, (2015). Forest management options for carbon stock and soil rehabilitation in Chilimo dry afro-montane forest, Ethiopia. DOCTORAL THESIS, Palencia, Spain.
[21] Meshesha, Y. B., & Birhanu, B. S. (2015). Assessment of the effectiveness of watershed management intervention in Chena Woreda, Kaffa Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 7 (15), 1257.
[22] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005, Ecosystem and Human well-being, Synthesis Island press, Washington, DC.
[23] National Forest Sector Development Program, Ethiopia. (2018). Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MEFCC), Volume II: Program Pillars, Action Areas and Targets.
[24] Padam, G., Rysankova, D., Portale, E., Koo, B. B., Keller, S., & Fleurantin, G. (2018). Ethiopia–Beyond Connections: Energy Access Diagnostic Report Based on the Multi-Tier Framework. World Bank.
[25] Parrotta, J., Yeo-Chang, Y., & Camacho, L. D. (2016). Traditional knowledge for sustainable forest management and provision of ecosystem services.
[26] Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Brander, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Verma, M.,... & Polasky, S. (2010). The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations, 183-256.
[27] Plummer, M. L., 2009. Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7 (1), 38–45.
[28] Porto, R. G., de Almeida, R. F., Cruz-Neto, O., Tabarelli, M., Viana, B. F., Peres, C. A., & Lopes, A. V. (2020). Pollination ecosystem services: A comprehensive review of economic values, research funding and policy actions. Food Security, 12, 1425-1442.
[29] Robert Costanza, Ralph d’Arge, Rudolf de Groot, Stephen Farberk, Monica Grasso, Bruce Hannon, (1997). Thevalue of theworld’secosystem servicesand natural capital 387, 253–260.
[30] Shumi, G. D., (2009). The structure and regeneration status of tree and shrub species of Chilimo forest-ecological sustainability Indicators for Participatory Forest Management (PFM) in Oromia, Ethiopia.
[31] Sing, L., Metzger, M. J., Paterson, J. S., & Ray, D. (2018). A review of the effects of forest management intensity on ecosystem services for northern European temperate forests with a focus on the UK. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 91 (2), 151-164.
[32] Soromessa, T., Kelbessa, E., (2014). Interplay of Regeneration, Structure and Uses of Some Woody Species in Chilimo Forest, Central Ethiopia. Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J. 3 (1), 90.
[33] Tagesse, T. G., Wossen, T. (2015). Forest dependence and income inequality in rural Ethiopia: evidence from Chilimo-Gaji community forest users. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 22, 14-24.
[34] Teshome, A., de Graaff, J., Ritsema, C., & Kassie, M. (2016). Farmers' perceptions about the influence of land quality, land fragmentation and tenure systems on sustainable land management in the north western Ethiopian highlands. Land degradation & development, 27 (4), 884-898.
[35] Van der Sluijs, J. P., & Vaage, N. S. (2016). Pollinators and global food security: the need for holistic global stewardship. Foodethics, 1 (1), 75-91.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Alemtsehaye Eyassu. (2021). Ecosystem Services, Local People Perception and Preferences in Chilimo Forest of Ethiopia. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 10(6), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Alemtsehaye Eyassu. Ecosystem Services, Local People Perception and Preferences in Chilimo Forest of Ethiopia. Am. J. Environ. Prot. 2021, 10(6), 127-135. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Alemtsehaye Eyassu. Ecosystem Services, Local People Perception and Preferences in Chilimo Forest of Ethiopia. Am J Environ Prot. 2021;10(6):127-135. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.12,
      author = {Alemtsehaye Eyassu},
      title = {Ecosystem Services, Local People Perception and Preferences in Chilimo Forest of Ethiopia},
      journal = {American Journal of Environmental Protection},
      volume = {10},
      number = {6},
      pages = {127-135},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajep.20211006.12},
      abstract = {Site and situation specific assessments of such services are crucial to sustainably conserve and manage forest resources. In this study, using Chilmo forest as a case study site, an attempt has been made to identify the main ecosystem services which are perceived and preferred by local communities. The study triangulated primary data collection methods such as field observations, household surveys, key informant interviews and pebble-distribution methods. In addition, secondary data was used to support and verify the primary data. Combination of techniques were employed for data analyses. Five lanscapes and four forest ecosystem services were identified. Out of which, provisioning services are the main source of livelihood and subsistence incomes for local communities. Forests are the sole source of water and fuel wood services in the study area. According to the perception and preferences of local people forest land received the highest scores compared to other landscapes for all services except provisioning services. We conclude that local communities are highly dependent on forests’ ecosystem services in the study area. This finding is expected to contribute towards management of the Chilmo forest and to be used as an input for further valuation study.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Ecosystem Services, Local People Perception and Preferences in Chilimo Forest of Ethiopia
    AU  - Alemtsehaye Eyassu
    Y1  - 2021/11/17
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.12
    T2  - American Journal of Environmental Protection
    JF  - American Journal of Environmental Protection
    JO  - American Journal of Environmental Protection
    SP  - 127
    EP  - 135
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5699
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.12
    AB  - Site and situation specific assessments of such services are crucial to sustainably conserve and manage forest resources. In this study, using Chilmo forest as a case study site, an attempt has been made to identify the main ecosystem services which are perceived and preferred by local communities. The study triangulated primary data collection methods such as field observations, household surveys, key informant interviews and pebble-distribution methods. In addition, secondary data was used to support and verify the primary data. Combination of techniques were employed for data analyses. Five lanscapes and four forest ecosystem services were identified. Out of which, provisioning services are the main source of livelihood and subsistence incomes for local communities. Forests are the sole source of water and fuel wood services in the study area. According to the perception and preferences of local people forest land received the highest scores compared to other landscapes for all services except provisioning services. We conclude that local communities are highly dependent on forests’ ecosystem services in the study area. This finding is expected to contribute towards management of the Chilmo forest and to be used as an input for further valuation study.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Central Ethiopia Environment and Forest Research Center, Ethiopian Environment and Forest Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Sections